Midterm (Ch 1-5) Flashcards
Organizational effectiveness
An ideal state in which the organization:
Has a good fit with its external environment (open system)
Effectively transforms inputs to outputs (human capital)
Satisfies the needs of key stakeholders
Organizations as Open Systems
Open systems: The view that
organizations depend on
the external environment for
resources, affect that environment through their output, and
consist of internal subsystems
that transform inputs to outputs.
Inputs –> Feedback —> Outputs
Organizations have numerous subsystems (departments, teams, technological processes, etc.) that transform the incoming resources
into outputs that are returned to the external environment.
INPUTS
*Raw materials
* Human resources
* Information
* Financial resources
* Equipment
OUTPUTS
* Products/services
* Shareholder dividends
* Community support
* Waste/pollution
Human Capital as the Organization’s
Competitive Advantage
The most important ingredient in the organization’s process
of transforming inputs to outputs
Human capital is:
Essential for survival/success, difficult to find/copy/replace with technology
Human capital improves the organizational effectiveness:
- Directly improves individual behaviour and performance
- Performing diverse tasks in unfamiliar situations
- Company’s investment in employees motivates them
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Activities intended to benefit society and the environment beyond the firm’s immediate financial interests or legal obligation
Triple-bottom-line philosophy:
- Economic (aim to survive and be profitable in the marketplace)
- Society (intend to maintain or
improve conditions for society) - Environment
The emerging evidence is that companies with a positive CSR reputation tend to have better financial performance, more loyal employees, and better relations with customers, job applicants, and other stakeholders
Organizational Behaviour Anchors (5)
Systematic research anchor:
A key feature of OB knowledge is that it should be based on systematic research:
forming research questions, systematically collecting data, and testing hypotheses against these data
Practical orientation anchor:
- Ensure that OB theories are useful in organizations.
- The true “impact” of an OB theory is how well it finds its way into organizational life and becomes a valuable asset for improving the organization’s effectiveness.
Multidisciplinary anchor:
the field should welcome theories and knowledge from disciplines other than its own
Contingency anchor:
- The effect of one variable on another variable often
depends on the characteristics of the situation or people involved
- A single outcome or solution rarely exists; a particular action may have different consequences under different conditions (e.g. the success of remote work depends on specific characteristics of
the employee, job, and organization)
Multiple levels of analysis anchor:
- Organizational behaviour recognizes that what goes on in organizations can be placed into three levels of analysis: individual, team (including interpersonal), and organization
Inclusive Workplace: Surface-level diversity
The observable demographic or
physiological differences in
people, such as their race,
ethnicity, gender, age, and
physical disabilities.
Inclusive Workplace: Deep-level diversity
Differences in the psychological characteristics of employees, including personalities,
beliefs, values, and attitudes.
Workplace Diversity Benefits and Challenges
Benefits of diversity:
- Better decisions, employee attitudes, team performance
- More team creativity, better decisions in complex situations
- Better representation of community needs
- Moral/legal imperative (A moral imperative is a strongly-felt principle that compels that person to act)
Challenges of Diversity:
- Team take longer to perform effectively together (communication problems)
- Higher dysfunctional conflict (behaviour such as aggression, hostility, or lack of respect toward others),
- Lower info sharing and morale
Work-Life Integration
- The degree to which individuals effectively participate in their diverse responsibilities, both at work and in their personal lives, while experiencing minimal conflict between these different life domains.
- This phrase has replaced
work–life balance, which
incorrectly implies that
work and non-work roles
are completely separate and opposing partitions - PROBLEM: work-life conflict - the heavy demands of one role deplete personal resources, which starve other roles.
Practicing work-life integration
- Literally integrate two
or more roles (e.g. conduct
meetings during an exercise or walk, On-site child care) - Flexible work scheduling
- Make sure your job, family life, sports activities, are roughly consistent with your personality and values
- Boundary management (disconnecting from work)
Remote Work Benefits and Risks
Benefits:
- Better work-life integration
- Valued job benefit, less turnover (leaving job)
- Higher productivity
- Better for environment
- Lower corporate costs
Disadvantages:
- More social isolation
- Less informal communication
- Lower team cohesion
- Weaker organizational culture
Employment Relationships (3) & their consequences
Direct employment:
- Employee working directly with employer
- This relationship
assumes continuous employment (lifetime employment, in
rare cases), usually with expectations of career advancement and the organization’s investment in the employee’s
skills
Adv: higher work quality, innovation, and agility
Disadv: lower job satisfaction, commitment when working with indirect workers
Indirect employment:
- Outsourced or agency work (sometimes cheap labour in 3rd world countries)
Disadv: Lower job satisfaction than other employment types
Contract employment:
- “Self-employed”, “Freelancer”
- A self-employed contractor an
independent organization that provides services to a client
organization.
indirect employment and self-employed contract work are the fastest growing work relationships.
