Midterm B Unit 4 Flashcards

unit 4

1
Q

Theory in evaluation and intervention

A

theory has an evidence base and it has clinical applications that have been proven, so using theory to help us understand what types of evaluations we should choose is appropriate. Part of theory is thinking about how we’re going to approach the evaluation process and the choosing of assessments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

clear choice approach

A

when it’s very obvious how you’re going to address the person’s needs. a particular frame of reference that is the only appropriate frame of reference to use with the client.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

top down approach

A

when we need to look at what occupations are being impacted and then break down the skills that might be causing that occupational deficit. For example, we do a screen and we understand that the client is having deficits or problems in their everyday occupations, so the first thing we do is look for assessments that will help us identify which areas of occupational performance they are having trouble with and how much trouble they’re having. Do we need to assess how well they’re performing in ADLs, or do we need to do a work-related assessment?

Once we’ve done that and we establish that there could be a problem in the way that
they’re performing their ADLs and it’s a pretty significant problem because they need a lot of assistance to complete their everyday tasks, then we need to figure out why they need that much assistance. So, we may need to assess specific performance skills, or client factors, or even the environment or performance patterns to help us understand why the client’s having those problems. So, from the assessment of ADLs, we observe or recognize that they seem to be having problems with a lot of the fine motor tasks and functional mobility tasks. So, now, we need to evaluate the performance skills and client factors that may be causing them to have a problem with fine motor performance and a problem with functional mobility. From there, we generate a frame of reference that we’re going to use to work with a client, and we move on to a theory-based intervention to address those needs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

bottom up approach

A

we first screen the person and determine that they need an evaluation, but our first step in the evaluation is to look at their performance skills and client factors that may be impacting their occupational performance. Perhaps the first thing that we do is evaluate their balance, their muscle strength, their flexibility, their range of motion, their cognitive skills. These are all client performance skills and client factors that we may first assess before we determine how much of an impact those are having on their occupation. Then we’re assessing their occupation to determine what is the impact. How much of the occupations of their choice are they unable to do because of these deficits of performance skills and client factors? From there, we choose a frame of reference and move on to a theoretically based intervention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

idiosyncratic approach

A

when there’s really no right way to do the assessment and we’re looking for options by evaluating many things at one time, or we may start with evaluating a performance skill at the same time that we’re evaluating an occupation, and we’re also thinking about the client factors, context, and environment, or performance skills that may be appropriate. The idiosyncratic approach may require you to go outside of the profession of occupational therapy to find appropriate evaluations that meet the client’s needs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

idiosyncratic approach continued

A

takes the most amount of investigation, research, and flexibility of thought to move beyond our understanding as occupational therapists to perhaps bring in an assessment from a psychologist, or a social worker, an early education assessment, or a physical therapy assessment, perhaps even speech, because maybe what’s available within occupational therapy doesn’t meet exactly the client’s needs, but you know what types of things they have, what types of needs that they have, and you go and seek out something that meets those needs at the same time that you’re addressing the underlying contributing factors and the occupations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

a few considerations when choosing an assessment one

A

need to think about
what is the characteristic of interest and importance to the client? Where are the
client’s characteristics in general? What’s their context and environment? How old are
they? What is their educational level? What setting are you seeing them in? What
occupational performance needs or occupations are most important for them? How do
these client characteristics align with the properties of the assessment tool that you’re
going to choose?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

a few considerations when choosing an assessment two

A

You also need to think about the intended purpose of the assessment.
Why are you using it to assess the client? You should be able to justify your choice of
assessment, not just that this was what was available within the clinic, but why is this
particular assessment appropriate for this client, and how do you know that?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

a few considerations when choosing an assessment three

A

What do you plan to do with the data? Is this information for the discharge or for treatment planning? What did the authors of the assessment say the intended purpose was?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

