Midterm Flashcards
archaeology
the study of the HUMAN past through the systematic recovery and analysis of material remains
classic archaelology
abour description, limited to ROMAN EMPIRE more or less
anthropological archaeology
more theory and questions asked, more question orientd
physical anthropology
study of humans as biological orgs–human ev and ancient DNA an primatology
cultural anthro
the way people live, customs, values beliefs–enthnography
linguistic anthro
study of languages
the concept of material culture
everything that is tangible in reference to humans (even soil)
archaeology vs history
history is looking at written docs–BUT subjective and losese non-written culture and the disempowered
arch, focuses on all MATERIAL CULTURES–BUT still know more when we have written documents
archaeological inquiry
arch addresses anthropological questions–anthropological archaeology follows the scientific method (question–>hypoth–>research design–>analyze results–>hypoth true of false–> next question)–exception is that most arch is destructive and non repeatable
Body Rituals of the Nacirema (reading)
commentary on how we think of other cultures
Nacirema=america backwards
holy mouth man=dentist
obsession with cleanliness
Pristine Myth (reading)
idea that europeans colonized the untouched lands
- author is a geographer
- did aerial surveys of the Amazon
- looking at landscape
- there is no “pristine” amazon–it is clearly touched but it has not been colonized (?)
BC, BCE, AD and CE (and order of year and time stamp thing)
Before Christ=BC=BCE=Before common era
500 BCE
AD=anno domini=CE=Common Era
CE 500
Hesiod’s 5 stages
Greek Mythology Age of Gold Age of Silver Age of Bronze (bronze armor) Age of Epic Heroes Age of Iron (when Hesiod lived)
Quiche’ Popul Vuh SEE LATER NOTES AND INTERNET
ancient Mayan origin story
maize god, hero twins and proper humans are made from maize
European Renaissance
14th century-17th century
- rediscovery of ancient greeks and romans
- antiquarians–appreciation of art for sake of collecting
Key conceptual advances
Antiquity of the earth and human kind
Darwin’s principles of evolution
Thomsen’s 3-age system
-The way people started thinking about ethics
Archbishop James Ussher of Armagh, Primate of All Ireland and Chancellor Trinity College (AD 1581-1656)
“calculated” the age of Earth based on the bible written genealogies and other sources
- world created on Saturday October 22. 4004 BC
- people believed this for a while
creationism and catastrophism
god created a perfect world exactly as we see t
great flood–Noah’s arc
BUT how do we explain neaderthal remains or vocanic eruptions only effecting the entire earth?
Thomsen’s 3-age system
- Stone, bronze, iron
- Christian Thomsen
- Curator of Danish National Museum
- 1836 Guide to northern antiquity
- first to order artifacts chronologically, based on context of finds
- AHHH something else here
Principle of Uniformitarianism
18th-19th century
the same geological processes that we see happening in the present have happened in the past–uniform processes
-these processes are so slow that the earth must be ancient
-HUTTON AND LYELL ARE IMPORTANT in this moder of thinking
Stratigrpahy and antiquity
subsurface layers produce ordered fossil groups
newer things closer to top
-John Frere 1797 says that things are under the surface and that we don’t have a full understanding of things–not accepted at first
Darwin’s Principles of Evolution (1859)
- Book on the origin of species about animals
- Evolution is the best explanation for origin and change of species
- Natural selection is the mechanism for change
- On the origin of species about animals did not touch on humans
Principles of evolution (19th c.)
- Change takes place over a long period of time
- An ancient earth plus slow change points to great antiquity of the human species…
- Human adaptation are physical and cultural?
