Methods in Context Flashcards
Considering strengths and limitations of a method - PERVERT model
- Practical issues
- Ethical issues
- Reliability of the information collected
- Validity of the information obtained
- Examples from research or your own understanding to illustrate the points you’re making
- Representativeness of the information
- Theoretical issues
Practical issues
- Time and cost
- Is the suggested method likely to work in the setting
- Is the suggested method likely to work with the participants being researched (eg language barrier, young kids lacking maturity etc)
- Schools are hierarchal, so even if headteachers agree individual teachers may not
- Schools are very busy and very structured routines (harder to interrupt)
- Is there resentment, hostility or resistance from participants (members of anti-school subculture might not answer questionnaires)
- Will the method build sufficient rapport and trust for participants to discuss personal, sensitive or upsetting topics
- Is the research practical to identify samples (eg can a sample be easily representative if some families entitled to FSM don’t claim)
- Will the researcher have the right characteristics for this method (eg old people can’t pretend to be students)
- If it uses secondary data, is this data available (eg documents restricted to public access)
- Availability of funding
Ethical issues - the duty of care and confidentiality
- Schools have a duty of care towards pupils, which means they have a legal obligation to care to ensure their safety and well-being, which would involve protecting vulnerable students and maintaining confidentiality
- Teachers have to maintain professional standards, so this may make them reluctant to discuss confidential or damaging information about pupils, families or schools
- Adults working regularly with children may need a DBS (disclosure and barring service) check to ensure they have no criminal record which might pose a threat
- Researchers also have a moral or ethical duty of care
Ethical issue - informed consent
- Participants have to know what research is about and what it is for to give informed consent
- This is difficult in methods like covert observation
- Any research involving people under 18 needs to have their parents’ informed consent
- Younger children may not be able to understand what the research is about, making obtaining informed consent har
Ethical issues - intrusive and harmful effects
- Is using the method likely to upset or harm participants (eg through invasive and sensitive question, could make parents feel bad about themselves, protecting confidentiality and identity, building up rapport then leaving quickly and abruptly)
- Will the method put the researcher or those being researched at risk of harm (will teachers be fired for talking frankly about schools or students, will parents who neglect education eg through unauthorised absences be fined etc)
- Is the method likely to undercover unexpected or unwanted information which might compromise confidentiality (eg revealing abusive or dysfunctional families and the debate on whether to report it or not)
- Is the method likely to involve deception
Reliability
- Is the method suggested reliable (would other researchers be able to repeat it and get similar results eg difficult to repeat research on some deviant groups)
- Is the method likely to use reliable data (eg official statistics are more reliable than interviews, as participants may produce answers intended to please or annoy the researcher)
Validity
- Is the method the best way to produce valid (true, authentic, genuine) information about the topic (eg participants may exaggerate or lie - using a method that builds rapport is a good way to improve validity)
- Will the method suggested impose answers on respondents (risk that answers may reflect what participants think the researcher wants)
- The Hawthorne Effect (presence of a researcher affecting behaviour or answers)
Using examples
- Should provide examples of real research or hypothetical scenarios to explain or illustrate points
Representativeness
Is the method likely to produce results that can be generalised to the rest of society (large, longitudinal studies are usually more reliable, and sometimes there may be a very small or unavailable sampling frame - eg of students with a lot of unauthorised absences)
Theoretical issues
- Is the suggested method more associated with interpretivists, positivists, feminists, marxists, structural or action theorists etc
- Will the method produce value-free objective information (remember Becker suggesting that objectivity, detachment and value freedom are desirable when studying disadvantaged people)
What is the primary focus of Functionalist theory in sociological research?
Functionalists focus on how social institutions contribute to the stability and functioning of society as a whole.
Why do Functionalists prefer positivist research methods?
Functionalists believe in studying society scientifically using objective, quantitative data to uncover general patterns and social laws.
What methods do Functionalists typically use for data collection?
Functionalists prefer methods like surveys, structured interviews, and official statistics for their reliability and ability to produce large-scale data.
How do Functionalists view education in research?
Functionalists see education as a key institution that transmits shared norms and values, maintaining social order and integration.
Why might Functionalists use official statistics in their research?
Official statistics provide large-scale, reliable data that Functionalists can use to analyze societal trends and measure social functions.
How do Functionalists ensure objectivity in their research?
Functionalists emphasize the use of standardization, hypothesis testing, and replicable methods to maintain objectivity and scientific rigor.
What is a limitation of Functionalist research methods in context?
Functionalist methods may ignore subjective experiences and the meanings individuals attach to social actions, focusing too much on macro-level analysis.
How do Functionalists handle the issue of social facts in their research?
Functionalists treat social facts as things that exist independently of individuals and can be measured objectively.
Why might Functionalists study social integration?
They are interested in how well individuals are integrated into society, as this is key to maintaining social stability and preventing disorder.
How do Functionalists apply their methods to real-world contexts?
They might use their methods to assess the role of institutions like schools, families, or governments in fulfilling societal needs and maintaining equilibrium.
What type of research methods do Marxists typically favor?
Marxists often use qualitative methods, such as interviews and ethnography, to uncover the lived experiences of exploitation and inequality. They also use comparative and historical analysis.