Midterm 1 revised Flashcards
objective vs subjective utilitarian
subjective utilitarian - naive, sees utilitarianism as a form of decision making
objective utilitarian - sees utilitarianism as a standard of rightness
Egoism
Ethical Egoism - view that an action is right if and only if it better promotes the agent’s interests than any other available action
Hedonistic Egoism - agent’s interests are reducible to pleasure
Separation of Persons
Look at people separately when assessing well-being and suffering. Contractualism, Scanlon
The Greater Burden Principle
It is unreasonable to reject a principle because it imposed a burden on you when every alternative principle would impose much greater burdens on others
maxim
“subjective principle of volition” that expresses an agent’s intended action and their reason (not purpose!) for performing that action.
Performing an action because it is morally required = thinking of the maxim of the action as a kind of law (universal law)
priori
can be known to be true just by thinking. No observation about the world needed
The Simple Story
All else equal, we have a much stronger duty against killing a person than letting a person die
Hypothetical Imperative
something is required in order to achieve an aim or goal, because it is a necessary means to that goal
Categorial Imperative
something is required in itself, unconditionally, irrespective of any aim.
Types of Moral Luck
actions or projects turned out
(blameworthiness; deservingness of punishment)
Circumstantial luck: luck involved in the kinds of problems and situations one faces (Fundamental Attribution Error; Obedience to Authority Experiment)
Constitutive luck: luck involved in one’s having the inclinations, capacities and temperament that one does
Causal luck: luck in how one is determined by antecedent circumstances (external vs internal luck)
The Control Principle
Object of moral assessments must be factors under our control. Moral assessments (regarding agent’s praise- or blameworthiness; the rightness or wrongness of their action, etc) should be luck-independent.
Incompatibalism (The Simple Argument)
If determinism is true, there can be no moral responsibility.
If the thesis of metaphysical determinism is correct, my actions are not ‘free’ in a sense that would make me morally responsible for them.
Soft Determinism / Compatibalism
If free activity is unforced and unimpeded activity, then there is no inconsistency between determinism and the claim that I sometimes act freely.
There is a perfectly intelligible sense in which I could have acted otherwise, even if determinism is true, therefore free will exists
Liberatarianism
Taylor
An action that is free is caused by the agent who performs it.
If things are not caused by my own free will, desires, and impulses, they are not caused at all.
Principle of Alternate Possibilities
There is no moral blame or merit in anyone who could not have acted otherwise