Mid-term: Ethics Flashcards

1
Q

What is ethics & its major goals?

A

he investigation on how we ought to live: the standards of right & wrong.
Goals: Regulate behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the Milgram Experiment?

A

Experiment where individuals are told they were studying the impact of pain on learning: they push a button to administer pain. The main aspect they are seeking is whether they will continue to push the button even if they believe they are causing pain?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How does the Milgram Experiment illustrate why it’s important to study ethics?

A

It demonstrates how it’s important to study ethics because it shows that there’s an ability to justify and defend moral choices.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the difference between normative and theoretical ethics?

A

Normative ethics are HOW to act in a particular situation or guideline we can apply in a real life situation.
Theoretical ethics are WHY we choose to act the way we do and how we decide right/wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the difference between relative and universal ethical theories?

A

Relativism: There are no such thing as independent moral values (morals vary depending on time and place and culture)
Universalist: There’re universal moral truths; rules apply to all people and exist independently for all individuals (there’s a standard behaviour)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the five elements of a moral argument?

A

1- The issue (what is discussed/question)
2- Conclusion (the answer to the question)
3- Reasons (what supports the conclusion)
4- The principles (general statement about right and wrong, guidelines)
5- The values (what matters to us)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Break down/construct the Terri Schiavo case

A

Husband’ side
The issue: Whether she should live/or not
Conclusion: Remove the feeding tube
The reasons: No hope of recovery, she should be allowed to die it’s what she would’ve wanted
The principles: supported by doctors and guardians
The values: Loyalty, compassion, autonomy

Parents’ side
The issue: Whether she should live/or not
Conclusion: Keep the feeding tube in
Reasons: She could wake up, she reacted to stimuli
Principles: Florida legistature, religion
Values: Compassion, non-maleficience, beneficience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is cultural relativism?

A

Morality is not universal: the idea of a person’s beliefs, culture, values, and practices should be understood based on that person’s own culture rather than be judged against the criteria of another another culture. This theory argues that noculture is inherently superior or inferior to another and that cultural norms and moral values are context dependent.

Morality is acceptable if the culture says it’s acceptable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What connects anthropology and Cultural Relativism?

A

Anthropology: study of culture, how do people live: It helps anthropologists study cultures objectively without imposing their own cultural biases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the five main ideas of Cultural Relativism?

A

1- Different cultures have different moral codes
2- If a moral code of a culture says an action is right, then it is right
3- There’s no universal truth
4- Our society moral code has no special status
5- It is arrogant to judge others (principle of tolerance)

If a culture says it’s right, then it is right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Do cultural relativist believe in universal truth?

A

Cultural relativists generally do not believe in universal standard of truth because they argue that truth is culturally constructed and varies from one society to another. For example, even if a culture’s action goes against universal standards, they will justify it with the fact that it is acceptable because it is part of one’s culture.

MORAL TRUTHS = CULTURALLY CONSTRUCTED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the major weaknesses of the theory of Cultural Relativism?

A
  • There is no moral progress (culture blends in modern world)
  • There is no room for reason
  • There is faulty of reasoning
  • No shared values
  • Pluralist cultures

MAIN: Faulty of reasoning (Even harmful practices are considered to be o

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why is cultural relativism often disagreed with?

A

Not everybody is okay with this practice rationally, it’s a universal statement to say that we have basic rights and the right to equality

Rights to equality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What can we learn from the theory of Cultural Relativism?

A

We’re all products of culture, we should not be ethnocentric, and we should be tolerant of everyone’s culture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why is utilitarianism a revolutionary ethical theory?

A

Utilitarianism is revolutionary because it is considered to be the first ethical theory that puts humans at its centre during a period of revolution: it thinks about people. It is also where philosophers thought about what is right and wrong in ethics, which is based on an individual’s overall happiness. In other words, morality isn’t introduced by God, but people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why is Utilitarianism a consequentialist theory?

A

Because it promotes consequence is more important than intent (ends justify the means) and it focuses on what a good end is: What brings people the most happiness and reduces pain, the majority of happiness, the greater good)

Promotes consequences over intent

17
Q

What is the utility principle?