a few considerations when choosing an assessment four

A

What are the user qualifications for the assessment? Can you perform the assessment
without specific training or certification? Can you perform the assessment without
paying for it? Sometimes we find copies of assessments at our work and you may not be able to use that assessment unless you have a true copy that was given by the publisher. Some assessments require specific training or certification in order to use them. Have you checked to make sure that you qualify? What are the practical considerations? Is the assessment time-consuming? Is it costly? Does it require any unnecessary amount of equipment or space?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

a few considerations when choosing an assessment five

A

Once you determine your needs for an assessment tool, you then
have to locate those in the literature. How do you find appropriate assessment tools?
Do you investigate occupational therapy and occupational science websites or journals? Do you look to other professions? Is there something else that
may be better suited? Explore professional associations and networks for resources.
AOTA will have a lot of resources or examples of different types of assessments that
have been used. Search major databases, like PubMed or the library website, for
resources on what appropriate assessments may be available for the particular person
you’re working on or that you’re trying to treat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

a few considerations when choosing an assessment six

A

You also need to think about the client’s emotional state and how they will respond to
the assessment. Will they be able to tolerate the full assessment in one setting? If not,
can it broken up? Some assessments specify that it can’t. How will you prepare the
client? What will you say to explain the assessment and why you’re performing it?
Perhaps you’ve chosen to assess their risk of depression. How are you going to explain to a client who may have no awareness that they are expressing thoughts that make you believe that they might have depression, that you are now going to assess their depression? Will they understand? Do they have the cognitive capability to understand the directions to the assessment, the assessment questions themselves, the tasks that you’re asking them to do, or why you’re doing the assessment? Remember, clients still need to consent. Can they consent to you doing the assessment that you’ve chosen, or is it too complicated or complex?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

different types of assessment

A

standardized versus non-standardized, norm reference versus
criterion reference, descriptive versus evaluative versus predictive.

What is going to be the best type of assessment for your client and for the setting that you’re evaluating them in? What’s going to give you the most amount of information and meet the client’s needs the best

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

the methods of assessment

A

often use multiple methods of assessment when we’re working with a client. We may do a combination of the interview, observation, and performance measures, which can be based on skill performance or self-report. We’ll probably do a combination, as we need to develop an occupational profile, which is typically based on interviews and maybe some observation. These interviews can be structured, unstructured, or semi-structured. Using something like the Canadian occupational performance measure is going to be a semi-structured interview where there’s a guide that helps you understand what types of questions you may need to ask a client in order to get the information that you need from them. This guide is just the form of the assessment tool itself because there are specific things that you need to go through with the client, but there’s no set of questions that you have to ask them in order to get those answers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Observation could be part of your performance measure

A

may be observing them perform a skill, or it can be an unstructured observation where you ask them to get dressed and you’re simply watching them see how they do and observing whether or not they struggle in any area. This type of unstructured observation can be very useful when you’re trying to determine where to start with a client if you have very little information about them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Performance measures

A

more of the formal tools that we look for to measure specific skills and performance or self-report tools, where a client can either fill a tool out themselves or you can ask them the questions to get their self-report on how they’re performing in certain tasks.

17
Q

The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

A

a semi-structured interview. It focuses on the occupational performance of a person in work, activities of daily living, and leisure.

looking at the occupational performance of a client and we’re having them tell
us about their typical day and typical occupations they participate in. They then also let us know how well they’re performing in those occupations right now and how satisfied they are with that performance. It may be that they have a task that they’re doing and they’re not performing very well at it, but they don’t mind that they’re not performing very well right now. There could be other tasks that they feel are much worse of a performance, that they are less satisfied with them, even though they may rate them higher in terms of being able to perform in them at the moment. It’s a non-standardized assessment, and the scores that are collected are compared across the individual’s time in therapy to see if they’ve improved in their satisfaction or performance. They’re also able to prioritize their goals within the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, which helps us to collaborate with clients in order to set client-centered goals and design interventions.

