Midterm Flashcards
Species
-Groups of similar individuals
Interpretations of diversity: Special creation
- species were created recently
- species are unchanging, look the same (phenotypes)
- variation=imperfection, Adam and Eve’s bad decision
- Linnaean classification=tried to pick the most perfect example as key comparison to make, orignal perfect specimen or type
Research from the Canadian National Collection of Insects
- moth named after Donald Trump
- Neopalpa donaldtrumpi
Interpretations of diversity: Evolution
- living species arose from a single common ancestor over millions of years
- species have been modified (evolved) through time
- “descent with modification”
- variation=opportunity to change over time
- 3 major categories: anagenesis, extinction, cladogenesis
- proposed in late 1700s and early 1800s
- Comte du Buffon, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (his explanation came closest), Erasmus Darwin, Charles Darwin
- volume of evidence
- natural selection as mechanism for “survival of the fittest”
Anagenesis
- Change through time
- ex) one lineage is getting smaller and the other larger through time
- species formation without branching of the evolutionary line of descent
- ex) humans have changed drastically through time (don’t look like chimpanzees)
Cladogenesis
- speciation
- from common ancestor
- ex) lineages no longer mating together so can be independent and different
- the formation of a new group of organisms or higher taxon by evolutionary divergence from an ancestral form
Extinction
Lineages disappear
Artificial selection
- process by which humans use animal breeding and plant breeding to selectively develop particular phenotypic traits by choosing which typically animal or plant males and females will sexually reproduce and have offspring together
- select particular traits
Tree thinking
-Darwin introduced the metaphor of the “Tree of Life”
What are the two grand questions of evolutionary biology?
1) What are the causes of evolution?
2) What has been the history of life?
What are some popular perceptions of life?
- fact of evolution widely accepted, sometimes unconsciously
- human evolutionary past often invoked to explain modern human behaviour or physical ailments like feet/back/knee problems (humans not meant to wear shoes), obesity (wheat belly), type 2 diabetes (non-hereditary)
- extreme is the “Paleofantasy” perspective
Popular perceptions: Paleofantasy perspective
- modern humans evolved in Paleolithic
- cultural change has since outpaced evolutionary change leading to a “gene-culture mismatch”
- ex) sugar cravings appropriate in environments where starvation is a real possibility
- “paleosolutions” = run barefoot, eat raw food, cut out wheat
- stasis
Stasis
- stability through time, some species don’t change much through time
- species are identifiable with ancestors that lived millions of years ago
What is the evidence for evolution?
1) change through time: micro-evolution in extant lineages, vestigial organs, paleontology
2) common ancestry: biogeography, clinal variation within species, homology
Evidence for evolution: Change through time - Micro-evolution
- evolutionary change within a species or small group of organisms, especially over a short period
- domesticated species (pigeons, dogs=greatest domestic variation, might be reproductive isolation between chihuahua and Great Dane due to size differences)
- extreme body size variation in wild animals (pigmy hippo 385kg vs hippopotamus 3000kg, anglerfish female 1000x larger vs parasitic male)
- introduced species (beak length in Florida soapberry bugs decreased with introduction of flatter fruit source) = organisms need to respond quickly to changing environments
- microbial evolution = antibiotic/pesticide resistance (penicillin overuse and bacteria became resistant to drug), host switches (influenza epidemic, H1N1), evolution within hosts (HIV, several strains of HIV-1 have diverged rapidly since transfer=hinders vaccine development, each originated from a chimpanzee, group M is most common strain, AIDS=symptom of HIV, evolves within hosts, leads to collapse of immune systems)
Evidence for evolution: Change through time - Vestigial organs
- organs that have no current use but reflect their ancestors
- eyes in cavefish
- limbs in snakes
- wings in flightless birds
- tailbone in humans
Evidence for evolution: Change through time - Paleontology
- the branch of science concerned with fossil animals and plants
- extinct species=dinosaurs and Pleistocene megafauna (species of very large mammals like mammoths)
- George Cuvier=listed 23 extinct species in 1801, proved Irish Elk extinct in 1812, would prove that extinct existed, belief at the time was that God’s creation was no longer perfect if this were true
- law of succession
- transitional forms (also support common ancestry), are the missing links
Law of succession
Fossil and living organisms from the same region are related and are distinct from those in other regions
Transitional forms
- intermediate form between dinosaurs and birds is Archaeopteryx
- Durodon and Basilosaurus are an intermediate species between mammals and whales
