Midterm Flashcards
Globalization as a “global heritage” - Sen
- Posits idea that developments confined within Western conception – global civilization is a world heritage, not just a collection of disparate local cultures
- Viewing globalism as merely western imperialism = costly error, major global developments didn’t include West
Sen on distributional benefits of the global economy
1.Through withholding technology will not make poor people less poor, observe how the gap between rich/poor changes with shift
Ex: Women are doing better in general, but worse compared to men – wage gap
2.Increase fair trade, more accessible technology/institutions
3.How to improve intensification of networks
“Even if the poor were to get just a little richer, this would not necessarily imply that the poor were getting a fair share of the potentially vast benefits of global economic interactions”
Interdependence
1.Kaldor
2.Freedom/open space for different actors
Actors can contest domestic/international norms
Ex: international organizations
Globalism
- Keohane & Nye
- Thickening of density of networks of connections across multi-continental distances, increase international participation and institutional velocity (response speed)
- Branches – economic, military, environmental & social/cultural
Globalism
- Keohane & Nye
- Thickening of density of networks of connections across multi-continental distances, increase international participation and institutional velocity (response speed)
- Branches – economic, military, environmental & social/cultural
- Cohen & Nye Definition
2 main parts:
1. It involves networks of interdependence
1. In this network, it implies an increase in number and relationship
2. It is about multiple-relationships, not just single linkages
2. It is multi-continental
1. Regional networks of interdependence aren’t good enough either
2. EU might not fit this definition of globalism
1. Has to be multicontinental
3. In other words, it has to have a global reach
4. Globalism is about that global reach…not like interdependence
5. It cannot be one independent relationship
Thick globalism
Ex: financial markets, environmentalism is thickening
- Involve many relationships that are intensive as well as extensive: long-distance flows that are large and continuous, affecting the lives of many people.
- The operations of global financial markets today for instance, affect people from Peoria to Penang.
Social globalism
- Movement of ideas, information, people, media, norms and human rights (mostly increase through net)
- Process of international socialization, driven by norms
Ex: soap operas, tourism, internet users, MNC
Economic globalism
- Long distance transfers of goods, services, capital and information
- Trade: GDP ratio – small countries must engage in trade via importation, lower GDP
Ex: Singapore imports water
Military globalism
- Premise of introduction of force
Ex: Cold War between US and Soviet Union
Globalization (according Keohane and Nye)
- “Globalization” is the process by which globalism becomes increasingly thick.
Global Cities
- Sassen Saskia
- Transformation to new spatial order, city > state
Ex: New York, London & Tokyo - 4 characteristics of global cities:
- Highly concentrated sources for world economy
- Firms that specialize in producing things – global in nature (MNC location)
- Headquarters – of decision making and production
- Markets for those producers
Westphalian System
- Was established in 1648 as part of the Peace of Westphalia
- Three core points to the treaty
- The principle of state sovereignty
- The principle of (legal) equality of states
- The principle of non-intervention of one state in the international affairs of another
IMF
- International Monetary Fund
- International organization consisting of 189 countries working to foster global monetary cooperation, secure financial stability, facilitate international trade, promote high employment and sustainable economic growth, and reduce poverty around the world
- Functions:
- Designed to stabilize currency and exchange rates
- Provides short term loans to cover negative balances of trade
- States give up some control, but are assured stability of currency
WTO
- World Trade Organization
- International organization dealing with the global rules of trade between nations
- Main function is to ensure that trade flows as smoothly, predictably and freely as possible
- The result is assurance. Consumers and producers know that they can enjoy secure supplies and greater choice of the finished products, components, raw materials and services that they use. Producers and exporters know that foreign markets will remain open to them.
- The result is also a more prosperous, peaceful and accountable economic world. Virtually all decisions in the WTO are taken by consensus among all member countries and they are ratified by members’ parliaments. Trade friction is channelled into the WTO’s dispute settlement process where the focus is on interpreting agreements and commitments, and how to ensure that countries’ trade policies conform with them. That way, the risk of disputes spilling over into political or military conflict is reduced.
- By lowering trade barriers, the WTO’s system also breaks down other barriers between peoples and nations.
- At the heart of the system — known as the multilateral trading system — are the WTO’s agreements, negotiated and signed by a large majority of the world’s trading nations, and ratified in their parliaments. These agreements are the legal ground-rules for international commerce. Essentially, they are contracts, guaranteeing member countries important trade rights. They also bind governments to keep their trade policies within agreed limits to everybody’s benefit.
- The agreements were negotiated and signed by governments. But their purpose is to help producers of goods and services, exporters, and importers conduct their business.
- The goalis to improve the welfare of the peoples of the member countries
Winners of free trade
- Exporters with competitive advantage
- Workers who gain jobs in export industries
- Net economic welfare gains for society
- Consumer who benefit from cheaper import prices
- Domestic firms who see higher demand from consumers who now have more disposable income due to cheaper imports
- Consumers who see lower prices due to competitive pressure of trade