Midterm 1 Flashcards
1
Q
Forensic Psychology
A
Field of psychology dealing with all aspects of human behaviour relating to the legal system
2
Q
Where did forensic psychology research first take place?
A
US and Europe
3
Q
wHo conducted one of the fist experiments in forensic psych? Where?
A
James Catell at Columbia
4
Q
Where were James Cattell’s experiments later called?
A
The psychology of eyewitness technology
5
Q
What is La Suggestibilite?
A
Study conducted by Alfred Binet around the same time as James Cattell which showed that testimonies given by children where highly susceptible to suggestive techniques.
6
Q
Who is William Stern
A
Conducted studies examining the suggestibility of witnesses
7
Q
What is the “Reality Experiment” and who is it attributed to?
A
Used by eyewitness researchers to study eyewitness recall and recognition. Is attributed to William Stern
8
Q
What does the “reality experiment” involve?
A
It involves participants being exposed to stages events and asked to provide information about the event.
9
Q
What did Stern find about the accuracy of a persons testimony?
A
Found that emotional arousal can have negative impacts on the accuracy of a persons testimony.
10
Q
Albert Von Schrenck-Notzing
A
One of the first to provide testimony in court on the effects of pre trial publicity on memory
11
Q
Retroactive Memory Falsification
A
Process where people confuse actual memories of events with events described by the media
12
Q
Julian Varendonck
A
Psychologist who demonstrated children’s testimonies were inaccurate and easily led by suggestive questioning
13
Q
Is it common for psychologists to testify on matters such as fitness to start trial and criminal responsibility as well as including risk assessment, treatment of traumatic brain injury, factors affecting eyewitness Emory and jury decison making
A
Yes
14
Q
Where has the most significant contributions by psychologist in Canada been?
A
In the areas of corrections such as constructing better risk-assessment tools and developing effective treatment approaches
15
Q
Clinical Forensic psychologist
A
Psychologist who are broadly concerned with the assessment and treatment of mental health issues as they pertain to the law or legal system
16
Q
A frequent task of clinical forensic psychologists
A
Assessment of an offender to determine if they are likely to pose a risk to the community if released form prison
17
Q
Issues clinical forensic psychologists are interested in
A
Conducting divorce and child custody mediation
Providing expert testimony on questions of a psychological nature
Running critical incident stress debriefings with police officers
Facilitation of treatment programs for offenders
18
Q
Forensic anthropologist
A
examine remains of deceased individuals to help determine their identity and how they might have died
19
Q
Forensic Biology
A
Apply their knowledge of life sciences to legal investigations. Such as the presence of insects on a decomposing body to determine the timeline of death
20
Q
Forensic odontology
A
Study dental aspects of criminal activity. May assist police in identifying deceased dental records or who left bite marks in an individual
21
Q
Forensic Pathology
A
Medical doctors eho examine injuries or remains of dead bodies to figure our cause of death
22
Q
Forensic Toxicology
A
Study effects of drugs and other chemicals on people within the context of the law
23
Q
Experimental Forensic Psychologist
A
Concerned with the study of human behavior as it pertains to the legal system
24
Q
Type of training experimental forensic psychologists undergo
A
PhD level graduate training with research focused in a topic related to forensic psychology
25
SFU Psychology and Law program
Allows students to receive PhD and LLB at same time. Produces forensic psychologist more informed about the legal process and system
26
SFU Mental health, law, and policy institute
Promotes interdisciplinary collaboration in research and training in areas related to mental health, law, and policy
27
Role of forensic psychologist as a legal scholar
Engage in scholarly anlyses of mental health, law, psychologically oriented legal movements
28
What is the applied work of a forensic psychologist scholar surrounded around?
Applied work is most likely centred around policy analysis and legislative consultation
29
What are 3 ways that psychology and law relate to one another
1. Psychology and the law
2. Psychology in the law
3. Psychology of the law
30
Psychology and the law
Use of psychology to examine the operation of the legal system
31
What are the types of research and examinations that fall under psychology and the law?
"Are eyewitnesses accurate?"
"Do certain interrogation techniques cause people to falsely confess?"
"Is it possible to predict of an offender will be violent after release from prison?"
32
Psychology in the law
Use of psychological knowledge in the legal system
33
What are 2 different forms psychology in the law may take?
1. Psychologist using their knowledge of human communication to assist police in hostage negotiations
2. Psycholgosts in court providing expert testimony concerning relevance
34
Psychology of the law
Use of psychology to study the law itself
35
What type of questions does the psychology of the law address
Does the law reduce the amount of crime in our society?
36
Expert witness
Witness who provides the court with information that assists the court in understanding an issue of relevance to a case
37
Can expert witnesses provide the court with their personal opinion on what matters relevant to the case?
Yes but opinions must fall within the limits of expert witness's area of expertise
38
What are expert witnesses there for?
They are there as an educator to the judge and jury. NOT as an advocate for the defence and prosecution
39
What are 2 reasons why being an expert testimony is challenging?
1. There's a lot for the expert witness to know
2. inherent differences exists between psych + law
40
General Acceptance test
Standard for accepting expert testimony which states that expert testimony will be admissible if the basis of the testimony is generally accepted within the relevant scientific community
41
Criticism of General Acceptance Test
The vagueness of the term general acceptance whether trial judges are able to make this determination
42
How was vagueness addressed in the US Supreme Court?
When daubert's experts evidence was rejected as they were generally not accepted by the scientific community so they made the Daubert criteria
43
What did the Supreme Court state that for evidence to be admissible it must..?
1. Be provided by a qualified expert
2. Be relevant
3. Be reliable
44
Daubert Criteria
American standard for accepting expert testimony
45
What are 4 things in the Daubert Criteria that say scientific evidence is valid?
1. peer-reviewed
2. testable
3. has a recognized rate of error
4. adhere to professional standards
46
Mohan Criteria
Canadian standard for accepting expert testimony
47
R. v. Mohan
Mohan was a pediatrician chargeds with sexual assault and wanted to call upon a psychiatrist to testify that he did not for the profile for a sexual offender
48
4 Criteria of Mohan criteria
1. Relevance
2. Necessity
3. Absence of Exclusion rule
4. Qualifications of the Expert
49
Relevance (mohan)
Evidence must be relevant and make the fact at issue more or less likely (percentage of it occurring)
50
Necessity (mohan)
Testimony must be about something that goes beyond the common understanding of the court
51
Absence of exclusion rule (mohan)
Any rule that may cause evidence to be inadmissible and prevents topic from being discussed
52
Qualification of expert (mohan)
Qualifications of expert determined by: amount of trainings and experience they possess
Must have expertise in the domain for testimony to be admissible
53
In addition to Mohan criteria, what else does experts in Canada must be?
Independent and impartial where their opinions would not change regardless of which party retained them
54
What are the 3 roles of expert witness
1. Conduit-educator
2. Philosopher-advocate
3. hired gun
55
Conduit-educator
presents a full overview of current research
56
Philosopher-advocate
Brings their personal views into their testimony and advocates for things that align with personal views
57
Hired Gun
testifies in a way that aligns with the side that hired them
58
What are 4 other ways of influencing the legal system
1. Cross-disciplinary Education
2. Amicus Curia beliefs (Friends of the court)
3. Dissemination of research findings
4. Legislatures + public policy
59
Cross-disciplinary Education
Actors in justice system and research receiving medication in psyc- + law
60
amicus Curia beliefs (Friends of the court)
Group of individuals come together to provide a document to educate the court on a particular subject
61
Dissemination of research findings
Sharing research through various outputs in efforts to make more accessible
62
Legislatures + public policy
Writing of large scale reports to influence policy lobbying through professional institutions
63
Suspect
Individual under investigation for a crime
64
Accused
Individual who has been charged with a crime
65
Plaintiff
individual in civil court who brings a case against someone
66
Complainant
Individual who has accused someone of committing a crime
67
Triers of fact
decision-makers in the justice system (judges and juries)
68
The Crown/Prosecution
Government's side of adversarial system; charge accused with crime
69
Defense
Side of adversarial system that defends accused
70
Purpose of criminal
To inflict punishment
71
Purpose of civil
To restore justice
72
Who investigates criminal cases
the police
73
who investigates civil cases
an individual
74
who brings a criminal case to court
the crown
75
who brings a civil case to court
plaintiff
76
who pays for criminal prosecution
the state
77
who pays for civil prosecution
Plaintiff
78
Who pays for criminal defense?
The defendant
79
Who pays for civil defense?
The defendant
80
Who must prove the criminal case?
The crown
81
Who must prove the civil case?
Plaintiff
82
Criminal remedy
restriction
83
Civil restriction
monetary (money)
84
Criminal standard of proof
beyond a reasonable doubt
85
Civil standard of proof
On a balance of probabilities
86
Criminal profiling
Technique for identifyingthe major personality behavioral characteristics of an individual based upon analysis of the crimes they committed
87
Voluntary confession
Willingly confessing to a crime
88
False Confession
Confession that is either intentionally fabricated or not based on actual knowledge of the facts that form its content
89
Retracted confession
Confession that the confessor later declares to be false
90
Disputed confession
Confession that is later disputed in trial
91
4 criteria for confessions to be admissible
1. Suspect must be of sound operating mind
2. no threats or false promises
3. no oppressive interviewing context
4. no deception that would shock the community
92
What police behavior would render a confession inadmissible?
Physical abuse, threats of torture, involving suspects family in threats or promises, creating oppressive conditions, using tricks to shock the community
93
What police behaviour would render a confession admissible
Lying within limits, good cop bad cop routine, offering counselling help, religious appeals. involving a suspects family in appeals, using polygraph test, presenting fabricated evidence
94
What are suspect rights in Canada?
Have the right to silence and the right to legal counsel
95
What happens if a suspect waives their rights to silence?
If a suspect waives their rights to silence then their confession is admissible in court
96
When is understanding your rights usually reduced?
It is usually reduces when conditions are stressful
97
3 reasons why confessions are powerful evidence
Save time, lead to other evidence, influential to jurors
98
Fundamental Attribution Error
Tendency to attribute other's behaviours to internal factors and to ignore situational factors
99
3 types of false confessions
Voluntary false confessions
Coerced-compliant false confessions
Coerced-internalized false confessions
100
Voluntary False Confessions
Suspect falsely confesses to ac rime they know they did not commit because they have something to gain (protection of another individual)
101
Coerced-compliant false confession
Suspect falsely confesses to a crime they know they did not commit
102
What is the result of coercive interrogation techniques
Coerced-compliant false confession
103
Why would someone commit a coerced-compliant false confession?
because they believe its the only way to stop the interrogation is to just confess
104
Coerced-internalized false confession
suspect falsely confesses to a crime they have come to believe the committed
105
What is the result of coercive interrogation techniques?
Coerced-internalized false confession
106
What do those who commits a coerced-internalized false confession believe?
Believe their own guilt even with a lack of memories
107
Why do people falsely confess?
Due to the vulnerability of the suspect, innocence, interrogations
108
Who is at a higher risk of a false confession?
Those who are high in suggestibility, who may not want to see the consequences of their actions, those who accept what an authority figure is telling them
109
What do interrogations break down?
Breaks down self regulation (our ability to focus and think logically)
110
How are suspects affected by intense situations?
It reduces the suspects ability to consider the consequences of their actions
111
What is an innocent person most likely to do?
