Midterm 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Why Archaeology? 4 reasons

A
  1. documents human history; 2. Unbiased; 3. fills in gaps between, contradicts, or supports historical documents; 4. answers anthropological questions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Historical archaeology

A

holistic enterprise that exists at intersections of documentary, oral,historical, and archaeological records

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

James Deetz

A

founded idea of American Historical Archaeology and archaeology of American Material Culture; promoted global perspective by exploring capitalism and its global cultural impact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Material Culture

A

new side of archaeology; sector of physical environment that we modify through culturally determined behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Site Formation Processes

A

aka taphonomic processes; environmental effects and human behaviors that create a site and that affect it after its original deposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Transformation Processes + Behavior/Natural Processes

A

all the conditions and events that affect material remains from the time of deposition to the time the archaeologist recognizes and acquires them as data; includes natural processes (natural disasters) and human processes (bombing)

  1. Behavioral Processes: human activities that produce tangible archaeological remains; include acquisition, manufacture, use, deposition → acquisition (obtaining the stuff through production or collection raw materials); manufacture (processing of raw materials into something usable); use (action of employing the resultant tool or material); deposition (stuff becoming part of the archaeological)
  2. Natural Processes: involved creation and disturbance of sites via natural occurrences (eg. gravity, wind, hurricanes, earthquakes)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Taphonomy

A

study of processes that affect the decay and deposition of archaeological materials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Depositional Contexts

A

primary (artifact has not been disturbed since its original deposition), secondary (matrix, provenience, and/or association have been altered by transformational processes after the original deposition)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Palimpsests

A

example of an archaeological anomaly; process of reusing, adding to, and/or destroying the archaeological record

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Research Design + Steps/Considerations

A

plan of operations that guide an archaeologist’s work; created in order to justify the need for research, fulfill ethical obligations, involve the public and community, and make decisions about field methods

STEPS: 1. Formulation (define research question and select a study area); 2. Implementation (research team, budget, permits, funding sources); 3. Data Gathering (what kind of data will best answer our questions and how will you acquire this data?)→ affected by preservation, taphonomy, environment, and/or human activity); 4. Data Processing; 5. Analysis ; 6. Interpretation; 7. Publication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Salvage archaeology + CRM + On-Campus Examples

A

archaeological investigations are one because a site is likely to be disturbed or destroyed by upcoming human activity or development

Cultural resource management (CRM) archaeology: type of salvage archaeology; archaeology that is conducted to comply with federal and state laws that protect archaeological sites

Eg. Bottle Bit of 1920s under Archaeological Research Facility; university plan observatory under Asian Studies Library; Cheney House

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Gage House case study

A

professor interests (daily life of Gage household, any material beliefs, any conflict over gender roles/norms of Victorian periods) and Gage foundations interests (find locations of outbuildings for museum reconstruction; satisfy state and federal historic preservation laws in order to get clearance for construction of a new visitor’s center); worked together to fulfill the research interests of both while conducting the research in an open, accessible, and collaborative manner that involves the local community; Gage household was a typical middle class household but what they did with their material culture was non-normative because they practiced feminist theories and beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Finding & recording sites

A

Archival research (maps, ethnographic accounts); Survey methods (way to systematically detect sites, features, and artifacts; can be invasive or non-invasive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Non-invasive Survey Methods

A

most helpful when trying to find features in a already defined area; PRO → non-destructive and image resolution is constantly improving vs. CON → labor intensive and slow; special equipment and training needed; often only functions under particular conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Types of Non-Invasive Survey Methods

A
  1. Pedestrian survey: walking along the ground to see any obvious artifacts
  2. Remote imagery: aerial and satellite imagery; used to identify features that are not obvious to the naked eye
  3. Geophysical Techniques: can be passive or active; sensitive to metal anything and does not give depth of anomaly – Passive: measures effects of a buried feature on surrounding magnetic fields; magnetometer measures and registers differences in a magnetic field – Active: sends signals into ground and measures response of soil resistance (uses electricity to detect differences in soil moisture); uses ground penetrating radar
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Invasive Survey Methods

A

PRO → probing, coring, and augering are very easy and cheap to do and serve as “windows” onto subsurface deposits vs. CON → shovel test pitting is labor intensive and slow; probing, coring, and augering only works in areas without naturally occurring stones

17
Q

Types of Invasive Survey Methods

A
  1. Probing: length of wire that is pushed into the ground to locate features
  2. Augering/Coring: removing a column of the stratigraphy; augering tube has a larger diameter than the coring tube; both are examples of survey and excavation methods
  3. Shovel Test Pitting: most invasive but most informative
18
Q

