Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

POLI 03 > Midterm > Flashcards

Midterm Flashcards

1
Q

Which of these hypotheses does our data support?

  1. The USA has a higher GDP, per capita, than the UK or South Africa.
  2. Having a Monarchy makes countries less wealthy per capita.
  3. Having a President makes countries more wealthy per capita.
  4. When Prof. de Kadt lives somewhere it becomes a democracy.
A
  1. The USA has a higher GDP, per capita, than the UK or South Africa.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Consequentialism (Bentham)

A

We should look at outcomes(utility, happiness, etc.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Deontology (Kant)

A

We should rely on a priori rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Contractarianism (Rousseau)

A

We should invoke agreements and obligations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Care-ethics (Gilligan)

A

We should show compassion for the vulnerable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Value-ethics (Aristotle)

A

We should take actions that show virtues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Utilitarianism (Bentham,Mill)

A
  • Human happiness is the ultimate“ good”

* Take actions that maximize utility/ happiness/ welfare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Liberalism

A

is concerned with orienting politics around freedoms

One of the most important political frameworks in human history

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Negative liberty

A

Freedom from:
Violence, fear, oppression, censorship, etc
Can be freedom from government, or from others
Th ability to act without constraint from othesrs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Positive Liberty

A

Freedom to:
Self-actualize, take opportunities, etc
The ability to act upon your own will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Egalitarianism

A

concerned with orienting politics around equality

An increasingly dominant modern political worldview

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fraternity

A

Humans must be unified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Concepts

A

Constituent units of the political world

→e.g. “State,” “Democracy,” “Wealth,” “Elections,” “Voters,” “Support”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Hypotheses and Theories

A

How concepts fit together

→e.g. “Democracy→Wealth”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Measures

A

The data we can observe in lieu of the concept

→e.g. “Boundaries,” “Polity IV,” “GDP,” “Dates,” “Voting Stations,” “Polls”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Inferences

A

Conclusions we draw from our data

→e.g. “A Polity IV score of 10↑wealth by$500 GDP per capita”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The scientific process is iterative

A
  1. Understand current theory [if it exists]
  2. Observe world
  3. Refine theory [if needed]
  4. Generate hypothesis [from theory]
  5. Test hypothesis [with a good test]
  6. Evaluate theory→Update [beliefs about] theory
  7. Back to step 1
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

A good measure is

A

Valid (it measures the right concept)

Reliable (it repeatedly gives us consistent measures)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

A good inference is

A

Unbiased (we are not mistaken)
•Constrained (we are not going beyond the data)
•Reproducible (you would draw the same inference using the same data)
•Replicable (we can draw the same inference using new data)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Coordination

A

Humans working together often produce better outcomes for all.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Competition

A

Humans competing can often be beneficial to all.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Public goods

A

Non-excludable: No one can be stopped from using the good
Non-rival: One person using a good doesn’t crowd out others
→No incentive for private individuals to invest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Coordination and competition require:

A
  1. Trust
    →Will others behave the way they say they will?
  2. Enforcement
    →If you cheat, will you be punished?
  3. Leadership
    →Is someone going to incur the personal cost to provide oversight?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Life without the modern State

A 
No central authority
•No(agreed-upon) laws
•No(agreed-upon) rights
•No police force 
•No court system
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

The State can provide a solution to these problems:

A
  1. Trust
    →Known rules of the game help develop trust
  2. Enforcement
    →Established law and order create expectations about consequences
  3. Leadership
    →Provides a vehicle for political elites to rule
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

State

A

Institutional: Comprised of rules and norms(e.g. a constitution)
Complex: Has multiple organs(e.g. police, military, courts, bureaucracy)
Defined: Corresponds to a population and a territory

27
Q

Regime

A

Constrained: Bound by the rules of The State
Governing: Has executive and legislative functions
Momentary: Corresponds to a set of people holding office

28
Q

The Weberian State

A

Max Weber: Monopoly over the legitimate use of violence.

29
Q

The Territorial State

A

Charles Tilly: Violent power over territory, defined by functions.

30
Q

The Predatory State

A

Margaret Levi: Organized extraction from society.