- Archaeopteris is an intermediate form between ferns and seed plants
- are the “missing links”
Evidence for evolution: Common ancestry - Biogeography
- study of the distribution of species and ecosystems in geographic space and through geological time
- similar species in geographic proximity
- “species flocks” = different groups fill same niche on different continents or different lakes
- terrestrial organisms on “islands” habitable surrounded by inhabitable land
- Honeycreepers in Hawaii (different beak phenotypes for specialization in modes of feeding and diets on the island, different colours for different mating systems, rapid evolution of distinct calls and colour patterns)
- silverswords and tarweeds, Hawaii
- finches, Galapagos
- anole lizards, Caribbean
- birds of paradise, New Guinea
- Rift Lake cichlid fish, Lake Victoria cichlids (Lake Victoria completely dry as recently as 14 700 years ago, many now extinct but Nile perch (predator) populations dropped and cichlids increasing due to hybridization, ancient hybridization between 2 lineages provided genetic diversity that allowed adaptive radiation of 700 species in 150 000 years)
Evidence for evolution: Common ancestry - Clinal variation and discontinuities
- a measurable gradient in a single character (or biological trait) of a species across its geographical range
- most evident in ring species (gulls across northern hemisphere, greenish warblers, salamander Ensatina eschholtzii, buckeye butterflies)
Ring species
- a connected series of neighbouring populations, each of which can interbreed with closely sited related populations, but for which there exist at least two “end” populations in the series, which are too distantly related to interbreed, though there is a potential gene flow between each “linked” population
- distribution pattern=donut
- island of inappropriate habitat in the middle of the ring
- gulls across northern hemisphere
- greenish warblers(both forms co-occur or overlap in Siberia but don’t reproduce with one another, inhabitable environment is a deforested gap)
- salamander Ensatina eschholtzii
- buckeye butterflies (northern and southern form with continuous gene flow, in cuba 2 species coexist where area of range overlap)
Evidence for evolution: Common ancestry - Homology
- similarity in form despite difference in function
- similarity due to common ancestry
- evidence from morphology (similar bone structure in human, mole, horse but different arrangement and function), embryology (early development in snake, human, cat all look similar, all have a tail and pharyngeal pouch) and molecular biology (genetic code, gene sequences, biochemical pathways, similar amino acids in all species, utility of model organisms,
2 major hypotheses in the Origin of Species
1) descent with modification
- species lineages change over time and are derived from common ancestral lineages
2) natural selection
- the main mechanism for the evolutionary divergence of lineages and explains adaptations
Conditions (testable hypotheses) for evolution by natural selection
1) phenotypic variation in a given trait exists among individuals of a population
2) phenotypic variation is heritable (traits inherited by parents and passed on to offspring)
3) more offspring are produced than can be supported by the resources available in the environment (Frequency of phenotypes are not going to change if resources are unlimited, but where it is limited, heritable traits that are better adapted will increase in frequency and the less adaptable will disappear from the population)
4) differential survival and reproduction based on phenotypic variation
* if one of these fail, then natural selection is not occurring in that population
Major components of Darwinian fitness
- survival (viability)
- number of offspring (fecundity)
Darwinian fitness
- Overall Fitness=viability x fecundity
- Fitness = lifetime contribution of genes to next generation
- relative measure
- if doesn’t survive, individual can’t contribute to the next generation
- this provides the lifetime contribution of genes to the next generation
- only meaningful in comparisons of phenotypes in the same population only in context of a particular population
- the genetic contribution of an individual to the next generation’s gene pool relative to the average for the population, usually measured by the number of offspring or close kin that survive to reproductive age
Malthus and reproduction
- Observed population of Ireland where there were too many people in a population and not enough food to feed everyone (Potato famine)
- Exponential population growth and resources that the population depends on is constant or linear, then you reach a disequilibrium =struggle for survival
- Some phenotypes will be preferred or selected over others
“Struggle for survival”
- every organism produces more gametes than offspring and more offspring than survive
- small variation in phenotype may affect survival and reproduction
Fitness sub-components
- survival to adulthood
- ability to evade predators
- courtship and mating
- successful reproduction
- quantity of offspring produced
Polymorphic traits
