MGMT 478 Exam #2 Flashcards

1
Q

A firm that achieves superior performance relative to other competitors in the
same industry or the industry average
 Always relative, not absolute

A

competitive advantage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  1. accounting profitability
  2. shareholder value creation
  3. economic value creation
A

ways to assess firm performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  • Helps managers achieve their strategic objectives more effectively
  • Uses internal and external performance metrics
  • Balances both financial and strategic goals
A

balanced scorecard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Three dimensions fundamental to sustainable strategy:
 Profits: The economic dimension
 The business must be profitable to survive

 People: The social dimension
 Emphasizes the people aspect

 Planet: The ecological dimension
 Emphasizes the relationship between business and the natural
environment

A

triple bottom line

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Goal-directed actions managers take
 To achieve competitive advantage
 In a single product market

 “How should we compete?”
 Who: which customer segments will we serve?
 What: customer needs will we satisfy?
 Why: do we want to satisfy them?
 How: will we satisfy our customers’ needs?

A

business level strategy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Unique features that increase value, so that consumers are willing to
pay a higher price.

 The focus of competition:
 Unique product features
 Customer service
 New product launches
 Marketing & promotion
 Competitive advantage achieved when:
 (Value – Cost) > competitors’

A

differentiation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

obtaining the lowest-cost position in the industry while
offering acceptable value

A

cost leadership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Successfully combining differentiation and cost-leadership activities

A

blue ocean strategy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Benefits:
 Strengths when a price war ensues
 Economies of scale (larger market share) allows to further lower prices

 Risks:
 High risk of replacement if a potent substitute emerges due to innovation
 Potential to lose competitive advantage when the focus shifts from price to
non-price attributes

A

benefits/risks of cost leadership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Benefits:
 Can contribute to low threat of entry & low threat of substitutes
 Customer loyalty

 Risks:
 When differentiated products are commoditized, lose competitive advantage
 Needs to be careful not to overshoot its differentiated appeal
 Can increase costs, not perceived value

A

benefits/risks of differentiation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Graphical depiction of a company’s performance
 Relative to its competitors
 Shows focus or divergence

A

strategy canvas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The decisions and goal-directed actions
taken to gain & sustain competitive
advantage in several industries and
markets simultaneously

A

corporate level strategy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The process in which several steps in the production and/or distribution of a product or service are controlled by
a single company or entity
 To increase that company’s power in the
marketplace

A

vertical integration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

acquiring a business operating earlier in the supply chain
 e.g., manufacturer integrates with raw materials

A

backward integration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Acquiring a business further up the supply chain
(activities closer to the customer)
 e.g., a distributor buys a retailer

A

forward integration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Lowers costs
 Improves quality
 Facilitates scheduling and planning
 Facilitates investments in specialized assets
 Co-located assets, unique equipment, human capital
 Secures critical supplies and distribution channels

A

benefits of vertical integration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Why do firms exist?”
 Transaction cost:
 All internal and external costs
associated with an economic exchange
 TCE uses transactions (contracts) as
the basic unit of analysis
 Firms are viewed as a bundle of contract

A

transaction cost economics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

if in house costs are less than cost market, the firm should vertically integrate.
own production of inputs or own output distribution channels

A

how TCE applies to vertical integration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

strategic alliances,

short term contracts

long-term contracts

licensing

franchising

equity alliances

joint ventures

parent-subsidiary relationship

A

alternatives to make-or-buy continuum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Firms send out request for proposal (RFP)

 Competitive bidding for contracts
(less than a year in duration)

 Benefits:

 Allows longer planning period than market transactions

 Lower prices due to competitive bidding

 Drawbacks:

 Firms responding to RFP have no incentive to make
transaction-specific investments
(e.g., new machinery)
Example:
General Motor’s car components

A

short-term contracts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Longer than a year in duration

 Help facilitate transaction-specific investment

 Enables firms to commercialize intellectual property

 Example: Humulin (human insulin)
 Developed by Genentech based on licensing agreement
 Commercialized by Eli Lilly

A

licensing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

 Franchisor grants a franchisee right to use:

 Trademark

 Business processes

 Franchisee provides to franchisor:

 Up-front buy-in
 Percentage of revenues

A

franchising

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

 Partnership in which one firm takes partial ownership in the other
(i.e., buy stock or assets)

 Why equity alliance?

