Midterm Flashcards
Integrative model
Prochaska 1-17
Selected bc of spirit and rapprochement, seeking what is useful and cordial in each therapy system
Theory
Prochaska 1-17
A consistent perspective on human behavior, psychopathology, and the mechanisms of therapeutic change
Common factors
Prochaska 1-17
Distinguishes it from other activities and glues together variations of psychotherapy
Specific factors
Prochaska 1-17
The relatively specific or unique contributions of a therapy system
Psychotherapy view of therapeutic relationship
Prochaska 1-17
Interpersonal; there is a convergence between psychotherapists, in their nominations of common factors and in their treatment recommendations
Cognitive behavioral view of therapeutic relationship
Prochaska 1-17
View the relationship between the clinician and client as one of the preconditions necessary for therapy to proceed.
Rogerian (humanistic) view of therapeutic relationship
Prochaska 1-17
Considers the relationship as the essential process that produces change.
Radical view of therapeutic relationship
Prochaska 1-17
View the relationship between client and therapist as exerting little influence.
Hawthorne effect
Prochaska 1-17
People can improve in such behaviors as work output solely as a result of having special attention paid to them. Researchers have found that attention leads to improvement.
Process of change
Prochaska 1-17
Represents a middle level of abstraction between global theories and specific techniques
Psychotherapy
Prochaska 1-17
The informed and intentional application of clinical methods and interpersonal stances derived from established psychological principles for the purpose of assisting people to modify their cognitions, behaviors, emotions, and/or other personal characteristics in directions that the participants deem desirable
Transtheoretical
Prochaska 1-17
Across theories
insight therapies
Prochaska 1-17
Work with consciousness, which is frequently viewed as a human characteristic that emerged with the evolution of language.
Feedback
Prochaska 1-17
When the information given a client concerns the individuals own actions and experiences
Education
Prochaska 1-17
When the information given a client concerns environmental events
Counterconditioning
Prochaska 1-17
Changing our behavior to the conditioned stimuli
Stimulus control
Prochaska 1-17
Changing the environment to minimize the probability of the stimuli occurring
Contingency management
Prochaska 1-17
If behavior changes are made by modifying the contingencies in the environment.
The case of Mrs.C
Prochaska 1-17
Struggles with OCD, symptoms manifest as constant hand washing as a result of a fear of contracting pinworms, hoarding, and a difficulty to experience arousal. She experiences SI and has attempted suicide.
Defining characteristics of behavioral therapy
Prochaska 198-200
Overt behavior
Importance of learning
Directive & active nature of treatments
Assessment & evaluation
Counterconditioning
Prochaska 198-200
Defined by Joseph Wolpe, because something is learned through conditioning, it an be unlearned through Counterconditioning
Contingency management
Prochaska 198-200
Defined by B.F Skinner, human behavior occurs in a predictable order, just like A,B,C. Counterconditioning focuses on A->B while contingency management concerns itself with B->C. Behavior is determined by consequences.
Cognitive-behavior modification
Prochaska 198-200
Defined by Donald Meichenbaum, cognitive-behavior modification attempts to control contingencies in order to shape adaptive behavior and to extinguish maladaptive behavior.
Reciprocal inhibition
Prochaska 198-200
Counterconditioning, focuses on respondent conditioning
Behavior modification
Prochaska 198-200
Operant conditioning; changing behaviors using reinforcement, punishment, reinforcement schedules, etc.
Examples of common factors
Prochaska 1-17
Therapeutic relationship (most important), Hawthorne effect (attention)
Patient
Schuyler 3-13
A sufferer
Therapist
Schuyler 3-13
A healer
Why is the concept of “match” helpful?
Schuyler 3-13
Goodness of fit
Process variables
Schuyler 3-13
A prescribed series of contacts
First-order change
Schuyler 3-13
Rearranging variables in the same field into different sequences; all factors remain within the original system
Second-order change
Schuyler 3-13
shift in premises (rules) on which system is based
Three steps of fear and avoidance exposure program
Davis 171-187
Planning an exposure session
Experiencing the exposure session
Debriefing the exposure session during which new learning is consolidated
What is the focus of Davis 171-187?
Facing fear and avoidance
How do cognitive distortions develop?
Burns 3-31
Even though you are convinced they are valid, most of the negative thoughts that make you feel bad are distorted and unrealistic
What emotions result from thoughts of loss?
Burns 3-31
Sadness & depression
What emotion results from feelings of unfulfilled expectations?
Burns 3-31
Frustration
What emotion results from thoughts of danger?
Burns 3-31
Anxiety & panic
What emotion results from the thought that you are bad?
Burns 3-31
Guilt
What emotion results from the thought that you’re inadequate in comparison with others
Burns 3-31
Feelings of inferiority
What emotion results from feelings of unfairness?
Burns 3-31
Anger
All-or-nothing thinking
Burns 3-31
You see things in black-or-white categories. If a situation falls short of perfect, you see it as a total failure
Ex: “I’ve blown my diet completely.”
Overgeneralization
Burns 3-31
You see a single negative event as a never-ending pattern of defeat by using words such as “always” or “never” when you think about it
Ex: “My boyfriend always comes home late.”
Mental filter
Burns 3-31
You pick out a single negative detail and dwell on it exclusively, so that your vision of all of reality becomes darkened
Ex: You dwell on a few negative comments among countless positive ones
Discounting the positive
Burns 3-31
You reject positive experiences by insisting they “don’t count;” takes the joy out of your life and makes you feel inadequate and unrewarded
Ex: You discount your positive qualities and think that you don’t have any
Jumping to conclusions
Burns 3-31
You interpret things negatively when there are no facts to support your conclusion
Mind reading
Burns 3-31
Without checking it out, you arbitrarily conclude that someone is reacting negatively to you
Ex: “He doesn’t pick up my call. He must have hated me.”
Fortune-telling
Burns 3-31
You predict that things will turn out badly
Ex: “It will never get better.”