Micro 1: General Equilibrium Flashcards

1
Q

What is general equilibrium, as opposed to partial equilibrium?

A

General equilibrium refers to equilibrium in all markets, as opposed to partial equilibrium, which is just concerned with equilibrium in particular markets.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is an Edgeworth box? What does it illustrate?

A

An Edgeworth box illustrates all possible endowments in an exchange economy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does it mean to say that demand functions are ‘homogenous of degree zero’?

A

z(tp) = z(p) for any t: all demands and supplies stay the same when prices double.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Walras’ law?

A

Define aggregate excess demand as z(p). For any p, the dot product of p and z(p) = 0.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why do we only need to find k –1 prices where markets clear, in a market with k goods?

A

This follows from Walras’ law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What requirements do we need on preferences and endowments to ensure the existence of Walrasian equilibrium?

A

z must be a continuous function, so individual demand functions must be continuous and convex. All consumers must own at least a little of each good.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What assumptions are required for the First Theorem of Welfare Economics to hold?

A
  1. Price-taking agents
  2. Complete markets - ie no externalities
  3. Symmetric information
  4. Rational optimisation
  5. No distortionary taxation etc
  6. Locally non-satiated preferences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does the First Theorem state?

A

All market equilibria are Pareto efficient - competitive markets will exhaust the gains from trade.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sketch a proof of the First WT.

A

At any market equilibrium, both consumers operate where the budget line is tangent to an indifference curve. Since they must both choose the same point, their indifference curves must also be tangent to each other. Therefore, the set of Pareto improvements is empty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can the First WT still hold under intertemporal and risky markets?

A

Yes - this is the Arrow-Debreu theorem (1954).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does the Second Theorem state? What additional assumptions does it require?

A

The Second Theorem states that any Pareto efficient allocation can be achieved by competitive markets given the correct redistribution of initial endowments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a lump-sum tax, as opposed to a ‘distortionary’ tax?

A

When a tax is distortionary, agents can change the amount of tax they pay by changing their behaviour. For example, you can pay less income tax by working less. By contrast, lump-sum taxes (which may still change behaviour) cannot be avoided like this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Can there be multiple Walrasian equilibria?

A

Yes. However, they are usually locally unique.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is tâtonnement?

A

The ‘Walrasian auctioneer’ model of convergence to price equilibrium: p is announced in each period, demands are announced, and then prices are adjusted in proportion to excess aggregate demand.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What requirements do we need to impose on the nature of goods to ensure that tâtonnement always converges on the equilibrium price vector?

A

All goods must be gross substitutes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In a Ricardian model, is anyone made worse off by international trade? If yes, who? If no, why not?

A

No. Under a Ricardian model of specialisation and trade, workers who consume only exports are indifferent between autarky and trade, and anyone who consumes any imports is made strictly better off.

17
Q

What does the Ricardian model of trade miss?

A
  • Imperfect factor mobility
  • Transport costs
  • Imperfect competition and market power from multinational corporations
  • Dynamic arguments about ‘infant industries’
  • Risk and the strategic dangers of over-specialisation
18
Q

When factors are imperfectly mobile, is anyone made worse off by international trade? If yes, who? If no, why not?

A

Yes - when we have fixed factors, the owners of the factor that is specialised away from are unambiguously worse off, and the owners of the other factor are unambiguously better off (at the expense of those made worse off). The owners of the mobile factor (usually workers) may be made better or worse off.

19
Q

In the Heckscher-Ohlin model, will the labour abundant country import or export the labour intensive good?

A

The labour-abundant country will specialise in the labour-intensive good and export it.

20
Q

Where, in the Heckscher-Ohlin model, will wages be higher?

A

In the labour-abundant country, specialisation in the labour-intensive good will drive up real wages in this sector.

21
Q

What does the Stopler-Samuleon theorem state?

A

A 1% increase in the price of the labour intensive good causes wages to rise more than 1%, and real returns to capital to fall.

22
Q

What does the Rybczynski theorem state?

A

If labour endowment increases by 1%, and all prices stay the same, the capital-intensive industry will contract, by more than 1% and the labour-intensive industry will expand by more than 1%.