Meta Ethics Flashcards
what is meta ethics
The consideration of second order questions about the nature and purpose of morality.
Such as what is the meaning of “good”, “bad”, “right”, “wrong”.
What are second order questions?
Questions about first order questions and the answers given to those questions.
What is A priori
Knowledge prior to evidence.
Knowledge in not dependant on sense experience.
What is A posteriori
Argument based on observations of the world.
Uses empirical facts and draws conclusions from them.
Named scholars for Utilitarianism
Mill
Bentham
Named scholars for Intuitionism
G.E.Moore
W.D.Ross
Named scholars for Divine Command Theory
Karl Barth
John Calvin
What is cognitivism
Claims that ethical judgements state facts so are objectively true or false.
What is non-cognitivism
Claims that ethical judgements are not statements of facts therefore cannot be objectively true or false
Implies that moral knowledge is impossible.
Ethical Subjectivism
The view that moral judgements merely state or express the emotions or preferences of the speaker.
Ethical objectivism
The view that moral values are intrinsic and not dependent on anything outside them
What would NML define good as
Abiding to precepts/Ten Commandments/word of God
Following what is natural
What would SE define good as
What brings about Agapeic love
What would VE define good as
Reaching Eudaimonia (happiness)
What is virtuous
Analytic truth
True by definition
E.g. “A bachelor is an unmarried man” or “triangles have three sides”
Synthetic truth
True by experience - needs empirical evidence/investigation
E.g. “Everything with a heart has a kidney” or “My village has a church”
What is Humes fork
There are two objects of human enquiry:
1) Relations of ideas (a priori) -
Denial is self-contradictory – denial is inconceivable
Necessary truths – discoverable by thought
We don’t need to gather evidence
2) Matters of facts (a posteriori)-
Claims that are true, but denial is not inconceivable
Observations are needed
How are moral uses of good, circular?
To say a good action is “excellent” or “the right thing to do”
This amounts to nothing more than “what is good is what I believe good is”
Something good from a moral perspective does not tell us why it is good. Only that the person considers it to be good.
Threfore circular argument.
What is ought Problem
You cant go from matter of fact, observable statements of the world to ethical statements on how we ought to behave in the world.
Who came up with the is-ought problem
Hume
What does hume mean by “is”
Statements of the world
Can be dicovered by science
Matter of fact (independant to humans)