First scientific excavation in the US
•American Archaeology 1784–
Thomas Jefferson
• First scientific excavations in the US
• Aimed to find evidence of indigenous mound-builders
• Believed that there was no way these mound-builders could be native Americans
They wanted to prove the mound builders were European
Cyrus Thomas (1825-1910)
- Government financed research
- 12 years of research
- published report in 1894
- concluded mounds were built by Native Americans
- arch as politics
box trench method
i think its that you dig a trench and then put box in it for safety or something
AV KIDDER (1885-1963)
o Stressed anthropological understanding
o ONE OF MOST IMPORTANT NAMES
o Incorporated many lines of research
o Built a ceramic typology of the North American Southwest based on stratigraphy
o Also worked in Mesoamerica among ruins of the ancient Maya
Culture
an integrated system of beliefs, traditions, and customs that govern or influence a person’s behavior. Culture is learned, shared by members of a group, and based on the ability to think in terms of symbols
Sir Edward burnett tylor (1832-1917)
culture is learned it is not biological or genetic
Unilinear Evolution
• Savagery→civilization
o This is clearly wrong
• Culture is shared at group level
Adaptive perspective:
Human behavior is shaped by technology ecology, demography and economy
Ideological perspective
Human behavior is shaped by ideas symbols and mental structures
Paradigms
Culture history—first half of 1900s
New or processual archaelology—1960s
Post processual arch 1980s
Processual plus—today
Culture History
first half of 1900s
• Following Darwin/Tylor
• Franz Boas
• Approach that dominates archaeology the first hald of the 20th century
• Based on a description of the arch record and the ordering of past events in time and space
• Emphasis is WHAT, WHEN and WHERE events took place in the past
o Why and how are missing
Processual arch
Lewis binford’s new arch Cultural processes approach How cultures change over time Group agnency not individual—seeks universal laws Behavior Culture as a system Systems theory Adaptive approach Scientific objective disconnected from the present
Scientific method
- Ovesercation/definition of a problrm
- Retest
- Publish
- Analysis.interpretation
- Test
- Data collection
- Empiracle implication
Levels of theory
Low level theory: Data—observations of objects
Middle level theory: behavior from data
High level theory: big questions—ideology etc
Middle level theory
A big part of processual arch • Ethnoarchaeology o Go to traditional societies and do anthro o Ask questions o How do they live o Now vs past o Making connections between present and past • Experimental archaeology • HOW people did things • WHY people did things
Post-processual Archaeology
Ian hodder • Rejects universal laws • Emphasizes role of the individual • Active models of culture • Ideational perspective • Symbols and ideas, not just functions • Knowledge is historically situated o Truth is subjective o Arch biases • All archaeology is political
themes of postprocessual arch
Feminist arch o Study of women o And women studying women o There is no evidence that 20,000 years ago men hunted and women gathered Marxist arch o Looking at ideology Objects as symbols o Can assume things based on use of object (???)
processual vs postprocessual
• Processiual is very scientific
• Post processual is less so
• What are crit you can imagine about each
o There can be too many assumptions with either
• Objects as symbols may give us the wrong answers
• But also women as gatherers is not true etc.
Processual-plus Archaeology
Current trend is a mixture (of processual and postprocessual)
• Recognition of value in both approaches
• Seeks patterns and generalities
• “setting theoretical egos aside…”
o michelle hegmon 2003
unifying themes of processual-plus
• past is engendered
• agency
• the symbolic is everywhere
• social significance of material culture
• critical consideraition of who owns the past
• scientific method
• critique: more transparency of theory needed and contribution to “general theory”?
archaeology as historically situated
• arch as political and reflexive
• objective but hidden dialogue with contemporary world
• reflexive science
• relevance
o can arch have a voice in elections etc.
o treatment of those that don’t normally have a voice
garbology article—William Rathje
• garbage project—garbology o sort fresh garbage o excavate garbage • archaeological, diet and nutrition o Garbage between affluence and impoverished area • Disease difference • Shortages etc • Nutrition o Looking at trash is unbiased o Tops of the cans—do they get recycled or not? What does this tell us about the way people think about things
Grand Challenges in Arch Article
o Overall study to see what important challenges are for archaeology
o Surprising challenges?
• Surprising that A7 falls in the realm of archaeology
•
o What is a particularly large one?
o E7
• Climate change
• Arch can give us a long term understanding of climate change
o When did humans really start affecting the environment
o 1800s
o how society is structured
o collapse and famine—arch plays a big role
o hurricane Katrina and Detroit
Cobb Critique of Grand Challenges article
o The critique is that it didn’t encompass the opinions of everyone
• Mainly men and older archaeologists
o Oriented toward the natural scientists in a sense
o Grand challenges article is only geared at archaeologists
The golden Marshalltown ARTICLE/READING
• Who deserved the golden Marshalltown—the people who actually dig and do the damn thang
• People who just want the prestige on the theory
• Memorable quote:
o “most fun with your pants on!”
