Midterm 1 Flashcards
Empiricism vs. Rationalism
Rationalism refers to the idea that we can only rely on our reason to know the world. By contrast, Empiricism proposes that we can only trust our senses.
Plato: rationalist
Locke: empiricist
Kant: both
Rationalism: We can’t trust our senses at all, what matters is the realm
of « ideal forms » that we can only know using our reason.
Empiricism: All knowledge originates from sensory
experience.
Plato and the allegory of the cave
The man coming out of the cave realizes that all the shadows he has seen his whole life were just reflections of true things, all illusions. The shadows are our ordinary everyday perception, the input from our senses that we should not trust according to Plato. It is through reason that you can get out of the cave and see the real world.
Locke: simple and complex ideas
information from our senses enters our minds as “simple ideas”— for instance the simple idea of “blue” or the simple idea of a “triangular shape”. These simple ideas can then be assembled together to form “complex ideas” – for instance the complex idea of a “blue triangle”
Hume
Inference of necessary cause and effect (B has to follow A)
relationship is invalid, but psychologically we believe there
is cause and effect.
Beliefs are caused by psychological « habits » (e.g. the sun
has risen every morning so far, we should expect it to rise
tomorrow again).
Kant
We may never really know the thing-in-itself (Noumenon: the world as it really is)
- All we can know is the impression that the noumenon
exerts on our senses (Phenoumenon).
- Our minds have to contribute innate knowledge in order
to make sense of our sensations (space, time, cause and
effect).
Kant: Psychology can be like history. History is based on facts so it is not a science and same for psychology.
What Kant was saying is that our senses don’t directly convey the four-dimensional nature of the world; it is our minds that have to reassemble the four dimensions from the rudimentary information received from our senses. In doing so, Kant managed to reconcile Rationalism with Empiricism. Our reason alone isn’t sufficient to know the world: without sensory information, our a priori structures are “empty”, they lack content. Conversely, sensory information by itself is meaningless, it is the a priori structures of our minds that give sensory information a meaningful form. We need both our reason and our senses to perceive the world.
Weber: just noticeable difference and fractions
discovered that for each sensory modality there was a fixed ratio that characterized the relationship between the just noticeable difference and the standard stimulus: Weber’s fractions.
Just noticeable difference (JND): What is the smallest
weight difference that someone can perceive ?
-> Another term for JND is the difference threshold
Weber fractions: the JND between the standard and
comparison weights is always close to 1/40 (or 0.025) of
the standard weight.
Fechner’s law
« Each JND is perceptually
equivalent !!! »
The 1 gram difference between 40 and 41 grams is exactly as
perceptually salient as the 10 gram difference between 410 and 400
grams.
Since the JND is the smallest detectable difference, it cannot be further
fragmented, i.e. perceptual « atom ».
Fechner’s law mathematically describes the relationship between physical intensity and subjective perception.
Fechner believed mind and matter were two sides of the same coin
Thresholds (absolute and difference)
Difference threshold: smallest difference you can perceive
- Absolute threshold: smallest physical intensity you can
perceive.
- The limit at which a stimulus is « detected» vs. « not
detected » is not sharp.
- The function has a logistic (« S ») shape!
- The threshold is defined as the sensory intensity at which a
stimulus is detected 50% of the time.
Thresholding procedures
Thresholding methods: what is the best way to quickly obtain
the most accurate threshold?
Methods of constant stimuli:
- Several intensities are systematically tested in a random order
- Most accurate, but takes a long time!
Methods of limits – ascending/descending
- Ascending/descending cycles; change direction when a « yes »
or a « no »
- A bit less accurate
- Some intensities still don’t contribute much information
Staircase method:
- Go back as soon as there is a change in response
- Faster than the method of limits, and almost as accurate.
Method of adjustment:
- Let the participant increase/decrease intensity in order to
identify the threshold
- Really fast
- Not very accurate
Concept of signal and noise
Signal and noise: Because what we subjectively perceive isn’t
100% determined by the « signal » present in the environment,
there is also « noise » in the signal.
- attention fluctuates
- criterion for saying « yes » may also fluctuate
- spontaneous activity in the nervous system
Noise masks signals and sensations
Noise is conceptual, whatever is causing change in your perception that is not related to the signal and that we don’t control or measure
There are a number of factors other than the strength of the sensory signal that can influence our perception. When these factors are unknown, or unmeasured, we call them “noise”. Because of sensory “noise”, the absence or presence of a sensory signal can sometimes lead to the same subjective sensory experience.
Signal refers to the true sensory information coming from the external world. Noise refers to the various physiological or psychological processes influencing our perception of that external stimulus in an unpredictable manner.
The signal is the meaningful information that you’re actually trying to detect. The noise is the random, unwanted variation or fluctuation that interferes with the signal.
Signal detection theory
Signal detection theory: you will do more errors and wait less if you are rewarded for answering quicker, and the opposite if punished
Magnitude rating (relative and absolute)
In proportion, how much more/less intense are two stimuli of
different intensites perceived?
In relative magnitude rating, stimulus intensity is rated relative to a fixed comparison stimulus called a modulus. In absolute magnitude rating, stimulus intensity is rated relative to two fixed boundaries. In cross-modality matching and general labeled magnitude rating scales, stimulus intensity of one particular sensory modality is rated against another sensory modality.
absolute magnitude rating, and in which participants are asked to rate the intensity of physical stimuli using a scale that goes from the lowest intensity of stimulation that someone can perceive to the highest.
Stevens power law
[R = aSb] R: Response S: Stimulus magnitude b: controls the curvature of the function a: Corrects for the scaling of measurement units used for S
Cross-modality matching
In cross-modality matching and general labeled magnitude rating scales, stimulus intensity of one particular sensory modality is rated against another sensory modality.
one last development related to cross-modality matching was the creation of general labeled magnitude scales (gLMS) that are designed to estimate the intensity of all sorts of sensations with the same scale.
gLMS scale
general labeled magnitude scales (gLMS) that are designed to estimate the intensity of all sorts of sensations with the same scale.