Teams with direct and indirect workers:
- Weaker social networks, less information sharing
MARS Model: Employee Motivation (3 internal forces)
The 3 Internal forces that affect a person’s voluntary choice of behaviour:
1) Direction:
- The path along which people steer their effort.
- In other words, motivation is goal-directed, not random.
- People have choices about what they are trying to achieve and at what level of quality, quantity, and so forth.
E.g. They are motivated to arrive at work on time, finish a project
a few hours early, or aim for many other targets.
2) Intensity:
- The amount of effort allocated to the goal.
- How much people push themselves to complete a task.
e.g. Two employees might be motivated to finish their project within the next few hours (direction), but only one of them puts forth enough effort (intensity) to achieve this goal.
3) Persistence:
- The length of time that the individual continues to exert effort
toward an objective.
- Employees sustain their effort until they reach their goal or give up beforehand.
To help remember these three elements of motivation,
consider the metaphor of driving a car in which the thrust of
the engine is your effort. Direction refers to where you steer
the car, intensity is how much you put your foot down on the
gas pedal, and persistence is for how long you drive toward
your destination.
MARS Model: Employee Ability
Natural aptitudes (the natural talents that help employees
learn specific tasks more quickly and perform them better) and learned capabilities (the skills and knowledge that people acquire, such as through training, practice, and other forms of learning) required to successfully complete a task
MARS Model: Employee Ability (Person-job matching: 3 strategies)
Person-job matching:
- The challenge to match a person’s abilities with the job’s requirements because a good match tends to increase employee performance and well-being.
3 Strategies:
1) Selecting
- Select applicants who already demonstrate the required abilities
- Companies ask applicants to perform work samples, provide references for checking their past performance, and complete various selection tests
2) Developing
- Train employees who lack specific knowledge or skills needed for the job
3) Redesigning
- Re-design the job so that employees are given tasks only within their current abilities.
- E.g. a complex task might
be simplified—some aspects of the work are transferred to others—so a new employee is only assigned tasks that they are currently able to perform.
- As the employee becomes more competent at these tasks, other tasks are added back into the job.
MARS Model: Employee Role Perceptions Definition
- The degree to which a person
understands the job duties
assigned to or expected
of them
MARS Model: Employee Role Perceptions (Definition and 3 forms of role clarity)
Role perceptions: the degree to which a person understands the job duties assigned to or expected
of them
Forms of Role Clarity:
1) Clear duties:
- Employees understanding the specific duties or consequences for which they are accountable
- Employees are occasionally evaluated on job duties they were never told was within their zone of
responsibility
2) Clear task priority
- Employees understanding the priority of their various tasks and performance expectations (quantity vs quality)
- Role clarity in the form of task priorities also exists in the dilemma of allocating personal time and resources (e.g. how much time managers should devote to coaching employees versus meeting with clients)
3) Preferred procedures
- Understanding the preferred behaviours or procedures for accomplishing tasks.
- Role ambiguity exists
when an employee knows two or three ways to perform a task, but misunderstands which of these the company prefers
MARS Model: Employee Role Perceptions (Consequences of clear vs ambiguous role perceptions)
Clear role perceptions:
- Employees perform work more accurately and efficiently
- Motivates employees because they
have a higher belief that their effort will produce the expected
outcomes.
- Essential for coordination with co-workers and other stakeholders
Ambiguous role perceptions:
- Employees waste considerable
time and energy by performing the wrong tasks or the right
tasks in the wrong way
MARS Model: Situational Factors (Constraints/facilitators & Cues)
Situational Factors:
- Conditions beyond people’s short-term control that constrain or facilitate behaviour
Constraints/facilitators:
- Employees who are motivated, skilled, and know their role
obligations will nevertheless perform poorly if they lack time,
budget, physical work facilities, and other resources.
