Mid term Flashcards

(114 cards)

1
Q

Archaeology?

A

It is the scientific study of human past throught its material remains.
Gains knowledge through a scientific method of inquiry
Relies heavily on empirical evidence
Must consider ALL the evidence and construct hypotheses (theories)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Pseudoarchaeology?

A

Based on very selective evidence, or no evidence

empirical: something that can be seen, touched, measured etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Erich Von Daniken

A

King of Pseudoarchaeology

Pacal’s coffin stone-aliens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The goals of archaeology

A

1) To reconstruct lifeways of the people that created the archaeological record
2) To explain why people did things the way they did, particularly why cultures changed over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Kinds of Archaeology

A

1) Prehistoric: study of the human past before written records
2) Historical: study of the past where written records are used together
3) Classical: specific kind of historical archaeology focusing on Greece and Rome.
4) Underwater/Marine: study of shipwrecks, but also marine activities of coastal dwelling peoples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

CULTURE?

A

that complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art, morals, law, custom, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by [a person] as a member of society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
B.C. 
B.C.E. 
A.D.
C.E
B.P.
A
before Christ
before common era
Anno domini (after death of Christ)
common era
before present
Millions of years ago
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Types of archaeologists

A
  1. Academic: research (Universities, Museums, Govt., Parks Canada)
  2. Consultant: heritage conservation
    E.g. BC Association of Professional Archaeologists
    http://www.bcapa.ca/
  3. Avocational: based on interest (public)
    e. g. Archaeological Society of B.C. www.asbc.bc.ca
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why do archaeology?

A
  • Simple curiosity – natural in humans
  • Contribution to knowledge

-A way of understanding who we are as a species?
How did we come to be who we are?
What can we learn from our past?

-Applied archaeology
Redressing the past (injustice)?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Archaeological Record

A

those traces and material remains that document past human activity
-can be broken down by geography and time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Archaeological Methods

A

ways in which we discover recover, preserve, describe and analyse the archaeological record

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Archaeological Theory

A

body of ideas that guide archaeologists in their work, and ultimately provides the means to interpret the archaeological record

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Antiquarian Period

A
Prior to 1800s
 pre-scientific pursuit
 collecting of artifacts as curiosities
 little attempt to understand societies
 explanations derived from biblical theology and scripture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The Rosetta Stone – found in 1799

A

Jean-Francois Champollion Deciphers hieroglyphs on Rosetta Stone in A.D. 1822

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Giovanni Belzoni

A

The most infamous tomb robber (looter) of all time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Archbishop James Ussher – 17th century AD

A

chronologyProclaims that the world was created on the evening before October 23, 4,004 B.C.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

John Frere -1797

A

Finds tropical animals and stone axes in English gravel beds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Jacques Boucher de Perthes -1836

A

Considered by some to be the “father” of

Paleolithic archaeology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Georges Cuvier

A

Late 18th century

Studied dinosaurs bones and geology

Realized that dinosaurs once “ruled” the earth

Explained extinction of dinosaurs through flooding, before humans were created

Theory of Catastrophism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

James Hutton

A

18th century Scottish geologist

Proposed that the earth was formed slowly through natural processes such as accumulation, erosion etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Charles Lyell

A

The Principles of Geology 1830-33

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Uniformitarianism

A

Created by Charles Lyell
a single set of processes can account for both past and present geological forms

Natural processes created the world as we see it (Implications: the earth is dynamic and continually changing)

Therefore: the earth must be much older than 6,000 years

Present is a key to the past

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Charles Darwin

A

On the Origin of Species (1859)
Showed how organisms could change over time natural selection

Implication: humans could be much older than 6,000 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