 Example: Coca-Cola & Monster $2B for a 16.7% stake in the company

 Why not an acquisition?

 Several wrongful death lawsuits

 They can benefit from explosive growth

 They can protect their wholesome image & brand

A

equity alliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

 Two or more partners create and jointly own new firm

 Long-term commitment facilitates transaction-specific investments

A

joint venture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

 Corporate parent owns subsidiary
 Directs it via command and control

A

parent subsidiary relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

mix of vertical integration and market exchange. Upstream, a producer might manufacture some of the input itself and buy the remaining portion from independent firms

A

tapering integration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

a long-term, result-oriented business relationship between the Customer and the Service Provider

A

strategic outsourcing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

 An increase in the variety of products/services
a firm offers or
the markets and geographic regions
in which it competes

A

diversification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

 Derive more than 95% of revenue from one business
 Birkenstock, Coca-Cola, Facebook

A

single business

30
Q

 Between 70% and 95% of revenue from one business
 Harley Davidson, Nestlé (Switzerland), UPS

A

dominant business

31
Q

Derive less than 70% of revenue from one business
 Remainder of revenue comes from business linked (related) to main line of business

A

related (constrained or linked) diversification

32
Q

single business, dominant business, related diversification, unrelated diversification

A

types of diversification

33
Q

High and low levels of diversification = lower performance
 Moderate levels of diversification = higher firm performance

(bell curve graph)

A

relationship between diversification and firm performance

34
Q

No businesses share competencies

 Example: Berkshire Hathaway, Yamaha (Japan)
Samsung and LG (S. Korea), Tata Group (India)
 “Chaebol”: a large family-owned business
conglomerate

A

unrelated diversification

35
Q

Increase in costs

 In-house suppliers not exposed to market competition

 Reduction in quality

 Know there is always a buyer

 Reduction in flexibility

 Potential for legal repercussions

 Monopoly concerns

A

risks of vertical integration

36
Q

Voluntary arrangements between firms that involve sharing of knowledge, resources, and
capabilities with the intent of developing processes, products, or services

A

strategic alliance

37
Q
  1. strengthen competitive position
  2. enter new markets
  3. hedge against uncertainty
  4. access critical complementary assets
  5. learn new capabilities
A

why firms enter strategic alliances

38
Q
  1. partner selection and alliance formation
  2. alliance design and governance
  3. post-formation alliance management
A

phases of alliance management

39
Q

More frequent transactions allow firms to demonstrate their reliability and good faith more quickly, thus potentially building trust sooner.

A

importance of interfirm trust

40
Q

 Alliance experience may increase
performance

 Dedicated alliance function
increases performance

Example: Eli Lilly
* Office of Alliance Management
* Each alliance managed by
a three-person team
– “Alliance Champion”
– “Alliance Leader”
– “Alliance Manager

A

relationship between alliances and firm performance

41
Q

 The joining of two independent companies
 Often companies of similar size
 Forms a combined entity
 Tends to be friendly

A

merger

42
Q

 Purchase of one company by another
 Buying company is typically larger
 Can be friendly or unfriendly
 Considered hostile when the target firm does not wish to be acquired

A

accquisition

43
Q

 The target company does not
wish to be acquired

A

hostile takeover

43
Q

 Benefits of mergers & acquisitions are often hard to achieve.

 Anticipated synergies don’t materialize.

 Most mergers & acquisitions don’t positively impact firm performance

 Stock prices usually go down when acquisition is announced

 Investors think acquisitions are generally risky

 Often result in destroyed shareholder value

 Ex) Verizon’s acquisition of AOL & Yahoo for $9B,
but had to sell them for $4B

A

relationship between firm performance and mergers and acquisition

44
Q

how firms achieve growth

A

build, borrow or buy framework

45
Q

Process of closer integration and
exchange between different
countries and peoples worldwide

 Made possible by:
 Falling trade and investment barriers
 Advances in telecommunications
 Reductions in transportation costs