Cues:
The work environment provides cues to guide and motivate people. E.g. companies install
barriers and warning signs in dangerous areas (cue employees to
avoid the nearby hazards)
Types of Individual Behaviours (2)
1) Task Performance:
- Voluntary goal-directed behaviours
- 3 types: Proficient, adaptive, proactive
2) Organizational citizenship behaviours (OCBs):
- Various forms of cooperation and
helpfulness to others that sup-
port the organization’s social
and psychological context.
- Some OCBs are directed toward
individuals (e.g. assisting co-workers with their work problems)
- Other OCBs represent cooperation and helpfulness toward
the organization (e.g. the company’s public image)
- Some organizational citizenship behaviours are discretionary (employees don’t have to perform them), other OCBs are job requirements even if they aren’t explicitly stated in job descriptions.
NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES of performing OCBs:
- They take time and energy away from performing tasks, so employees who give more attention to OCBs risk lower career success in companies that reward task performance.
- Employees who frequently perform OCBs tend to have higher work–family conflict because of the
amount of time required for these activities
Presenteeism
- Showing up for work when unwell, injured, preoccupied by personal problems, or faced with dangerous conditions getting to
work - Employees who show up for work when they should be absent tend to be less productive and may reduce the productivity of co-workers.
- They may also worsen their own health and spread disease to co-workers.
- More common among employees with low
job security (such as new and temporary staff), employees who
lack sick leave pay or similar financial buffers, and those whose
absence would immediately affect many people.
Five-Factor (CANOE) Personality and Individual Behaviour (Type of performance –> Relevant Personality Dimension)
Proficient task performance –> Conscientiousness, extraversion
Adaptive task performance –> emotional stability, extraversion (assertiveness), openness to experience
Proactive task performance –>
extraversion (assertiveness), openness to experience
Organizational citizenship (cooperative,
sensitive, flexible, and supportive) –> Conscientiousness, Agreeableness
Counterproductive work behaviours –> Lower Conscientiousness, agreeableness = more CWB,
CANOE and Work Performance Predictors
- Effective leaders, salespeople are somewhat more extraverted
- Openness to experience may predict a creative work performance
- Conscientiousness is a weak predictor of adaptive, proactive performance
- Agreeableness:
-Predicts team member, customer service performance- Weak predictor of proficient, proactive performance
Five Factor Model Issues (4)
1) Higher big five scores aren’t always better
E.g. Employees with moderate extraversion perform
better in sales jobs than those with high or low extraversion.
2) Specific traits may predict better than their overall Big Five factor:
E.g. The specific extra-
version traits of assertiveness and positive emotionality predict proficient task performance better than the overall extraversion factor.
3) Personality isn’t static
- Personality can shift when the individual’s environment changes
significantly over a long time, such as when moving to a different culture or working in a job for many years.
4) The five-factor model doesn’t cover all personality concepts
E.g. needs and motives
The Dark Triad
Machiavellianism
- Strong motivation to get what one wants at the expense of others
- Believe that deceit is natural and acceptable to achieve goals
- Take pleasure in misleading, outwitting, controlling others
- Seldom empathize with or trust coworkers
Narcissism
- Obsessive belief in one’s own superiority, entitlement
- Excessive need for attention
- Intensely envious
Psychopathy
- Social predators: ruthlessly dominate and manipulate others
- Mask of psychopathy: superficial charm, but selfish self-promoters
- Engage in antisocial, impulsive, and often fraudulent thrill-seeking behaviour
Dark Triad and Workplace Behaviour (Consequences/Benefits)
The dark triad
predicts counterproductive work behaviours, but
not as well as do the specific Big Five factors of low agreeableness and low conscientiousness.
Consequences:
Dark triad traits predict:
- Bullying and other forms of workplace aggression
- Serious white-collar crime behaviour
- Decisions that produce poorer absolute and risk adjusted investment return
- Those with high
psychopathy take excessive risks due to their overconfidence
and disregard for consequences.
Benefits:
- They have a manipulative political skill, which some supervisors rate favourably in employee performance.
- Being manipulative also occasionally helps employees move
into more powerful positions in informal employee networks.
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
(MBTI)
Is an instrument designed to measure the elements of Jungian personality theory, particularly preferences regarding perceiving
and judging information.
