Midterm GED Flashcards

1
Q

Mearsheimer

A

Post-CW LIO doomed to fail due to economic inequality, internal sovereignty/national identity crises, and failed interventions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Borzel & Zurn

A

LIO 1: Multilateralism
LIO 2: Post national liberalism
Outcomes: strengthened LIO, weakened LIO or re-emergence of nationalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Lake, Martin & Risse

A

Challenges to LIO: populism, nationalism and anti-globalism
Sources of resilience: conflict reduction, economic benefits, institutionalization, legitimacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cooper & Heine

A

Modern diplomacy: more actors (NGOs, MNCs, IGOs), blurred lines between domestic and foreign policy
new types of diplomacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

McConnell & Woon

A

China’s diplomatic strategy: major country diplomacy balancing heirarchy and equality, BRI & Win-Win model economic partnerships v. geopolitical influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Cheng & Zeng

A

DSR is a political slogan and moves from the BRI’s physical infrastructure to digital (AI, data centers) , not a fully coherent strategy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hegemonic Stability Theory

A

a hegemony is required to maintain global order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Liberal International Order (LIO)

A

An international order based on liberal principles such as democracy, free trade, and international institutions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Challenges to LIO (Internal)

A

declining US power, legitimacy crises, inequality, nationalism, populism, erosion of democratic norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Challenges to LIO (External)

A

rise of China and Russia as revisionist power, climate change, COVID-19, technological disruptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

China in the global order

A

supports economic globalization but resists universal HR norms, uses economic and military power to shape global institutions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outcome of the changing LIO (China)

A
  1. integrate into a reformed LIO
  2. create a parallel order challenging Western norms
  3. push for changes in the existing order rather than overthrow it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Contemporary Challenges in Diplomacy

A
  1. new diplomatic levels
  2. expanded actors (hierarchies to networks)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Club v Network

A

Club: exclusive, state-led, elite driven negotiations
Network: complexity across multiple stakeholders, increased democratizations, technology and multilateralism play key roles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Role of NGOs in Global Governance

A
  1. Agenda setting
  2. International standard setting
  3. Decision-making
  4. Monitoring and implementation
    * opportunities in UN conferences to shape global priorities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

PD 2.0 & the Digital Age

A

social media transformed diplomacy, controlling narratives and managing misinformation, allow states to shape global events

17
Q

Mao Zedong

A

1st gen, revolutionary diplomacy leaning towards Soviets, ideological radicalization following the Sino-soviet split, rapprochement with the US

18
Q

Deng Xiaoping

A

2nd gen, shift to development focused diplomacy, open-door policy, non-alignment, economic modernization, national interests over ideology

19
Q

Jiang Zemin & Hu Jintao

A

3rd & 4th gen, reassurance diplomacy to counter external hostility, engaged in multilateralism, arms control treaties, expansion of diplomacy beyond MFA

20
Q

Xi Jinping

A

5th gen, more proactive global role, assertion of core interests (south and east china seas), centralization of power, hierarchical relations

21
Q

Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)

A

represents China’s growing influence, though its execution remains complex, no coherent implementation plan, involved multiple actors (gov’t agencies, state owned enterprises, provincial)

22
Q

Thick v. Thin

A

Strong institutions v. Limited or light institutionalization

23
Q

Bounded v Unbounded

A

Restricted group of members v. Most states globally

24
Q

Realist Orders

A

driven by security competition and power politics, arise in bipolar or multipolar worlds

25
Q

Liberal Orders

A

promote democracy, open markets, and rules based cooperation, unipolar

26
Q

Agnostic Orders

A

arise in unipolar world order when the unipole does not have a universalistic ideology

27
Q

Ideological Orders

A

arise in unipolar world order when the unipole has a universalistic ideology (e.g., liberalism, communism) short lived

28
Q

Future of Global Order

A
  1. Multipolarity Dominates: US, China, Russia, competing bounded orders
  2. Emergence of Realist Orders: focus on security and balance of power, military/economic alliances shape int’l relations
  3. Economic Competition between Orders: US to counter China’s economic rise, BRI geopolitical tool, II’s adapt to new power realities
29
Q

LIO I (1)

A

Post WWII, rule based multilateralism, western dominated, state-centric, limited authority over states, balance between free trade and national regulation

30
Q

LIO II (2)

A

Post CW, expansion of liberal authority in II’s, strong emphasis on democracy, human rights, supranational governance, loss of state sovereignty, increased institutional authority, criticized for double standards, western dominance, institutional inequality

31
Q

Contestations against LIO

A

Increased Liberal intrusiveness (challenges sovereignty by interfering in domestic affairs)
Legitimation Problems (unequal treatment of states, liberal norms imposed on state with different cultural traditions)
Crises Moments expose liberal authority: intervention lacked legitimacy, exceeded mandates, perceived failures of economic liberalism or enforce common policies

32
Q

Contestation Strategies

A

Pushback, Reform, Withdrawal, Dissidence

33
Q

Pushback

A

Strong influence, rejects Liberal intrusiveness, emphasis on sovereignty and limit human security justifications for interventions

34
Q

Reform

A

Strong influence, accepts liberal order but demands changes, demand more representation for rising powers

35
Q

Withdrawal

A

Weak influence, accepts order but disengages from it, EU migration crisis => lack power to reform, non-compliance

36
Q

Dissidence

A

Weak influence, rejects liberal order entirely, reject international law as a Western construct

37
Q

Resilience in the LIO

A

Economic interests: globalized businesses depend on free trade/supply chains
Institutional Inertia & Legal Frameworks: IO’s persistent despite contestations, norm diffusion sustains HR, democracy and multilateralism
Public support & legitimacy: younger generations and urban voters continue to favor multilateralism, against populism

38
Q

Track Two diplomacy

A

informal conflict resolution by NGOs, academics and civil society

39
Q

Future of Diplomacy

A

Increased complexity, Technological disruption, Evolving global power structures, Greater inclusivity, Resilience & adaptation