Midterm 1 (excluding review) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Literature Search

A

State of research

Design ideas

Methodlogical problems

Databases

  • PsychInfo
  • PsychLit
  • Journal articles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Journal parts

A
  1. Abstract
  2. Introduction
  3. Method
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
    - penultimate paragraph: limitations
    - last paragraph: future
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Principles of the APA

A
Beneficence and Nonmalefience
-minimize harm, maximize help
Fidelity and Integrity
-truthfulness
Trust
-establish w/ participants
Justice
-who should benefit?
Respect for People's Rights and Dignity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

10 sets of ethical standards

A
Resolving ethical issues
Competence 
Human relations
Advertising
Record keeping and fees
Education and training
Research and publication
Assessment
Therapy
Privacy issues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Institutional Approval (IRB)

A

Exempt - no deception/harm

Expidited - little deception/harm

Full review - children, animals, much deception/harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Research misconduct

A

Fabrication - making up

Falsification - manipulating

Plagiarism - stealing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Deception

A

Active - lie
-debriefing: full story disclosed

Passive - info left out
-dehoaxing: lie revealed and why

-desensitiving: harmed in some way when leaving a study

Social and Personality (Survey) Psych use the most deception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Use of Psychological Tests

A

Test Publisher Responsibility:

APA standards

  • sell only to qualified users
  • trythfully market the tests they publish
  • provide all test info, including evidence of validity (lie scales) to test users prior to purchase
  • provide test manuals to users upon purchase
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Types of Psychological Tests

A

Projective Tests (least common)

ex. Ink blot, Thematic Appreciation
- projective hypothesis - responses to ambiguous stimuli reflect unconscious processes

Intelligence Tests (most common)

ex. Welcher Adult Int Scale, Welcher Int. Scale for Children
- assesses current cognitive ability
- high reliability
- typically “battery” tests

Self-report Personality Inventories (2nd most common)

ex. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
- yields profile of psychological functioning
- specific subscales to measure lying/faking
- trait requirements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Compliance

A

Foot-in-the-door (does not work w/ $)
Door-in-the-face (works well w/ $)
Low-ball (lack if knowledge, thus ethical concerns)
That’s not all (principle of scarcity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Levels of Measurement

A

Conclusions are determined by type(s) of operations that can be performed on data

Categorical (qual):
Nominal
Ordinal

Continuous (quant):
Interval
Ratio

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Nominal

A

Words (or numbers) define categories

Ex. Gender, ethnicity, eye color, diagnoses

Can report frequencies
Cannot add, subtract, multiply, divide, calculate mean, SD, or correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ordinal Scales

A

Numbers assigned indicate rank on some attribute

Ex. Class rank, rank as a salesperson, rank of a university

Gives no info about the distance between scores

Cannot add, subtract, multiply, divide, calculate mean, SD, or correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Equal Interval Scales

A

Most common

Numbers assigned: each number represents a point equidistant to the two points next to it

Can calculate mean, SD, and correlation, and scores of one group to another

No absolute zero point (disadvantage)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ratio Scales

A

All properties of interval scales but there IS an absolite zero point

Ex. Reaction time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

4 types of reliablity

A

Test-retest
Equivalent forms
Internal consistency (split-half)
Scorer reliability and agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Test-retest Reliability

A

Administer test to same group on 2 occasions

Challenge of practice effects (behavior changes before occasion #2)

Appropriate when test takers are not permanently changed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Equivalent-forms Reliability

A

Extent to which an individual obtains a similar score on different administrations of an equivalent measure

Ex college entrance exams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Internal Consistency Reliability

A

(Split-half)

Extent to which individuals score similarly on items of the same value

Appropriate for homogeneous tests

Administered to one group

Items must be split randomly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Scorer Reliability and Agreement

A

Inter-rater Reliability (IRR)

Amount of consistency among scorer’s observations

2+ individuals score the same thing

90% agreement is the gold standard

Each scorer must code independently

Appropriate only when scoring requires judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Calculating IRR

A

Inter-rater Agreement: calculated to determine consistency of judgements between scores
-Cohen’s kappa

Intra-rater Agreement: calculated to determine consistency of judgements of one scorer across all tests
-Coefficient alpha

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Anhedonia

A

Lack of motivation

Things aren’t as appealing as they used to be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

IRR of Selected DSM-5 Diagnoses

A

For most DSM-5 categories, reliability is good

Problem: comorbidity (symptom overlap)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

4 Main types of validity

A

Face
Vontrnt
Criterion-Related
Construct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Face Validity

A

On quick insoection; surface level

How the test TAKERS percieve things

Tells us little about what a test measures

26
Q

Content Validity

A

Tests that measure concrete attributes (observable and measurable behaviors)

Extent to which the items on a test are representative of what the test is supposed to measure

  1. Defining the testing universe
  2. Developing the test specifications
  3. Establishing a test format
  4. Constructing test questions
27
Q

Criterion-Related Validity

A

Tests that predict outcomes

Extent to which test scores are systematically related to a relative criterion

2 types: Predictive and Concurrent

28
Q

Criterion

A

Measure of performance (Independent behaviors, attitudes, and events we correlate to test scores

29
Q

Predictive Validity

A

Subset of C-R

Scores predict future behavior
-important to show relationships between test scores and future behaviors

Predictive Method

30
Q

The Predictive Method

A
  1. Group takes test (the predictor)
  2. Scores held
  3. After elapsed time, collect measure of some behavior (the criterion)
  4. Correlate scores with the criterion
31
Q

Concurrent Validity

A

Subset of C-R

Scores predict current performance
-typically used clinically

Concurrent method

32
Q

The Concurrent Method

A

Test and criterion are measured at the same time

33
Q

Contruct Validity

A

Tests that measure abstract constructs (many tests needed)
Ex. Intelligence, love, personality, theoretical, etc.)

Extent to which the items on a test are representative of what the test is supposed to measure

  1. Defining the testing universe
  2. Developing the test specifications
  3. Establishing a test format
  4. Constructing test questions

Varying agreeability between researchers

Concrete and Abstract constructs

Convergent ans Discriminant subsets

34
Q

Concrete constructs

A

Activities that are more observable and measurable

35
Q

Abstract Constructs

A

Underlying attitudes or attributes that exist in our minds/imaginations

36
Q

The Construct Process

A

Use scientific method to first gather theoretical evidence and then gather psychometric evidence

Exs. Reliability
Convergent validity
Discriminant validity
Content validity
C-R valudity
Experimental interventions
37
Q

Construct Explication

A
  1. Identify behaviors that relate to construct
    v
  2. Identify other related constructs
    v
  3. Identify behaviors related to other construct
    vvv(all 3)
    Construct explication
38
Q

Self-efficacy

A

Confidence in your ability to perform a specific task

Int (0)
Self-esteem (0)
Anxiety (-)
Coping (+)
Performance (+)
Past achievements (+)
39
Q

Convergent Validity

A

Subset of Construct

Evidence that test scores correlate with scores on other tests that measure the same construct

40
Q

Discriminant Validity

A

(Divergent Validity)

Subset of Construct

Evidence that test scores are not correlated with unrelated constructs

41
Q

Multitrait Multimethod Matrix

A

Method of establishing convergent and discriminant validity at the same time

Measure several different constructs using several different methods

42
Q

Factor Analysis

A

An advanced statistical procedure based on the concept of correlation that helps investigators to explain why two tests are correlated

Factors - the underlying commonalities of tests or test questions that measure a construct

43
Q

General Intelligence

A

(g)

Combination of many different intelligences
-mainly fluid and crystallized

44
Q

Fluid Intelligence

A

Non-verbal, spatial, innate and stable

45
Q

Crystallized Intelligence

A

Verbal tasks

Increases with time

46
Q

Exploratory Factor Analysis

A

Identifies the underlying components (not based on a theory/hypothesis)

Does not provide verification required to establish construct validity

47
Q

Multiple choice studying

A

Recognition - retroactive interference

48
Q

Essay studying

A

Recall - proactive interference

49
Q

Confirmatory-factor analysis

A

Confirms whether factors in a theory actually exist

Goid for establishing construct validity

50
Q

Goodness-of-fit test

A

Evidence that the factors obtained empirically are similar to those proposed theoretically

51
Q

Confirmatory-factor analysis

A

Good for establishing construct validity

52
Q

Threats to Construct Validity

A

Mono-appreciation bias
Mono-method bias
Construct confounding

53
Q

Statistical Conclusion Validity

A

Concerned with sources of random error with appropriate use of statistics and statistical tests

54
Q

Internal Validity

A

Experiment

A causes B

Eliminates many extraneous variables

Degree to which casual inferences can be made between a measured or manipulated variable (IV) and another measured variable (DV)

55
Q

Threats to Intermal Validity

A

History - events after the study begins which could alter the results
(Demand Characteristics)
Maturation - internal changes that occur to subjects during the course of the study which are not a part of the study

^ can be reduced by using a control group

Regression Artifact - tendency of extreme scores to regress toward the mean

^ avoiding extreme scores will minimize this

Mortality - loss of subjects

^ large groups, representative populations, and follow-up procedures minimize this

56
Q

Maximizing Internal Validity

A
  1. Standardization
  2. Obtain as much info as possible about the participants
  3. Obtain as mych info as possible about the procedural details
  4. Choosing an appropriate research design
57
Q

External Validity

A

Generalizability

Degree to which the observed casual relationships are generalizable

  • Population Validity - generalize sample to pop.
  • Ecological Validity - settings
  • Temporal Validity - time
  • Treatment Variation Validity (“Therapist Validity”)
  • Outcome Validity - different yet related DVs
58
Q

Maximizing External Validity

A
  1. Random Sampling
  2. Heterogeneous samples (diversity)
  3. Conduct analyses to determine whether the relationship holds across characteristics of subjects, settings, etc.
59
Q

Sampling Methods

A

Representative sample
Equal probability of selection methos (EPSEM)
Sampling error
Both random and non-random can be used in the same study

60
Q

Random Sampling Methods

A

Simple Random Sampling (EPSEM)

Stratified Random Sampling

  • division into strata
  • proportional (most common) and non-proportional

Cluster Random Sampling

  • things (clustersd) instead of people
    (i. e. Numerous schools)
  • one-stage, two-stage

Systematic Sampling

  • select every nth person
  • avoids contagion effect
61
Q

Non-random Sampling Methods

A

Convenience Sampling
-location chosen

Quota Sampling

  • asking for the quota
  • numbers of kind of people you want

Purposive Sampling
-specify characteristic of population of interest

Snowball Sampling
-refer a similar friend

Higher = more valid
Lower = more error