Are most likely to waive their rights, want to help out, and believe a confession may be seen as false because they believe their own innocence.y
112
Police Interrogation
Process where the police interviews a suspect to get information and a confession
113
What is the focus of police interrogations
Psychological techniques
114
True or false. Physical methods were not previously utilized to elicit confessions
False. Physically coercive tactives were used to extract confessions
115
Reid Technique
9 step interrogation model used in North America to extract confessions from suspects
116
4 Strategies utilized in Reid Technique
1. Loss of Control
2. Social Isolation
3. Certainty of guilt
4. Minimization of culpability
117
Loss of Control
Control is taken away from the suspect. The interrogators control everything such as content of conversation, physical environment, and amount of time spent on interview
118
Social Isolation
Interrogations happen alone with lack of support from friends or support person. The suspect has no one to back them up
119
Certainty of Guilt
Interrogators focus on the guilt of the suspect. May present real or fabricated evidence to illustrate guilt. Interrogators go in with the idea that the suspect is guilty and they just need to get a confession
120
Minimization of culpability
Interrogators minimize the suspects role in the crime. Shift the blame to others and provide justification such as “you’re only a kid”
121
3 Steps of the Reid Technique
1. Factual analysis
2. Behaviour Analysis Interview
3. Interrogation
122
Factual Analysis
Investigator gathers evidence and reviews case file
123
Behaviour Analysis Interview
Assess guilt with behaviour provoking question. Non accusation all interview
124
Interrogation
Obtain confession. 9 step procedure is implemented
125
First step of Reid Interrogation Technique
Accuse - suspect of doing the crime and confront them of their guilt
126
Second step of Reid Interrogation Technique
Offer suspect possible excuses for committing the crime. A
127
Third step of Reid Interrogation Technique
Cutoff the suspects attempt to deny their involvement in crime
128
Fourth step of Reid Interrogation Technique
Overcome the explanations offered by suspect. Do not let them talk
129
Fifth step of Reid Interrogation Technique
Hold the attention of the suspect and make them feel cornered in if they begin to withdrawa
130
Sixth step of Reid Interrogation Technique
Show sympathy and understanding. Urge them to come clean
131
Seventh step of Reid Interrogation Technique
Reframe the issue.”Maybe someone pressured you to do it”
132
Eighth step of Reid Interrogation Technique
Elicit a full infestation when suspect agrees to one of the alternative explanations
133
Ninth step of Reid Interrogation Technique
Write the full confession and have them sign
134
Minimization techniques
Designed to lull suspect into a fall sense of security. Providing alternative explanations and justifications for the crime
135
Maximization techniques
Designed to intimidate suspect. Interrupt denials and make accusations
136
When can a suspects statements be used as evidence against them?
When in Canada and America, the suspect knowingly and voluntarily waives their rights to silence and legal counsel.
137
What are the 3 problems with the Reid Technique
1. Detecting Deception
2. Investigator Bias
3. False confessions
138
Detecting Deception
Detecting when someone is being deceptive. There is very little research to show that police can detect deception with accuracy.
139
Investigator Bias
When people form a belief about something before they enter a situation. They unconsciously seek out and interpret info in a way that confirms their belief.
Happens during interrogation when the police enters thinking the suspect is guilty/
140
False Confessions
Due to situation and pressure being put on individuals
141
Explain the Mr.Big Operation
When an undercover cop befriends a suspect and convinces them to engage in criminal activity as they will receive compensation. They will then meet Mr.Big and talk about a past crime they committed as Mr.Big will need something on them to have dirt on them. Their confession is recorded.
142
Problems with the Mr.Big operation
Controversial, admissible in Canadian courts, Coercive, lack of suspect rights. Influential to jurors
143
What is the goal of the peace method
Encourages information gathering rather than a confession. Is more human and is likely to hold up in court. Implemented to reduce oppressive interrogation techniques
144
What does PEACE stand for?
Preparation + plan, engage + explain, account, closure, evaluation
145
Voluntary confession
Willingly confessing to crime
146
False confession
Confessions that is either intentionally fabricated or is not based on actual knowledge of the facts
147
Retracted confession
Confession that the confessor later declares to be false
148
Disputed confession
Confession that is later disputed in trial because its shown to be involuntary or not true
149
3 types of false confessions
Voluntary, coerced-compliant, coerced internalized
150
Voluntary False Confessions
Falsely confessing to a crime they know they did not commit because they have something to gain (fame or protection of individual)
151
Coerced-compliant false confession
Results from a desire to escape a coercive interrogation environment or gain a benefit promised by the police. Caused by coercive interrogation tactics
152
Coerced-internalized confessions
Results from suggestive interrogation techniques where the confessor actually comes to believe they committed the crime
153
4 things for the admissibility of confessions
1. Suspect must be of sound operating mind
2. No threats or false promises
3. No oppressive interviewing context
4. No deception that would shock the community
154
5 Things that would render a confession inadmissible
Physical abuse, threats of torture, offers of leniency, including family in threats, creating oppressive conditions
155
What would render a confession admissible
Lying within limits, offering counseling, religious appeals, including family in appeals, polygraph test, presenting fabricated evidence
156
Criminal Profiling
Technique for identifying the major personality and behavioural characteristics of an individual based upon analysis of the crimes they have committed
157
Where is criminal profiling most commonly used?
Violent serial crimes
158
Process of profiling includes:
Analyzing crime scene like gathering victims info and studying police reports, make inferences about killers motive, make inferences about identify of perpetrator
159
Deductive Criminal Profiling
Profiling the background characteristics of an unknown offender based on evidence left at the crime scene by that particular offender
160
Example of deductive criminal profiling
Assuming that the length of fingernails of an offender indicate they are a guitar player
161
Inductive Criminal profiling
Profiling the background characteristics of an unknown offender based on what we know about other solved cases
162
Example of inductive criminal profiling
Assumption that a murderer of children has a previous criminal conviction
163
What does inductive criminal profiling largely rely on?
A determination of how likely it is that an offender will posses similar characteristics similar to those who have done similar crimes
164
4 cluster SEARCH strategies
1. Hunters
2. Poachers
3. trollers
4. Trappers
165
Hunters
Actively seek out victims close to home
166
Poachers
Travel far to find victims
167
Trollers
Encounter victims during regular routine
168
Trappers
Put themselves in situation where they have access to preferred victims
169
3 cluster victim selection strategies
1. Telio-specific
2. Pedo specific
3. non-specific
170
Telio-specific
offenders who predominantly target adult female with specific physical features
171
Pedo specific
target child and adolescent with preferred physical features
172
Non-specific
No preferred victim type
173
3 ways to categorize serial offenders
Organized/disorganized Model, Holmes typology, Investigative psychology
174
Characteristics of an organized offender
High intelligence, skilled occupation, sexually adequate, lives with partner, geographically mobile, lives far from crimes, follows crimes in media, maintains residence and vehicle
175
Characteristics of a disorganized offender
Low intelligence, unskilled occupation, sexually inadequate, lives alone, geographically stable, lives close to crime, does not maintain vehicle or residence
176
Organized crime scene
planned offence, use of restraints, antemortem sexual acts, vehicle use, no post-mortem mutilation, corpse not taken, little evidence left behind
177
Disorganized crime scene
Spontaneous offence, no restraints, post-mortem sexual acts, no vehicle, post-mortem mutilation, corpse taken, evidence left at scene
178
4 Classifications of Holmes and Holmes
Visionary, mission-oriented, hedonistic, power-oriented
179
Visionary
Have visions or hears voices from god or spirits instructing them to kill particular individuals
180
Mission-Oriented
motivated by a desire to kill individuals they regard as evil or unworthy
181
Hedonistic
Takes sadistic sexual pleasure in torturing their victims (kills for thrills)
182
Power oriented
get satisfaction from capturing and controlling their victim
183
What does a theoretical base on criminal profiling not take into account?
Does not take into account situational influences in shaping behaviour. How the way you act in class is different to how you would act on a Friday night
184
Geographic Profiling
Technique using crime scene locations to predict the most likely area an offender lives, works, or will commit their next crime
185
What us geographic profiling primarily used for?
Used for prioritizing potential suspects and ranking them staring with the person that lives the closest
186
Basic assumption behind geographic profiling
Serial offenders do not travel far from home to commit crimes
187
Anchor Point
Location the offender leaves to commit the crime (home base)
188
Buffer zone
Around the home of offender where they’re less likely to commit crimes
189
Comfort zone
Where offender is most comfortable committing crimes
190
Distance Decay
Probability of a crime decreases as distance from past crime increases (as you move away from point a, the chances of crime occurring increases
191
Temporal Sequencing
Over time the geographical range of a serial offender’s crime will increase
192
What use VICLAS
Developed by RCMP to collect and analyze info on serious crimes in Canada. Enter characteristics into a computer system providing connections to other crimes. Largely dependant on who os entering the information
193
Crime linkage
Process of deciding if a single perp committed 2 or more crimes
194
Linkage blindness
Inability of law enforcement across different jurisdictions to note that crimes committed in respective jurisdictions may be related