A

globalization

46
Q

Country-level Impact: Increase in Living Standards

Multinational
Enterprises (MNEs

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)

Global Strategy:
 To gain and sustain a competitive
advantage when competing against other
foreign and domestic companies around
the world

Global brands

A

impact of globalization

47
Q

Deploys resources and capabilities
in at least two countries
 Need an effective global strategy

A

multinational enterprise

48
Q

access to larger market,

low cost input factors,

develop new competencies

A

advantages of going global

49
Q

liability of foreignness,

potential for loss reputation

potential for loss of intellectual property

A

disadvantages of going global

50
Q

cultural
administrative & political
geographic

economic

Decide on what countries to enter

A

CAGE Distance framework

51
Q

global standardization

transnational

international

multidomestic

A

types of global strategies

52
Q

 High-cost reductions & Low-local responsiveness

 Economies of scale & location economies

 Achieved through global division of labor where capabilities have lowest cost

Benefits: reduced labor costs, economies of scale, location economies

Risks: no local responsiveness, little or no product differentiation, risk of wage changes

A

global-standardization

53
Q

 High-cost reductions / High-local responsiveness

 Used by MNEs that pursue a blue ocean strategy

 “Think globally, act locally”

Benefits: reduced labor costs, economies of scale, benefits from global learning

Risks: difficult to implement, high failure rate

A

transnational

54
Q

Sells the same products/services in both domestic & foreign markets

 Low pressures for both local responsiveness & cost reductions

 Used by MNEs with large domestic markets and with strong reputations and
brand names

A

international

55
Q

Used to maximize local responsiveness (low on cost reductions)
 Local consumers ideally perceive products as local
 Duplication of key business functions across countries

A

multidomestic

56
Q

Benefits:
- highest possible local responsiveness
- reduced exchange rate exposure

Risks:
- duplication of units is expensive
- little economies of scale
- little or no learning across regions

A

benefits/risks of multidomestic

57
Q

Benefits:
- leverage home-based core competencies
- utilize economies of scale
- low-cost implementation through exporting, liscensing & franchising

Risks:
- no or limited local responsiveness
- affected by exchange rate
- IP embedded in products/service can be expropriated

A

benefits/risks international strategy

58
Q

the company must meet that exchange’s minimum financial and non-financial requirements or lsting standards

A

how a public stock company is set-up

59
Q

high visibility
adhere to highest ethical standards
unethical behavior can destroy reputation

A

benefits & issues with public companies

60
Q

Principal: hires, monitors, and compensates

Agent: performs work, provides time and talent

Both: information asymmetry

Core assumptions:
 Managers (agents) are opportunistic and self-interested
 Risk aversion of agents
 Information asymmetry between principals and agents

A

principal-agent problem

61
Q

When one party is incentivized to take undue risks or shirk responsibilities, the
costs are incurred to the other party
 Ex) when the agent is able to do the work but may decide not to do so

A

moral hazard

62
Q

A system of mechanisms to direct and
control an enterprise to ensure it pursues
its strategic goals successfully & legally

A

corporate governance

63
Q
  • board of directors
  • executive compensation
  • market for corporate control
  • auditors
  • government regulators
  • industry analysts
  • business ethics
A

corporate governance mechanism

64
Q

Agreed-upon code of conduct in business, based on societal norms

A

business ethics

65
Q

 Strategists should ask:
 Is the action within the acceptable norms of professional behavior?
 As outlined in the organization’s
code of conduct
 As defined by the profession at large
 Would you feel comfortable explaining and
defending the decision in public?
 How would the media react?
 How would the company’s stakeholders
feel about it?

A

things to consider when facing an ethical dilemma

66
Q

Translates strategy into action by detailing the firm’s competitive tactics and
initiatives

critical to achieving a competitive advantage

A

business model

67
Q
  • razor-razorblades
  • subscription
  • pay as you go
  • freemium
  • wholesale
  • agency
  • bundling
A

popular business models

68
Q

an increased likelihood of selecting inferior alternatives
Ex: when agents misrepresent their ability to do the job

A

adverse selection

69
Q

costs incurred to prevent agency problem

  • monitoring cost
  • company structuring (board of directors)
A

agency cost