THE PERCEIVING FUNCTION—how people prefer to gather information—occurs through two competing orientations: sensing (S) and intuition (N):
- Sensing:
involves perceiving information directly through the five
senses; it relies on an organized structure to acquire factual and preferably quantitative details.
- Intuition:
Relies more on insight and subjective experience to see relationships
among variables. Sensing types focus on the here and now,
whereas intuitive types focus more on future possibilities.
THE JUDGING FUNCTION—how
people prefer making decisions based on what they have
perceived—consists of two competing processes: thinking
(T) and feeling (F). People with a thinking orientation rely
on rational cause–effect logic and systematic data collection to make decisions.
MBTI Benefits and Drawbacks
Benefits:
- MBTI takes a neutral or balanced
approach by recognizing both the strengths and limitations of each personality type in different situations.
- Improves self-awareness and mutual understanding
- It’s the most widely
studied measure of cognitive style in management research
- The most popular personality test for career counselling and executive coaching
Drawbacks:
- Usually a poor
predictor of job performance and
- Is generally not recommended for employment selection or promotion decisions.
- MBTI can potentially identify employees who prefer face-to-face versus remote teamwork, but it does not predict how well a team
develops.
- Has questionable value in predicting leadership effectiveness.
Jungian & Myers-Briggs Types
GETTING ENERGY:
Extraversion (E)
*Talkative
*Externally-focused
*Assertive
Introversion (I)
* Quiet
* Internally- focused
* Abstract
PERCEIVING INFORMATION:
Sensing (S)
*Concrete
*Realistic
*Practical
Intuitive (N)
* Imaginative
* Future-focused
* Abstract
MAKING DECISIONS:
Thinking (T)
* Logical
*Objective
* Impersonal
Feeling (F)
*Empathetic
*Caring
*Emotion-focused
ORIENTING TO THE EXTERNAL WORLD:
Judging (J)
*Organized
*Schedule-oriented
*Closure-focused
Perceiving (P)
* Spontaneous
* Adaptable
* Opportunity-focused
Values in the Workplace & Values System Definition
Stable, evaluative beliefs that guide our preferences:
* Define right/wrong, good/bad – what we “ought” to do.
* Direct our motivation, potentially decisions/behaviour.
Values system – a person’s hierarchy of values.
Compared with personality, values are:
* Evaluative (not descriptive).
* May conflict strongly with each other.
* Affected more by nurture than nature.
Schwartz’s Values Model
57 values clustered into 10
categories (The 10 categories include universal-
ism, benevolence, tradition, conformity, security, power,
achievement, hedonism, stimulation, and self-direction) further clustered
into four quadrants:
- Openness to change
- motivated to pursue innovative
ways - Conservation
- motivated to preserve the
status quo - Self-enhancement
- motivated by self-interest
- Self-transcendence
- motivated to promote welfare
of others and nature
How Values Influence Decisions and Behaviour
- Values affect the relative
attractiveness of choices:
- Our decisions are guided by personal values because those values generate positive or negative feelings (valences) toward
the available choices.
- We experience more positive feelings toward choices that are aligned with our values
and negative feelings toward alternatives that are contrary to our values. - Values frame
our perceptions of reality:
- We are constantly bombarded with stimuli from our surroundings.
- Personal values influence whether we notice something as well as how we interpret it
- Our decisions and actions are affected by how we perceive
those situations. - Values motivate us to act
consistently with self-concept and public image:
- If achievement is a key feature of your self-view and public image,
then you are motivated to act in ways that are consistent
with that value.
- The more clearly a behaviour is aligned with a specific value that identifies us, the more motivated we are to engage in that behaviour.
Values Congruence and its Importance
Similarity of a person’s values hierarchy to another source.
Importance of values congruence:
* Team values congruence—higher team cohesion and
performance.
* Person–organization values congruence—higher job
satisfaction, loyalty, and organizational citizenship, lower
stress and turnover.
Ethical Values and Behaviour (4 principles)
Ethics: study of moral principles and values, whether actions are right or wrong, outcomes are good or bad.
Four ethical principles:
- Utilitarianism.
- Greatest good for the greatest number.
- We should choose the option that provides the highest degree of satisfaction to those affected
- One
problem is that utilitarianism requires a cost–benefit
analysis, yet many outcomes aren’t measurable. - Individual rights.
