Midterm study guide Flashcards
Folk Linguistic views
Some languages are superior to others, varieties of language are superior to others
Folk Linguistic belief
Proper grammar provides more clarity, assumption that other varieties are lacking order or regularity – stereotypes
Variation
is intristic to spoken language on every level, phonology (sounds), Lexicon (words), Morphology , syntax (grammar) etc
ex ) fond = foolish , nice = ignorant
variation = progress
Consequences of Variation
social meaning, social identity, does not mean a casual relationship, inaccurate observations, allow someone to make a particular claim, these influences are influenced by stereotypes, attitudes or beliefs
Stereotypes
Generalization to which one assigns a trait to someone, categorical, general statement
empirical
based on, concerned with, or verifiable by observation or experience rather than theory or pure logic, bad claims
empirical observations
accent
Observation
a claim about some aspect of language
Attribution
attempt to explain a given observation
Folk linguistics
stereo types, fails to recognize other types of variation
ex) members of this group___ do this ____
Folk Linguistic consequences
misrepresentation of language usage, stereotypes, word rage, and linguisitic shaming
Language Standarization
an attempt to stop language change aka controlling variation
Whats wrong with english
1) it doesn’t differentiate like romance languages do 2) no impersonal 3rd person singular pronoun ex) a person can’t help THEIR birth
Syntax
a way a word is put together
Nasal airflow
everyone has it, some more than others
nasality
different varieties of language have different forms of nasality
Why are we here
examine ; what people believe about language because it varies, why they do so, the possible consequences, use empirical analysis to reduce negative consequences
Studying language
produce technical precise way of observing and describing data
facts of life by lippi green
all spoken languages change over time, all languages are equal in linguistic terms
possible folk linguistic views
language change is bad, language change means loss of expressibility
folk belief
dynamic process, nonspecialists to provide an account of the environment
Abstraction
a group of error free nonlinguistic speakers
availability
some matters can be discussed
unavailability
=folk will not comment on such topics
accuracy
detail- global - sound is limited and detail is not, specific - detailed drops g’s
equal
equally capable of expressing any thought, no thought that a language can’t express
Folk linguistic belief
proper grammar provides more clarity and predicated or assumption that other varieties are lacking order or regularity
lexical variation
discourse marking like
folk linguistic view
some varieties of language are unaccented, accent is chosen and easy to change
highlighting
aka foregrounding / generalization over emphasizes or over perceives a difference in the observed group/. ridcule and shame
erasure
aka backgrounding / generalization under emphasizes , variation within the observed group, properties shared between groups.
stereotyping
denies that there is variation
standard variety , SE
standardization consists of the imposition of uniformity upon a class of objects
folk linguistics observation on SE
answers differ
internal
proper correct preset, best grammar
external
educated, reference point, even for neutral linguists, an idealization or abstraction
correctness
standard is correct, other forms are not
standardization
the one with the best grammar
beliefs about standards
common sense suffixes, based on logic, somehow designed , those who trust nonstandard are not to be trusted, definable in external terms only, highlight privilege
ideology of standard
belief in controlability, tolerance of nonstandard
prescriptivism
imposition of a particular set of rules for grammar and word usage for the purpose of idealized standard // rules of language that are learned by all users without explicit instruction// rules of language that are set and imposed by a select group of language arbiters
ebonics
observations- nonstandard form of english, attributions- racially motivated targeting black people
consequences of prescriptivism
confidence booster, marker of privilege
regional variation
stereotypes, the south
folk linguistics on regional variation
items for folk linguistics analysis can be measured by availability - can speakers detect item, accuracy- observation matches item, and detail - how precise can they be in describing it
folk linguistics awareness in regional variation
some items are more obvious ( salient) than others ex) pop/soda, includes claims about presence , extent, origins of a feature, these influences are influenced by stereotypes, attitudes and beliefs
linguists on dialect
any variety of a language ex) regionalism= geographic variety/ accent = sound system of a dialect