MIDTERM Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Why is Statute Law better then case law

A

Statute law, on the other hand, provides stability and consistency because it is codified and available for all to read. Statutes are made by the federal and provincial levels of government. Laws passed by the third level of government—the municipal level—are called by-laws. Each of these levels passes laws through the life cycle described in the preceding section. A statute is a more effective and efficient way of regulating behaviour than leaving the issue to a judge to determine and monitor on a case-by-case basis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why are some laws described as procedural

A

The procedures that govern requirements, such as the documents to be served and filed and the time limits that must be met, are contained in a separate instrument; the Ontario version is called the Rules of Civil Procedure. For law enforcement personnel, it is as important to respect procedural law as it is substantive law. Procedural law provides the same rules for all participants in the process to follow. Failure to follow the procedural law can be very serious for law enforcement officers, law clerks, paralegals, and other participants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The Life Cycle of a law and the stages it goes through

A
  1. Introduction
  2. Debate & Discussion
  3. Adoption
  4. Codification
  5. Amendment
  6. Repeal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What groups of people living in a society need

A

Laws, Laws permit groups (societies) to live together harmoniously by defining, communicating, and enforcing accepted behavioural norms. These norms can be religious or secular (non-religious); both kinds of norms can evolve into laws as we know them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why would government decide to codify a common law (why would they put it into the criminal code)

A

The government may make this decision because it believes that the common law rules are appropriate and worthy of entrenchment in statute or because it disagrees with the common law rules that have developed on a certain legal issue and wants to ensure that changes are made.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who determines legislative jurisdiction

A

in Canada, legislative jurisdiction is primarily determined by the Constitution, specifically the Constitution Act, 1867 (formerly known as the British North America Act, 1867). Here are the key components that define legislative jurisdiction in Canada

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Where are you going to look for a statute thats been passed within the past 12 months

A

Electronic sources
* Ontario’s e-Laws website
https://www.ontario.ca/laws
* Federal government’s Department of Justice
website http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/
Paper sources
* Canadian Abridgment (Carswell)
* Canadian Encyclopedic Digest (Carswell)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a preamble of a statute

A

An introduction, made up of one or more provisions, the preamble sets out the objectives and guiding philosophy of the statute. The preamble can often provide some interesting insights into the socio-political context of the statute. It is also an official component of the statute for interpreting and enforcing the statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How would identify a statute as either provincial or federal

A

To identify whether a statute is provincial or federal, you can consider the following key factors:

  1. Constitutional Jurisdiction:• Federal Powers: The Constitution Act, 1867 (formerly the British North America Act) assigns certain areas of lawmaking to the federal government. These typically involve national or international matters. Some areas under federal jurisdiction include:
    • Trade and commerce
    • Criminal law
    • Immigration
    • National defense
    • Postal service
    • Banking
    • Patents and copyrights
    • Provincial Powers: Provinces have authority over local or regional matters. Some areas under provincial jurisdiction include:
    • Property and civil rights
    • Education
    • Health care
    • Municipal governments
    • Natural resources within the province
    • Highways and motor vehicle regulation
  2. Statute Title or Preamble:

The statute itself may indicate its scope. For example, a federal statute may mention “Canada” or refer to nationwide issues, while a provincial statute may refer to a particular province (e.g., “Ontario Education Act”).

  1. Administering Government Body:• Federal statutes are administered by departments like the Department of Justice Canada, or federal ministries.
    • Provincial statutes are enforced by provincial departments, ministries, or local authorities.
  2. Court Jurisdiction:

If a statute is challenged or enforced in federal courts (like the Federal Court of Canada), it is likely a federal statute. Provincial statutes are generally dealt with in provincial courts.

By checking which area of jurisdiction the statute governs, or which body enforces it, you can determine if it’s provincial or federal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the history of the constitution act of 1867

A

Canada was created in 1867 by an act passed by the British Parliament now cited as the Constitution Act, 1867,1 previously known as the British North America Act 1867. In 1982, the British Parliament passed the Canada Act 1982,2 which contained the Constitution Act, 1982.3 The Constitution Act, 1982 was passed by our Parliament and includes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.4 The passage of these pieces of legislation by both the British and Canadian parliaments meant that Canada officially had a constitution and that this constitution was completely Canadian. The Constitution Act, 1982 states that it, and therefore the Charter, is the supreme law in Canada. No single government, federal or provincial, can change the Constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define Civil Law

A

Civil or secular laws (simply “laws” from here on) follow a similar life cycle, which may include some or all of the stages shown in Figure 1.1. The introduction stage involves developing a preliminary version of the proposed law so that it can be evaluated by the lawmakers responsible for creating it. The preliminary version of the law is then debated and discussed before being adopted upon agreement by lawmakers. Once the adopted law is codified, it may become necessary to amend the law to incorporate required changes. If, on the other hand, the law is no longer required, then it is removed through the process of repeal. If changes are required, then the existing law is repealed followed by re-enactment of a new version of the law that reflects the necessary changes.

Civil law refers to the branch of law that deals with the rights and obligations of individuals, organizations, and private parties in NON-CRIMINAL matters.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a bill

A

a preliminary version of a statute law that is written down to be reviewed, debated, and voted on before becoming law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are statutes/regulations

A

statute law
legal provisions, in codified form, that are developed and adopted by the parliamentary and legislative process

Many statutes are accompanied by a type of subordinate legislation known as regulations, particularly where the subject matter being covered is of a technical nature. Unlike statutes, regulations are not passed by Parliament or provincial legislatures. They are prepared and published by administrative officials (department or ministry staff) under the authority of the relevant statute to deal with the technical issues. Regulations tend to be very practical and can include lists, schedules, diagrams, forms, and charts. The rules of various levels of courts are generally published in the form of regulations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The common features of regulations

A

Regulations tend to be very practical and can include lists, schedules, diagrams, forms, and charts. The rules of various levels of courts are generally published in the form of regulations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Difference between commercially published and officially published information books on statues

A

The difference between commercially published and officially published information books on statutes lies primarily in their purpose, authority, and audience.

  1. Commercially Published Books:• Purpose: These books are produced by private publishers with the goal of profit, offering interpretations, annotations, or practical guides on the law.
    • Content: They often include commentaries, case studies, expert opinions, or simplified explanations of statutes. They may be tailored to lawyers, students, or business professionals seeking to understand the practical application of the law.
    • Examples: Legal textbooks, annotated statutes, legal research guides, or practice manuals.
    • Audience: These books are typically written for a broader audience, including legal practitioners, students, and sometimes the general public.
    • Authority: While these works may be written by legal scholars or experts, they are not the authoritative source of the law. They interpret and explain official statutes rather than present them verbatim.
  2. Officially Published Books:• Purpose: These are published by government or official bodies (such as the federal or provincial government) with the primary aim of disseminating the law in its authoritative form.
    • Content: They contain the exact, unaltered text of statutes, regulations, or legal codes as passed by the legislature. They do not include commentary, interpretation, or analysis.
    • Examples: Government gazettes, official publications of the statutes of a jurisdiction (e.g., the “Criminal Code of Canada”), or collections of regulations.
    • Audience: These publications are primarily aimed at legal professionals, judges, and anyone who needs to refer to the law in its official form.
    • Authority: These are the authoritative and binding texts of the law. They have legal standing in courts and other formal proceedings.

Key Differences:

•	Interpretation: Commercially published books often interpret or explain the law, while officially published books present the law as it is written.
•	Authority: Official publications are the legal source, while commercial ones provide guidance or secondary insight.
•	Audience: Official publications target legal professionals and institutions, whereas commercial ones target a wider audience, including those who seek simplified or practical insights into the law.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define common law

A

The role of the common law in our legal system is a direct result of our history as a British colony; we have inherited the common law as part of our law-making system. The common law is the body of judicial decisions made by courts in England and in Canada that establishes legal rules and principles dealing with specific issues. The common law has evolved over many years and reflects changes in society.

common law
a legal rule or a body of legal principles, established through judicial decisions, that deals with particular legal issues or subject areas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the purpose of a statute

A

This method of changing the law may be more time-consuming than having a court create a new precedent because of the democratic process of debate and review that is an important part of our parliamentary process. However, once the statute has been passed and becomes law, there is stability and consistency in that the letter of the law has been published and is available for all to read.

The purpose of a statute is to formally establish, regulate, or prohibit specific actions or behaviors by providing a written law enacted by a legislative body.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

do other countries other then Canada still use religious laws

A

Yes, several countries around the world still use religious laws, either as a part of their legal system or as the primary basis for their laws. The extent to which religious law is integrated varies, ranging from countries where it plays a dominant role to those where it coexists with secular law.

In some societies, codes of religious rules actually evolve into laws for governing society (sometimes called civil laws); in other societies, a separate civil code emerges and evolves parallel to the religious code—hence the distinction between religious laws and secular laws. For many Canadians, secular laws have come to assume much greater importance than religious laws for governing behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Who has the power to change the charter

A

Given the importance of the Constitution, including the Charter, its authors included restrictions on how it may be revised. Specifically, section 38(1) describes the general amending formula which is more commonly described as the “7/50 formula.” According to this formula, at least two-thirds of the provincial legislatures in at least seven of the provinces, representing at least 50 percent of the population of Canada is required to approve any change to the Constitution. This is a high threshold to meet and so has the effect of maintaining the Charter’s stability and the values it protects over time and through changes in government and popular opinion.

20
Q

Define jurisdiction

A

jurisdiction

authority to make law, either by governments or by courts

assigning jurisdiction is important because it prevents legislative overlap while ensuring that all of the issues that need to be addressed are covered.

21
Q

What is included in a full case citation

A

the case name—for example, R v Ford;
a year in parentheses or square brackets—for example, (1982) or [1982]—which is either the year in which the case was decided (parentheses), or the year of the reporter volume in which it is reported (square brackets);
a number that represents the volume number of the series of case reports in which the case is reported—for example, 65;
letters that represent the initials of the case reports in which the case is reported—for example, “CCC” for “Canadian Criminal Cases” (see Appendix A); these initials may be followed by a series number if the case reporter has been published in more than one series—for example, “(2d)” means second series;
the page number in the case reporter where the case can be found—for example, 392; and
in parentheses, a short form of the name of the court from which the decision comes—for example, “SCC” for “Supreme Court of Canada”—if the court is not obvious from the name of the reporter.
The examples above produce the following case citation:
R v Ford (1982), 65 CCC (2d) 392 (SCC).

22
Q

What decisions in a court is a judge bound by

A

judges are not free to decide cases in any way that they want. They are bound by the system of legal precedent that forbids them to ignore principles that have been added to the chain of the common law. However, the binding nature of legal precedents (existing links) is limited by the level of jurisdiction in which those links were formed.
The binding power of an of an individual court decision becomes clear if you consider the structure of Canada’s court system as summarized in Figure 3.1. The provincial and territorial trial courts, with the exception of Nunavut where the trial court has only one level, are divided into inferior trial courts and superior trial courts

23
Q

Definition of a case name

A

cases are referred to by the names of the two parties. In criminal law cases, one of the parties is always the Crown. The Crown is identified by the initial “R.” The “R” stands for either “Regina,” which is Latin for “the Queen,” or “Rex,” which is Latin for “the King.” The latter is used if there is a king in power in the Commonwealth at the time a case is decided. Therefore, the case name in a criminal law case is typically “R v [Name of accused]” and is indexed under the name “[Name of accused].”

24
Q

Purpose of the Supreme Court of Canada

A

The names of the provincial and territorial courts are listed in Table 3.1. A judge is bound by the decisions of all courts within the province or territory that are at a higher level and is also bound by the decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada. Therefore, all courts in the country except the Supreme Court of Canada are bound by the decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada; all courts in a specific province, except the province’s court of appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada, are bound by the decisions of the province’s court of appeal, and so on.

