Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Research Methods and Ethics > Midterm > Flashcards

Midterm Flashcards

1
Q

What does it mean to be a producer of research?

A

Generating works using the empirical method in academia or as a student

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does it mean to be a consumer of research?

A

Reading the product of research that you did not produce (daily life, future careers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is empiricism?

A

The empirical method and empirical research have the goal of gaining knowledge through direct observation and empirical questioning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why is psychology an empirical science?

A

Psychology is an empirical science because it employs the empirical method.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is inductive reasoning?

A

Bottom-up reasoning, observational studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is deductive reasoning?

A

Top-down reasoning, experimental studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the three types of research and what are their respective goals?

A

Basic research: Enhances a general body of knowledge for its own sake

Translational research: The development of the interventions/protocols used in the applied setting

Applied research: Study seeks to solve a real-world problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the differences between scientific journals and journalism.

A

Journalists…
1. Need catchy headlines
2. Need to summarize
3. Need to use lay terms
4. May not understand the study they are summarizing
5. May be biased
6. Not subjected to peer review

Scientific journals…
1. Need descriptive titles
2. Must be detailed
3. Use scientific terms
4. Have conducted the research they are describing
5. Must be objective
6. Subjected to peer review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the five steps to critical thinking?

A
  1. What is the question?
  2. Are you making assumptions?
  3. What evidence supports a conclusion?
  4. How can the evidence be interpreted?
  5. What other evidence is needed?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the warning signs of uncritical thinking?

A

Using heuristics
Gut feelings
Avoiding the review of mistakes
Rebelling against criticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the three non-empirical ways of knowing?

A

Experience, intuition, authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Name and describe the main biases.

A

Present/present bias: Failing to think about what we don’t see (surgery example)

Confirmation bias: Focusing on evidence that fits our preexisting ideas

Bias blind spot: Believing we are unbiased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Name and describe the main heuristics.

A

Good story: Accepting a conclusion because it “sounds good” or “makes sense”

Availability heuristic: Persuaded by what easily comes to mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When this card pops up, study the sources of information flow chart.

A

N/A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Name, in order, the components of a scientific paper and their purposes.

A
  1. Title: Briefly describe the study
  2. Introduction: Review of prior research, current research rationale and hypothesis
  3. Methods: Participants/subjects, study design, materials, procedures
  4. Results: Statistical analyses, tables, figures
  5. Discussion: Explanation of the findings, evaluation of the study, suggestions for the future
  6. References: List of all outside sources used in the article
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Name the four goals of research and what they refer to.

A

Description: Simplest form of research, important for defining what it is we’re observing

Explanation: Connections between variables

Prediction: What conditions give rise to a behaviour/outcome

Application: Using what was learned in a real-world situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is a variable?

A

A variable is an aspect of a study that changes or can change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is a constant?

A

A constant is an aspect of a study that doesn’t change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is a measured variable?

A

A measured variable is observed and recorded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is a manipulated variable?

A

A manipulated variable is controlled by the experimenter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is a conceptual definition?

A

A theoretical definition of a construct

22
Q

What is an operational definition?

A

How a construct is measured or manipulated in a study

23
Q

What are the three claims and what do they refer to?

A

Frequency claims: Describes a particular level/degree of a single variable

Association claims: Argues that one level of a variable is likely to be associated with a particular level of another variable

Causal claims: Argues that one variable causes changes in the level of another variable

24
Q

What are the four validities and what do they refer to?

A

Construct validity: How well the variables in a study are measured or manipulated

External validity: The extent to which the results of a study generalize to a larger population

Statistical validity: How well the numbers/data support the claim

Internal validity: The extent to which a variable is responsible for changes in another variable as opposed to a confound

25
Q

Relate the three claims to the four validities

A

Construct validity: Relevant to all claims

Statistical validity: Relevant to all claims

Internal validity: Only relevant to causal claims

External validity: Relevant to all claims

26
Q

How do the four validities impact each other?

A

Internal and external validity have an inverse relationship (the greater one is, the less the other)

27
Q

When this card pops up, study the claims and validities table.

A

N/A

28
Q

What are the three principles of the Belmont Report and what do they refer to?

A

Respect for persons: Participants as “autonomous agents” and protection for vulnerable
populations

Beneficence: Do no harm, maximize benefits for participants and minimize risks

Justice: Distribute benefits and burdens fairly, avoid exploitation of vulnerable populations

29
Q

What are the core principles of the TCPS and what do they refer to?