Sampling

A

process of selecting a subset of a collection for a study; helps choose where and how much to study because excavating an entire site is unfeasible and unethical

19
Q

Three major decisions of sampling

A
  1. Shape and Size of Sample Units: survey area or “data universe” is subdivided into manageable sample units
  2. Sample size: number of sample units chosen from a data universe – sample fraction: number of samples chosen over total number of samples in the data universe
  3. Sample strategy: non-probabilistic/quantitative (based on prior knowledge or observations) vs. probabilistic (survey sample is representative of the total data universe)
20
Q

Three types of probabilistic sampling methods of sampling

A
  1. Simple random: each sample unit within a population has equal chance of being chosen for survey
  2. Systematic random: first unit chosen at random, rest based on predetermined interval; avoids clumping or clustering
  3. Stratified: data universe is divided into distinct zones where each zone is sampled separately either randomly or systematically
21
Q

Mapping + methods

A

provides frame of reference for recording all other context info; creates a simplified, representative version of what you see

Methods: hand-drawn, GPS, EDM (electronic distance meter; aka total station); method dependent on what scale you are trying to record

22
Q

Excavation

A

systematic subsurface exploration of archaeological remains in order to understand the spatial arrangement of activities within sites, stratigraphy, and the actions that create the site; complements regional and macroscale surveys; takes a lot of time and money

23
Q

Steps + Grid System Terminology of Excavation

A

Steps: Establish a grid system; conduct surface investigations

Grid system: provides a series of reference points for recording archaeological materials

Datum: point from which all measurements (both vertically and horizontally) are taken; anchor or origin point that relates the location of the site to the rest of the world

Surface investigations:

    • Penetrating or vertical excavations: detailed information over localized area; shows change over time (diachronic)
    • Clearing or horizontal excavations: detailed view of a single era (synchronic)
24
Q

Lot vs. point provenience

A

Lot: all artifacts from a single excavation level are given the same provenience information

Point: 3D position of artifacts or ecofacts are individually recorded as they are exposed during excavation

25
Q

Screening

A

aka flotation; wet vs dry; different mesh size; dependent on how much water is available and what you hope to recover

26
Q

Relative dating techniques

A

Relative Dating Techniques: tells us whether something is older or younger than something else

    • Stratigraphy, Superposition: layers on bottom are older than those on top
    • Association: If Layer A is younger than Layer C, then the artifacts that Layer A contains are also younger (deposited later) than Layer C.
27
Q

Absolute Dating Techniques

A

aka chromatic dating; provides a calendrical date for how old something is; determines an artifact’s’ age using a specific time scale; dates are represented using Before Present (BP) notation

    • Direct: uses analyses of a thing itself to assign a date
    • Indirect: uses associated things to find a date
  1. Dendrochronology: aka tree ring dating; calibrates a tree’s growth rings from wood fragments to create chronological sequence that other wood samples can be compared to; one of the oldest absolute dating methods and used by culture historians; developed by A. E. Douglas by applying the concept of cross dating to determine a sample’s age; great in areas where wood preserves well; old wood problem (wood can be scavenged and reused); tells you the date that the tree died via calendrical date; ring width indicates stress (bigger width, less stress)
  2. Radiocarbon dating: aka C14 dating; developed in 1940s by Willard F. Libby; example of radiometric dating technique and therefore measures radioactive decay; C14 has a half life of 5730 years and is used to date materials 60k years old; LIMITATIONS → changing presence of C14 in the biosphere pushed archaeologists to create a calibration curve that charts these fluctuations using dendrochronology + marine reservoir effect can make artifacts appear older because ocean water affects carbon exchange
  3. Potassium-Argon dating: based on half life of radioactive potassium into argon; used for older materials because the half life of P40 is 1.3 billion years; present in many volcanic rocks; tells time that has elapsed since volcanic events; useful for studies of very deep time (eg. human evolution), from 500k to 2 billion years ago
  4. Obsidian Hydration Dating: aka OH Dating; based on cumulative absorption of water of volcanic rim; measured with dating by association
  5. Thermoluminescence Dating: aka TL dating; measures naturally occurring background radiation that has been trapped in crystalline minerals; measures the radiation a material has accumulated since it was last heated by heating a sample and measuring the energy emitted; used on ceramics, fired lithics, and some sediments
28
Q

Calculation of radiocarbon result data ranges

A

Baseline Date with Sigma/Standard Deviation (eg. 1040 +/- 60 if present date is 1950); the more sigmas, the broader the range, the more accurate the calculation (eg. 1 Sigma give you 68% accuracy; 2 Sigmas give you an 97% accuracy)

29
Q

TPQ/TAQ + Seriation

A

Terminus Post Quem (TPQ): time after which; date which indicates earliest possible starting date for an archaeological deposit

    • For individual things: choose earliest production date
    • For an entire strata: choose the youngest possible date

Terminus Anti Quem (TAQ): time before which; date which indicates the latest possible end date for an archaeological deposit

Seriation: variety of techniques that seek to order artifacts in a series so that adjacent members in a series are more similar than members farther apart; based on belief that objects slowly change over time; can be a stylistic change or a frequency change

    • Stylistic: based on how things look; assumes small incremental changes over time
    • Frequency: based on popularity; assumes that once something is introduced, it gradually becomes popular, peaks, and then decreases in popularity; if graphed, the popularity forms a lenticular or battleship curve
30
Q

Deetz’s gravestone study

A

tested relative dating method theory of seriation by using gravestones because they had dates and distinct characteristics (death’s head, cherub, and willow gravehead styles); found that the grave heads changed as the social and cultural conceptions of religion and death did

    • Death’s Head: earliest; repent for your sins; death is impending and inevitable
    • Cherub: gentle prospect of death; emphasized a connection with God
    • Willow: latest; more of a peaceful, live in the moment vibe
31
Q

Artifact analyses

A

initial collection, basic sorting (based on provenience), cleaning, entering information into databases with photos

32
Q

Attributes + Classification + Typology/Artifact types

A

Attributes: include form, function, and material; pretty much anything observable/measurable

Classification: process of sorting artifacts into types

Typology/Artifact types: organizational set that archaeologists use to classify artifacts; a particular typology is the result of whatever attributes the classification is focused on

33
Q

Ford-Spaulding debate

A

questioned what typologies are and why they were created

FORD: typologies are a “device which is used to examine the most minute fragments of culture history through time and space but there is a natural variation; etic perspective

SPAULDING: statistically “real” types objectively exist and we can use statistical tools to create typologies that people in the past would have recognized; emic perspective

TODAY: typologies are useful “analytical tools drawn from sets of attributes that we choose to record and that we construct to be able to answer specific questions we have about past social behavior”; people in the past would likely recognize our types to some degree, especially for the recent past, when we make efforts to employ emic categories but even if not, that doesn’t mean the research is invalid; both emic and etic perspectives

34
Q

Steward’s typology of types

A

morphological, historical-index, functional, cultural (not in use any longer)

Morphological: based on style or outward appearance

Historical-Index: possesses a characteristic that defines a time period

Functional: based on relationship between an artifact and its cultural use

35
Q

Ceramic methods of analysis

A
  1. Compositional studies: what is made from and where did the components came from; clay sourcing (chemical and petrographic analyses)
  2. Process of manufacture: material preparation, forming, finishing, and firing
  3. Use: residual analysis
  4. Classification/Chronology: slipware
  5. Meanings: form/functio; trade/exchange; symbolic/ideological; symbolic/ideological; identity/style
36
Q

Lithics

A

Terminology: core; hammer stone; tools; etc.

2 Major Technologies:

    • Flaked stone: direct percussion (large; imprecise); pressure flaking (small; more precise)
    • Ground stone: more rounded/smooth
37
Q

Steve Shackley’s study of lithics and identity (Ishi)

A

aka “the last yeti”; lived at UC Museum of Anthropology (at SF) from 1911 to 1916 and produced stone tools for visitors at the museum; Steve Shackley is a UCB archaeologist who found similarities between the Yahi/Yana tribes and the Wintu/Nomlaki tribes between Ishi’s lithics, thereby providing evidence of creolization (mixing of cultural attributes and creation of new cultures)

38
Q

Zooarchaeology + related terminology

A

developed out of processual archaeology; study of animal bones and how animals relate to human life; looks at field arrangements, barns, animal husbandry, etc.; looks at the kinds of animals were being raised/hunted/eaten by people (taking into consideration species, age, sex, and seasonality)

Goal of Quantifying: NISP (number of identified specimens); MNI (minimum number of individuals)

Process of analysis: identified elements using a comparative collection; calculation of NISP; calculation of MNI; determination of seasonality

Seasonality: when a site was being used during the year

Taxon: species, family, class