Mid Term Review Flashcards

1
Q

Elements of a contract

A

Offer
adequate consideration
acceptance
mutuality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Meeting of minds

A

mutual understanding between two or more parties involved in a contract, meaning they all agree to the same terms and conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Statute of Frauds

A

—certain contracts have to be in writing—value over $1000; duration
of greater than one year; guaranteeing the debt of another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Elements of a Tort

A

duty
breach of duty
proximal cause
cognizable damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reasonable person standard

A

would a reasonable person have performed the act or omission given the same circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Types of damages

A

compensatory
punitive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Negligence

A

failure to behave with the level of care a reasonable person would in the same situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Contributory Negligence

A

prevents a plaintiff from recovering damages if they were also negligent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Palsgraf case

A

dynamite in a valise; trying to get on train; woman
injured far down the platform from the explosion; cattle scales fell over onto her

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Strict Liability

A

legal responsibility for the consequences flowing from an activity even in the absence of fault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Plato property ideas:

A

Plato argued for collective ownership to promote pursuit of the common interest and to avoid social divisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Aristotle property ideas

A

Aristotle argued for private ownership:
When everyone has a distinct interest, people will make more progress, because everyone will be attending to their own business.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

John Locke

A

–Rights over our bodies fundamental rights
–Our labor projects ourselves into those objects and gives us rights in those objects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Fifth Amendment on property

A

property not taken without due process of law; or taken for public use, without just compensation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fee Simple interest

A

an estate of indefinite duration in real property that can be freely transferred.
Add example

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Leasehold interest

A

an estate for a limited duration in real property, often cannot be freely transferred.
Add example

17
Q

Sovereign airspace

A

No set altitude limit on national sovereignty
Karman Line is held by some states 62 miles ASL
Practical line is held by some states, which is the limitation of highest airplane/lowest satellite orbit

18
Q

Trespassing

19
Q

Key Provisions of OST

A

-No WMD’s
-Exploration and use of space would be for benefit of all mankind
-Compromise between the US and USSR:
-Space and celestial bodies are not subject to national sovereignty or appropriation by any other means

20
Q

Difference in liability for damages caused on Earth (or airliner) versus those caused in
space

A

Strict liability for damages on earth, while in space you have to prove the other party was at fault

21
Q

Eisenhower’s role in the OST

A

1: Eisenhower decided that the overflight of Sputnik did not violate U.S. sovereign air-space
2:Eisenhower addressed the UN in 1962 to set forth basic parameters of international space law.
3: antarctic treaty

22
Q

Similarities between OST and Antarctic treaty

A

peaceful exploration
No WMDs
No country could exercise national sovereignty

23
Q

1968 Rescue Agreement

A

-A States is responsible for notifying others if there is an accident or distress situation
-Other States are to use “all possible steps” to rescue personnel of a spacecraft and render them “all necessary assistance.”

The astronauts are due to be returned to the lawful authority.

States are required to notify another State upon the discovery of a space object and to return it to the other state

24
Q

1972 Liability Convention

A

Only States may be held liable for damages.

Only States may make the claims for their damages or for those of their nationals who suffer damages.

Private citizens have no right of action against their own launching States.

Absolute or strict liability applies if a space object causes damage to an object “on the surface of the Earth or to an aircraft in flight
Fault-based liability exists for “damage being caused elsewhere than on the surface of the earth

25
1975 Registration Convention
Under the Rescue Agreement, New Zealand attempted to return the space object to the USSR which denied responsibility. Registration Convention establishes two types of registers – one maintained by each State and one maintained by the UN Secretary General.
26
1979 Moon Agreement
The moon can only be used for peaceful purposes Military bases, weapons testing, and military maneuvers are prohibited CHM resources the moon and its natural resources are for the benefit of all people Few signatories
27
Reason Moon Agreement has so few signatories
Use of CHM over Province of all mankind,
28
Means of redress under international law
-economic such as tariffs, embargoes -political, other countries condemning perps -military by force
29
Arvid Pardo
Maltese Ambassador, Arvid Pardo, addressed the United Nations and proposed that all ocean space beyond national jurisdictions be considered the common heritage of mankind (“CHM”).
30
Principals incorporated into UNCLOS 3
-seabed, ocean floor, and subsoil are CHM, and cannot be owned by any person or state -International seabed authority governs sharing of profit from resources/activities
31
Difference in interpretation between CHM and “province of all mankind”
Province of all mankind allows for ownership of resources extracted, while CHM does not, since the resources belong to all of mankind.
32
Explain the difference between “freedom of the sea” and the principals of UNCLOS 3
-Freedom of the high seas allowed any party to capture and utilize ocean resources, outside of national jurisdiction -UNCLOS 3 determined seabed, seafloor, and substrate to be CHM, and provided detailed instructions for use of CHM.
33
Four elements of CHM
No state or person can own common heritage spaces or resources CHM resources shall be utilized under a system of cooperative management CHM shall be utilized only for peaceful purposes. CHM is to be transmitted to future generations in substantially unimpaired condition
34
Restrictions on WMD’s in outer space under the OST
No wmd's stationed in orbit or in outer space/ on celestial bodies
35
Restrictions on use of Moon for military purposes
establishment of military bases, installations and fortifications, the testing of any type of weapons and the conduct of military maneuvers on celestial bodies shall be forbidden
36
“First space war”—US actions; Russian counter-actions—according to Szymanski— 2014 invasion of Ukraine
-Ukrainians jammed russian communications satellite 15mar -Russian Glonass systemwide failure 24 satellites 2apr -8 more glonass satellites failed 14apr -last oko satellite lost -russia diplo/econ attack on iss -crash of russian proton m launch vehicle -Russia hacked us financial system and stole 1.2 billion usernames and passwords
37
Reasons why OMB and GAO supported creation of US Space Force
General accounting office and office of management and budget both supported space force because air force was just using the money for fighter jets
38
PLA’s view on the importance of space—People’s Liberation Army (China)
he U.S. has many singularly valuable space systems, while China does not. Chinese strategists see the U.S. as so reliant on satellites for critical military functions that threatening to degrade or destroy these crucial systems may be enough to force the United States to stand down in a conflict