- traits attributed to two or more genes and can be measured quantitatively (variable traits)
- Take population and put it in an environment of variation in fitness (AA more frequent, Aa medium, aa poor)
- Next generation, frequency of aa will go down (will still be some ) and heterozygotes reproduce with each other to still form some aa, more fit Aa
Flower colour in snap dragons
- pink (dominant) vs yellow (recessive) flowers
- phenotypic variation: yellow and white flowers (condition 1)
- heritable variation: ss=yellow, Ss and SS=white (condition 2)
- fitness differences: bee visits and seed set (condition 3)
- association between fitness and heritable phenotype (condition 4)
- observe the number of pollinator visits and see which attracts most often = fitness
- natural selection shifted the frequency distribution of flower colour
Continuous traits
- displays a range of expression (such as weight, height, etc.) rather than an all-or-none appearance (such as white or red)
- height in humans separated by sex, follows normal bell distribution
- if there is a variation in fitness, height distribution is shifted to the right towards taller individuals in the next generation
Galapagos finch beaks
- phenotypic variation in beak depth (condition 1)
- parental phenotype predicts offspring phenotype
- variation in beak depth is heritable (condition 2)
- Showed beak depth was highly correlated with the average of the two parents
- Access large and hard seeds with bigger beaks =selection
- another bird species introduced that was already feeding on the large and hard seeds so finches could not adapt to the larger beaks due to lack of larger seeds
- severe drought reduced seed abundance, seeds are large and hard, strong selection on foraging
- survival low but nonzero (condition 3)
- finches with deeper beaks more likely to survive drought and reproduce in the future (condition 4)
- survivors passed on larger beaks to their offspring
- natural selection shifted average beak length
Properties of natural selection
- acts on individuals, affects populations
- acts on phenotypes, changes allele frequencies
- acts on individuals, not for the good of the species (what helps the current generation may be reversed for the next generation, only produces the best at the given moment)
- is not random, but not goal directed
- existing traits and new genes = novel phenotypes
- not perfect
Conceptual changes with Darwinism
- tree thinking
- population thinking (variation=opportunity, small changes accumulate to generate large scale patterns)
- natural selection explains speciation, change within species and extinction
- speciation is gradual (varieties to subspecies to species)
- difficulty in species definitions explained
Why Darwin?
- naturalist
- theoretical leanings (geology, math)
- experimentalist (breeding pigeons, measuring survival in birds)
- right time (age of exploration), right place
Five sub-theories in the Origin of Species
1) evolution (first Darwinian revolution, organisms are not constant through time)
2) common descent (=common ancestor)
3) multiplication of species (formation of many different species through domestication and artificial selection)
4) gradualism (changes occur gradually through time)
5) natural selection (increasing controversy, force in changing organisms through time)
Controversy about natural selection - Religious beliefs
- constant world
- unique position of man
- created world
- wise and benign creator (created things a certain way and shouldn’t be able to improve it by natural selection)
Controversy about natural selection - Secular beliefs (no religious beliefs)
- essentialism (for every species, there are a set of attributes which are necessary for its identity and function, if a bird has no feathers is it really a bird)
- physics envy (biology not easily reducible to a small number of mathematical principles, some physicists/chemists did not consider biology to be a real scientific discipline)
- teleology (organisms and structures were designed with a specific purpose in mind, they have a destiny, vultures=remove the dead from environment)
- political ideology
Controversy about natural selection - Secular beliefs (no religious beliefs): Political ideology
- Nazi Germany favoured Eugenics, firm belief in teleology (chose which children survived based on phenotypes)
- Pre-Soviet Russia a leader in genetics (crop breeding genetics for Russian climate)
- Stalin and communist leaders denounced and jailed geneticists, based agricultural policies in Russia and China on Lamarckian beliefs (own individual wealth should not be based on who’s children we are but instead from the collective communities, Lamarckian belief=children raised in hardship are expected to rise to the occasion, overcome it and have children that are also tough)
- Nikolai Vavilov=bourgeois geneticist, established worlds first seed bank
- Trofim Lysenko=crop breeding under this leader, used Lamarckian logic to breed for cold tolerance and fudged data, disastrous crop improvement programs, crop failures, food shortages and starvation
Lamarckian beliefs
a theory of evolution based on the principle that physical changes in organisms during their lifetime, such as greater development of an organ or a part through increased use, could be transmitted to their offspring
*extreme values
Controversy about natural selection - Missing/incorrect data
- origin of variation
- inheritance of variation, particularly for continuous traits
- age of earth
Alternatives to Natural Selection - Neo-Lamarckism
- combined elements of natural selection and Lamarckism
- “soft” inheritance
- very widespread
- even Darwin (by pushing ourselves to have the best athletic performance, we can somehow pass on these traits to our children)
Alternatives to Natural Selection - Orthogenesis
- mutations are directional rather than sporadic/random
- mostly palaeontologists
- variation internally generated
- fixed direction of change in species
- could explain extinct forms
- ex) horses started small then got larger, mutations themselves did this
Alternatives to Natural Selection - Mutationism and macroevolution
- spontaneous variants defined as “mutants”
- discrete variation
- mutations of large effects define new species
- chromosomal rearrangements known to simultaneously produce both major phenotypic effects and reproductive isolation
- chromosomal rearrangements=“hopeful monsters”
- ex) mutations in fly wings allowed fleas (no wings) to create a new species (are closely related to flies)
Foundations for consensus
1) hard inheritance
- Mendel and Weismann (mouse tails, chop off tail of parent and young still born with tail)
- organisms inherit traits from parents with only modest or no influence from the environment in which their parents lived
- genes are hardwired
2) revised calculations of the earth’s age
- understanding of sun changed
- evolution of diversity of life
3) contributions by geneticists
- chromosomal recombination allows for variation to be passed down the generations
- most mutations of small effect
- inheritance of continuous (polygenic) traits
- theory of population genetics (use of mathematical equations)
4) contributions by “naturalists”
- systematics and paleontology
- macro-evolutionary patterns in the fossil record
- geographic variation among populations
- individual variation within populations
Evolutionary synthesis
- second Darwinian revolution
- mutual education between geneticists and naturalists (looking at mutants, field work)
- Mayr=came up with biological species concept, great historian of entire period
- T Dobzhansky=Drosophila genetics, genetic variants in wild populations, ardent naturalist, familiar with population genetic theory
- incorporated mathematical theory of population genetics
- genetics, natural selection and chance events combine to cause adaptive evolution
- data from many different fields
Genetic variation
- ultimately a result of mutation
- per gene mutation rates=1 in 10 000 to 1 in 10 000 000
1) point mutation=creates new alleles (alternate forms of a single gene)
2) chromosomal inversion=alleles inside inversion are transmitted together as a unit
3) gene duplication=redundant genes may acquire new functions through accumulation of additional mutations
4) genome duplication=may create new species, massive gene duplication, first discovered in plants
Why the 1000 fold difference in gene mutation rates? Why may one gene undergo mutation more than another?
- some DNA sequences more prone to changes than others (repetitive DNA sequences)
- genes are not all the same size (bigger genes=more nucleotides=better chance of mutation)
- a less essential gene for survival more likely to pick up mutation
- more carefully conserved genes are those protected the most from mutation
- age=sloppier mutation
Genetic variation in the wild
1) Classical School
- a few rare mutants
- most of the population remains stable, no mutation
- evolution waits for mutational variation
- ex) Drosophila in lab
2) Balance School
- much allelic variation
- lots of phenotypic variation in population
- constantly changing population
- evolution waits for environmental change (dry vs wet year)
- ex) Drosophila in natural populations
Genetic variation in the wild: Visible polymorphisms
- shell banding patterns in snails (can track colour over time , see if one phenotype did better than another)
- stripes on garter snakes
- coat colour in mice (blend in with soil)
- need breeding studies to confirm genetic basis
Genetic variation in selection experiments
- Maize=selection on seed oil
- 3-fold difference in oil content after 60 years (generations) due to selection compared to the original population
- either due to new mutations or presence of already high oil content seed individuals
Genetic markers
- a gene or short sequence of DNA used to identify a chromosome or to locate other genes on a genetic map
- revolutionized the study of evolutionary genetics
- molecular phenotypes
- heritable and polymorphic (variable traits)
- reflect allelic (DNA) variation at a locus
- allow direct measurement of genetic differences without breeding experiments
Why are genetic markers useful?
- many species difficult to rear in captivity
- complex inheritance of many traits
- breeding experiments not often feasible