A

It’s what acts in a way that brings the majority happiness, minimizing pain and equal consideration.

18
Q

What are the key claims of Utilitarianism?

A

The desire of happiness is self-evident and universal

Pleasure brings about happiness pain brings about unhappiness

People are naturally sympathetic and concerned with promoting the happiness of others

The rightness and wrongness of an action is determined solety by its consquences

An action is morally right to the extent that that it promotes the happiness or pleasure of all those affected by it

An action is morally wrong to the extent that it increases unhappiness or pain

The moral community consists of all sentient beings

MAIN: pleasure brings happiness and pain brings
unhappiness

19
Q

Explain how Utilitarians measure happiness: duration/intensity

A

There are different types of pleasure and happiness: need to consider how intense is the happiness or pain, how long does it last and how many people are affected by it.

20
Q

Who do Utilitarians consider part of their moral community?

A

All sentient beings

21
Q

What is speciesism?

A

How any species are as important. It is the discrimination against other species and can be compared to sexism and racism but towards animals.

22
Q

What are the strengths of Utilitarianism?

A

Causes happiness to the majority of beings
Promotes what’s better for all beings
Glorifies equality for all individuals
Acts for the greater good

23
Q

How does speciesism link to Utilitarians ideas?

A

It considers all sentient beings and promotes equality and happiness for all

24
Q

What are the weaknesses of Utilitarianism?

A

It is unjust to specific cases
It ignores moral sentiment (feeling of right and wrong)
Ignores individuals’ rights and justice
Happiness is not all that matters in life

25
Why are responsibility and good will ethically significant, according to Kantian ethics? | What is morality linked to for Kantian?
Kant connects morality and happiness together: morality is linked to our duties or responsibilities
26
How is an action morally good in Kantian ethics
If an intention and good will are respected and if it respects universal law (idea that everyone could behave this way at the same time)
27
What is the first formulation of the Categorical Imperative?
“Act only according to the maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.” Moral action = Applied to all humans at all times
28
What are the major criticisms or weaknesses of Kantian Ethics?
There are no considerations of consequences (sometimes they matter) Conflicting duties (How do you know which responsibility/rules you need to follow to make a decision?)
29
What is the second formulation of the Categorical Imperative?
“Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end and never simply as a means.” We cannot use people to further our own gains Every individual deserves respect, dignity, autonomy, worth Consider: justice, fairness, basic human rights | You can't use people as a means to an end
30
What are the strengths of Kantian Ethics?
Humans have infinite worth Reflects moral conscience Provides foundation to argue that all humans have fundamental rights
31
When did Virtue ethics develop?
Virtue ethics developed in Ancient Greece and were initially discussed by Aristotle: moral virtues cannot be taught, and you must live it to understand it. Happiness is based on the more we accomplish/do.
32
What is virtue ethics and what is a virtue?
It's based on character and virtues: morality is linked to virtues. Virtues are traits of qualities that contribute to a person's character and helps them lead a good and ethical life.
33
How do we learn to be virtuous?
By experience and practice: the more we practice, the more virtuous we become and the better we get.
34
How does a virtue ethicist make moral decisions?
Disposition (may or may not consult rules, no specific rules) act on what you think is best for yourself. Role models (behave according to virtuous character and how they would act in the situation)
35
How can happiness be compared to Virtue Ethicists ideas and Utilitarian ideas?
Virtue Ethics see happiness through virtue and moral excellence and Utilitarians see it as maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain.
36
What are the strengths and weaknesses of Virtues Ethics?
Strengths: Personal to an individual, not a community as a whole Plausibility, feels right, importance of motivation beyond rule-following The good-life, Connects with morality and happiness Weaknesses: no clear guidelines (no rules to follow) Circular logic (a good person behaves as a goos person behaves) nothing to do when virtues conflict (what do I choose, honesty or loyalty?)
37
In general, how do Virtue Ethicists differ in their approach to ethics from other universalist theories?
Virtue ethics focus on character over actions (morality is about being a good person with virtuous character traits)
38