midterm - unit 2 Flashcards
An interesting and somewhat surprising, empirical observation is that the US output-capital ratio has been relatively constant over the course of time how is this possible even though/if the marginal product of capital (MPK) is decreasing?
-Typically the marginal product of capital should decrease when more capital is amassed, and this is because of the diminishing law of returns.
-Even though this is usually true there are some factors which can explain the observation that the US output-capital ratio has been relatively constant over the course of time.
-Technology is a major factor in explaining this because, as technology has advanced productivity has increased meaning the more output can be produced with the same amount of capital.
-The advancement of technology has also increased the amount of capital that has been gained over the years.
The invention of capital during the industrial revolution and 200 years of capital accumulation since then have led to great increases in per-capita output. In 1987, Robert Solow won the nobel prize for giving us hope that said growth might continue forever. State and elaborate on the crucial difference between capital and land that might permit us to grow forever
-The main difference between land and capital that might permit us to grow forever is in their differences in their potential for growth and productivity.
-For starters Capital talks about man made resources, these are things that can continue to be manufactured and improved upon over time.
-Land is a limited resource that cannot be extended and takes hard work to maintain or replace if damaged.
-For capital the invention of new technologies will contribute to it’s growth and advancement, and improve upon what has already been made.
-For land, technology cannot change the fact that land is a limited resource like it can with capital.
-Due to these differences the potential for growth comes from the ability of capital to be constantly innovating.
Give an example of a negative shock to aggregate demand. Holding long run aggregate supply fixed, what happens to equilibrium output and the equilibrium price level following such a shock? Be sure to distinguish between the short and the long run.
-An example of a negative shock to aggregate demand would be a financial crisis like the Great Depression which caused a large increase in consumer spending.
-In the short run the negative shock to aggregate demand would lead to a decrease in equilibrium output and a decrease in the equilibrium price level.
-With a decreased aggregate demand firms produce less, which leads to higher unemployment.
-In the long run the firms can change their prices they could also change how they go about their production, and they may end up getting to a new equilibrium point just at a lower output.
The rule of 70
Approximates how long it will take for the size of an economy to double
TO CALCULATE:
- (70)/(growth rate in percent)
Which factor of production explains the lack of cross country convergence
Labor
Technology and TFP
Technology is arguably the major driver of a country’s per capita output
TFP: Patents
Patents as a measure of output of the process of technological advancement
Malthus growth assumptions
- aside from labor, the main factor of production is land
- everything that is produced is consumed
- higher levels of consumption lead to increased fertility
Malthus growth result
-his key prediction said that technological advancement does not lead to sustained improvements in quality of life
-this is because when technology improves, any positive effects are offset by a decrease in land per capita
Malthus growth implication
since finite resources must be shared among a country’s population, having more people is bad (for everyone’s quality of life)
Solow growth assumptions
- aside from labor, the main factors of production are capital and technology
- each period, a country must decide what fraction of output to consume and what fraction of output to save in the form of capital investment
- higher levels of savings lead to faster growth in the capital stock
- technology continually improves each period
Solow growth result
-technological advancement does lead to sustained improvements in quality of life
-this is because when technology improves, increased saving leads to a higher capital stock, which allows for a higher level of output/consumption
-per capita capital, output, and consumption rise with technology without any sort of upper bound
Solow growth implications
the combination of capital accumulation and continued technological advancement is sufficient for us to essentially grow forever
Growth limitations
- depletion of natural resources
- negative effects on the environment more broadly
- diminishment of distinctive cultures (also trade)
Types of recessions
- simple/algorithmic
-two consecutive quarters of decline in a country’s real GDP - actual/holistic
-a significant decline in economic activity that is spread across the economy and that lasts more than a few months