- Everyone has the same natural rights
- The individual rights
principle extends beyond legal rights to human rights
that everyone is granted as a moral norm of society.
- One problem with this principle is that some individual rights
may conflict with others. - Distributive justice.
- Benefits and burdens should be the same or proportional.
- The main problem with
the distributive justice principle is that it is difficult to
agree on who is “similar” and what factors are relevant. - Ethic of care.
- Moral obligation to help others.
- Ethic of care includes being attentive to others’ needs, using one’s abilities to give care to others, and being responsive to (having empathy for) the person receiving
care.
Moral Intensity and Ethical Conduct
The degree that an issue demands the application of ethical principles.
Moral intensity higher when:
* Decision has substantially good or bad consequences.
* High agreement among others that outcomes are good-bad
(not diverse beliefs).
* High probability that good-bad outcomes will occur from the
decision.
* Many people will be affected by the decision.
Moral Sensitivity and Ethical Conduct
A person’s ability to detect a moral dilemma and
estimate its relative importance.
Moral sensitivity is higher in people with:
* Expertise/knowledge of prescriptive norms and rules.
* Past experience with specific moral dilemmas.
* More empathy.
* A self-view as an ethical person.
* Mindfulness (A person’s
receptive and impartial attention to and awareness of the
present situation as well as to
one’s own thoughts and emotions in that moment.)
Supporting Ethical Behaviour
- Corporate code of ethics
- Educate and test employee’s ethical knowledge (Many large firms have annual quizzes)
- Systems for communicating/investigating wrongdoing
- Ethical culture and ethical leadership
Values Across Cultures: Individualism
The degree to which
people value personal
freedom, self-sufficiency,
control over themselves,
being appreciated for
unique qualities
High: Canada, United States, Chile, South Africa
Medium: Japan, Denmark
Low: Taiwan, Venezuela
Values Across Cultures: Collectivism
The degree to which
people value their group
membership and
harmonious relationships
within the group
High: Israel, Taiwan
Medium: India, Denmark
Low: Canada, United States, Germany, Japan
Values Across Cultures: Power Distance
High power distance
* Value obedience to authority
* Comfortable receiving
commands from superiors
* Prefer formal rules and
authority to resolve conflicts
Low power distance
* Expect relatively equal power
sharing
* View relationship with boss as
interdependence, not
dependence
High: India, Malaysia
Medium: Canada, United
States, Japan
Low: Denmark, Israel
Values Across Cultures: Uncertainty Avoidance
High uncertainty avoidance
* Feel threatened by
ambiguity and uncertainty
* Value structured situations
and direct communication
Low uncertainty
avoidance
* Tolerate ambiguity and
uncertainty
High: Belgium, Greece
Medium: Canada, United
States, Norway
Low: Denmark, Singapore
Values Across Cultures: Achievement-Nurturing
High achievement orientation
* Assertiveness
* Competitiveness
* Materialism
High nurturing orientation
* Value relationships
* Focus on human interaction
High: Austria, Japan
Medium: Canada, United
States, Brazil
Low: Sweden, Netherlands
Cultural Diversity within Canada
Deep-level diversity across ethnic and regional groups
Compared to Francophones tend to:
* Have less deference to authority
* less accepting of Canada’s military activities abroad
*More tolerance and morally permissive views regarding marriage, sexual activity, and non-married parenthood
Indigenous Canadians
* High collectivism
* Low power distance: Indigenous communities place a high priority on consensus and thereby reduce the
leader’s control over group decisions.
* Non-interference: displeasure is not typically displayed by
explicit and open disapproval of another’s actions.
* Natural time orientation: tend to view time as less structured than in European cultures
Personal values/traits vary across Canadian regions
Regional variations seem to be caused by:
* regional institutions (local government, education, religions)
* regional migration
Canadian vs American Values
Canadians tend to:
- Have higher moral permissiveness
- Encourage more collective rights
- Have less affiliation with religious
institutions, separation from policy
- Have less deference (humble submission and respect) to patriarchal
authority
Americans tend to:
- Have lower moral permissiveness
Encourage more individual rights
- Have more affiliation with religious
institutions, involvement in policy
- Have more deference to patriarchal authority
Self-Concept Defined
Our self-beliefs and self-
evaluations.
We compare situations with
our current (perceived self)
and desired (ideal self).
Three levels of self-concept:
individual, relational,
collective.