o aka the hands on stuff is fun
• arch as anthro
• humans tread on, interact with and alter the environment
• arch based on study of humans their places and their things
How you DO archaeology
preservation
survey
excavation
Classes/types of archaeological data
artifacts
ecofacts
features
artifacts
portable objects that owe their form to humans o Something that is created by people o Pieces of basket o Paintings o Arrows o figurines
Ecofacts
influenced by humans but not necessarily made by humans—humans didn’t specifically MAKE these—portable objects that have cultural significance, but do not owe their form to humans
o Bones
o Wood charcoal
o Pit used to do something
Features
non portable human made remains that cannot be removed without destroying their original form
o If you were to move them it will be something different entirely
o Floors
o Cave art
Sites
a spatial cluster of artifacts ecofacts and features—OR simply a place where human activity took place • Geographic location • Function • Cultural affiliation • Chronological affiliation
Preservation
Taphonomy—study of decay, or how organisms become part of the fossil record
In arch how natural processes produce patterning in arch data
Aridity helps preserve sites
Stone and pottery preserve the best—better than metal
Anaerobic environments help preserve materials
Pompeii
o Volcanic ash preserved everying
Bog bodies
Lack of oxygen helps
Extreme environments help the arch record
Survey
• Accidental discoveries o Frequently • Construction projects o You can’t build on artifacts/ burial grounds • Scientific survey o Statistical surveying o GPS • Mapping sites o You can make 3d maps with a certain device o V cool • Subsurface detection o Augers, cores, shovel test pits (STP) o Guide to future excavation o Patterning • Remote sensing methods o Remote sensing can detect things that the eyes can’t see • Below surface sensing • Aerial remote sensing
Excavation methods
vertical
horizontal
Site formation processes (how sites form)
- Behavioral processes—human activities that produce tangible arch remains
- Transformational processes—conditions and events that affect arch data from the time of deposition to the time of recovery
- CONTEXT
Archaeological context
Context is fundamental to interpretation
Interpretive: primary context in situ—always meant to be there
Secondary context—disturbed after disposition
The matrix
physical medium around the remains: Soild Sediment Shell Gravel Nothing is floating in space
Provenience
3d location of an artifact or feature ie its horizontal and its vertical dimensions–where exactly it sits in space
Association
relationship between remains
Excavation strategies
• Natural vs. arbitrary strata
• To follow the natural stratigraphy
o Youre looking at the color of the soil and soil patterns that are natural
• To look at arbitrary strata
o Its like to understand what was made around it—human made?
• Bioturbation and other mixing
o Sometimes when youre digging you can’t tell that well whats happening
o Could be rodent burrows
o Or tree roots
o Modern stuff that changed the old stuff in a sense
o It causes stratigraphy to be unclear
Caracol Belize—A case study ARTICLE/READING
• A site in Belize
• Tallest structure in Belize
o They will not allow anything taller to be built
• They beat Tikal
• AD 562—Star-War event
• Caracol’s Face caches
o A cache is a ceremonial object–/vessel
o Found A LOT OF THEM
o They found a lot of FULL vessels
• All about strats and association!!!
o They found all of these different face caches and drew the stratigraphy and locations of the items
• Temporal sequences
o Created a chart of when each type of face cache was placed there
• These rural people had these calendars and traditions around a certain amount of years
o THIS IS MIDDLE THEORY
• Could figure out time and space and stuff
• High theory would tell us why the faces change and why there are also birds
Stages of research
Research design
• Get funding
• Survey—understand the place you are working—understand the landscape
• Excavations—targeted exposures of the ancient past based on questions
o You dig based on questions
• Analysis and interpretation—what did we find
• Share—publications presentations reports refine and reshape study regroup
what happens with excavations
recovered and recorded interpretation low level theory middle level theory --where interpretation happens high level theory
Lyell and Hutton
Uniformitarianism
uniformitarianism
this is where middle level theory is based
–uniformitarianism is the assumption that the same natural laws and processes that operating in the universe now have always operated in the universe in the past and apply everywhere in the universe
How middle level theory works
- We can understand the context of the artifacts, that is the behavior that created the specific distribution of the materials by using ANALOGY
- An analogy notes similarities between two entities and inferring from the similarity that an additional attribute of one is also true of the other
- —–Never 100% sure