Merger Models Flashcards
What is Accretion / (Dilution)?
- income statement impact of an acquisition
- reflects if buyer is better or worse off as a result of acquisition
- Accretion: Pro forma EPS > Acquirer’s EPS
- Dilution: Pro forma EPS < Acquirer’s EPS
- Breakeven: No impact on Acquirer’s EPS –> Greatest price Acquirer can afford to pay before deal starts to hurt
Level of accretion or dilution is a critical issue; determines affordability to potential acquirers
How do you calculate Pro Forma EPS?
Pro Forma EPS = (Acquirer’s Net Income + Target’s Net Income + After-tax “Incremental Adjustments”) / (Acquirer’s Shares Outstanding + New Shares Issued)
What are the incremental adjustments?
- incremental after-tax interest expense from new debt financing (if we pay with cash)
- after-tax synergies
- after-tax depreciation and amortization expense (from write-ups)
What is Goodwill?
- goodwill = excess purchase price over fair market value of net identifiable assets acquired
- target’s assets and liabilities are reported at FMV on date of acquisition (you “write up” to FMV)
- Net Identifiable Assets = Assets - Target’s existing goodwill - Liabilities
Relative P/E Analysis (100% stock, no write-ups, no synergies)
Accretive if Acquirer P/E > Offer P/E
- lower exchange ratio
Dilutive if Acquirer P/E < Offer PE
- raises exchange ratio
What are some financial reasons for an acquisition?
1) consolidation / economies of scale: if the 1st and 2nd biggest companies combine, they can get better deal with suppliers and save money
2) geographic expansion
3) gain market share
4) seller is undervalued
5) acquire customers or distribution channels
6) product expansion or diversification
The goal of each of these reasons: boost EPS and result in IRR > WACC
What are some of the fuzzy reasons for an acquisition?
1) intellectual property/patent/key technology (that the acquirer wants but can’t quite determine the value of)
2) defensive acquisition (fearful of fast-growing competitor, acquire it to prevent disruption)
3) acqui-hire (recruiting top notch employees is expensive… shortcut the whole process by buying an entire, smaller co and hiring everyone)
4) the “intangibles”
5) Office politics, ego, and pride
6) potential for extremely high growth (these cos may have no profits/cash flow/revenue, so acquisitions are not based in financial criteria such as EPS accretion/dilution)
Most M&A deals fall into this category of fuzzy reasons, but companies often make up financial reasons to justify them.
The steps in a sell-side process
1) plan the process and create the marketing material
2) contact the initial set of buyers (NDA)
3) set up management meetings and presentations
4) solicit initial and subsequent bids from buyers
5) conduct final negotiations, arrange financing, and close the deal
What do companies prefer to fund acquisitions with: Debt or Equity?
Debt, because its cheaper
However, if the co has extra Cash, it will almost always prefer to use that Cash first because Cash is cheapest (companies earn almost nothing on extra cash)
What are the advantages and disadvantages of the various acquisition financing options (cash, debt, stock)?
Cash tends to be the cheapest option; most companies earn little Interest Income on it, so they
don’t lose much by using it to fund deals. It’s also fastest and easiest to close Cash-based deals.
The downside is that using Cash limits the Buyer’s flexibility in case it needs the funds for something else in the near future.
Debt is normally cheaper than Stock but more expensive than Cash, and deals involving Debt take more time to close because of the need to find investors.
Debt also limits the Buyer’s flexibility because additional Debt makes future Debt issuances
more difficult and expensive.
Finally, Stock tends to be the most expensive option, though it can sometimes be the cheapest, on paper, if the Buyer trades at very high multiples.
It dilutes the Buyer’s existing investors, but it also prevents the Buyer from paying any additional cash expense for the deal.
In some cases, the Buyer can also issue Stock more quickly than it can issue Debt.
Walk me through a merger model
1) Get the financial stats for the buyer and seller (at minimum, Current Equity Value and Net Income, along with everything that goes into those calculations: Current Share Price, Shares Outstanding, Pre-Tax Income, and Tax Rate)
2) Determine the Purchase Price and Cash/Debt/Stock Mix (Sources & Uses Sched to estimate true cost of acquisition and its effects)
3) Combine Both Companies’ Pre-Tax Incomes and Adjust for the Acquisition Effects (e.g. Foregone Interest on Cash, Interest on Debt, synergies)
4) Calculate Combined Net Income (using Buyer’s tax rate) and EPS (by putting Combined Net Income / Buyers Existing Share Count + New Shares Issued in Deal)
5) Calculate the Combined EPS Accretion/Dilution and Draw Conclusions (by taking the Combined EPS, dividing it by the Buyer’s standalone EPS, and subtracting 1)
Shouldn’t we use the Purchase Enterprise Value in determining how much an acquirer pays? Enterprise Value represents the true cost of acquiring the co
No. In Merger Models, you always start with the Seller’s Purchase Equity Value because, at the bare minimum, the Buyer needs to pay that much to acquire the Seller’s shares
Beyond that, the price the Buyer pays is NOT necessarily the Purchase Enterprise Value, because
1) The Buyer doesn’t just “get” all the Seller’s Cash
2) The Buyer may choose to refinance the Seller’s Debt (so the existing Debt may not cost the Buyer anything)
3) Or the Buyer may choose to completely repay the Seller’s Debt using the deal funding, in which case Debt DOES increase the purchase price
4) There are also transaction fees and integration costs associated with the deal that may add to the upfront price
How do you calculate Cost of Debt, Cash and Equity / Weighted Cost of Acquisition?
- Cost of Debt: just like Cost of Debt in WACC calculation; it’s the interest rate the company would have to pay if it issued additional Debt
- Cost of Cash: based on interest rate the co is currently earning on its Cash balance, which tends to be very low
- Cost of Equity: based on the Buyer Net Income / Buyer Equity Value, or the RECIPROCAL of the Buyer’s P / E multiple (this is different from how you calculate Cost of Equity in WACC equation. It’s different because you are looking at Cost of Equity in terms of its IMPACT on the COMPANY’S EPS, not the company’s overall discount rate)
- Once, costs are calculated, Weighted Cost of Acquisition = % Cash Used * After-Tax Cost of Cash + % Debt Used * After-Tax Cost of Debt + % Stock Used * After-Tax Cost of Stock
Yield
The Yield is how much you get in Net Income for each $1.00 spent on Acquiree’s stock
Yield = Net Income / Purchase Equity Price
Whether a deal is accretive or dilutive depends on how the Seller’s Yield compares with the Weighted Cost of Acquisition
WCA < Yield of Seller: Accretive (i.e., co is paying LESS than what seller is yielding)
WCA = Yield of Seller: Neutral
WCA > Yield of Seller: Dilutive
In a 100% stock deal, how do you know if the deal is accretive or dilutive?
You can look at the P/E multiples of the Buyer and Seller (at the Seller’s Purchase Equity Value) to see if the deal is accretive or dilutive
Buyer’s P / E > Seller’s P / E at Purchase Price: Accretive
Buyer’s P / E = Seller’s P / E at Purchase Price: Neutral
Buyer’s P / E < Seller’s P / E at Purchase Price: Dilutive
What are the “Acquisition Effects” referenced in Step 3?
Debt: If an Acquirer uses Debt, it will have to pay Interest Expense on that Debt in the future, which will reduce its Pre-Tax Income, its Net Income, and its EPS
Stock: If an Acquirer uses Stock, it will have additional shares outstanding in the future, which will reduce its EPS
Cash: If an Acquirer uses Cash, it will give up future Interest Income on that Cash, which will reduce its Pre-Tax Income, its Net Income, and its EPS
What happens to the Seller’s shares in an acquisition?
They are removed from the combined share count because the Seller is no longer an independent entity after the deal closes
The shares don’t “disappear,” but they are removed from the market
They are “transferred” to the Cash, Debt and Stock that the Acquirer used
How do you know that an acquisition was accretive or dilutive?
If the combined EPS is higher than the Buyer’s standalone EPS, the deal is accretive; if the combined EPS is lower, the deal is dilutive; and if it’s the same, the deal is neutral
- Create Sensitivity Tables to assess changes in EPS at different purchase-prices, transaction structures and purchase methods
What are some shortcomings of EPS and merger models as a metric?
1) Not always meaningful, e.g., if Acquirer is a private company, or if the Acquirer has a negative Net Income
2) Net Income and Cash Flow are very different, i.e., there is a difference between profits and cash flows, and deals that look great based on EPS might look terrible based on Cash Flow
3) Merger Models don’t capture the risk of M&A deals, e.g., teams might not mesh, could be legal issues, etc.
4) Merger Models don’t reflect the qualitative factors
What’s the REAL price the Buyer pays?
At minimum, Acquirer must pay for all the Target’s shares, so the Purchase Equity Value is always the starting point for the purchase price.
Beyond that, the exact purchase price depends on the terms of the deal. The main factors that affect it are:
1) Treatment of Seller’s existing Debt
Seller’s Debt is Assumed with No Changes: Does NOT increase the amt the Buyer “really pays” for Seller. Interest doesn’t change
Seller’s Debt is Repaid with Buyer’s Cash: DOES increase the amt the Buyer “really pays.” Interest changes.
Seller’s Debt is Replaced with New Debt: Does NOT increase the amount the Buyer “really pays,” but it may affect the interest slightly.
2) Treatment of Seller’s existing Cash
3) Transaction Fees, Unfunded Pensions, and Other Items
When Company A acquires Company B, how do you determine the Combined Equity Value?
If no new Stock is issued, Combined Equity Value = Acquirer’s Equity Value
If it’s a 100% Stock deal, Combined Equity Value = Company A’s Equity Value + Company B’s Purchase Equity Value
Because the Combined Equity Value and Combined Net Income change based on purchase method, the combined P / E multiple changes
When Company A acquires Company B, how do you determine Combined Enterprise Value?
Combined Enterprise Value = Combined Equity Value + Debt (and other Debt-like Liabilities) - Cash (and other non-core Business Assets)
- This includes the Cash or Debt used to fund the deal
Or, more simply put: Combined Enterprise Value = Acquirer’s Current Enterprise Value + Seller’s Purchase Enterprise Value
The Combined Enterprise Value tells you how much the Combined Company’s core business will be worth to ALL investors, regardless of how the Buyer pays for the Seller
Combined Enterprise Value stays the same regardless of purchase method (therefore, Enterprise Value-based multiples also stay the same regardless of purchase method)