Mgmt of Pts with Ulcer Bleeding (2012) Flashcards
What’s the first step in approaching pt w/ suspected UGIB?
hemodynamic status, risk assessment, resuscitate prn
What are the two common scores to risk stratify?
Rockall score (0-7) Blatchford score (0-23)
What factors make up the Rockall score and what does it predict?
Factors: age, ‘shock’ (SBP <100, HR >100), comorbidities
predicts risk of further bleeding and death in pts hospitalized for UGIB
** this is a pre-endoscopic risk score **
What factors make up the Blatchford score and what does it predict?
Anything interesting (from a disposition perspective) re the Blatchford score?
Factors:
labs (Hgb - M < 13, F < 12; BUN >18.2)
clinical (SBP <110, sex, HR >100, melena, recent syncope, h/o liver dz, cardiac failure)
predicts risk of intervention (transfusion, endoscopic or surgical therapy) and death
If Blatchford score = 0, may consider d/c from ED w/o inpatient endoscopy
what % of UGIB pts have Blatchford = 0 ?
What’s the % of pts w/ Blatchford = 0 that will require intervention?
up to 5-20% of UGIB have Blatchford = 0
<1% chance of requiring intervention
Transfusion goal?
> = 7, or higher if certain comorbidities (cardiac ~ 8)
what else besides transfusion do you need to consider for resucitation?
intubation
goal:
protect airway
prevent aspiration (especially if AMS or ongoing hematemesis)
facilitate safe endoscopy
What are two pre-endoscopic tx options?
erythromycin
gastric lavage
what are the instructions for using pre-endoscopic erythromycin?
why would you use it?
250mg IV given 30 min before EGD
may consider to improve diagnostic yield and to decrease need for repeat EGD (conditional rec; mod qual ev)
However, no improvement in clinical outcomes (transfusion burden, hospital stay, need for surgery)
what is the overall impression of gastric lavage?
don’t do it.
up to 18% of UGIB pts will have clear or bile-stained aspirate
what are the instructions for PPI for acute UGIB?
80mg IV bolus followed by 8mg/hr drip
What are the pros and cons of PPI in acute UGIB?
PROS:
- decrease # of pts w/ high risk stigmata (active bleeding, non-bleeding visible vessel, adherent clot) at index EGD (conditional rec; high qual ev)
- if EGD will be delayed or not done, IV PPI may reduce further rebleeding (conditional rec; mod qual ev)
CONS:
- doesn’t improve risk of death, rebleeding, or surgery
After EGD, what do you do about the PPI?
if no ulcers or erosions on EGD, stop PPI
otherwise. ..
- for pts w/ high risk stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH), PPI infusion decreases rebleed rate, need for surgery, and death
- for the oozing subgroup, however, PPI infusion didn’t change risk of rebleeding. may not need PPI infusion for this subgroup
- intermittent PO PPI may be equiv to IV infusion x 72hr
When should you do the EGD?
generally w/n 24hrs of admission (conditional rec; low qual ev)
what defines a high risk pt presenting w/ UGIB?
when should high risk pts have EGD done?
tachycardic, hypoTN, hematemesis, Blatchford >= 12.
For high risk pts, early EGD (w/n 12 hrs of presentation) is a/w better clinical outcomes (fewer transfusions, shorter hospitalization, decreased mortality) (conditional rec; low qual)
Define ulcer
it’s a histologic definition - extension into submucosa or deeper, but endoscopists make dx of ulcer based on their interpretation of the depth visualized
Define erosion
breaks that remain confined to mucosa.
no clinically relevant bleeding occurs from erosions d/t there being no vasculature in the mucosa