Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Public Policy > Midterm > Flashcards

Midterm Flashcards

1
Q

How many sentences can the short question answers be?

A

4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Deborah Stone distinguishes between equity and equality. Explain the distinction she makes

A

I use the word “equality” to denote sameness and to signify the part of a distribution that contains uniformity—uniformity of slices, or of meals, or of voting power, for example. I use “equity” to denote distributions regarded as fair, even though they contain both equalities and inequalities
(TA)
Obviously, for Stone, equity and equality are each contestable concepts in their own right (meaning political actors compete to define them). But the basic difference between the two is that equity has something to do with the outcomes, whereas equality is just about the inputs. This can make a huge difference in policy terms. Take education: should we ensure that per-pupil funding is the same for all students (i.e. equality), or purposefully distribute funds to equalize outcomes in student performance (i.e. equity). In the latter, this will mean that students with disadvantages and less innate ability receive more funding than their more advantaged peers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe three differences between a policy analyst and a policy politician

A

Analysts: Efficiency
Politicians: distribution

analysts: outputs
politicians: inputs

analysts: sunk costs not worth it
politicians: sunk costs look bad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do Schneider and Ingram define “target populations”?

A

policy is purposeful and attempts to achieve goals by changing people’s behavior. By specifying eligibility criteria, policy creates the boundaries of target pop- ulations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Deborah Stone: “Markets can’t produce _____ b/c markets are inherently _____ and ______”

A

community; competitive, divisive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is wrong with thinking of policy making in market terms? (Stone)

A

does not include aspects of sentimentality, altruism, loyalty, influence (group socialization), cooperation, incomplete info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are Stone’s thoughts about efficiency?

A

“If we start from the premise that efficiency itself is a contestable idea about what constitutes social welfare, then the best way to organize society to achieve efficiency is to provide a democratic governing structure that allows for these contests to be expressed and addressed in a fair way.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are 10 characteristics of the Polis?

A
  1. It is a community, or perhaps multiple communities, with ideas, images, will, and effort quite apart from individual goals and behavior.
  2. Its members are motivated by both altruism and self-interest.
  3. It has a public interest, whose meaning people fight about and act upon.
  4. Most of its policy problems are commons problems.
  5. Influence is pervasive, and the boundary between influence and coercion is always contested (sources of ideas & preferences)
  6. Cooperation is as important as competition.
  7. Loyalty is the norm.
  8. Groups and organizations form the building blocks.
  9. Information is interpretive, incomplete, and strategic.
  10. It is governed by the laws of passion as well as the laws of matter
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Stone’s definition of equality?

A

Same size share for everybody

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does Stone describe as the rationality project?

A

the quest for an apolitical science of government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe the Market Model (from lecture)

A
  • Individuals pursue self interest, altruism is defined away
  • public interests= sum of individual interests
  • ideas and interests self generalized; decisions are based of gain maximization, info is complete, Laws of Matter rule, Market exchange drives change/improvement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe the Polis Model (from lecture)

A
  • Community interests are central
  • altruism can motivate decisions
  • public interests= good for community
  • ambiguity is the rule, not the exception
  • groups, ideas, passions, matter
  • “Common Problems” are ubiquitous i.e. educational inequality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are Stone’s arguments about numbers? Lecture example?

A
  • The fundamental issues of any policy conflict are always contained in the question of how to count the problem
  • counting always involves deliberate decisions
  • Word count in an assigned paper seems neutral until you start asking if it is too long/short, do u count prepositions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is an example of wrongful exclusion in counting?

A

incarceration #s in unemployment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is an example of wrongful inclusion in counting?

A

counting hospital beds for health planning, ppl thought beds in their worn-down local hospitals should not count as much as Mayo Clinic beds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why is counting political?

A
  1. Counting requires decisions about categorizing, about what or whom to include and exclude.
  2. Measuring any phenomenon implicitly creates norms about how much is too little, too much, or just right.
  3. Numbers can be ambiguous, and so leave room for political struggles to control their interpretation.
  4. Numbers are used to tell stories, such as stories of decline (“we are approaching a crisis”).
  5. Numbers can create the illusion that a very complex and ambiguous phenomenon is simple, countable, and precisely defined.
  6. Numbers can create political communities out of people who share some trait that has been counted.
  7. Counting can aid negotiation and compromise, by making intangible qualities seem divisible.
  8. Numbers, by seeming to be so precise, help bolster authority of those who count.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Numbers promote what? example

A

Numbers promote conflict resolution; roe v wade, “weighing of competing factors” “relative weights of the respective interest involved”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Why is counting double-edged?

