micro and macro effects Flashcards

1
Q

macro effects of a weak exchange rate

A

improvement in current account balance as more expensive imports cheaper exports

therefore net exports in AD equitation can rise so economic growth therefore lower unemployment, high demand pull inflation

or supply side as more expensive imports can drive up COP for firms across the economy pass on cost push which if dominant could cause lower growth higher unemployment

Potential for greater FDI, lower start up costs and cheaper exports nudging foreign firms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

micro effects of weak exchange rate

A

high prices for consumers

high cost of production past on to consumers lower profits lower dynamic efficiency

high debt servicing costs if debt in foreign currency

inefficiency productive and x as complacency due to natural benefits rising costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are protectionists policies

A

protecting domestic industries against foreign competition through tariffs, import quotas and subsidies, or other restrictions placed on the imports of foreign competitors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

micro effects of protectionist policies

A

high prices

lower quantity, consumer choice and producer choice

producer revenue up,

consumer surplus falls DWL, but producer rises

allocative inefficiency do to movement from comparative advantage countries to domestic firms who lack advantage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

macro effects of protectionist policies

A

governemnt revenue to service debt or deficit or fund government expetiture

inflation for firms importing goods production costs rise

current account balance could improve by constraining import expenditure or even higher net exports

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

macro effects of protectionist policies

A

government revenue to service debt or deficit or fund government expenditure

inflation for firms importing goods production costs rise

current account balance could improve by constraining import expenditure or even higher net exports due to Certus paribus higher AD

employment encourage greater domestic output protects and even creates employment as derived demand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

macro effects of strong exchange rate

A

SPICED so current account deficit

AD lower x-m, lower growth higher cyclical unemployment, lower demand pull inflation

SRAS, cheaper firms access raw materials shifting SRAS right

Less FDI harder to set up higher sunk costs and less exports

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

micro effects of strong exchange rate

A

higher profitability cheaper imports but could hurt if exports dearer

domestic producer efficiency, boost efficiency e.g training, capital, reduce x inefficiency

cheaper imports low prices good for consumers, higher consumer surplus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

examples interventionist policies to promote development

A

government spending on education, health, infrastructure, aid money, manage trade, nationalisation, subsidy price control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

macro interventionist policies to promote development

A

growth , lower unemployment

LRAS, higher long term growth, prosperity, international competitiveness

income inequality reduce it e.g. govt spending on welfare or regulation on workers e.g. min wage, nationalisation.

risk of govt finance worsening if fuelled by borrowing long term implications for future generations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

micro interventionists policies to promote development

A

allocative inefficiency e.g protectionist policies due to comparative advantage being taken away, price controls min/max impact on living standards

gov failure, unintended consequences or government corruption giving govt power e.g. Aid money

x inefficiency, govt doesn’t have profit motive costs’ can spiral, nationalisation

but could get allocative efficiency if fixes market failure e.g. education and health are merit goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

examples of expansionary monetary policy

A

lower interest rates, QE,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

macro effects of expansionary monetary policy

A

higher growth

lower unemployment, CYCLICAL

higher inflation demand pull

via increase in AD exports less competitive, lower export revs, more imports so worsening of current account position OR it rates leading to weaker exchange rate via hot money outflows

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

micro effects of expansionary monetary policy

A

reduce rates of return on savings, pensioners, unemployed therefore worse off living standards reduced

impact on housing market, lower IT cheaper to borrow money increasing demand and house prices but worse off for first time buyers

lower firms costs on variable interest rates lowering cost of production higher profits

better for indebted households increasing living standards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

macro effects of contractionary monetary policy

A

lower growth

higher unemployment cyclical

lower inflation great as CPI 10.1%

Current account improvement exports now more internationally competitive as lower rates of inflation and lower growth, lower wages lower expenditure on imports

or higher money inflows via hot money appreciating the currency which actually worsens CA

high interest rates reduces chance of systemic risks like bank failure as high interest rates discourages amount of borrowing by business and households discouraging household and corporate debt more saving takes pressure off banking sector less chance of shock

reduces chance of credit and asset bubbles as only those who can afford or need will borrow sustainable borrowing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

micro effects of contractionary fiscal policy

A

positive impact on savers

fall in house prices good for first time buyers bad for consumer confidence

impact on firms who have loans and have variable interest rates could increase COP passing on to the consumer hurting profitability

worsen indebted households repaying with higher variable interest rates hurting living standards and reducing disposable income

17
Q

what is expansionary fiscal policy

A

increases in govt spending, cutting taxation and running a budget deficit.

18
Q

macro effects of expansionary fiscal policy

A

higher growth

higher employment

high inflation demand pull

higher current account deficits due to higher inflation eroding export competitiveness and increase imports as high growth lower unemployment, higher disposable incomes

gov finances impact rising budget deficit from borrowing burdening future generations

19
Q

micro effects of expansionary fiscal policy

A

crowding out takes place in the loanable funds market

solves market failures on education, infrastructure improving allocative efficiency

public service impact quality of education and healthcare

x inefficiency due to lack of profit motivation, wasteful, opportunity costs

increases profit for firms due to tax cuts

20
Q

macro effects of contractionary fiscal policy

A

improve government finances, benefits of budget surplus and decreasing national debt increases confidence in govt finances increasing coupon rates on govt bonds easier for govt to borrow overtime and increased FDI, fiscal space to fund for future recession

reduce demand pull inflation

improve current account deficit to reduce imports

lower growth

higher cyclical unemployment

lower govt spending on key sectors e.g education could cut LRAS productive capacity reducing investment and productivity

21
Q

micro effects of contractionary fiscal policy

A

less chance of crowding out of private sector e.g. loanable funds market

less x-inefficiency from wasteful gov spending

worsening on public spending could cause individual impact on people who rely

inequality cutting G and rising regressive taxes increases income inequality

22
Q

macro effects of free trade

A

comparative advantage, benefits and costs of current account good for some bad for others

boost in AD higher x-m, higher growth lower unemployment and demand pull inflation

improved living standards and poverty alleviation

dynamic efficiency and technology increases LRAS

23
Q

micro effects of free trade

A

lower prices higher consumer surplus with higher quantity and choice

producer surplus from cheaper imports

higher competition driving up efficiency

better tech lowering cost of production

economies of scale

24
Q

macro effects of supply side policies

A

LRAS

higher growth

lower unemployment

lower inflation

improvement in current account exports more competitive

if interventionist hit to gov finances worsening budget deficit, worsening national debt

25
Q

micro effects of supply side policies

A

boost productivity

market based SSP such as deregulation or reduction in benefits or no minimum wage can harm stakeholders

competition benefits of privatisation and deregulation,

Risk of monopoly power if fail e.g. consolidate market power raise barriers to entry, tax cuts could allow big companies to get even bigger

solve or make market failures e.g. gov spending on infrastructure, deregulation, privatisation

26
Q

macro effects of economic growth

A

higher incomes therefore higher living standards alleviation of poverty as more jobs are created due to derived demand so less unemployment

demand pull inflation

current account deficit due to more imports and less competitiveness of exports

improvement to gov finances higher income tax revenue higher VAT, Tarif etc.

27
Q

micro effects of economic growth

A

market failure due to environmental impacts, negative externality in production

worsening income inequalities as economic growth may not be evenly distributed

higher incomes only way to increase happiness may not e.g. more working, infrastructure, gender equality more to happiness

increased profits dynamic efficiency

28
Q

macro effects of foreign direct investment

A

growth unemployment, higher incomes better living standards, less poverty

increased inflation demand pull

improvement in BOP in financial account improved current account

technology diffusion spreading to country boosting LRAS

improve govt finances higher corporation taxes

29
Q

Micro impacts of FDI

A

environmental resource depletion negative externality

treatment of workers and pay, hurting domestic workers

dynamic, lower costs higher productivity investment in green production

competition distortion add to or take away dependant on country e.g. developing countries could destroy competition

30
Q

micro effects of market structures

A

Static efficiency e.g. allocative, productive and x efficiency (concentrated markets tend not to see but competitive we do see)

anti-competitively e.g. merges, limit pricing, advertising

price discrimination of monopoly

31
Q

macro effects of market structures

A

impact on LRAS due to dynamic efficiency advancement in tech

competitive markets job creation as labour derived demand

productive efficiency EOS boosting LRAS

competitive markets good for living standards and lower incomes and income inequality

32
Q

micro effects of trade union

A

higher wages, lower employment

worker rights and protection (stakeholders)

improve outcomes in monopsony market, increasing wages and employment

cost burden to firms

less wage discrimination

33
Q

macro effects of trade union

A

raise unemployment in traditional but reduce in monopsony

inflationary pressure driving up prices

worsening international competitiveness

worsening current account, BOP

can detract FDI

34
Q

micro effects of subsidy

A

reduces price, by reducing COP increasing consumer surplus

increases quantity for market failures where their are positive externalities of consumption/production

improves affordability for inequities in market e.g. education, healthcare

producer revenue increase and can promote inefficiency due to reliance moral hazard more waste

cost to government

35
Q

macro effects of subsidy

A

protectionist measure fore domestic producer, industry, workers

widely use can reduce COP reduce cost push inflation

improve international competitiveness, improve current account improve BOP

attract FDI

bad impact on government finances, budget deficit national debt

36
Q

micro effects of privitisation/deregulation

A

static allocative, productive and x efficiency, lower prices higher quantity quality

more profit dynamic efficiency

Stakeholder impacts, negative cost cutting with wages as more competitive Deregulation could be harmful e.g. less maternity leave

Market failure, worsen environmental market failure, ignore externalities

37
Q

macro effects of privatisation/deregulation

A