The purpose of the Supreme Court of Canada is to serve as the highest court in the country, providing authoritative interpretations of Canadian law and ensuring the consistent and just application of legal principles across the nation.

25
Q

What are the reasonable limits to the charter

A

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees fundamental rights and freedoms to individuals in Canada, but these rights are not absolute. Section 1 of the Charter provides for “reasonable limits” on rights and freedoms, stating:

“The rights and freedoms set out in the Charter are subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.”

This means that the government can place limits on rights and freedoms, but only under certain conditions. The key considerations for reasonable limits are defined through legal principles established by the Supreme Court of Canada, particularly in the landmark case of R v. Oakes (1986). The Oakes Test is used to determine whether a limit on a Charter right is justifiable.

26
Q

Charter violations have to be committed by who

A

In general, Charter violations can only be committed by government actors, including all levels of government and public authorities. Private individuals and businesses are not directly subject to the Charter, though they may be governed by other laws that protect rights and freedoms (such as provincial or federal human rights legislation).

27
Q

What remedy is the subject or person of a charter violation entitled to

A

remedy
an award or order provided by the court to compensate a victim for the commission of a legal wrong, such as a tort or a breach of contract or a Charter violation

When a person’s Charter rights have been violated, they are entitled to remedies provided under Section 24 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The specific remedy depends on the nature of the violation, the circumstances of the case, and the harm caused. The remedies aim to provide appropriate redress, restore rights, and prevent further violations.

28
Q

What is a precedent

A

A precedent is a judicial decision on a particular legal issue that sets the law for the same or similar cases that follow. The courts in these later cases will apply the precedent and make the same or a similar decision, thereby reinforcing the legal principle of the precedent. The body of law—these cases—makes up part of the common law.

29
Q

How to identify a criminal case

A

In criminal law cases, one of the parties is always the Crown. The Crown is identified by the initial “R.” The “R” stands for either “Regina,” which is Latin for “the Queen,” or “Rex,” which is Latin for “the King.” The latter is used if there is a king in power in the Commonwealth at the time a case is decided. Therefore, the case name in a criminal law case is typically “R v [Name of accused]” and is indexed under the name “[Name of accused].”

30
Q

What is a ratio decidendi

A

Latin for “reasons for decision,” but often used to describe the few words or phrases that form the most essential part of a legal decision for the purposes of precedent

31
Q

What is the charter

A

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a part of Canada’s Constitution that guarantees fundamental rights and freedoms to individuals. Enacted in 1982 as part of the Constitution Act, 1982, it protects various civil liberties and ensures that individuals are treated fairly by governments and public authorities. The Charter applies to all levels of government—federal, provincial, and municipal—and sets limits on governmental power in relation to citizens’ rights.

32
Q

Who has to prove a established charter violation

A

First, a person who is claiming that one or more of their Charter rights have been violated must prove the violation and must prove that it happened by the operation of law or by government action.
Once proof of a violation has been established, the burden falls to the government to prove that the right in question can be limited in accordance with the law (and why).
As explained above, some limits on Charter rights are expressed within the Charter’s rights-granting sections themselves (see, for example, s 7). In a case dealing with one of these limited rights, the Crown will first try to prove that circumstances exist to support the limitation of the right in the particular case. If the Crown fails in this, or if the right is not subject to an internal limitation, the Crown must try to prove that the limitation sought is “demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society,” according to the wording of section 1.

33
Q

The aspects of constitutional legislation

A

Constitutional legislation in Canada defines the structure of government, the division of powers between federal and provincial authorities, and the rights of individuals. It also establishes the processes for amending the Constitution and ensures that all laws and government actions are subject to constitutional principles, such as the rule of law, federalism, and judicial review. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, federalism, and the supremacy of the Constitution are central pillars of Canadian constitutional law.

34
Q

Where will you find the reasonable limits of the charter

A

The reasonable limits of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms are found in Section 1 of the Charter

35
Q

The power of common law in the charter

A

The common law plays an important but distinct role in relation to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. While the Charter is the supreme law governing the protection of individual rights and freedoms from government action, common law consists of judicial precedents and principles that have been developed over time by courts in Canada and other common law jurisdictions.

36
Q

What are the things that are not subject to the charter

A

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms primarily governs the relationship between individuals and the government. It protects individuals from abuses of government power, but it does not apply to every aspect of society or law. There are certain areas or actions that are not subject to the Charter. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms applies primarily to actions by government bodies and actors, including laws and policies at the federal, provincial, and municipal levels. It does not apply to purely private matters between individuals or organizations, and it does not directly govern private-sector companies, private relationships, or internal decisions of private organizations. Other legal frameworks, such as human rights legislation and common law, provide protection in areas not covered by the Charter.

37
Q

The rights of a incarcerated persons

A

Charter challenges have been brought by prison inmates who were denied the right to vote because of their incarceration. The decisions have made it clear that inmates are entitled to vote in federal and provincial elections.11 Restrictions on their voting have been held not to be “reasonable limits” on the inmates’ rights for the purpose of section 1 of the Charter, and policies preventing inmates from voting are unconstitutional.

38
Q

24(2) of the charter

A

24(2) of the Charter provides the specific remedy of excluding evidence obtained in a manner that infringed a person’s Charter rights from being used at trial. In other words, because the evidence was obtained in a manner that is in breach of the Charter, the judge may rule it inadmissible at trial, meaning the Crown cannot use it in an attempt to secure a conviction of the person.

Text of Section 24(2):

“Where, in proceedings under this Charter, a court finds that a provision of this Charter has been infringed or denied, the court shall determine whether the evidence that was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied the rights or freedoms guaranteed by this Charter is admissible in evidence.”

39
Q

The difference between an everyone and a citizen

A

“everyone” encompasses all individuals regardless of their legal status, while “citizen” specifically refers to individuals recognized as members of a particular country, with associated rights and responsibilities. Understanding this distinction is important, especially in discussions about legal rights, citizenship laws, and the application of constitutional protections.

40
Q

Define analogous

A

sharing similar qualities or characteristics in some aspects, yet being different in other aspects

41
Q

Who can create a common law rule

A

The law is developed through court decisions, rather than through legislative statutes alone. While legislation exists, it is interpreted by courts. Judges’ decisions as to the meaning and application of legislation then become the law. Therefore, the common law is flexible for changing circumstances and cases.

42
Q

Can precedent be changed

A

Precedent can indeed be changed, modified, or overruled through various mechanisms, including decisions by higher courts, legislative action, evolving societal norms, judicial interpretation, and responses to conflicting case law. This flexibility allows the common law system to adapt to changing circumstances and ensure that legal principles remain relevant and just.

43
Q

The theory of new principles

A

The theory of new principles in the context of law often refers to the idea that legal systems, particularly common law systems, can evolve and adapt through the establishment of new legal principles in response to changing societal values, norms, or circumstances. This theory highlights how courts may develop or modify legal doctrines to reflect contemporary understandings of justice, equity, and rights.

44
Q

The purpose of the anitaions in the criminal code

A

Some frequently applied statutes, such as the Criminal Code,5 are published in annotated form, which means they are available in an edition that contains supplementary references to relevant cases, and even summaries of the cases, directly below the statute provisions themselves.

45
Q

what a judge in Ontario has to do in an identical fact situation

A

In Ontario, when a judge encounters an identical fact situation, they follow the principle of stare decisis, which is a foundational doctrine of common law. This principle dictates that courts should adhere to precedents set by higher courts in previous similar cases. By analyzing the facts, applying relevant legal principles, and distinguishing cases when necessary, judges ensure consistency and predictability in the law. This process upholds the integrity of the judicial system and reinforces the rule of law in Ontario.