A

requires observation, which can cause changes in behavior (reactivity) i.e pay for performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is basic Stone idea about numbers?

A

If numbers are thus artifacts of political life, and if they are themselves
metaphors, symbols, and stories, are they “real” in any sense?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What does Stone believe about policy conflicts?

A

policy conflicts do not arise out of lack of facts. The “deeper and more important conflicts are over values”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the assumption about the cause of conflict that Stone disagrees with?

A

-Most conflict is seen to derive from ignorance, lack of facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What does Stone believe to be at the heart of conflict?

A

Sure, policy disputes entail some disputes over facts, but the deeper and more important conflicts are over values.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What does Stone believe about facts?

A
  • Facts are produced via social processes and institutions
  • Facts must be interpreted
  • There are no neutral facts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What are Stone’s 3 Dimensions of Distribution?

A

1) recipients: who gets something?
2) Item: what do they get
3) process: how do they get it?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Recipients: Who gets something?

A

Membership, Merit (i.e. donuts for people who participated; membership doesn’t go by merit), rank (vertical equity i.e. TAs only), groups i.e. women only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Items: What do they get?

A

Need i.e. hungry ppl need donuts, Value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Process: How do they get it?

A

Competition (market) if you pay for it you can have it; lotteries; elections

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

How do you analyze distributive problems?

A
  • identify recipients: what criteria make them eligible? Why?
  • Identify item:how do we define what is being distributed? How can changing this change our calculus of equity?
  • Identify process: who decided how distribution is being carried out and how do they make that decision? Identify your biases and inclinations?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Define efficiency

A

maximize outputs relative to inputs, efficiency is dynamic, no one likes inefficiency; efficiency is a contestable idea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What does Stone think about measuring efficiency?

A

measuring efficiency is like trying to pull yourself out of quicksand without a rope

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What does Stone mean when she says, “the distribution of national cake is a political choice?”

A

The equality-efficiency trade-off is not an immutable natural law. Rather, political leaders choose to promote economic growth in different ways and to distribute the fruits of the economy in different ways, too.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Is there an equality-efficiency trade-off? motivation

A

Yes: Maintaining equality reduces or eliminates the motivation to work
No: People arc motivated to work by inherent satisfactions. self-esteem, need for belonging, and desire to contribute to the common good.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Is there an equality-efficiency trade-off? waste

A

Yes: Maintaining equality requires bureaucracy, and bureaucracy equals waste.
No: Administration is a productive activity in itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Is there an equality-efficiency trade-off? redistribution

A

Yes: Redistribution to maintain equality reduces economic growth
No: Redistribution does not reduce economic growth; it stimulates work, innovation, and risk-taking by providing economic security.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Is there an equality-efficiency trade-off? inevitable

A

Yes: A trade-off between equality and efficiency is inevitable.
No: Society can have both equality and economic growth; how to balance these goals is a political choice

36
Q

Define efficiency

A

It has come to mean the ratio between input and output, effort and results, expenditure and income, or cost and benefit; there are many possible paths to the goal of “most value for the money

37
Q

What 4 questions does Cairney identify as helping inform definition of public policy?

A

1) does government action include what policymakers say they will do as well as what they actually do?
2) does it include the effects of the decision as well as the decision itself?
3) what is the gov’t and does it include elected and unelected policymakers?
4) does public policy include what policymakers do not do?

38
Q

Behn: what is the difference between policy analyst and policy politicians with regards to outcome?

A
  • outputs are what concern analysts i.e. effectiveness of military
  • inputs are what concern politicians i.e. profits and military jobs for constituents
39
Q

What does Behn suggest about the role of policy analysts?

A

Policy analysts should take active roles in not only the formation of effective policy but of a political strategy; analyst should have background knowledge about similar attempts; don’t fall into trap thinking it’s “impossible”

40
Q

What does Orren & Skroneck view as the opposite of policy? Define them

A

rights; claims that one person, in or outside gov’t, may make on the persons or actions of another, enforceable in a court of law

  • policy looks ahead, rights look backwards -rights cannot be reavaluated or modified;
  • rights are attached to individuals
  • “natural locale” of rights is judiciary
41
Q

What are Orren & Skroneck’s key claims?

A
  • the dilution of rights and the erosion of structure are twin features of state formation in modern America
  • expanding policy state has nationalized politics
  • expanding policy state proliferates rights but also makes them weak and unstable
42
Q

How does Orren & Skroneck define structure?

A

a set of conjectures or extrapolations derived from an arrangement of parts; exerts influence over both rights and policy

43
Q

How do O & S define policy?