“Modern” Archaeology Period

A

begins in 1800s with revolutions in geological and evolutionary thinking

realization of depth of time represented in archaeological and geological record

scientific principles come to govern the study of the past

concerns with the workings of past societies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Christian Thomsen
appointed curator in 1816 Organized artifacts by material and technology Stone, Bronze, Iron Chronological order J.J.A. Worsaae took Thomsen’s ideas and applied them to archaeological sites throughout Europe Organized sites in chronological order
26
Modified Thomsen scheme
``` Old stone age: Paleolithic Middle Stone age: Mesolithic New Stone age: Neolithic Bronze Age Iron Age ```
27
Analogy
Using ethnographic information to try and explain archeological patterning Ethnographic peoples as models for Interpreting the past
28
Heinrich Schliemann
Born in early 19th century Became interested in epic tales of Homer, especially the Trojan war Wanted to know where ancient town of Troy was located Schliemann knew that Troy would have been a big opulent town, with temples and grand architecture, treasure, etc. 1870: Schliemann begins excavations at Hissarlik Employs 150 local people as excavators 1873: begins finding architectural remains and large hordes of metal objects, including gold 1875 Announces that he has found Troy Sneaks all treasure out of country -goes on display at Berlin Museum in 1881 and disappears More recently scholars have questioned Schliemann’s actual role in “finding” Troy
29
cultural change
Archaeologists examine artifact changes over time
30
Augustus Pitt Rivers
``` Initial interest in evolutionary history of muskets (musket form change over time) Arranged his own collection in evolutionary sequence Argued: apply same analysis to any types of artifacts Conducted excavations with military Precision Every find was recorded (contra Schliemann) ```
31
Typology
putting things in order by time and category Creating schemes of classification based on attributes Ordering in time and space
32
Oscar Montelius
Began developing archaeological typologies in late 19th century Used evolution of railway carriage as example of typolo
33
Flinders Petrie
Created special typologies for Egyptian pottery – allowed for dating Seriation- the pottery come in different shapes (in series, through time) Stylistic seriation: similarities and differences in attributes (could be temporal or spatial) Frequency Seriation: Frequency seriation: looking at relative frequencies of artifacts Battleship curve
34
Mortimer Wheeler
Began using grid-square method of excavation
35
The Descriptive Period
1870-1950s (Alfred Kidder, leading American archaeologist) -Construction of typologies and classifications were main concerns Known commonly as the Culture History Approach Putting archaeological “cultures” in time and space
36
Alfred Kidder
Worked in American southwest Created ceramic typology and chronology for the entire southwest US Lindbergh Also argued strongly that archaeology and anthropology should be strongly aligned
37
Franz Boas
Influential anthropologist in early 20th century Argued against universal social evolution -societies should be examined in light of their own history (people are products of their history) Historical Particularism
38
Historical Particularism
-societies should be examined in light of their own history | people are products of their history
39
The Direct Historical Approach
``` Applied in areas where there was historical continuity e.g. the American southwest Logic: cultural continuity between people that created the archaeological record and current inhabitants ``` Work backwards
40
Culture change Diffusion Migration
Diffusion: The spread of ideas from one area to another Example: Many thought that the idea of civilization developed in Near East and spread elsewhere, including the Americas Migration: physical movement of peoples These two were thought to be the primary mechanisms for culture change
41
Gordon Childe
Developed the concept of archaeological cultures -every society has rules for behaviour (norms), reflected in pottery design, spear point shape, etc began asking why do cultures change? -why did people develop agriculture? Childe favoured environmental explanations
42
Julian Steward
influential 1950s anthropologist who developed concept of Cultural Ecology -cultures are determined by the ecology in which they participate The cultural core of subsistence related traits mediates between environment and the rest of culture
43
Willard Libby-1949
Announces the invention of radiocarbon dating Provides absolute date (e.g. 2,105 BP) Huge impact on archaeology and many other disciplines Libby went on to win Nobel Prize
44
Lewis Binford
Influenced by Steward - in turn became one of the most influential archaeologists in history - Paradigm shift
45
Processual archaeology 1960s - present
Binford and others were dissatisfied with culture history Wanted to go beyond and ask why cultures change Wanted to explain culture process (Processual Archaeology) Processual archaeologists Wanted to distance themselves from old school archaeologists Called their movement the “New Archeology” Interested in universal “regularities” Envisioned cultures as “systems” subsistence, technology, ideology were all sub-systems -part of peoples’ adaptation to their environment subsistence, technology, ideology were all sub-systems -also pushed for the use of scientific methods -part of peoples’ adaptation to their environment -Statistics and quantitative methods (and objectivity) Hypothesis testing -Binford and associates were quite aggressive in their critiques of “old school” archaeologists -picked on certain archaeologists and forced them to reconsider their ideas (many were afraid) -eventually changed the course of archaeology, particularly in the Americas
46
Post-Processual archaeology
Began in Europe in 1980s as a reaction to Processual archaeology Leading proponent was Ian Hodder (Cambridge at the time, now Stanford) Challenged the Processual view that culture was primarily an adaptation to the environment Interested in “social” aspects of human lifeways Looking at “individuals” in history Claimed that culture change can be caused by human agency Argue for more gendered approaches Today includes a number of different approaches, e.g: Marxist, Hermeneutic, Interpretive, Feminist, etc. Key contributions: -Self reflexivity Can we be completely objective? (free of bias?) -Multivocality (inclusion of many perspectives)
47
Today's archaeology
Some archaeologists are trying to find a balance between Culture History, Processual and Post-Processual archaeologies No one school appears to dominate Not necessarily mutually exclusive approaches! New techniques in archaeological science Why is this important Theory or conceptual leanings tend to guide archaeologists at every step Determines what questions we ask and how we go about answering them
48
Archaeological Record
those material remains that | document past human activities
49
3 classes of archaeological data
1) Artifacts 1) Features 1) Ecofacts 2) Sites 3) Regions
50
Artifacts
portable objects whose form has been | wholly or partially modified by humans
51
FEATURES
non-portable human or human-made remains that cannot be removed from their place of discovery without altering or destroying their original form
52
ECOFACTS
non-artifact natural remains | that have cultural significance
53
SITES
Any place on the landscape where there is evidence for human activity Could contain artifacts or features and ecofacts, or any combination e.g. habitation sites Kill sites Quarry sites
54
Regions
Region is a physically definable area (enclosed by mountains, lakes, etc) Spatial distribution of sites over landscape Advantages: larger scale, can look at trade and exchange, roads, shared beliefs
55
Matrix
Physical substance that surrounds the archaeological material Can be gravel, sand, mud, shell, ice, water etc. Matrix would be different in each case (deposition)
56
Provenience
Exact location of find within the matrix Usually 3-d recording FiRs-1: 2304 Catalogue number
57
The Law of Association
J.J.A. Worsaae Items found together on the same horizontal plane are of similar age
58
STRATUM | STRATIGRAPHY
``` "Layer" Anything composed of layers or strata is “stratified” interpretation of the layering [“strata or stratification”] in archaeological sites ```
59
LAW OF SUPERPOSITION
``` In a set of strata, the order of DEPOSITION must have been from lowest to uppermost UPPER - deposited last LOWEST - deposited first (Stratigraphic section ot Profile) ```
60
RE-DEPOSITION
``` changes the order of the layers so that “older” layers now lie above “younger” layers [but law of superposition is NOT violated because law relates to deposition NOT necessarily age] ```
61
Archaeological Context
. PRIMARY - undisturbed since its original deposition Association and provenience are intact 2. SECONDARY – not in original position of deposition (disturbed) Association and provenience are questionable
62
FORMATION PROCESSES | Transformational Processes
1. CULTURAL – (C-Transforms) human activities that modify the environment (and leave material Evidence) 2. NATURAL – (N-Transforms)
63
Cultural Formation Processes
human activities that modify the environment ``` 4 idealized stages Acquisition Manufacture Use Deposition ```
64
Natural Formation Processes
Large number of processes Dynamic (continuous) Unique to each situation (not the same processes operate everywhere) Fast flowing rivers (can move archaeological material even after burial) Burrowing animals, insects, tree roots Move archaeological materials Earthquakes/tsunamis Hurricanes Ice freezing/thawing Play a large role in preservation of organic archaeological materials Examples? Preservation dictated largely by environment: Critical factors: Temperature and humidity
65
SCONDARY CONTEXT
means data associations result from | TRANSFORMATIONAL PROCESSES
66
Best conditions for organic preservation
``` Extremely dry Mummies Extremely wet shipwreck Extremely cold Baby mammoth 42000 BP, permafrost in Siberia ```
67
Difference between archaeology in Olden days or today?
Archaeology in the Olden Days Pursuit of the wealthy Focus was on conspicuous “sexy” sites Archaeology in the Field Today 1. Research Design - Research Questions, Sampling 2. Survey - Surface Methods, Subsurface Testing, Mapping, Technology
68
THE CHAIN OF DATA REDUCTION
All human behaviour that ever happened in the past. All the material remains produced by that behavior. All the remains that survive transformational processes. All the remains that are possible to locate. Archaeological data that are located by an archaeologist. Data that are collected in archaeological fieldwork. Data that get analyzed. Data that are published. produces... ARCHAEOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE
69
Development of cultural complexity
When did agriculture begin? -look for archaeological evidence in tools: e.g. stone sickle blades for harvesting, domesticated plants/animals When do people start settling down? -look for evidence of transition from hunter-gatherer camps to long-term villages When do we see evidence for social inequality? -look for evidence in burials; some may be much more elaborate than others
70
Research Design
Step by step plan to address specific research question(s) Includes assessment of previous knowledge, new data collection, analysis and publication
71
Research funding for academic archaeology
Canada Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Indigenous communities US National Science Foundation (NSF) Plus many other agencies (National Geographic, etc.)
72
A GOOD RESEARCH DESIGN…
1. establishes the question(s) you will investigate and the kinds of data needed to answer it 2. guides what kind of data you will collect in the field, which makes your project do-able and focused 3. makes your project fundable
73
Archaeological survey | Types of survey
1) General reconnaissance survey 2) Site survey In either case, one must define the boundaries of the survey
74
General reconnaissance survey Ground Aerial?
Systematic attempt to locate, identify and record the distribution of archaeological sites Includes geographic and environmental background Physical setting: proximity to lake or river, quarry, valley system, etc. Ground Survey: Geomorphology/landforms/hydrology/forest types/resources Indigenous Traditional Knowledge Previous archaeological work (e.g. RAAD – Remote Access to Archaeological Data in B.C.) Historic documentation Other local knowledge Conspicuous sites Aerial reconnaissance Remote sensing from the air Aerial Reconnaissance Photography直升机或无人机向下拍
75
Remote sensing on the ground(sub-surface testing)
Invasive Coring Augering Shovel testing Non-invasive Magnetometry Resistivity Ground penetrating radar
76
Other ways of detecting(survey)
``` Sideways Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) Satellite Imaging (Landsat) Satellite Archaeology Google Earth and others Sarah Parcak Satellite Imaging -Survey Remote sensing under water Sidescan sonar Can detect large features on ocean/ lake floor Drone photography and mapping ```
77
Archaeological Survey | benefits
- data collection method used to gain information about a site or region (many sites) - archaeologists inspect surface and subsurface to locate archaeological data - produces information through methods less intensive than excavation
78
Archaeological excavation
Major way to acquire data about the past Generally the entire site is not excavated Sites that are threatened may be entirely excavated
79
Site Datum
Reference point from which everything is measured Usually permanent or semi-permanent marker on landscape Grid is established from datum
80
Excavation Unit
1*1 m in size/ 2*2 m in size
81
Recording Provenience | Methods?
- the three dimensional location of artifacts and other archaeological data within an archaeological site Optical Transit/Stadia Rod Total Station Compass/Hip Chain
82
What is Archaeological Excavation
intensive data collection method used to gain information about a site focuses on the associations of artifacts and features a site contains main means of acquiring archaeological data destructive process, collecting provenience information is absolutely crucial!!!
83
Borden Site Designation Scheme
Used to identify archaeological sites throughout Canada Four letters (two capital, two lower case) and a number ``` e.g. FiRs-28 Each small square = 10’ of latitude (12) Each small square = 10’ of longitude (24) ```
84
Archaeological dating
Relative Compare two or more bits of archaeological data, and determine which one is older No specific age given Absolute
85
Assemblage
All materials collected from a single site or layer
86
Archarology Laboratory (other dating method?)
``` Artifact cleaning Artifact conservation Artifact labeling Artifact cataloguing Describe and record details, measurements, etc Usually on standardized database ``` Photographs and illustrations ``` Attributes: colour, shape, length, width, etc Classification E.g. 100 pots classified by colour: 50 red, 50 black by shape: 60 round, 40 oval by shape and colour: 30 red round, 20 red oval 30 black round, 20 black oval Fossil Index The Pleistocene – 1.8mya – 10,000 BP Glacial cycles Beringia LoessFine dust particles Loess-sand-gravel Pollen studies (Palynology) Faunal Dating Chemical dating(e.g fluorine and others) Organic material (e.g. bone) transform where organic material replaced by minerals (fossilization) ``` Fossils of different ages will have different mineral content
