Midterm 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Accountability policies

A

standards-based reforms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

NCLB/ESEA requirements

A

schools tested every year, 100% must be proficient in math and reading, status accountability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

status accountability

A

must meet threshhold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

growth standard

A

must show growth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

principal and agent

A

agent is teacher, principal is taxpayers and parents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

incentive compatible

A

all parties want the same outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

individually rational

A

agent is willing to sign (exp outcome for an option is equal to next-best)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Problems with performance pay

A
  1. nature of teaching (hard to measure)
  2. team production (little incentive to cooperate when competing)
  3. multitasking (teaching to test)
  4. selection (those who expect to be high prod choose profession)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

NCLB results

Dee, Jacob

A

larger gains in math than reading, most gains in elementary schools, gains among minorities and those with subsidized lunches, slow relative gains among low-achievers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Teacher PfP results

A

large, positive effects at all levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Problems with teacher PfP

A
  1. generalizability of high stakes tests
  2. Cheating
  3. Motivation Substitution (teachers who are motivated by oreferences may switch jobs)
  4. Innefficiency
  5. gov interactions (states set up tests)
  6. value-added uncertainity (some undeserving get rewards due to error)
  7. transparency (teachers don’t understand controls for SES)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

types of school choice

A
Residential
Open Enrollment
Magnet Schools
Charter Schools
Vouchers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How vouchers improve achievement (3 ways)

A
  1. students choose to switch to superior schools (little evidence)
  2. competition from private schools causes public to be more efficient (evidence)
  3. Choice allows sorting between peer groups (shining star effect, schools can focus efforts)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

school choice evidence

A

open enroll: none

magnet: none
charter: small positive, more likely to be really good or really bad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

voucher evidence

A

effect close to zero, strong exception for african americans, small exception for poor in math and catholics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

2 reasons for net zero effect of vouchers

A
  1. Students in private and public may have both increased achievement due to competition
  2. increased choice may have unobservable benefits
17
Q

problems with model

A
  1. perfect competition assumption
  2. assumed products weren’t differentiated
  3. imperfect info (VA unkown, trust market)
  4. systemic costs (transportation, implementation)
18
Q

means-tested

A

benefits provided according to ability to pay

19
Q

Dobie and Fryer

A

Harlem preschool, positive benefits each year that could close racial gap

20
Q

redshirting, why it could work

A
  1. Relative age is higher, role model
  2. learning begets learning
  3. diminishing returns (more HC)
21
Q

redshirting results (Elder and Lubotsky)

A

big score differences that diminish quickly, high SES kids have biggest advantage, diffs gone by 8th grade

22
Q

Hoxby

A

men who go to selective college earn back investment many times over, increasing over time, returns to most selective colleges increasing

23
Q

changing interaction between poverty and access to college

A

high-quality colleges are becoming more accessible to the poor and more inaccessible to low-ability