Midterm 2 Flashcards
Recognition
- fast
- effortless
- prone to error
- faster you do it the more mistakes you make
- recognition is influenced by the context in which you encounter those objects
e. g. the butcher on the bus - - this is a connection between familiarity and memory - retrieving through externally provided cues
What is pop out search
- all items except the target share the same feature target is easy to find regardless of the number of distracting items
- if its unique your eye goes to it immediately as it pops out
Conjunction Search
- target does not posses any unique features and can only be identified based on a conjunction of two or more features
- the more distracting items there are the slower search is
Frequency and Recency (priming)
- familiar (high frequency) words more likely to be recognized
- recently primed words more likely to be recognized
- priming effect is bigger for lower frequency words
Word superiority effect
- entire words are perceived faster than letter
- easier to recognize letter when they’re part of the word
Degree of wellformedness
- word superiority effect occurs for well formed non words but not poorly formed non words
- Wosk is not a real word but its paired like words we in everyday life but Hyle is poorly formed H and L dont go together
Feature net model of word recognition
- each detector has an activation level
- with input activation level increases
- detectors “fire” when their response threshold
- refer to CLOCK diagram
1) Feature detectors
2) Letter detectors
3) Bigram Detectors
4) word Detector
Recognition by Components theory
- geons the visual alphabet of object recognition
- geons create objects
- 36
Non accidental properties
- helps us go from 2D to 3D
- features of 3D images that are almost always present in any 2D viewpoint
- by accident a curve 3D edge appears as a straight 2D line such as a coin
Recognition by multiple views
- multiple viewpoints encoded in memory
- mental rotation required if current view does not match any stored views
- e.g. looking at a bee any angle you see you know its a bee becuase you have seen it from this angle before
Inversion effect
- faces are easier to recognize when upright than inverted
- inversion effect is bigger for faces than houses, they’re processed differently
composite effect
- hard to recognize half of face when align with another face
- faces are processed holistically
- face recognition based on the relationship between features not perception of individual features
- composite effect happens for words
Fusiform face area FFA
- highly activated for faces
- non face objects evoke activity in the FFA
Greebles FFA response
before training faces had higher FFA response than greebles
- after training greebles and faces were similar with FFA response
Apperceptive agnosia
can see but they cant organize the elements they see in order to perceive an entire object
- not being able to put on shoes becuase cant recognize it as a shoe
- confused which object is his shoe and which is his foot
- mistake his wife for a hat
Bottom up processing
process directly shaped by the stimulus
concept driven
relying on your knowledge
top down processing
shaped by knowledge
integrative agnosia
- damage to the parietal lobe.
- appear normal in tasks requiring them to detect features in a display, but they are impaired in tasks that require them to judge how the features are bound together to form complex objects
prosopagnosia
- look at a photograph and correctly say whether the photo shows a face or something else
- they can say whether its man’s or a woman
- whether it belongs to someone young or someone old.
- But they can’t recognize individual faces—not even of their own parents or children, whether from photographs or “live.
- results from some problem or limitation in the functioning of this brain tissue.
“super recognizers”
- accurate in face recognition, even though they have no special advantage in other perceptual or memory tasks
- able to remember (and recognize) faces that they viewed only briefly at some distant point in the past
Selective attention
- too much going on you ignore some and chose the other
divided attention
- the ability to multi task to keep 2 tasks in mind
- there are limits to the - types of mental operations that can be carries out simultaneously
- tasks similarity increases the costs of dividing attention
- less overlap between the task less error
Overt attention
- spatial visual selection through overt eye movements
- foveal information tends to be processed more deeply than peripheral information