31
Q

The state is defined by five features:

A
  1. Power: The state can compel compliance
  2. Territory: The state has a defined territory
  3. Population: The state stands over a defined population
  4. Extractive: The state raises revenue from its people
  5. Institutional: Exists irrespective of a particular regime/government
32
Q

Diverging Paths

A
  1. Capital:
    Concentration:
    Are economic resources concentrated to dispersed?
    Accumulation: Have people stocked economic resources?
  2. Coercion:
    Concentration:
    Is force concentrated or dispersed?
    Accumulation: Is there a stock of violent means?
33
Q

Capital-diffuse

A

Requires lots of coercion(“Empires”).

34
Q

Coercive-diffuse:

A

Requires lots of capital(“City-States”).

35
Q

Balance

A

Create sustained military forces (“ModernStates”).

36
Q

Neither

A

The State cannot sustain(“Non-States”).

37
Q

State Capacity

A
  1. Projection of Power:
    Public goods provision (what about partisan provision?)
    Low levels of conflict (what about violent crime?)
    Infrastructure reach (what about geographic spread?)
  2. Raising Revenue:
    Clear and fair tax code (what about different systems?)
    Percent of projected tax raised (what if projections are wrong?)
38
Q

State Collapse

A
  • Violence: From within vs. outside.
  • Political: Do institutional features still apply?
  • Services: Failure to provide what is expected.
  • Legitimacy: Eroded trust and support by citizens and elites?
39
Q

The Origins of Collapse

A

• EconomicOrigins:
Conflict emerges over inequality and resources
Sudden shocks to state revenues
• PoliticalOrigins:
Social cleavages are wielded by elites Excessive predation by powerful elites
Ex:Colombia (80s), Somalia (90s), Venezuela (2017)

40
Q

Collapse of the DRC

A
  1. The never-established State:
    → From the beginning, the State was designed only to extract
    → Never a non-personalized bureaucracy or set of rules and norms
  2. State capacity vs. State size:
    → Low capacity but huge space created vacuums
    → Poor public infrastructure limited State reach
  3. Resource-rich, wealth-poor, highly unequal: → Much to be gained, but little to be lost
    → Incentives for elites were to fight
41
Q

Monarchy

A 
Definition: The leader inherits power
Authority: History, Conquest, or God
Assignment: Hereditary (the child of the previous ruler)
Measurement:
→ Presence of a set monarch/family 
→ Absence of freedoms
42
Q

Dictatorship

A

Definition: A ruler or party without formal contestation Authority: Force, Fragility
Assignment: Military might and bureaucratic capture
Measurement:
→ Absence of alternation or contestation
→ Any elections are not free and fair
→ Absence of freedoms
Ex:
Totalitarian
Authoritarian
Racial Oligarchy
Economic Oligarchy

43
Q

Democracy

A

Definition: The “demos” (people) elevate or eject leaders Authority: The “will” of the people
Assignment: Direct (referenda) or representative (elections)
Measurement:
→ Regular elections
→ Separation of powers
→ Peaceful alternations in control

44
Q

The Mass-Driven Democracy

A
  1. People hold opinions and views
  2. They express those views to elect representatives
  3. Representatives go forth and represent
  4. Outcomes are the “will of the people”
45
Q

The Elite-Driven Democracy

A
  1. Elites hold opinions and views
  2. They go forth and campaign on their views
  3. Elites carve up the electorate
    4 . Outcomes come from “selection among elites”
46
Q

Variation in Democracy

A

• Parliamentaryvs.Presidential
→ Is the executive directly elected?
• Proportional representation vs. First-past-the-post
→ How do we aggregate votes into seats?
• Federalvs.Central
→ Is power devolved to smaller political entities?
• Party-centricvs.Candidate-centric
→ Do political actors belong to larger coordinating groups?

47
Q

The Case Against Democracy

A
  1. Investment
    → Democracy is susceptible to non-future oriented populism.
  2. Particularistic Pressures
    → Politics requires compromise, democracy requires more.
  3. Technocracy
    → Non-democracies can concentrate technical expertise
48
Q

The Case For Democracy

A

1 Capture
→ Democracy may be less likely to lead to personalistic capture.
2 Property rights
→ Democracies may better enshrine property rights.
3 Certainty - investment
→ Democracies may provide more stable future prospects.

49
Q

Democratic Transitions

A 
Definition: Moving from dictatorship to democratic mode. Measure: A first free and fair election.
Theories:
1. Economic Modernization
Economic wealth → democratic demands
2. Socio-Cultural Change
Culture of liberalism → social movements
3. External Pressures
International political-economic pressure → pliant elites
50
Q

Democratic Consolidation

A

Definition: Remaining a democracy after change. Measure: A successful democratic power alternation. Theories:
1. Economic Modernization
Wealthy societies → protect what they have
2. Post-Materialist Cultures
Material and political stability → move past pure self-interest
3. External Pressures
Economic inter-connectedness → a lot to lose

51
Q

Democratic Backsliding

A

Definition: Receding from democratic to dictatorship mode. Measure: A coup, a failed alternation, a cancelled election. Theories:
1. Economic Crises
Gulf between expectations and reality → opportunities for elites
2. Violent Threat
Moments of national fear → waning of civil liberties
3. Military Coups
Strong military relative to other organs → displace elected leaders

52
Q

Hypotheses of Democracy:

A
  1. Low inequality → no transition
  2. Low costs of repression + high inequality → no transition
  3. High costs of repression + high inequality → transition
53
Q

Modernization:
Empirical regularity that high wealth countries don’t revert.
Culture:
Appear to be attitudinal changes associated with regime types.
Internationalization:
Correlation between interdependence and political systems.
Crises:
Crises do appear to set off change, good and bad.
Inequality:
Higher inequality typically associated with political instability.

A

correlation does not imply causation

54
Q

Brazil

What Happened?

A
  1. Persistent elites:
    → Small exclusive set of (wealthy) elites
  2. Powerful military:
    → Disproportionate authority and power
  3. Crises, compounded:
    → Brazilian economy is susceptible to price shocks
55
Q

Representation

A

Definition: Elected elites who act on voters’ behalf. Can synthesize diffuse preferences.
Can prioritise particular dimensions.
Can establish expertise or competency.
Are usually forced to compromise with others in creating law.

56
Q

Quality of Representation

A

Definition: Correspondence of voters’ preferences and elites’ actions.
Which dimensions matter?
→Some argue all, others just the electoral mandate.
Which voters matter?
→Some argue everyone, others just winners.

57
Q

Challenges to Representation

A
  1. Absent preferences
  2. Tyranny of the majority
  3. Dynamic representation
  4. Lobbying
58
Q

Regime components:

A

Executive: A core of people who execute government’s will
{Presidents, prime ministers, cabinet, ministers, secretaries, bureaucrats}
• Legislature: A body of representatives who create law
{Speaker, members of parliament, senators, representatives, committee groups}
• Judiciary: System of legal courts for arbitration and mediation
{Constitutional courts, judges, lawyers}
• Sub-National Units: More local units of government
{Provinces, US States, municipalities, cities, towns, etc.}

59
Q

Number of chambers

A

Unicameral: Single chamber of parliament Bi/tricameral: Two (or three) chambers of parliament

60
Q

Electoral Systems

A

Votes: Individual eligible voters’ choices on election day Seats: Individual representatives in a legislature
Representativeness?
No. seats ÷ no. votes (à : ] → Higher, more representative Equality of seats per voter → Equality of representation?

61
Q

Judiciary

A

Issue: How much power do legal courts have?
Representativeness?
Interventionist court system → less representation
Laissez faire court system → tyranny of majority

62
Q

Sub-National Government

A

Moving power from larger political units to smaller units
Representativeness?
Unitary system → Less direct representation
Federal system → Tyranny of the majority (depends on geography)

63
Q

United Kingdom

A
  1. Parliamentary regime
    → Head of executive is Prime Minister
    → Beholden to House of Commons (lower house)
    → Head of State is a largely ceremonial Monarch
  2. First-past-the-post
    → Bicameral with one elected, one quasi-inherited chamber
    → Lower house: Full FPTP
    → Upper house: Peers (some appointed, some hereditary)
64
Q

The European Union

A
  1. Executive
    → Essentially semi-presidential
  2. Legislative
    → Bicameral system
    → Unequal and hierarchical
    → Lower house: Directly elected via varying PR systems
    → Upper house: Indirectly appointed by governments
  3. Supra-national Powers
    → High economic competence, “shared” elsewhere

POLI 03 (1 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions