midterm Flashcards
Common Law
- becomes law through recognition in the courts
- “judge made law” fill in the gaps
- there are two key components
precedent
- 1 key component of common law
- court decides something for the first time
- can be overruled
- trial court
stare decisis
- 1 key component of common law
- “let the decision stand”
- refers to the precedents if there was a previous case with the same issue
Statutory law
enacted by legislature
criminal law
conduct which is offensive to the people or society as a whole
-government on behalf of the people bring forth legal action
civil law
disputes concerning the right and duties that exist between private persons and/or citizens and government
-usually suing for money
equity law
- one party goes to court seeking judicial relief
- make someone do something or prevent someone from doing something by court order
- usually “under peril” time matters
- NEVER seeking money
private law
relationships between persons
-ex; who can get married
public law
government gets involved for the good of the people or society
-statutes= doesn’t always affect everyone directly
jurisdiction
the right, authority and power of the court to hear and decide a case
- needs to go to the correct court
- 2 types of jurisdiction
original jurisdiction
hears evidence, determine facts, applies the law to the facts (judge does all 3)
- power of the court to hear the case for the first time
- bench trial= trial without a jury
appellate jurisdiction
reviews cases that have already been tried to make sure there are NO mistakes in law
where to find jurisdiction
- MOST courts have original OR appellate jurisdiction
- supreme court had BOTH
- jurisdiction is found in the constitution or statutes
trial in a criminal case
state v.
Crime against= people v. defendant
U.S. v.
trial in a civil case
plaintiff v. defendant
bringing forth the lawsuit v. person being sued
trail in a equity case
petitioner v. respondent
asking for court order v. person you want to do something/prevent
-could also be plaintiff v. defendant
appeals
-1 appeal per case (not per party)
-civil case either party could appeal
-Appellant v. Appellee
the one appealing v.
petition
after appeal is used and a party still believes there is a mistake in law
- petitioner v. respondent
- supreme court gets most cases by petition
politics
acquisition, retention, and exercise of power for the purpose of collective action
-determines “who gets what, when , how”
Law
a system by which society makes choices that allocate its scarce resources and organize relations among individuals and institutions in order to achieve predictability in business and personal affairs
dispute resolution (American courts exercise power within gov)
generally refers to one of several different processes used to resolve disputes between parties, including negotiation, mediation, arbitration, collaborative law, and litigation.
allocation of benefits and burdens (American courts exercise power within gov)
winner=benefits loser=burden
protecting individual rights and liberties (American courts exercise power within gov)
- rights of criminal defendants
- religious freedom
- freedom of speech
provide order (American courts exercise power within gov)
creating common law
norm enforcement (American courts help maintain status quo and change)
a principle binding upon members of a group such as society that serves to guide, control, and regulate proper and acceptable behavior
where are norms found
sources of law: constitution, statutes, court decisions
- also found in community acceptable behavior
- trial courts
policy making (American courts help maintain status quo and change)
-appellate courts
legal realism (American courts help maintain status quo and change)
A perspective that legal rules are to benefit the larger society and public policy based on judicial decisions
classical view (American courts help maintain status quo and change)
a court decision was the predictable, almost mechanical, result of a judge’s application of an unambiguous rule of law, contained in a statute, constitution, prior court decision, to the facts of a particular case
-accepted view for trial court judges
neoinstitutionalist view
appellate courts make public policy and that judges policy preferences can and do affect outcomes
-court decision also on case facts, legal principles, court rules and of judges view about how courts should function
Dual Court System
The U.S. court system is divided into two administratively separate systems, the federal and the state, each of which is independent of the executive and legislative branches of government.
- states had their own court system first 1776
- national and state
Federal question jurisdiction
is the subject-matter jurisdiction of United States federal courts to hear a civil case because the plaintiff has alleged a violation of the United States Constitution, federal law, or a treaty to which the United States is a party.
Federal party jurisdiction
refers to a court’s power to make a formal judgment against a party who would otherwise not be subject to the jurisdiction of the federal courts, because the claim arose from a common nucleus of operative fact.
-never in state court
Diversity jurisdiction
is a form of subject-matter jurisdiction in civil procedure in which a United States district court in the federal judiciary has the power to hear a civil case where the persons that are parties are “diverse” in citizenship, which generally indicates that they are citizens of different states or non-U.S. citizens.
- $75,000 min
- could be in state or federal
how do you originally become a lawyer
through apprenticeship
- pay the lawyer to teach you
- go to court with them, research, and writing
law school
- started during the last third of the 1800s
- in 4 states you can serve apprenticeship over law school (ex: California)
- 3 states allow combination of both
casebook method
- standard method of teaching law
- started at Harvard in 1870s
- rea appellate court opinions and their decisions and find out the reasoning behind law
- brief each case you read
- determine the legal question, how it was decided, and the legal reasoning