midterm Flashcards
What is consumer behaviour
study of decisions (low and high effort), study of satisfaction, study if branding
Consumer decisions are important: managers, consumers, society
Decisions translate into sales, market shares and profits
how to maximize and measure cust satisfaction
How to maximize cust satisfaction:
Exceed expectations
Satisfaction with process of buying vs product
Minimize dissatisfaction
How to measure customer satisfaction:
Survey data (qs measuring cust sat and drivers of dat)
Sales data (sales records of customers, clv)
Problem recognition, how to increase gap (3)
Gap between actual state (is) vs ideal states (should)
Moves consumers from passive –non decision– state to active –decision– state
INC GAP = Increases motivation to act (ie make a decision) how to inc gap??
1. Point out low actual state
2. Provide high ideal state (must be authentic, super key, culturally relevant)
3. Contrast low actual vs high ideal states
Brand authenticity & sources of authenticity
brand faithful to itself, true to consumers, motivated by responsibility
Sources of authenticity: Realistic ideal points in retailing / advertising, Transparent & fair manufacturing process, Original designs/handmade products, Firm’s origin story with founders, Firm’s behavior consistent with its values/mission statement
Search (2)
- Internal (ie memory) search…… memory → brand names, brand attributes
- Top of mind brands/attributes - External search (google search, amazon search, ecommerce sites, review websites, product websites, consumer reports magazine, talking to friends) paid ads, organic search
-Paid ads
-Make a list of keywords relevant to your offering
-Specify where your ad will appear (Google search website or affiliate websites)
-Bid on your keywords (i.e., maximum price/click)
Google will accept or offer a higher price for your keywords
-Set a total advertising budget for a time period
**Online retailers/streaming services have advantages on external search (can recommend / sell products to consumers, can get consumer data for targeted product offers / developing new products)
High effort decisions, come from (3)
=more time and energy
Comes from 1)high motivate 2) high ability/more knowledge about product features 3) high opportunity/more time to think
decisions can be either….
cognitive or affective
Brand attribute matrix
Table of brand and attributes that you collect as a first step towards choice of high effort products (ex. In video slides) can be provided in advertising
Through external search
Through internal search
Cognitive-TORA
Compensatory (Assumes that bad performance on one attribute can be compensated by a good performance on another attribute)
How do consumers choose one brand for high effort? One method is TORA or theory of reasoned action (formula in slides)
Consumers form attitudes using mental process represented by this formula, more positive attitude is more likely is choice → Approximates our thinking
Decision making apps use TORA
Useful tool for individual consumer decision making, managers, social marketers
4 steps of TORA
- People list attributes
- People think about performance and importance of each attribute (scale in head)
- People combine performance/importance of each attribute (weighted utility of that attribute)
- People add utility (value) from all attributes ( add up tp get total utility of product as a whole)
Cognitive-Non compensatory, explain and explain 2 kinds
But Consumers Often Have Minimum Cut-offs,i.e.,Non- Compensatory
Minimum cutoffs for attributes
- Conjunctive = high cutoffs on all attributes (chosen alt is the only surviving alt)
- Disjunctive = variation in attribute importance, different cutoffs for attributes (chosen alt has greatest number of acceptable features)
Cutoffs in Choice Are More Important When…
When there are many brands and attributes, because using cutoffs simplifies choice in these situations
When attribute is very important to consumers (e.g., fuel economy, CO2 emissions…)
=> Firms should provide numerical choice cutoffs to consumers that favor their brand (ex. Battery life, time saved)
=> Firms should price products below maximum price cutoff (i.e., maximum willingness to pay) ………..does not work for luxury products where consumers cant use price cutoff easy bc price not given
Which (compensatory or non compensatory) is consumer likely to use??
if brand attribute matrix has more brands and attributes then use non compensatory
BC cutoffs reduce brands in consideration set → reduce info, reduce effort
Compensatory on surviving brands
Marketers should be cutoffs to consumers
affective decision making (2 types)
- Emotions at point of sale
- Especially important for hedonic products (iphone, xbox), product trial and sampling creates positive emotions
- Can create feelings with new car smell, test drive experience, upbeat music, VR - Affective forecasting: we make predictions about how we are likely to feel in the future (consumers overestimate future regret) (pay more at auctions than at regular sale is effect of affective forecasting???)
How can firms use TORA
Can do consumer survey for large number of people, calc average attitude towards a brand and competing brands→ find out what attributes the managers should focus on to improve attitude towards their brand
Trade offs! Focus on important attributes and attributes brand is doing bad on
Diagnostic tool in slides (if important and brand poorly then 1) add new attributes 2) change beliefs 3) compare with comp)
TORA strengths
Ensures we dont miss important attributes relevant to decision making (important for high effort decisions)
Ensures rational n long term analysis of info
Allows objective ie numerical comparisons between brands/choice options
TORA weaknesses
Incomplete set of attributes can bias results (e.g., insurance cost )
Does not permit cutoffs on attributes (e.g., families want the safest car, i.e., will not compromise on safety for price)
Does not measure feelings towards the brands (e.g., people fall in love with Mini Cooper, Mustang, Audi TT.
- Feelings arise first (before thoughts) and feelings (influence/bias) subsequent thoughts
advertising
Both affective and cognitive appeals
Advertising needs to first create positive feelings → feelings are experienced automatically by people (feelings come first) → Feelings influence subsequent thinking through confirmation bias (sometimes called “motivated reasoning” or “halo effect”)
Five senses (vidual, audio, smell = marketer has more control) (taste, touch = marketer has less control)
Smell effects mood, memory, and brand
language and decision making
Language Should Avoid Negative Feelings & Create Positive Feelings
The Chevy Nova never sold well in Spanish speaking countries because Nova means “no go” in Spanish
When Pepsi started marketing its products in China, they translated their slogan, “Pepsi Brings You Back to Life” too literally. The slogan in Chinese read: “Pepsi Brings Your Ancestors Back from the Grave.”
Low effort decision making (def and 3 ways to them)
Low effort decision making (low motivation/ability/op)
- Cognitive and affective heuristics
- Simple feelings
- Position/advertise the brand - Choice heuristics
- If x (on sales, coupon, like, remember, works well) then y (buy now)
- Types: cognitive (performance, price) affective (liking, familiarity) - Single attribute
- Ex. all bran = high fibre → single important attribute
Judgments
estimates we make → important bc judgements influence decisions
name 4 judgment heuristics
availability, framing, anchoring, decoy
Availability
Vivid (easy recalled): information more important/true than less vivid information for risk/probability judgments[
- Lower availability - lower perceived risk
Vivid events = higher perceived probability (ex. Plane crash inc sales of insurance) → this is for probability judgements
For other judgments (time, money, quantity, liking)
- Immigration lineups (for cust satisfaction, this heuristics says one line is better bc movement is vivid)
- Cash vs card spending → credit card = availability = difficult to visualize loss = more spending
- Get in short and wide glass, drink looks less
Easily remembered info has ring of truth
- Ex. store brand, has same packaging as branded one, dependable association
- Ex. why diff colours matter (fresh association = green)
2 versions of availability
IMPORTANT vs TRUE