Midterm 2 Flashcards
The court recognized that in applying the predominating purpose test, the court looks to four factors with neither being dispositive:
1.
2.
3.
4.
- The language of the contract
- The nature of the business of the supplier of goods and services
- The reason the parties entered into the contract
- The amounts paid for the rendition of the services and goods, respectively
- The language of the contract
- The nature of the business of the supplier of goods and services
- The reason the parties entered into the contract and
- The amounts paid for the rendition of the services and goods, respectively
(Some courts will add, what caused the problem?)
The predominant Purpose Test Under the 2022 Amendment
Pre-2022 UCC Amendment
One step- determine the predominant purpose, either goods under the UCC or not, and apply the determination to the whole contract.
If the contract was predominately for goods, apply the UCC to the whole contract.
If the contract was predominately for services, apply the common law to the whole contract.
Under the 2022 amendments:
If the predominant purpose is the sale of goods, apply the ________ to the whole contract.
If the predominant purpose was for services, apply the _______ only to a dispute involving the ______ aspect.
UCC
UCC
Goods
The language of the contract
Step 1 of the Predominant purpose test
The nature of the business of the supplier of goods and services.
Step 2 of the predominant purpose test
The reason the parties entered into the contract
Step 3 of the Predominant Purpose
The amounts paid for the rendition of the services and goods, respectively
Step four of the predominant purpose
Some courts will add what caused the problem?
Last step of the Predominant Purpose Test for some states
_________ is a significant consideration in deterring what the predominant purpose is.
Cost
With a ________, you have a warranty under the UCC.
Good
__________ is a term of art peculiar to the sale of goods.
Equipment
You don’t have a warranty for ________.
Service
What a reasonable person would think is under the ____________ theory of contracts.
Objective
What would an objective reasonable person have thought under the circumstances?
Objective theory of contracts
What someone’s actual intent was?
Subjective theory of contracts
Today we look at the _________ theory of contracts.
Objective
“We must look to the ________ _________ of a person as manifesting his intention rather than to his secret and unexpressed intention. The law imputes to a person an intention corresponding to the reasonable meaning of his words and acts.”
Outward expression
“The mental assent of the parties is not requisite for the ____________ of a _________.” If the words or other acts of one of the parties have bot one reasonable meaning, his undisclosed intention is immaterial except when an unreasonable meaning which he attaches to his manifestations is known to the other party.”
Formation
Contract
A manifestation of willingness to enter is not a _____ if the person to whom it is addressed knows or has reason to know that the person making it does not intend to conclude a bargain until he has made a further _______ of _________.
Bargain
Manifestation of assent
An offeree, regardless of manifestation of this consent, is not bound by __________ contractual provisions of which he is unaware, contained in a document whose contractual nature is not obvious.”
Inconspicuous
Where there is no evidence of actual notice of terms, “the offeree will still be bound by the agreement if a reasonably prudent user would be on _________ _______ of the terms.”
Inquiry notice
A type of electronic signature that involves a user clicking a simple button to accept the agreement.
Click wrap Agreements
State that a user agrees to terms when the user accesses the site and uses it. They are usually enforceable if a user has actual or constructive notice of them.
Browse wrap agreements
Notice that is imputed to a person at the time that existing information would prompt an ordinarily prudent person to investigate the issue further.
Inquiry Notice
When only one side is bound and leaves an option open to everyone else.
Unilateral contract
In Stepp v. Freeman, the contract was an ________________ contract, because the facts and circumstances surrounding the lottery ticket pool had made it “inferable that a contract existed as a matter of tacit understanding.”
Implied-in-fact
The first required element to formation of a contract is the ________ ________ of the parties. Typically, an ____ by one party and _______ by the other establishes ________ _______. However, a court may also infer that the parties assented to the contract by looking at the _______ ___________, including the parties conduct and declarations. This is known as a contract _______ _ __________.
Mutual assent
Offer
Acceptance
Mutual assent
Surrounding circumstances
Implied in fact
Is an express contract an actual contract ?
Yes
Does an express contract require proof of all elements of a contract: _________,________,_________?
Offer
Acceptance
Consideration
Yes!
__________ contract is formed by language (oral or written).
Express
Express Contract: Assent to the terms of the contract is actually expressed in terms of an offer and acceptance. True of False
True
Is an Implied-In-Fact Contract an actual contract?
Yes
An Implied-in-Fact contract requires proof of all elements of a contract: _______,___________,________.
Offer, acceptance, consideration
In an _______________ contract the court infers that the parties assented to the contract by looking at surrounding circumstances, including the parties’ conduct and declarations.
Implied-in-Fact
In an _______________ contract, the plaintiff bears the burden of showing it was reasonably certain that a contract was intended.
Implied-in-Fact
Is an Implied-in-Law Contract (AKA) Quasi- Contract an actual contract?
No.
Do the elements of a contract have to be proven in an implied-in-law (AKA quasi-contract)?
No