A
  • a commitment to a designated goal or course of action, made authoritatively on behalf of a given entity, and accompanied by guidelines for its accomplishment
  • motive (an animating premise or theme) is embedded in the apparatus of government
44
Q

What does O & S argue about policy’s reach?

A

“We argue that policy has expanded its role in American government and society by eroding the boundaries and dissolving the distinctions that once constrained policy’s reach;” the only game in town

45
Q

What does O & S argue about policy and progress?

A

“Now that policy has infiltrated every aspect of American life, now that it spews out of every corner of the state apparatus, now that there is little agreement a/b how pressing problems should be addressed, or in what order and at what expense, the promises of progressivism are wearing thin”

46
Q

What is Baumgartener & Jones’ policy image?

A

beliefs, perceptions about policy

47
Q

What is Baumgartener & Jones’ policy venue?

A

institutions where policies are fought over in

48
Q

What is Baumgartener & Jones’ main point?

A

when policy image and venue change, you’re more likely to see policy change

49
Q

Define Kingdon’s policy window? What leads to one opening?

A

period in which policy change is possible; when multiple streams come together

50
Q

What are Kingdon’s 3 streams?

A

1) problem- i.e. if the problem in K-12 is low achievement, that would suggest certain policy solutions; constructed; come to the fore w/focusing events
2) policy- policy solution, different from problem
3) political-favorable conditions in institutions

51
Q

What is coupling? (Kingdon)

A

combining the streams

52
Q

Describe role of the policy entrepreneur (Kingdon)

A

as opposed to ppl hammering out problems, entrepreneurs (bureaucrats, lobbyists) have solutions but are waiting for problem to arise so they can couple solution w/problem; want to define problem, solution comes first; waiting for new window to open

53
Q

Describe the Advocacy-coalition framework’s policy actors vs multiple streams

A

greater emphasis on individual ppl; focused also on coalitions of actors i.e. bureaucrats

54
Q

What is bounded rationality?

A

a third party looking back and recognizing limits on actors; ability is limited to intake information

55
Q

ACF subsystems

A

b/c of the complexity of society and its issues, participants must specialize if they are to have any hope of being influential. This specialization occurs within policy subsystems composed of participants who regularly seek to influence policy within a policy subsystem, such as California water policy; Lecture: “issue-specific network”

56
Q

Describe the 3 beliefs of ACF

A

1) deep core: deep, normative beliefs a/b how the world works
2) policy core: policy-specific, normative implications/causes within policy subsystem
3) secondary: operational beliefs; can debate as potential solutions when we agree on underlying problem

57
Q

Define ACF (lecture definition)

A

comprehensive approach involving a broad scope of actors when we have problems that involve deep ideological disagreement, lots of ambiguity, scientific + technical information that can be used in a variety of ways

58
Q

What are the implications of bounded rationality?

A
  • We may be more instrumental in deciding what info to process (could lead to bias)
  • different from assuming ppl are omnipotent actors
59
Q

What is policy according to the ACF?

A

policy is a translation of core beliefs as articulated through interactions of coalitions

60
Q

Describe Canes-Wrone’s graph about responsiveness

A

constant, positive slope; public opinion may matter, but it does not guarantee that what the public wants will happen, shows that the probability of policy has a sensitivity to public opinion; more popular policies more likely to happen

61
Q

Describe Canes-Wrone’s graph about congruence

A

horizontal line, vertical line, horizontal line: one support gets over a particular point, policy happens; avoids scenario where vast majority of people support something and it doesn’t happen

62
Q

What is responsiveness conditional on?

A

electoral cycle, issue salience, policy domain, need-based popularity

63
Q

How is responsiveness unequal?

A

varies by income/wealth, race

64
Q

In their article “The Public Presidency,” what do Canes-Wrone argue?

A

popular appeals increase chances of legislative success, popularity of President is NOT central (less intuitive b/c before ppl thought popularity was key), Prez will not always follow P.O.

65
Q

What were Canes-Wrone’s findings about Presidential appeals?

A

mass appeals increased budgetary success for popular AND unpopular presidents; popularity does NOT effect issue positions, didn’t find evidence that unpopular presidents support popular issues

66
Q

Canes Wrone found that the president has influence only on _____ ____ ____ _____

A

policy issues he promotes

67
Q

Canes Wrone found that the president is more likely to promote ____ _____

A

popular proposals

68
Q

In Mayer’s article, “Executive Orders and Presidential Power,” what does he say Presidents use executive orders for?