18
Q

Pediatric Evaluation Of Disability Inventory (PD)

A

pediatric-focused self-report that you get from an interview with a parent.

self-report, it’s a structured
interview of the parent reporting their functional performance, the amount of
assistance needed, and the types of modifications needed for them to participate in
activities of daily living and measures self-care, mobility, and their ability to participate
in social activities. It’s for children under eight years, so it’s really meant to help with
placing children or understanding the types of interventions to do with children in both
the young school-age and early intervention.

is a norm-referenced assessment, so you are able to take the total scores and compare them to what the norm would be or what other children who do not have a disability would score at the same age. It is very standardized. The types of questions listed on the paper are answered exactly. There isn’t room for an interview, and because it’s norm-referenced, it has to be done in the same way in order for you to compare the scores across other children.

19
Q

Peabody Developmental Motor Skills (Peabody)

A

a performance-based measure. We actually watched the child participate in different skills. It is very standardized. It has exact directions for every skill that you would give a child with the
types of equipment that you would use and what you can or cannot say to a child during
test performance. You are observing them perform it, so it is also a bit observation-based. It looks at the reflexes, stationary, locomotion, object manipulation, grasping,
and visual-motor integration of a child, so it’s examining the fine motor performance
and gross motor performance across a few different variables.

scores can be looked at across what would be typical for a child of that age. The assessment is norm-referenced, so you can look at the norms compared to where your child or the child that you’re evaluating scored.

It is standardized, so even when a parent says, “Oh, well, they tie their shoe all the time
at home,” if they don’t perform it during the test when they’re asked to in the specific
way that they’re asked to as part of the test, you cannot count that as performance. So,
when you have these types of standardized assessments, they’re great for giving you
very concrete information about the child’s performance and about their skills in
different areas. You can also be pretty sure that test, re-test, and inter-rater reliability are
pretty high because they have to be done in the exact same way.

However, it may not be as good for observing the child’s actual performance of skill as
taking a parent report or knowing how they perform in their natural environment,
because performing with a stranger observing them and giving them very specific
directions may be testing other things, like their language comprehension skills or their
ability to perform under pressure or stress.

20
Q

Kohlman Evaluation of Living Skills Assessment

A

designed for the outpatient and short-term stay settings. It’s for adults to determine if they can live in the community independently. This is a criterion-referenced assessment, so remember that means there’s a cut score. There’s a score where we say, yes, they could most likely live independently, no, they cannot live independently or most likely cannot live
independently

21
Q

What’s the benefits of having a cut score versus a norm referenced
assessment?

A

you do understand with the cut score whether or not they meet the
minimum for being able to live independently, Unlike an assessment that maybe doesn’t
have any type of way of comparing scores to a norm population or to a population of
others, but unlike a normed assessment, you can’t see where they are in terms of how
close to normal or how close to the typical population they’re performing.

Say the cut score is 20. If they score a 21, are they functioning pretty independently, or
what areas are they still struggling in? If the total score’s out of 30 and they are getting a
29, does that mean that they are much better off than the person who got a 21? There’s
really no way to know because a cut score is a simple YES or NO. You have to consider
that when you’re picking an assessment. What information do you lose by using
something that’s criterion-referenced instead of norm-referenced, but what do you gain
in terms of time or efficiency by doing something that requires a cut score versus a
norm reference score?

22
Q

dynamometer

A

a performance-based and scale measure where you’re
squeezing the instrument and it’s got the dial on top that allows you to see how many
pounds of strength the person has. This is actually a standardized assessment, even
though you’ll probably see it used many times and non-standardized in a clinic, it is
standardized and norm reference.

There’s a specific way that you have to position the person, a way that you position the
handle, how you tell them to squeeze. There’s a script that is provided for doing grip
strength, and there are norms, so you can see across ages and across genders what the
range is normal for that person. This helps you to understand where they are
compared to their typical peers, and you’re watching them do it, so it is performance-based. So, unlike some of the other assessments we’ve discussed, where the
standardization has made it take a longer time to do the assessment than some other
types of assessments, a dynamometer is standardized and norm-referenced, but it’s still
a quick measure, so it’s not always about time.