Midterm 1 - Readings Flashcards
what is a report according to Lippmann’s public opinion?
the joint product of the knower and known in which the role of the observer is always selective and usually creative
according to Lippmann’s public opinion, what does experience seem to show?
that a person brings something to the scene which later he takes away from it, that oftener than not what he imagines to be the account of an event is really a transfiguration of it
according to Lippmann’s public opinion, what is the problem of the acquisition of meaning of things the problem of?
introducing definiteness and distinction, and consistency or stability of meaning into what is otherwise vague and wavering
according to Lippmann’s public opinion, what is the order in which we see and define things? what does this mean?
we define first and then see
we tend to perceive that which we have picked out in the form stereotyped for us by our culture
according to Lippmann’s public opinion, how are we supposed to understand someone’s report?
need to appraise the info which has been at their disposal and the minds through which they have filtered it
according to Lippmann’s public opinion, what is the most pervasive of all influences?
those which create and maintain the repertory of stereotypes
what matters about stereotypes according to Lippmann’s public opinion? what do these depend on?
the character of the stereotypes and the gullibility with which we employ them
these depend upon those inclusive patterns which constitute our philosophy of life
according to Lippmann’s public opinion, what has more authority over imagination and printed word/spoken word? why?
photographs since they come directly to us without human meddling
what does Mr Wallas say in Lippmann’s public opinion?
we may indeed have become biologically parasitic upon our social heritage (idea that stereotype is passed through generations)
what is social facilitation?
performance on simple or well-rehearsed tasks tends to be enhanced when we are in the presence of others (even when we are not competing against them).
explain Cohen’s study on culture of honor
- uni students came to lab, half Southern US (culture of honor)
- walked down hallway and confed bumped into them and swore at them (either publicly or alone)
- told they would be shocked, asked to pick level (confeds said 25 and 75)
- tested saliva before and after for cortisol and T
- 85% south had high anger levels (35% north)
- only south increased cortisol and T after insult
- south ps more likely to pick bigger shock in front of 2 confederates
What is a field experiment?
- An experiment that takes place in a natural setting within which the researcher manipulates the IV and records the effect on the DV
- ps don’t know they’re participating in research
Isen & Levin field experiment on emotions and behaviour w phone booth
- half ps found dime planted in phone booth
- almost all who got dime helped confed pick up papers when they came out (and only 1/25 of those who didn’t find dime!!!)
how does experience sampling methods work?
- way to collect naturalistic observations
- notified several times during the day to record data (can use electronically activated recorder)
- ex Larson study found moms had more positive emotions when away from home, opposite for dads
What is terror management theory?
- human beings are unconsciously terrified of their mortality
Study on terror management theory
- judges in AZ asked to set bond for prostitute
- half judges given questionnaire ab thoughts/feelings ab their own death
- set much higher bond, prob motivated to defend belief system in face of law violation
what research has the highest ecological validity of naturalistic observations?
archival research
what ethics must be respected in social psychological research? (5)
informed consent, privacy, risks and benefits, deception, debriefing
Explain the effects of mere contact in the Robbers cave experiment
mere contact btw the groups without introduction of superordinate goals was going to be insufficient to reduce the negative relationships btw the groups
the mere fact of contact had no positive effect toward reducing existing hostility
SDT begins w what basic observation?
that all human societies tend to be structured as systems of group-based social hierarchies
Individual vs Group based social hierarchy
- indiv: ppl get power bc of their own characteristics
- group: power indiv has bc of group membership
what is the achieved component of social status dependent on?
the social status and power of one’s ascribed group membership
3 hierarchy/power systems
- age
- gender
- arbitrary-set (socially constructed, flexible, contextual)
which system is associated with the greatest degree of brutality, violence and oppression?
arbitrary-set system
Which systems are more associated with social control?
age and gender systems
are arbitrary-set stratifications found in small hunter-gatherer communities?
no bc they lack sufficient economic surplus (does not allow for the dev of highly specialized social roles)
systems of arbitrary set hierarchy will emerge whenever _____?
the proper economic conditions allow
3 assumptions of SDT
- age and gender hierachies exist in all systems; arbitrary-set hierarchies emerge in systems producing economic surplus
- most group conflict/oppression is manifestation of predisposition to form social hierarchies
- human social systems subject to counterbalancing influences of hierarchy enhancing/attenuating forces
Differences between SIT and SDT
while SIT recognizes and accommodates itself to the reality of social hierarchy and power differences btw social groups, SDT is centrally focused on an built around the notion of group based social hierarchy
SIT was originally developed to explain in-group favouritism while SDT was originally conceived as a model of social hierarchy
SDT argues that group based social hierarchy is driven by which three proximal processes?
aggregated individual discrimination
aggregated institutional discrimination
behavioural asymmetry (behav. diffs that contribute to and are reinforced by group hierarchical system – subordinates play active role in their oppression)
Systematic terror
- use of violence or threats of violence disproportionately directed against subordinates
- maintains hierarchy