A

make substantive policy, exercise emergency powers, strengthen their control over executive branch agencies and administrative processes, emphasize important symbolic stances, and maintain their electoral and governing coalitions.

69
Q

What did Gilens & Page find in “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens?”

A

ordinary citizens have little influence on policy, organized interests and economic elites have substantial influence; democracy by convenience = orginary ppl gt what they want from gov’t only when they happen to agree w/interest groups and elites

70
Q

What is majoritarian pluralism & why does it seem valid at face value?

A

dueling and diverse groups shape policy; conflict & struggle representative enough to generally be in line w/public preferences; Madison Federalist 10; seems valid b/c preferences of avg. citizens are positively and highly correlated w/preferences of elite

71
Q

What are Fung’s 4 democratic deficits? Define democratic deficits

A

difficulties that prevent electoral institutions from making government responsive

1) citizens have unclear, unstable preferences i.e. minimum wage good or bad?
2) elections are blunt signals for preferences even when stable
3) difficult for citizens to use elections to compel politicians (accountability) to act to advance popular interests rather than their elite ends
4) the state itself may lack the capacity to produce outcomes that advance citizens’ interests well

72
Q

Name Fung’s proposals to reduce minimal representation

A

deliberative polling,

73
Q

What is deliberative polling? (Fung) citizen juries?

A

random sample of ppl, educate them, have them ask questions to officials and experts, poll them again; don’t have to form consensus; citizen juries meet for longer and offer recommendations

74
Q

What 2 things does the social construction of the target population refer to? (Schneider and Ingram)

A

The social construction of a target population refers to 1) the recognition of the shared characteristics that distinguish a target population as socially meaningful, and 2) the attribution of specific, valence-oriented of values, symbols, and images to the characteristics

75
Q

What are characteristics of Advantaged target populations? (Schneider and Ingram) Give examples

A

Positive and strong; The elderly, business, veterans, scientist; substantive benefits

76
Q

What are characteristics of Dependents target populations? (Schneider and Ingram) Give examples

A

Positive and weak; Children, mothers, disabled; symbolic benefits

77
Q

What are characteristics of Contenders target populations? (Schneider and Ingram) Give examples

A

Negative and strong; The rich, big unions, minorities, cultural elites, moral majority; symbolic burdens

78
Q

What are characteristics of Deviants target population? (Schneider and Ingram) Give examples

A

Negative and Weak; criminals, drug addicts, communists, flag burners, gangs; substantive burdens

79
Q

What does Mumper say in “Does Policy Design Matter? Comparing Universal and Targeted Approaches to Encouraging College Participation”

A

Not a big difference, universal design may be more politically viable; reverse-targeting i.e. state merit scholarships rewards the powerful while holding
down program costs

80
Q

In “Lobbying and Influence” (Leech,) what 3 theories does she brand as most prominent in the studies she examined?

A

1) it may be a simple case of bribery or bought votes. That is what the many PAC studies would seem to suggest.
2) it may be that interest groups are influential because they help members get re‐elected, by providing information (signals) about constituency preferences and by their potential to mobilize constituencies in support or opposition to a candidate.
3) it may be that interest groups help make policymaking itself easier by serving as service bureaus, working with allied members of Congress, providing information, mobilizing publics, attracting media attention, and generally subsidizing the activities of government officials.

81
Q

In “Lobbying and Influence” (Leech,) which theory does she conclude has the most evidence?

A

3: provision of information and other policy‐related aid is a source of interest group influence

82
Q

In terms of interest groups, what is meant by majoritarian pluralism and majoritarian electoral democracy?

A

the difference between a government that responds to the preferences of a majority of voters (majoritarian electoral democracy), and a government that responds to whomever has the most interest groups representation (majoritarian pluralism). To understand why this matters, think about what groups are represented by interest groups (see Schlozman article), and how their interests might differ from the preferences of the median voter.

83
Q

What are the 5 conditions under which responsiveness varies in “A Democratic Polity” (Manza and Cook)?

A
  1. elections
  2. issue salience
  3. fiscal costs of being responsive
  4. policy domain (a lot of interests=status quo, social movements=pressure to reform)
  5. previous conditions (path dependency=low responsiveness)
84
Q

Define biased pluralism

A

dueling and unrepresentative groups shape policy; Schattschneider (flaw in the pluralist heaven,) interest group conflict tilts toward elite; Baumgartener–> no interest groups towards janitors, professionals, not elite

85
Q

Define economic-elite domination

A

Gilens & Page; ordinary citizens have little influence on policy

Public Policy (1 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions