Midterm 2 (Chapters 23-27, no 25) Flashcards
Aggregate Demand (AD) curve
combinations of real GDP and the price level that make desired aggregate expenditure equal to actual national income; a set of stable equilibriums
Negative slope of AD curve
Inverse relationship between P and Ye
Relationship between price and wealth held in money
When price increases, purchasing power of money decreases, so wealth decreases
Relationship between price and wealth held in bonds
When price increases, value of the loan repayment decreases, so the wealth of the lender decreases while the wealth of the borrower increases
Relationship between wealth and consumption
Direct relationship
Trade effect
When domestic price increases, X decreases and M increases, NX decreases, and AE decreases
Relationship between P and AE
Inverse relationship: economy doesn’t have to make as much to satisfy lower desired spending
Fallacy of Composition
Individual micro demand curves cannot be added to get the aggregate demand curve
Movement along AD curve
A change in the price level causes a shift of the AE curve and a movement along the AD curve
Aggregate Demand Shock
Increase in autonomous AE shifts AE curve upward and AD curve to the right, vice versa
Simple multiplier of AD curve
Measures the horizontal shift in AD curve in response to a change in autonomous desired expenditure
Size of the horizontal shift of AD curve
simple multiplier x increase in autonomous expenditure
Aggregate supply (AS) curve
relationship between the price level and the quantity of aggregate output supplied for given technology and factor prices
Aggregate Supply Shock
Due to exogenous changes in costs: factors prices (increase, leftward) or technology/productivity (increase, rightward)
Macro equilibrium
AD=AS; Ya (points on SRAS)=Ye=Y (points on AD)
Keynesian SRAS
constant unit costs, P is constant while Y increases, k=simple multiplier
Intermediate SRAS
increasing unit costs, P and Y increase, k= multiplier
Classical SRAS
escalating unit costs, P increases while Y is constant, k=0 (very inflationary)
Key assumptions in the short run
factor prices are exogenous, technology and factor supplies are constant, thus Y* is constant, means that Real GDP is determine by AD=AS
Key assumptions in the adjustment process
factor prices are flexible/endogenous and adjust in response to output gaps, technology and factor supplies are constant, thus Y* is constant, real GDP=Y*
Key assumptions in the long run
factor prices are fully adjusted/endogenous, technology and factor supplies are changing, thus Y* is changing, meaning economic growth
Adjustment asymmetry
Booms cause wages to rise quickly, Recessions cause wages to fall slowly
3 ways to eliminate an output gap
(1) Do nothing, inventory adjustment forces Y back to Y* (2) Demand shock through fiscal policy (3) Supply side economics
Phillip’s curve
rate of change of wages are inversely related to unemployment rate
Potential output as “anchor” and SRAS as “chain”
SRAS reacts to AD/AS shocks using wage adjustments to pull Y back to Y* automatically
Long run equilibrium
Y is no longer adjusting to output gaps, AD intersects SRAS at Y*
LRAS or Classical AS
relationship between P and Y after all input costs have adjusted; a vertical line at Y* (Y*=LRAS)
What causes economic growth (changes in long run EQ)?
Only changes in Y* create economic growth due to increase in technology and factor supplies. Increase in AD only causes inflation in the long run (unless expenditure is on technology).
Paradox of thrift
In a recession, there’s a natural tendency for individuals to increase savings but this decreases C, AE, AD, Ye for the group and exacerbates a recessionary gap
Automatic fiscal stabilizers
built-in tax-and-transfer system that automatically stabilizes business cycle
Automatic stabilization vs. discretionary stabilization
If GDP is relatively low, the government automatically runs a deficit, and vice versa; Shift of budget function due to intentional change in budget
Limitations of discretionary fiscal policy
(1) Decision and Execution lags (2) Temporary v. Permanent changes - H may not trust change, long-run expectations (3) Fine v. Coarse tuning - fiscal may be too broad for fine-tuning but useful for gross-tuning
Real sector
allocation of resources among alternative uses depends on relative prices (Px/Py) i.e. shape of P distribution
Money sector
change in the money supply would change the absolute price level (Px in terms of dollars or the common denominator) i.e. mean of P distribution
Classical dichotomy
divide the economy (fictitiously) into real and monetary sectors
Exchange identity
amount of money/value that you give up = what you get; MV=Py
Neutrality of Money
Change in M leads to a change in P if you assume velocity (V) is constant since technology is constant and Y is constant since it’s at/near Y*
Modern view of money
In the SR, change in M can lead to a change in P or Y. In the LR, change in M leads to a change in P.
What is money?
Medium of exchange, store of wealth, unit of account