midterm Flashcards
principles of utilitarianism
actions that result in happiness have positive utility and ones that create misery have negative utility
what type of theory is utilitarianism
consequentialist
what are all sentient creatures deserving of
moral concern
advantages of utilitarianism
provides one with a decision procedure
objection of utilitarianism
it conflicts with moral intuitions, fails to recognize individual rights
utilitarians reply
consider the consequences and terror of the patients
John mills book describes
defense of individual freedom
2nd objection of utilitarianism
theory value claims that happiness is the greatest good (ultimate end)
3rd objection of utilitarianism
impossible to compare and weigh the happiness of one person against another
4th objection of utilitarianism
calculation of the probable consequences of actions
5th objection of utilitarianism
criticism concerns theory of responsibility it implies
act-utilitarianism
concerned consequences of specific acts
rule-utilitarianism
concerned consequences of general policies
kantain ethics
person
imanuel kant
groundworks for the metaphysics of moral
kants objections
consequences can never make action right or wrong
morality
motives-duty vs inclination
freedom
determination of will-autonomous vs heteronomous
reason
imperatives-categorical vs hypothetical
hypothetical vs categorical
if you want to achieve x, then do y and do y, whether you want or feel
humanity formula
never act in a way we treat humanity
autonomy formula
act so your maxims could be legislator of universal laws. focus on status of law givers not law followers
universalization
always act on maxim that you can consistently will as principle of action
what does morality require
all people must be treated equally
the transplant problem possess what
rational beings have dignity
objection of kantain ethics
not provided with a decision procedure but allows more individual autonomy
ethical theories tend to be…
reductionist, offering one idea as the key to morality
what does each theory claim
the discovery of the single standard of morality
what fundamental questions does the social contrast theory imply
- obligations are determined
2. fulfill our obligations
Hobbesian contractarianism
natural equality of physical power
kantain contractarianism
natural equality of moral status
more about kantain contractarianism
people matter because they are ends in themselves and everyone is entitled to equal consideration
rawlsian theory of justice
hypothetical social contrast
the hypothetical position everyone knows
they are human and have basic human needs
2 basic principles people choose to guide institutions of their society
- principle of liberty
2. principle of equality
universal right to health care
person
norman Daniels
sickness and disability prevent us from functioning normally, can’t compete with others
natural rights
person
John locke
people are equal and independent
libertarianism
- taking goods away from those who are entitled to them violates their rights
- biggest objection is disadvantage of those born in poverty