Mid Term 1 Flashcards
2 major themes
Criminal law is an exercise in discursive problem solving
Criminal law legitimizes state power (translates states use of violence into authority)
Concept of precedence
Decide disputes by referring to past cases (past cases with similar facts)
- use each case that comes before you to develop rules to help you with decided cases in the future that have similar facts
Common Law
Collection of post decisions
Brought to us by English settlers
Stare decisis
Stare decisis
Lower courts are bound by the decisions of higher courts
Civil/private Matters (Provence/territories)
Common law every except Quebec
Discursive Problem Solving
Criminal law is an exercise in discursive problem solving : type of law than rather than relying on rules- it’s a system that solves problems as they arise
British North America Act
1867
Federal:
criminal law making
Criminal procedure
Provincial:
Set up courts of criminal and civil jurisdiction
Common Law
1879
Body of cases
Write them down as the criminal code
Canadian Criminal Code
Trial judge can create new offences (criminal) can create new criminal defences
1955
Only time we revised the criminal code.
Another source of criminal law is statutes (cases)
Can’t create new crime, but can create new defences
The important thing isn’t the rule, it’s the reasoning they (the judges) use when they apply that rule and because it’s a common law situation, they are applying the rule in the context of a particular set of facts
Role of Judge
Judicial Reasoning (stare decisis)
Overturning vs applying vs. Distinguishing on the facts
We can apply facts that are similar from Precedent 1 and Precedent 2 or we can distinguish the new case from the precedent cases (p1 and p2) on the facts
RESULTS ORIENTED JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING
- making the decision that will fly with society
Crime Control Model
CJS is there to repress crime
We don’t want to just punish it, we want to prevent it as well (managerial approach)
Police screen out innocent people –> encourage guilty pleas (fast, efficient)
Illegally obtained end = admitted
Quick conviction… Appeals are a waste of time (inefficient)
Legal rights and criminal procedure get in the way of justice
Due Process Model
Created by liberal principles
Protect vulnerable individuals from the overwhelming power of the state.
Actors who are the most concerning:
Police (wield monopoly over force)
Prosecutors (have vast resources of the state behind)
Procedural rules protect defendant from any abuse of state power
Not enough to prove guilt, you must assure that the police, the crown attorney and juror all follow the rules.
Continuum of Citizen Dissent
Legal: voting, lobbying…..legal: protests…
Civil disobedience (intentionally refuse to obey a law that you believe to be unjust or in support of some other dissent around injustice ….
Committing yourself to non violence is accepting arrest…
Civil disobedience exposes state’s moves as illegitimate and therefore violent …. Accepting the violence of the state exposes the violence of the state
Exclusion of Evidence
Administration of justice into disrepute
Doesn’t stop police officers from using force the next time
Feeds the crime control model
Breaking the rules to get justice
Criminal prosecution of a police officer
Hard to do… The victim is open to retaliation
Crown attorney who prosecuted the charge needs police cooperation
Burden of proof: beyond a reasonable doubt
Won’t change police culture…. Still feeds the crime control model
Disciplinary Hearings
- Internal investigation
- Investigator is immersed in the culture of policing therefore it is difficult to have confidence in this - Public complaints commission
- Crime control: complain = victimization of the officer
- If successful, remedy includes loss of employment
- loss of Liberty –> due process
- low success rate
R v Dunlop and Sylvester 1979
Aiding and abetting in gang rape?
They did nothing to assist the victim
Aiding and abetting if they did nothing?
Mere presence is not sufficient.
If presence is accompanied by prior knowledge or attendance with the purpose of encouraging then it can be considered an offence.
Encouragement or facilitation includes
Keeping a lookout
Enticing the victim to the place
Preventing victims escape
Acquitted
Civil Litigation
Civil (not criminal)
The answer is not firing or jailing the police officer but receiving monetary compensation for damages
Burden of proof is NOT beyond a reasonable doubt
Has a higher success rate than disciplinary hearings
Role of Police… Initiate the trial process
- Investigation
- Investigatory power
- s8 (search and seizure) : any search without a warrant is prima facie (a violation of the citizen’s privacy)
- citizen has a reasonable expectation of privacy
- Investigatory detention
- articulable cause
- reasonable suspicion
- Arrests
- summons, promise to appear (no loss of Liberty)
- arrest (loss of Liberty)
- taking physical control of someone to detain them, which includes touching or words of arrest and the individual submitting to the arrest
3 types of offences
Indictable offence
More serious, more potential loss of Liberty, more procedural protections
Summary offence
Max penalty of 6 months, 5000$ or both
Hybrid/dual offence
The crown elects to proceed:
- by indictment
- by summary
Until the crown elects –> treated as an indictable offence
- gives the accused those additional procedural protections
Don’t arrest unless…
Can’t establish identity (get them into court… Summons)
To preserve evidence –> court
Can’t prevent further offences
Police start the court process
Don’t arrest unless —> summons
⬇️
Arresting officer —> summons or appearance of notice
️⬇️
Officer in charge —> summons or promise to appear, or recognizance (bail)
Bail
500$ max
Says : I promise to come back and if I don’t I must pay x amount
If you don’t appear, criminal conviction of failure to appear
2 hours - bail court - judicial oversight
- Primary ground: appear in court
- Secondary ground: reoffend or interfere with administration justice
- Tertiary ground - confidence in administration of justice
If the crown can approve any of these things applies to you….detention order ( you can then go to higher court for a bail review)