Midterm Review Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

independant variable

A

The variable that is changed across conditions (by the researcher)
Plotted on x axis
e.g. in an experiment assessing asthmatics response time to ventolin dose, the dose of ventolin is the independant variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Dependant variable

A

The outcome variable that is being measured
‘Dependant’ on independant variable
plotted on y axis
e.g. in an experiment assessing asthmatic response time to ventolin dosing, the response time to treatment is the dependant variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Key points of Prospect Theory (3)

A

1) Malleable reference point - an individual views consequences in terms of changes from a reference level (status quo bias)
2) Individuals are loss averse - dysutility associated with a loss is larger than the utility associated with a gain of the same magnitude
3) Risk adverse - we are risk adverse when in gains mindset, risk seeking when in loss mindset

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Implications of prospect theory (8)

A

1) Loss aversion - more dysutility from a loss, than utility from equal gain. e.g. consumers are more sensitive to price increases (loss) than price cuts (gain)
2) Loss framing - loss frame is much more motivating
E.g. credit card script example framing same decision as a loss vs. gain drastically changes outcome (loss frame much more motivating)
3) Reference dependance - reference point is malleable
E.g. Tiger woods is risk adverse
4) Expressions case - framing something as a ‘credit surcharge’ (loss) vs. a ‘cash discount’ (gain) makes consumers more likely to use cash
5) Risky prospects
6) Endowment effect - once you have something, foregoing it feels like a loss (and we are loss adverse)
7) Status quo bias - current baseline is seen as the reference point, and any change from that is perceived as a loss
8) Good news, bad news - better to integrate losses, and separate gains

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Anchoring bias

A

we develop estimates based on an initial anchor (based on our available information) and adjust from there
E.g. have you seen more or less than 51 owls in your life? How many owls have you seen in your life?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Avaliability bias

A

Relies on examples that immediately come to mind

e.g. deadliest animal, immediately instinct is shark, when actually it is mosquito

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ease of Recall bias

A

ease of mental retrieval is used as proxy for likelihood/frequency
e.g. seeing all headache patients and thinking brain tumour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Misconceptions of chance bias

A

failure to recognize independance of events

e.g. HTHTTH vs. HHHTTT have equal probability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Inattention to mean regression bias

A

If any element of performance is random, extreme performers will regress to mean
We tend to overweight past performance in forecasting
e.g. intersection with high number of crashes, will likely regress to mean

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The Curse of knowledge bias

A

once we have information, we find it nearly impossible to ignore it
e.g. jurors cannot ignore information already presented to them in court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hindsight bias

A

It seems obvious in hindsight that an unpredictable event would happen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Present bias

A

individuals are more likely to chose want options over should options the sooner their choices will take effect
e.g. selecting groceries in advance to eat in a week, more likely to make healthy choices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Factors that influence want vs. should decisions

A

1) The fresh start effect
2) Cognitive load
3) Future lock in 0 choice now for future implementation
4) Licensing - giving yourself permission to make want choice, because in the future you will exert willpower (e.g. video rentals, choice of want movie, vs. should)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Commitment devices

A

tools used by a ‘planner’ to prevent the ‘doer’ from exhibiting present bias
e.g. antabuse for alcoholics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define procedural justice

A

the way a decision was made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

define distributive justice

A

The outcome of a decision (how much each person gets)

17
Q

Factors that affect perception of procedural justice (4)

A
  1. Process control - the oppourtunity to present arguments/facts
  2. Neutrality of decision maker
  3. Trustworthiness - pureness of decision maker’s motives
  4. Standing - respect for individuals rights
18
Q

Reference Transaction

A

A relevant precedent that is characterized by a reference price or wage
e.g. snow shovel prices increasing in snow storm

19
Q

Principle of dual entitlement

A
  • both parties in a transaction are entitled to their reference points
  • gains by one party should not be financed by losses by the other party
20
Q

Factors that alters our sense of fairness (5)

A
  1. procedural justice
  2. reference transaction
  3. framing effects (gains vs. losses)
  4. perception that profits are being protected
  5. perception that market power is being exploited
21
Q

Three kinds of overconfidence

A

1) Overprecision - confidence interval too narrow
2) overplacement - all individuals think they are better than other individuals
3) Overestimation - we think our abilities are higher than they are

22
Q

Causes of overconfidence

A

1) Avaliability - imagine paths to success but not to failure
2) Anchoring - anchor on the best forecast and adjust insufficiently for realistic constraints
3) Failure to appreciate the role of chance
4) Biases of knowledge and perspective - we focus on our abilities while neglecting the competition
5) motivated reasoning - rationalize that success is likely and failure is not
6) positive reinforcement - frequently rewarded for overconfidence

23
Q

Bounded awareness

A

individuals systematically overlook critical, easily accessible and relevant information
e.g. Carter racing

24
Q

Change blindness

A

extreme focus on one aspect of a situation causes us to miss other information in the periphery
e.g. gorilla video

25
Q

Positive effects of goal setting (3)

A

1) Direct attention
2) greater effort
3) prolonged effort and increased persistence

26
Q

Conditions that make goals effective (3)

A
  1. Commitment
  2. Feedback on goal
  3. Feasibility of goal
27
Q

Negative effects of goal setting (5)

A
  1. Narrow focus causing neglect of non goal areas
  2. Potential rise in unethical behaviour to meet goal
  3. Distorted risk preferences
  4. Corrosion of organization culture (decreased cooperation)
  5. Reduced intrinsic motivation
28
Q

Positive effects of plan making (3)

A
  1. Makes procrastination more difficult
  2. Obstacles anticipated and planned for in advance
  3. Forgetfulness less likely
29
Q

Confirmation bias

A

Seeking evidence that confirms our prior beliefs and ignore or underweight evidence that contradicts them

30
Q

Cognitive dissonance

A

A state of tension that occurs whenever a person holds two cognitions that are psychologically inconsistent
- Results in motivation to resolve dissonance

31
Q

Escalation of commitment

A

Individuals tend to become committed to a previously selected course of action beyond the point prescribed by an optimal, rational model
e.g. Fog of war

32
Q

Situations when nudges are most effective (5)

A
  1. Infrequent decisions
  2. Complicated market with lack of individual expertise
  3. Decision made when individual under high cognitive load
  4. Decisions made when incentives are poorly aligned with general welfare
  5. Situations with limited feedback
33
Q

Process nudges

A

nudges which change the decision making process in order to help people meet their own goals
e.g. I ask you today if you are willing to start contributing to 401k next month

34
Q

outcome nudges

A

nudges that move people towards and predetermined outcome selected by a benevolent planner
e.g. I default you into saving in a 401k but let you opt out

35
Q

Characteristics Intervention that slow attention habituation (4)

A
  1. long intervals between repetitions
  2. intense stimuli
  3. exposure occurs at unpredictable intervals
  4. Content is dynamic (changes each time)
36
Q

Injunctive social norms

A

What we should do

37
Q

Descriptive social norms

A

What people actually do

38
Q

5 Pathways to persistence

A
  1. Psychological habit - association leading to persistence
  2. Change in mental contents - changing false beliefs
  3. Recursive social processes - treatment leads other people to enduringly treat targets in ways that support behaviour change (e.g. solar panels on house)
  4. Change in future costs - one time intervention that reduces future costs (e.g. programming thermostat)
  5. Rip currents - treatment induces people to perform a behaviour that then exposes them to ongoing external processes that they would not have otherwise been exposed to
    (e. g. getting someone to vote once, puts them on the voter registry, makes them more likely to vote in future)