Meta-Ethical theories Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What do you need to know about Meta-Ethical Theories

A

Naturalism

Intuitionism

Emotivism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Naturalism

A

Moral values can be correctly defined by observation of the natural world

it is a moral realist theory and is also cognitivist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Moral realism

A

Right and wrong actually exist; they are real properties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Cognitivism

A

Moral statements are subject to being either true or false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who believes in Ethical naturalism

A

The idea that moral values can be known empirically - it is linked to absolutism

Aquinas, Natural law, we just need to be rational

Bentham, Utilitarian, We know what is good or bad if it leads to pleasure or pain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is an objection to naturalism

A

David Hume’s ‘is-ought’;
man is dead
girl is crying
murder is??? bad?

murder ought to be bad*

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Intuitionism

A

Moral truths cannot be defined but are self evident through our intuition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who is a intuitionist and what does he argue

A

G.E Moore, argues that we cannot know what’s ‘good’ through empirical facts, but through intuition

He uses the analogy of the colour yellow and the horse, yellow is like good, simple but hard to explain. Horse is easier to explain because it is complex.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are pros and cons of Intuitionism

A

+ Takes Hume’s ‘is ought’ seriously
+ Defends the existence of moral facts

.- People can have different opinions and therefore intuitions
.- Cannot be analysed empirically - Similar to Plato

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Emotivism

A

Argues that moral statements are not facts, but just emotional states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who argues for emotivism and why

A

AJ Ayer, agrees with the Vienna circle and the verification principle, he argues that as moral statements aren’t logical and aren’t provable, which makes them meaningless

Making all moral statements just opinion with no power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly