Midterm Flashcards
Policy Justifications for VL
Deterrence and Compensatory
General Rules for VL (EE & IC)
EE: ER liable if EE’s action within scope of employment
IC: ER not liable for IC’s action
Right of Control Test (EE v. IC)
a. Extent to which master controls details of work
b. Distinct occupation or business
c. Customs of occupation
d. Who supplies the place and tools of work
e. Length of employment
f. Payment
g. Employer’s regular business
h. The belief of parties
Scope of EE Employment 2 Approaches
- Motivated to serve ER
- Foreseeable - was tort an incidental risk of business
VL for EE’s intentional tort
Usually no VL unless (1) EE was furthering ER’s work or (2) engaged in activity connected to work
Examples of EE activities in the scope of employment
Detours, Bussard exception to coming and going, personal needs/comfort/convenience/health/welfare
Examples of EE activities out of scope of employment
Frolic, coming & going
Meaning of non-delegable duty for VL IC exception
holding out as an agent: repairing dangerous instrumentalities, statute requirements, inherently dangerous activities
Exceptions to general rule for IC VL
(VL if): Non-delegable duty, abnormally dangerous activity, illegal activities
VL and Collateral Risk
if injury/harm from IC is not a result of what makes the activity dangerous, ER not VL
General (CL) rule for roaming animals and SL
Owners SL for harm by animals
Examples of Roaming Animals
Barnyard animals: sheep, goat, horse, chicken
Highway Exception to CL SL
Negligence (instead of SL) when animals on public roads cause damage to adjoining parcels
SL Fencing Out
P Buying SL-
Proper Fence & Animals broke in: SL
No Fence: Neg
SL Fencing In
D protecting from SL-
No Fence: SL
Proper Fence & Animals broke out: Neg
2 Requirements for SL of Wild Animals
(1) exercised control
(2) injury related to animal’s risk
What kind of liability applies when a wild animal “causes” an injury NOT related to its risk?
Negligence (ex: tripping over a tiger’s tail)
General rule for liability of domestic animals
Negligence unless 2 factors met