Midterm Flashcards

1
Q

What are the three legs of the Epistemological stool?

A

Spirit, Traditional, Rational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Show how it is faulty to try to build knowledge of God, even when based on the Bible, using just one or two of the epistemological legs.

A

You don’t get the full truth.
Tradition-teaching, preaching, singing.
Rational-what we do with our minds
Spiritual-what God can do by His Spirit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

To practice sound biblical hermeneutics how must we view the OT?

A

OT -> NT -> X2-4 centuryX

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does not approaching the OT with sound biblical hermeneutics affect christology for most today?

A

If you don’t have an understanding of the OT, you won’t understand NT.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does not approaching the OT with sound biblical hermeneutics affect christology for most today?

A

If you don’t have an understanding of the NT (Christ), you won’t understand Jesus name Baptism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does not approaching the OT with sound biblical hermeneutics affect pneumatology for most today?

A

Not understanding the OT, you won’t have an understanding of the Holy Spirit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the wrong methodological approach of most churches today demonstrated in their view of Luke-Acts?

A

They don’t see it as a pattern.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does correct biblical hermeneutics inform the practice of the “historical Church”?

A

Is it first century? If it’s not, then it’s wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is drawn from the book of Acts that must speak to correct epistemology?

A

Acts is the only historical book in the NT. Not taking an epistemological approach when reading what the Spirit taught.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the necessary biblical understanding of how Christians must evaluate any experience?

A

Does it line up with the Word of God?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are a growing number of non-apostolic scholars admitting regarding the typical trinitarian’s hermeneutical and methodological approaches to Scripture?

A

It’s incorrect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Name and discuss 6 different views of inspiration and find an example of each in writings, articles, podcast, preaching, etc…

A

Natural Inspiration- Human authors inspired like a poet.
Spiritual Illumination- Human authors inspired same way God inspires Christians today.
Partial Inspiration- Parts of the Bible are inspired especially in spiritual matter. However, historical, scientific or other non-spiritual matters aren’t.
Conceptual Inspiration- God inspired authors with general concepts, but left words and details to the author.
Verbal Inspiration- God inspired authors with each word
Divine Dictation- Authors just took dictation for God as he spoke. “Thus saith the Lord”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Name and discuss the three views of inerrancy and find an example of each.

A

Absolute- Every detail
Full- Not correct in science or history
Limited- True in spiritual, but not in history or science.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Discuss a couple of examples of how detailed the oversight of inerrancy is, which is demonstrated in the methodology of the NT utilized by Jesus and Paul.

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define biblical inspiration.

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Name the three different translation theories and discuss each demonstrating which is best, and which is open to the most interpretive error.

A

-

17
Q

How must our methodology be consistently Apostolic or biblical, regarding connecting inspiration and inerrancy, and the implications regarding translations?

A

-

18
Q

What is the difference in aim or goal between a translator and an interpreter?

A

-

19
Q

Explain how one can be Apostolic in the areas of Christology, Soteriology, and Pneumatology; but not consistently Apostolic in bibliology?

A

-