87
Abosolute dating
Calendars Aztec Coins Glacial Varves counting 数石头有几层 Dendrochronology(tree ring dating)Invented by A.E. Douglass Based on concept of annual tree ring growth Tree rings indicate age and general environmental conditions Requires: -archaeological use of same tree type -very good preservation of organics Cores of modern samples compared with those of increasing age Each region has distinctive growth pattern Different tree types cannot be compared with each other Master chart is then established for a particular region ``` Radiometric Methods Radiocarbon Potassium Argon Thermoluminescence Fission Track ``` Amino Acid Racemization Archaeomagnetic Dating
88
Disadvantages and Adcantages of Dendrochronology
Disadvantages: - requires proper tree types - use of same species by people in the past - needs very good preservation conditions Advantages: - precise and reliable dating method (to within a few years) - In SW USA, chart goes back at least 2,000 BP
89
ABSOLUTE ‘RADIOMETRIC’ DATINGBasic Principles
Use decay rate of radioactive isotopes to measure time Range of time measured based on isotope “half life” Decay rate unaffected by environment Exploit the principles of radioactive decay Two most important methods: Radiocarbon (14C) and Potassium/Argon (K/Ar) Others: Thermoluminescence, Fission Track, Uranium series
90
Radiocarbon (14C) dating
Invented by Libby (chemist) in 1949 Based on decay of carbon isotope Half life 5,730 years Materials: must be organic Bone collagen, charcoal, shell, wood, leather, etc. Date by association Samples can be contaminated easily Conventional dating: maximum age range of about 40,000 BP Sample gets destroyed (burned) Date is a statistical average Newer technique: AMS (accelerator mass spectrometry) Requires much smaller samples Can date back to 50,000 BP Lower limit is about 100 BP 3400 ± 200 BP Date lies somewhere between 3,600 and 3,200 BP Problem: amount of 14C has not been constant Radiocarbon dates need to be calibrated (software widely available) Bristlecone Pine chart Dates become more difficult to calibrate beyond 9,000 BP Marine reservoir effect (can also affect lakes and rivers) Excess circulating carbon Correction needed
91
Advantages and Disadvantages of Carbon Dating
Disadvantages - maximum limit of 50,000 BP - organic material - samples contaminated easily Advantages - quick, efficient dating method - many commercial labs - somewhat cost effective - calibration software widely available
92
Potassium Argon (Argon/Argon) Dating
Half life of 1.3 billion years Volcanic layers can be dated with this technique Method first used in 1959 to date “Zinj” layer at Olduvai Gorge Dated to 1.75 mya (million years ago) Dating range: 100,000 to 3 billion years ago Disadvantages - need volcanic materials in stratigraphy - fewer labs equipped to do this kind of work Advantages -in areas with strata of volcanic origin, this is a fairly reliable method
93
Other Types of Dating?
Thermoluminescence (TL) dating Used mainly to date pottery (certain minerals) Ceramics and glass trap electrons (natural radiation) Different constant per area (background) Sample heated to 400-500° C, trapped energy is released - clock set to “zero” - measuring energy released leads to time since firing (last “zero”) Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) Quartz and feldspar in buried sediments ``` Can date sediment layers Disadvantages -accuracy not great (but improving) -should be used with other methods -background radiation needs to be accounted for ``` Advantages -can date materials that K/Ar cannot date (pottery, soil, minerals such as quartz)
94
Fission Track Dating
- volcanic rocks - minerals in rocks contain small amounts of 238Uranium - decays over time - some 238U atoms decay through spontaneous fission - microscopic tracks can be counted -standard rate of decay Date range: 100,000 - > 2 billion years Disadvantages: - suitable raw materials not present everywhere, esp. volcanic glass - large error bars Advantages: -can work as independent check on K/Ar dating
95
Amino Acid Racemization
Changes in amino acids after death L-isomers change to D-isomers Knowing rate of change can tell us how long ago animal died Aspartic acid: 5,000-100,000 BP Method still in development
96
Archaeomagnetic Dating
Direction and intensity of earth’s magnetic field has changed over time These are “recorded” in some clays containing magnetic minerals Requires (non-portable) materials with clay, e.g. clay floors in houses Sample collection is complicated requiring specialist and equipment Date range at present is about 2,000 BP Earth’s magnetic field reverses polarity in cycles Also recorded in soil Cannot be used as a dating method by itself Good for cross dating with K/Ar dates
97
``` Absolute Dating Techniques METHOD Radiocarbon (14C) Radiopotassium (40K) Fission-Track Uranium Series AA Racemization Luminescence ESR ```
``` TIME RANGE (Approx) 100 – 50,000 BP 100,000 - billions BP 100 000 – 2 billion BP 30,000 – 300,000 BP up to 100,000 BP up to 1,000,000 BP up to 1,000,000 BP ```
98
ISSUES, LIMITATIONS, and PROBLEMS with ABSOLUTE DATING
SPECIFIC TO RADIOCARBON Radiometric years may not equal calendar years - calibration required Marine versus Terrestrial carbon affects result (Marine reservoir) FOR ALL ABSOLUTE METHODS Statistical measurements – variable precision Low precision affects interpretation Time coverage lacks for 40 000 to 350 000 years ago
99
How to Date specific?!
Method chosen depends largely on age range of site and datable materials Cross-dating is always a good thing to do! (use more than one method)
100
Stone technology
Most common artifacts found in sites around the world (stone tools) Begins over 3 million years ago in Eastern Africa People all over the world relied on stone technology Hardest occurring raw material in nature Raw material extremely important Type of rock will dictate method of working e. g. slate not generally good for flaking, but can be abraded/ground e. g. certain types of basalt are good for flaking
101
Chipped stone technology
Raw materials are not evenly distributed on the landscape (depth of planning required) People often went to “quarries” to collect stone that is good for flaking - tools for toolmaking - learning - scheduling other resources - social aspects Hammerstone Hard hammer: generally a rock (must be harder than material worked) Soft hammer: antler, bone, hard wood, softer stone Flake / Core distinction Flake: piece of rock material that has been detached from a parent piece Core: parent material from which flakes have been detached
102
Features of a TYPICAL FLAKE Ventral Surface Dorsal Surface
On ventral surface 1. Point of impact 2. Striking platform 3. Cone of percussion 4. Bulb of percussion 5. Ripple marks On dorsal surface 6. Flake scars 7. Cortex RETOUCH-further edge flaking to shape tool form or re-sharpen edge after use
103
Oldowan Technology
Old stone technology that began around 2.5 million years ago | Cores and Flakes
104
ACHEULEAN BIFACIAL TECHNOLOGY
Hand-axe Cleaver Various Hand-axe forms
105
LEVALLOIS FLAKING TECHNIQUE
``` preparing a core for removal of a finished tool, in this case, a Levallois point Starts 200,000 BP ```
106
BLADE TECHNOLOGY
``` - blades are flakes that are very long and thin (2:1 ratio) ``` ``` - blade production maximizes amount of cutting edge from a piece of stone Begins 100,000 BP Solutrean Points About 17,000 BP Atl Atl (spearthrower) Variations: ``` -throwing board -Australia: woomera Used until fairly recently Bow and arrow(about 12,000 BP)
107
Wood/plant based technology | Likely very early in human history (preservation?)
Very rare preservation, but can tell much about technology, use and paleoenvironment
108
Bone tool technology
First appear in Upper Paleolithic in Europe (preservation?) Usually land mammal bones (in B.C. deer, elk, moose etc) Bird bone used as well Fish bone not good for tool use cutting and grinding
109
Fire
Making fire is a complex procedure Requires proper raw materials Complex learning process
110
Containers
Gourds Ostrich egg shells Hide/leather containers Internal organs of various animals Basketry
111
Pottery
Japan: around 12,000 BP Near East: by 9,000 BP Near East pottery appears roughly at same time as permanent villages Pottery tends to be associated with sedentary societies Mobile hunter gatherers rarely made/carried around pottery Fairly complex technology Requires suitable clay and proper mixture of water Temper must be added, (prevents breaking during firing) Some common tempers: sand, crushed shell + ? Early pottery made by coil method use hand to shape Paddle and anvil method use stone to shape Around 5,000 BP potter’s wheel first used in Near east Firing technology to burn it- kilns Importance Extremely important in archaeology before radiocarbon dating invented Possible to source the clay, if pottery traded over some distance Residues can tell us what the pot was used for (food, honey, wine, etc)
112
Metal
Preservation is largely dependent on soil conditions Earliest metal used was copper, in Near east by 9,000 BP Native copper Not widely distributed Cold hammered/rolled into shape Traded extensively In this form, copper is not very strong Metallurgy first shows up around 6,000 BP Good evidence in eastern Europe by 5,500 BP Bronze After 5,500 BP alloying developed in Near East Copper alloyed with tin, arsenic or lead results in bronze Bronze is much stronger and more durable than copper Iron May have developed in Africa between 4-3,000 BP Quarries Very complex technology Requires much learning Apprentice system in Africa Heavy social component Smelting process requires high temperatures Experience Iron implements are much stronger than bronze Carburization (iron is converted to steel) in eastern Mediterranean after 3200 BP Rest of Europe: Iron starts spreading at 2700 BP Gold-Egypt, central& south America
113
How do we know how the technology was made or what it was used for? Ethnographic analogy Experimental archaeology
Experimental Archaeology Replication and use of ancient technologies Range from stone tools to entire villages Boat construction Hide scraping Ethnoarchaeology
114
Technology? | function
Greater complexity and efficiency over time More specialized knowledge (stone to iron) Technology: allowed for cultural adaptation to varied environments