micro Flashcards
pros of organic growth and what it is
Organic growth- a firm increasing their output by increasing investment or labour
Organic growth is cheaper than merging or takeovers (which are better suited for larger firms) and is far easier
cons of organic growth
Somethings you cannot gain from organic growth e.g. Wanting to get into an Asian market from a European one, you will have to merge, organic growth will not suffice
Organic growth may be too slow for directors and managers who want to maximise salaries and bonuses
what us vertical integration and its pros
Vertical integration- a merger between 2 firms in the same industry but at different stages of production e.g. Car manufacturer buying a car dealership
Possible cost savings to make firm more efficient
May reduce risk if one industry goes into decline then they still have something
Firm would have more control over the market and dictate prices etc
cons of vertical integration
If both firms are very good at what they do, if one buys the other the quality of the smaller one may lower because the management is not as good or efficient
Some firms may pay too much to take over and the market share may actually decrease
May be very expensive to merge
Experienced and skilled workers may leave, making the firm worse off
cons of horizontal integration and what it is
Horizontal integration- merger of two firms in the same industry at the same point of production e.g. Two bakeries
May be poorly managed
pros of horizontal integration
Reduced average costs bc of economies of scale
Reach economies of scale
Give more negotiating power, allowing for larger profit margins
Benefits of diversity, cross subsidisation
Job security
Higher consumer surplus
Greater tax revenue
Reduce competition by taking out a competitor
Can allow one firm to buy unique assets owned by another company
Allows a business to grow in a market where they already have knowledge and expertise, making the merger more likely to be successful
eval for horizontal integration
May experience diseconomies of scale Will be very expensive in short term Revenue may not necessarily increase People don't like big conglomerates, people do like artisan, increasing trend lately Monopsony Contestability Legal costs, X-efficiency costs
what us conglomerate integration
Conglomerate integration- merging of two firms with no common interest
Reduces risks bc then the firm is not so dependent on the one market, but two
Size makes it easier for conglomerates to get finance to expand
Opportunity for asset stripping which is bad for the firm being bought over though and the locals
But they do not have expertise in the market of the firm they buy into
constraints of business growth
Size of market- depends on the industry and the opportunity for expansion there e.g. Vegan product industry is growing but vintage records is not
Access for finance- how willing the banks are to give them a loan, usually they will out profit towards funding but banks too
Owner objectives- not every owner wants to expand
Regulation- maybe a firm cannot output more because of pollution permits
why demerge
Diseconomies of scale- no effect on profitability
They may be worth more separately
Management did not have time or skills to make that part of the company flourish
impact of demergers on businesses, workers and conumsers
Businesses- will benefit if demerging means greater efficiency and profit, depends on the firm and how innovative they are etc
Workers- senior managers will gain a promotion but workers may lose their jobs, especially if the firm becomes more efficient
Consumers- will gain if the demerger means they become more efficient but will lose out if they become focussed on increasing profits by raising prices
allocative efficiency
Allocative efficiency- or economic efficiency measures whether resources are allocated to the goods and services demanded by consumers. Allocative efficiency when marginal benefit of consumption = marginal cost of production P=MC or AR=MC, price is to maximise consumer/producer welfare. Private costs differ to social costs and this affects allocative efficiency
productive efficiency
Productive efficiency- when production is achieved at the lowest cost and only exists if there is technical efficiency. This is when given input produces max output or a given output is produced by min input
MC=AC
dynamic efficiency
Dynamic efficiency- concerns how resources are allocated over a period of time, think long term and opportunity cost. E.g. Rate of investment and where that investment is spent, or sustainable growth- not dynamically efficient if they leave future generation worse off
x-inefficiency
X-inefficiency- or organisational slack is when a firm is not producing and lowest possible cost, firm operating within average cost curve, but not at the boundary. Could be because of managers, trade unions, environmental pressures
in/efficiency in differeent market structures
In/efficiency in different market structures- production must take place on boundary to be allocatively efficient. Dynamic efficiencies shown by shifts in curve
characteristics of perfect competition
- Many buyers and sellers but none of whom are large enough to dictate price. Many sellers sell to different small groups of buyers
- Freedom of entry and exit- barriers are low so a firm can come and establish itself
- Buyers and sellers have perfect knowledge- of prices so if one firm charges slightly higher, its demand will be 0, so the firm bust accept the market price, they are price takers
- Allocatively and productively efficient
- Homogeneous products- no branding and products are identical e.g. Agriculture
- Profit maximisation is the goal
characteristics of monopolistic competition
Large number of buyers and sellers in the market
No/low barriers to entry of exit
Firms are short run profit maximisers
Firms produce differentiated goods, to some extent
characteristics of an oligopoly
- High barriers to entry and exit
- High concentration ratio- three largest firms produce around 80pc of output would be considered monopolistic or if five or fewer firms have 50% market share.
- Interdependence of firms- what one firm does will influence what other firms do e.g. If one firms increases efficiency and output then another firm will follow. Uncertainty because you don’t know how firms will change their competitive strategy
- Product differentiation- where you cannot buy the same product elsewhere
- Non price competition
characteristics of a monopoly
Only one firm in the industry
Barriers to entry prevent new firms from entering the market- legal barriers, sunk costs, capital costs, marketing costs etc
The monopolist is a short run profit maximiser where MC=MR
High degree of product differentiation
characteristics of a monopsony
Only one buyer in the market
Same conditions as a monopolistic market (apart from the number of buyers and sellers)
Assumed they are profit maximisers