Midterm Flashcards
Intentionalism
The argument that the Nazi regime was top-down. That Hitler had complete power and could control and everything that happened was premeditated and planned.
Hitler was a “strong dictator” fully in charge and worked at realizing plans that date back to the 1920s
Functionalism
This argument is the the regime was a bottom up model and everything was not planned.
Hitler was a “weak” dictator and rode the wave of initiatives made up by bureaucrats and on-site personnel.
Working toward the Fuhrer
Ian Kershaws model.
Refers to Werner Williams speech (feb 1934) that introduces “working toward the fuhrer”
How it works:
- Hitler suggests (or appears to propose) visions or big ideas
- Individuals or agencies present suggestions on how to implement these ideas - put them into practice
- Hitler - or others in leading positions - choose a suggestion retroactively approve of a practice already in place
How does Hitler benefit from “working towards the fuhrer”?
- Psychological
- Hitler was prone to delay work and decisions, let others worry about details and indulge in long periods of indolence, and then go into a work frenzy - Strategic
-competition among agencies and individuals vying for hitlers approval will prevent joint conspiracies against him - explains why no one tried to replace him - Ideological
- the mechanism conforms to the NS worldview that nature is an ongoing struggle for supremacy in which only the fittest survive - must be implemented in politics as well
*it is not only Hitler that benefits from this system the individuals/agencies involved in this competition can combine proposals/initiatives that “work towards the fuhrer” while also gaining power
Common and self interest are not exclusive
Kershaw’s model - what can the system survive with?
(i) fanaticism
(ii) loyalty
(iii) consent
(iv) accommodation
(v) indifference
(vi) silent apathy
(vii) active resistance
The system thrives off of i and ii but can survive with v and vi
In kershaws model the system calls for a lot of initiative from below - not fuelled by ideological fanaticism but how does this benefit me? If I can suggest ideas that hitler uses or does not alt-right reject I can improve my position and preserve self interest
- the more pressure the system undergoes the more radical and extreme the suggestions and solution become and are preferred
Roger Griffin
1948 - core ingredient of racism
Core ingredient or (lcd) of fascism past and present
“Fascism is a political ideology whose mythic core is a palingenetic form of populist ultranationalism”
Palingenesis
Rebirth from decadence
- “once we were great and united; it will be so again if we unite and remove everything that divided us and brought us down”
Implications:
-an essentialized collective identity (often based on race)
- a great past (mythicized view of history)
- a clearly identified enemy
William Jones
1746 - 94
Resides in India as a judge
First European to study Sanskrit texts
First to systematically explore the relationship b/w English and indo-Aryan languages
Sanskrit more perfect than Greek and more copious than latin - u cannot study all 3 w/o believing they came from a common source
Indo-European & PIE migration
Original indo-Europeans resided in Pontic-caspian steppe
In several ways over many centuries they migrated south and east (Iran and India) and west into Europe
In ancient Indian texts these people were “Aryan” - was a social designation to someone who was of a high social standing (has little to do with race)
* the word Aryan played no role in the any of the migrations to Europe
PIE migrations: see map (notes 2)
THE 3 R’s -Aryan
Racialization
The term Aryan is increasingly racialized. It starts to refer more as a race than to a family of languages
-aryans are seen as superior “noble” conquerors. They spread of their language and culture is based off on their racial superiority
-the explicit racism enters with the word Aryan when a hierarchy is established
Reduction
Aryan is increasingly reduced. It is no longer synonymous w indo-European but increasingly refers to more exclusively “Nordic” “Germanic” or in some cases “German”
*the term was originally not used to describe the migration west into Europe
Reversal
The term undergoes a geographic reversal
Aryans are no longer said to migrate south east westward but from the north-west eastward
Where exactly these “aryans” originated remained disputed
Reduction
Reversal
4 additional points (indo-European argument)
- Linguists discovered that older languages were more regular and systematic than younger languages.
What came earlier, the ancestral type or progenitor is better - Obvious similarity bw the develop,ent of languages and the changing understanding of the evolution of species that Darwin introduced roughly half a century later - comes as no surprise that the understanding of race will be similar as well
- In time Nazi discourse starts to use the word Aryan less and less and use “Nordic” - aryans refer to all white Europeans
- Debates of what the language family should be called:
Indo-European (1813 Thomas young)
Indo-Germanic (1823 - preferred by German scholars)
Aryan - (1819 by Friedrich Schlegel - problem is that these only refer to the indo-Iranian languages)
Japhetic (William jones - named after Noah’s son who repopulated Europe after the flood)
Hitler background
Born on Austrian - German boarder (Austrian side)
Drops out of school fails to get into art school
Ends up in Munich joins a Bavarian regiment at the outbreak of WW1
Followed Germany to many soldiers unexpected defeat
Retained by the army as a spy to report on radical political groups emerging in Munich
Joins DAP which is renamed NSDAP (national sozialistische arbeiterpartei)
Failed beer hall putsch attempt in 1923
Goes to jail and writes Mein Kampf
Hitlers Main Mein Kampf Arguments?
3 types of races: creative - maintaining- destroying
Aryans are the only culture-creating race because they possess idealism
Idealism: the willingness to sacrifice yourself for the greater good of your race
The basic relationship bw races throughout history is struggle
Hitler proposes a simple analogy bw races and species
- species cannot interbreed w/o creating infertile offspring
- hence races should not interbreed b/c it always results in a lessening of the quality of the superior race
Since aryans are the most superior race it has the most to lose
When dealing w lesser races you must subjugate and enslave them
Whatever culture exist in human history came about due to an original Aryan input
If the aryans were to be degenerate or disappear the world itself would be doomed
Darwin’s evolution theory and 2nd law of thermodynamics (wo any energy input all systems will collapse)
Everything that aryans are the Jews are the complete opposite. They are everything the Aryans are not