A

Respect for Persons: Recognizing individuals as autonomous beings, informed consent

Concern for Welfare: Mental, physical and spiritual health

Justice: No unfair burden or benefit, no unfair exclusion

30
Q

Relate the principles of the TCPS to the principles of the Belmont report.

A

Both include respect for persons and justice

Beneficence is synonymous with concern for welfare

31
Q

Name and describe key pieces of historical research that influenced the development of current ethical guidelines.

A

The Tuskegee Study: Participants were not told about having syphilis, treatment was withheld and the study targeted poor, uneducated and marginalized participants

Residential schools nutrition experiments: Study the effects of malnutrition and tooth decay, despite the fact that how to treat malnutrition was widely known, causing extreme harm to unknowing, vulnerable and marginalized participants

Milgram obedience study: Participants experienced distress because they believed someone was being harmed and deception was used

32
Q

What are some key considerations of informed consent?

A

Readability and cultural norms
Parental consent/minor assent
Deception/debriefing
Documentation

33
Q

What is the role of an IRB or REB?

A

Tasked with reviewing research for compliance with ethical standards

34
Q

Who makes up an REB?

A

At least 5 members:
2 with expertise in relevant research disciplines
1 knowledgeable in ethics
1 knowledgeable in the relevant law (advisable, not mandatory)
1 community member with no affiliation to the institution

35
Q

What are the 3 Rs of animal ethics?

A

Reduce the number of animals used

Replace animals with other options when possible

Refine procedures to be as humane as possible

36
Q

What is fraud?

A

Intentionally falsifying or misrepresenting data

37
Q

What is plagiarism?

A

Presenting someone else’s work as your own or reusing your own work in a different academic context

38
Q

What are some characteristics of scientific measurement?

A

Researchers systematically measure what they’re interested in with an emphasis on accuracy

Measurement requires quantification rules so that it’s systematic, consistent, and transparent

Identical characteristics or attributes are quantified and interpreted in the same way

39
Q

Name the four scales of measurement and their characteristics.

A

Nominal: Distinctive (categorization and classification)

Ordinal: Distinctive, ordered in magnitude (Ranking and ordering)

Interval: Distinctive, ordered in magnitude, equal intervals (Describing differences among individuals, can be negative)

Ratio: Distinctive, ordered in magnitude, equal intervals, absolute zero (Describing amount of a given characteristic, cannot be negative)

40
Q

Name the types of reliability and what they are.

A

Test-retest reliability: Multiple trials of the same test

Interrater reliability: Degree of agreement among independent observers

Internal reliability: How well a study measures what you want it to measure

41
Q

What does Cronbach’s alpha describe and which reliability is it associated with?

A

Cronbach’s alpha measures he degree of relation between items (internal reliability)

42
Q

What are the five types of construct validities and what do they refer to?

A

Face validity: It looks like what you want to measure (subjective)

Content validity: The measure contains all the parts that your theory says it should contain (subjective)

Criterion validity: Does it correlate with key behaviours

Convergent validity: Measures that measure the same thing should converge

Discriminant validity: Measures that measure different things should discriminate

43
Q

What is the relationship between reliability and validity?

A

A measure can be less valid than it is reliable, but it cannot be more valid than it is reliable

A measure can be reliable but not valid, but cannot be valid and not reliable

44
Q

When this pops up, study the validities flow chart.

A

N/A

45
Q

Which ethical principles were most clearly violated by the Tuskegee study?

A

Not treated respectfully, were harmed, were a targeted, disadvantaged social group, were not fully informed, and were coerced

46
Q

Which ethical principles were most clearly violated by the residential school malnutrition study?

A

Participants were not informed, were harmed and were a vulnerable population

47
Q

Which ethical principle was most clearly violated by the Milgram obedience study?

A

Participants were harmed and were deceived

48
Q

Why is research better than experience?

A

Experience doesn’t have a comparison group and is confounded

Research is probabilistic

49
Q

Why is research better than intuition?

A

Mistakes can be made due to biases and heuristics

50
Q

Why is research better than authority?

A

The authority may not actually be an expert

51
Q

What are the conditions required to make a causal claim?

A

Must be an association between variables (covariance)

Must be temporal precedence
(One variable must come first)

Internal validity (control for confounds)

Research Methods and Ethics (2 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions