Midterm 1 Flashcards

(50 cards)

1
Q

Why did doctors feel justified in withholding information in each of the following three cases:

a. Tuskegee Syphilis Study
b. Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital study
c. The treatment of Henrietta Lacks at Johns Hopkins Hospital

Are any of these cases benevolent deception, or were patients simply being used as a means to an end?

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The Henrietta Lacks case involves three interlinking ethical issues- violations of informed consent, privacy breeches, and control over biological materials. Summarize each of these issues and consider which areas of ethical misconduct, if any, the Nuremberg Code should have prevented.

A
  • Henrietta Lacks did not give informed consent when signing the consent forms for her surgery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe the four models of physician-patient interaction. Which do you think was most evident in:

a. Physician’s interactions with Henrietta Lacks
b. Physician’s interactions with Deborah Lacks and her siblings

A

c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Discuss the cases of HeLa, Trovan, and AZT. Do any of those cases violate the Belmont report’s principle of justice?

A

c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Some have argued that the benefits of the HeLa cell line justify any harm done to the Lacks family in the collection of her tissue. Explain how that position could be argued and consider if the same might be said of He Jianjui’s research on gene editing.

A

c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are some of the analytical tools that became important in the study of priority disputes in science? How might these tools be applied to study a contemporary controversy like the cloning of pets?

A

c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the HeLa bomb?

A

c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the signifiance of the HPV vaccine?

A

c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the signifiance of the polio vaccine?

A

c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who were McKusick and Hsu?

A

c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the Moore case?

A
  • Official title is Moore v. Regents of University of California (1988)
  • Involves Dr. David Golde who patented the Mo cell line
  • Moore accused him of malpractice and property theft
  • Sandoz sued $15 million for rights to develop the Mo cell line
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain essential biologicals.

A

c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the Jim Crow laws?

A

Laws enforcing racial segregation in Southern states between 1877-1950s Civil rights movements
Constitutionality of the ‘Separate but Equal’ principle held up in 1896 Supreme CourtPlessy v. Ferguson decision
Enforced by vigilantism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the Great Migration?

A

The migration of African Americans of the deep South to Industrial cities
Happened from 1910-1970

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who was George Gey?

A

Researcher who cultures HeLa

Had a major role in distrubting HeLa cell line.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who was Richard Telinde?

A
  • Cervical carcinomas are divided into two types; invasive carcinomas (have penetrated the surface of the cervix) and noninvasive carcinomas (also known as carcinoma in situ)
    • In 1951, most doctors believed that invasive carcinoma was deadly while carcinoma in situ was not
      • Therefore, they only treated invasive carcinoma very aggressively and did not treat carcinoma in situ because they thought it wouldn’t spread
      • Telinde disagreed
    • Telinde’s theory was that carcinoma in situ was an early stage of invasive carcinoma
      • He, therefore, treated all carcinoma in situ as well as invasive carcinoma, often removing the entire uterus, cervix, and most of the vagina
      • Critics said this measure was extreme and unnecessary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What was the Tuskegee syphilis study?

A

1932-US Public Health Service and the Tuskegee Institute
Record natural history of of syphilis in order to develop treatment programs
Study involved 600 African American men (399 w/ syphilis, 200 w/out)

The medical situation at outset of experiment:
35% of reproductive age population
Treatment success less than 30%
Mercury and bismuth treatments

Men told they they were being treated for ‘bad blood’
Free med exams, meals and burial insurance
Men not given proper treatment to cure illness
Original 6 month study extended 40 years
1940s- penicillin
1972- information leaked to press by whistleblower
Advisory panel declares the study ethically unjustifiable-knowledge gained of little value compared with risks to subjects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was the HeLa Distribution Centre?

A

a

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Explain the Microbiological Associates.

A

s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is benevolent deception?

A

s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Who was Southam?

22
Q

What was the Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital?

23
Q

What is spontaneous transformation?

24
Q

What is the golden age of medicine?

A
  • From 1900s to the 1950s
  • Found treatments for syphilis, diabetes, strep, and staph
  • The vitamin market exploded in the 30s
  • During WW2, antibiotics were put into production to fight about TB
  • In the 50s, the vaccine for polio was invented by Salk.
25
What was the pediatric scurvy research?
- An example of human research subjects. - A research study conducted by Hess and Fish - Diets of orphaned children modified to induce scurvy and rickets Criticism: Safeguarding the vulnerable Pain and suffering Voluntary consent Defenses: Progress of medicine Conditions uniquely uniform and controllable Paying back society
26
What is the Nuremberg Code?
Above all, participation in research must be voluntary.  The results of research must be useful and unobtainable by other means The study must be rationally based on knowledge of the disease or condition to be studied. IT must avoid unnecessary suffering The study cannot include death or disabling injury as a foreseeable consequence Its benefits must outweigh its risks The study must use proper facilities to protect participants The study must be conducted by qualified individuals Participants may withdraw from the study if they wish Investigators must be prepared to stop
27
What was the Helsinki Declaration?
``` Section A: Prioritizing participant health Standards of monitoring Section B: Expanded view of ‘voluntarism’ Section C: Combining research with clinical care ```
28
Who was Henry Beecher?
``` Ethics and Clinical Research (1966) Similarity between Nazi science and American research 22 unethical studies Preventable deaths Undue risks Use of vulnerable subjects Administrative convenience Implications: misconduct in a peace-time, democratic setting? ```
29
What was the National Research Act and Belmont Report?
``` National Research Act Regulatory system Written consent Institutional Review Boards Belmont Report Principles to resolve complex ethical questions Respect for persons Beneficence Justice ``` ``` Principles: Respect for persons, Beneficence, Justice: Practices: Informed Consent Risk and Benefit Analysis Appropriate Selection of Patients ``` Respect for Persons: Autonomy is a form of personal liberty of action where the individual determines their own course of action in accordance with their chosen plan. Respect for individuals as autonomous agents entitles them to such autonomous determinations without limitation on their liberty being imposed by others Beneficence: Requires not only that we treat persons autonomously and that we refrain from harming them, but also that we contribute to their welfare including their health. Thus the principle asserts the duty to help others further their important or legitimate interests…to confer benefits and actively to prevent or remove harms…and to balance possible goods against the possible harms of an action. Justice: Requires the fair and equal distribution of benefits and risks of participation in a research study. Recruitment and selection of participants must be done in a fair and equal manner. Justice forbids exposing one group of people to the risks of the research solely for the benefit of another group. Community representatives have the responsibilty to ensure that community participation in a research study is justified.
30
What was the parental model?
Goal: Patients receive the interventions that best promote their health and wellbeing Physician presents the patient with selected information to encourage patient to consent to intervention the physician considers best. Assumes that there are shared objective criteria for determining what is best Physician has duty to seek the best interest of the patient Physician acts as a guide Vision of autonomy: assent or rejection of physician’s choices
31
What was the informative model?
Goal: Physician provides patient with all relevant information, patient selects and then physician carries out the selected interventions Assumes that patients values are known, what they need is facts Physician is a technical expert Patient autonomy involves control over medical decision making
32
What was the interpretive model?
Goal: To identify patient’s value and help patient to select the available treatments that realize those values. Physician provides facts Physician assists patient in making their own values more clear Physician is a counselor Autonomy involves self-understanding as the patient comes to better understand who they are and act in a manner that is consistent with their identity.
33
What is the deliberative model?
Goal: help the patient determine and choose the health-related values relevant to the clinical situation. Physician’s values and patient’s values are clarified Physician acts as a friend presenting and evaluating alternative approaches Autonomy involves dialogue about preferences, alternatives, values and their implications for treatment
34
Explain social justice.
‘The good of the whole community, where that is taken to include both the good of each and the good of all, in an acknowledgement that one depends on the other.’ - Respect - Fairness - Right distribution of risks - Right distribution of benefits - Two issues of social justice in medicine include; - Rights of patients during trials - Rights of patients following completion of trials
35
What were the AZT trials?
1997 AZT trials Following successful trial of drug therapy for HIV transmission from mother to child At the time, 65% of world’s population of HIV infected people live in sub-Saharan Africa They experience a higher rate of transmission of HIVE from mother to child (30-45%) According to one estimate, more than 80% of deaths among people 25-55 were attributable to HIV infection Controversy involved the participants in control arm of the trials Placebo-control groups For: Local standards of treatment did not include HIV prophylactic intervention Placebo controlled studies are most efficient way to obtain information It would be ‘ethical imperialism’ to use US standards to design medical research Against: Duty to protect all members of a trial Placebo controlled studies are easily compromised ‘Ethical relativism’ of experimenters justifies trials that would never be possible in US, creating incentive to exploit developing and post-colonial countries Revision of the Helsinki Declaration- placebos should not be used when standards of treatment are known. The benefits, risks, burdens, and effectiveness of new treatments must be tested against the best alternative methods US FDA Alternative guidelines ‘whether a particular placebo controlled trial of a new agent will be acceptable to subjects and investigators when there is a known effective therapy is a matter of patient, investigator, and IRB judgement, and acceptability may differ among regions and populations chosen. ‘ - lack of consent
36
What were the Trovan trials?
Meningitis that took place in Nigeria | - Lack of consent
37
What is an Entrepreneurial Body?
- Body is a source of valuable and marketable materials - It is commodified - Why? 1. ) Shift toward joint ventures between university and industry. 2. ) Patenting of genetically modified organisms. 3. ) Expanding markets for tissue.
38
What is the Human Genome Project?
- Genetic mapping - Understanding and surveillance of diseases - Origin of individual racial groups - Preservation from 'extinction' - Clash with Indigenous groups - Racial profiling - Future uses of information - Biopiracy
39
What is Cord Blood?
- Cord blood is divided between public blood banks and family blood banks. - In the public blood bank system, the blood is donated to society - A third is discarded, a third is used for unrelated transplants, and only a third of the total amount of blood is used for related transplants - In family blood banks, the family owns the cord blood - A third is stored without use, another third is used for stem cell therapy, and the final third is used for related transplants
40
What is Myriad Case?
- The case involving a company that found the genetic coding for breast cancer and ovarian cancer - Involve patent to reveal DNA of patients, which is owned by patients not by doctors and scientists - Need more info
41
What is CRISPR?
Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) Discovered as part of basic research into how bacteria fight viral infections CRISPR allows scientists to delete or insert DNA in cells Disease prevention Mutations to BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer genes Gene drives Control of malaria through mosquito population Treatments Cancer Deletions and rearrangements of 100s or 1000s of DNA letters Mutations far from target site Mutations may be benign or cancerous
42
Who was He Jiankui?
Chinese scientist He Jiankui Alters CCR5 gene, a gene that creates a protein that makes it possible for AIDS to infect cells Implants embryos in a volunteer Twin girls: Nana- both copies of CCR5 gene disabled Lulu-only 1 copy of CCR5 gene is disabled The study was risky Changes will be inherited by all children’s progeny Susceptibility to West Nile Virus, Japanese encephalitis, influenza The study didn’t address an unmet medical need There was a risk of ‘mosaicism’ The study was carried out in secrecy The volunteers didn’t have adequate information to provide informed consent There was an unmet medical need Even routine medical procedures carry some risk Mutations related to CRISPR have overwhelmingly been benign Objectors have hyped the risks of CRISPER
43
What is mosaicism?
The term mosaicism is used to describe the presence of more than one type of cell in a person
44
Explain breaching experiments.
``` Harold Garfinkel ‘breaching experiments’ Social processes: Language and imagery Influence of political and economic interests Boundary work Alliances Trust ```
45
What are priority disputes?
See HIV Co-Discovery
46
Explain the co-discovery of HIV.
``` Co-discovery of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Gallo (1981): T cells Cell culturing Techniques Montagnier & Barre-Sinoussi(1983): Isolates new virus from AIDs patient Publication in Science Gallo (1985) Isolates virus Techniques for growing virus Test for detecting virus in blood Publication in Science Controversy Similarity in genetic sequence of AIDS virus Did Gallo use French virus for his own experiments? ```
47
What is cold fusion?
``` Pons and Fleishmann ‘Cold Fusion’ Studying controversies: The Strong Programme of Social Construction Openings and closures of debates ‘Symmetrical approach’ Avoiding the ‘sociology of error’ ```
48
Explain the Vitamin C and Cancer controversy.
An accepted scientific fact: Vitamin C is not a treatment for cancer A typical argument: Researchers eventually learned that vitamin C does not cure cancer because vitamin C does not cure cancer But there is a problem with this argument… Vitamin C believers Dr. Linus Pauling Nobel laureate in molecular biology ‘Molecular disease’ Sickle cell anemia ‘Orthomolecular medicine’ ``` Uncovering networks: Dr. Ewan Cameron Scottish surgeon ‘Holistic health’ proponents Health food industry ```
49
What is sociology of error?
An accepted scientific fact: Vitamin C is not a treatment for cancer A typical argument: Researchers eventually learned that vitamin C does not cure cancer because vitamin C does not cure cancer But there is a problem with this argument…
50
What is dog cloning?
``` Calculating potential risks and benefits Animal suffering Pregnancy losses, sickness and death of young The effects of cloning on genetic variation Effects on human welfare Food safety Values: Cloning is ‘unnatural’ Cloning gives too much power to humans Commodification of animals Implications for unwanted animals ```