mercantile law Flashcards
WHAT IS CONTRACT?
Section 2(h) of the Act defines the term contract “as an agreement enforceable by law”.
Section 2(e) defines agreement as “every promise and every set of promises, forming the consideration
for each other”.Again Section 2(b) defines promise in these words:
“When the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent thereto, the proposal is said to be
accepted. Proposal when accepted, becomes a promise”.
ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF A VALID CONTRACT
- Proper offer and proper acceptance with intention to create legal relationship.
- Lawful consideration.
- Capacity.
- Free consent.
- Lawful agreement.
Section 11 of the Indian Contract
Act specifies that every person is competent to contract provided,
(a) he is of the age of majority according to the law to which he is subject and
(b) he is of sound mind and
(c) he is not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject
TYPES OF CONTRACT
- Void Contract
- Voidable Contract
- Illegal contract
- Unenforceable contract
- Express Contracts
- Implied Contract
- Tacit Contract
- Executed Contract
- Executory Contract
- Unilateral Contract
- Bilateral Contract
Void Contract
It is a contract without any legal effect and cannot be enforced in a Court
of Law. Section 2(j) defines a void contract as “a contract which ceases to be enforceable by
law becomes void when it ceases to be enforceable”.
Void Contract
Where both parties to an agreement are under a mistake of fact, (Section 20),
when the consideration or object of an agreement is unlawful, (Section 23), an agreement
made without consideration, (Section 25), agreement in restraint of marriage (Section 26),
trade (Section 27), legal proceedings (Section 28), agreement by way of wager (Section 30)
are instances of void contract.
Voidable Contract
As per Section 2(i), “an agreement which is enforceable by law at the option
of one or more the parties but not at the option of the other or others is a voidable contract.”
Voidable Contract
A contract brought about as a result of Coercion, Undue influence, Fraud or
misrepresentation would be voidable at the option of the person whose consent was caused
by any one of these factors.
Illegal contract
It is a contract which the law forbids to be made. The court will not
enforce such a contract and also connected contracts. All illegal agreements are void but all
void agreements or contracts are not necessarily illegal.
Unenforceable contract
Where a contract is good in substance but because of some technical
defect i.e., absence in writing, barred by limitation etc. one or both the parties cannot sue
upon it, it is described as an unenforceable contract.
Express Contracts
A contract which is made by words either spoken or written is said to
be an express contract. According to Section 9 insofar as the proposal or acceptance of
any promise is made in words, the promise is said to be express.
Implied Contract
By implied contract means implied by law (i.e.) the law implies a contract
though parties never intended. According to Section 9 insofar as such proposal or acceptance
is made otherwise than in words, the promise is said to be implied. For example, A delivers
by mistake goods at B’s warehouse instead of at C’s place. Here there is an obligation on
the part of B to return the goods to A, though they never intended to enter into a contract.
Tacit Contract
A contract is said to be tacit when it has to be inferred from the conduct of
the parties. Examples obtaining cash through automatic teller machine, sale by fall of
hammer at an auction sale.
Executed Contract
If the consideration for the promise in a contract (i.e., any act or
forbearance) is given or executed, such type of contract is called contract with executed
consideration.
Executory Contract
It is so called because the reciprocal promises or obligation which
serves as consideration is to be performed in future
Unilateral Contract
A unilateral contract is a one-sided contract in which only one party
has to perform his promise or obligation to do or forbear.
Bilateral Contract
Where the obligation or promise in a contract is outstanding on the part
of both the parties, it is known as bilateral contract
Formal Contracts
Formal Contracts include (a) Contract of record and (b) Contract under Seal.
Contract of Record
A contract of record is either a judgement of a court or a recognisance.
A judgement is an obligation imposed by a Court upon one or more persons in favour of
another or others. As a matter of fact it is not a contract in the real sense, since it is not
based upon any agreement between the two parties. A recognisance is a written
acknowledgement of a debt due to the State. It is usually met with the connection with
criminal proceedings.
Contracts of record derive their binding force from the authority of the Court.
Contract under Seal
A contract under seal is one which derives its binding force from its
form alone. It is written and is signed, sealed and delivered by the parties. It is also called a
deed or a speciality contract.
PROPOSAL/OFFER
it is defined under Section 2(a) of
the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as when one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to
abstain from doing anything with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or
abstinence, he is said to make a proposal.
Classification of Offer
(a) General Offer
(b) Special Offer
(c) Cross Offers
(d) Counter Offer
(e) Standing, Open or Continuing offer
Rules as to offer :
(a) The offer must be capable of creating legal relation
(b) The offer must be certain, definite and not vague
(c) The offer may be expressed or implied.
(d) The offer must be distinguished from an invitation to offer.
(e) An offer may be specific or general.
(f) The offer must be communicated
(g) The offer must be made with a view to obtaining the consent of the offeree.
(h) An offer may be conditional.
(i) The offer should not contain a term the non compliance of which would amount to
acceptance. Thus a man cannot say that if acceptance is not communicated by a certain
time the offer would be considered as accepted.
ACCEPTANCE
A proposal or offer is said to have been accepted when the person to whom the proposal
is made signifies his assent to the proposal to do or not to do something [Section 2 (b)].
The rules regarding acceptance are :
- Acceptance must be absolute and unqualified
- Communicated to Offeror:
- Acceptance must be in the mode prescribed:
- Time:
- Mere silence is not acceptance
- Acceptance by conduct
Communication of offer
The communication of an offer is complete when it comes to the
knowledge of the person to whom it is made (Sect. 4). An offer may be communicated either by
words spoken or written or it may be inferred from the conduct of the parties.
Communication of acceptance
Communication of an acceptance is complete :
(i) as against the proposer, when it is put in course of transmission to him so as to be out of the
power of the acceptor to withdraw the same;
(ii) as against the acceptor, when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer.
Under Section 4, the communication of a revocation is complete
(i) as against the person who makes it, when it is put into a course of transmission to the
person to whom it is made so as to be out of the power of the person who makes it;
(ii) as against the person to whom it is made, when it comes to his knowledge.
WHAT IS CONSIDERATION ?
Section 2(d) defines consideration as follows : “When at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing or promises to do or abstain from doing something, such an act or abstinence or promise is called consideration for the promise”.
CONSIDERATION
(1) That is to say, consideration is the doing or not doing of something which the promisor
desires to be done or not done.
(2) Consideration must be at the desire of the promisor.
(3) Consideration may move from promisee or any other person.
(4) Consideration may be past, present or future.
(5) Consideration need not be adequate, but should be real.
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS REGARDING CONSIDERATION
(i) Consideration must move at the desire of the promisor
(ii) Consideration from promisee or any other person
(iii) Executed and executory consideration
(iv) Past Consideration
(v) Adequacy of consideration
(vi) Performance of what one is legally bound to perform
(vii) Consideration must not be unlawful, immoral, or opposed to public policy.
VALIDITY OF AN AGREEMENT WITHOUT CONSIDERATION
- Natural Love and Affection
- Compensation for past voluntary services
- Promise to pay time barred debt
- Agency
- Completed gift
in order that a promise to pay for the past voluntary services is binding,
the following essential factors must exist :
(i) The services should have been rendered voluntarily.
(ii) The services must have been rendered for the promisor.
(iii) The promisor must be in existence at the time when services were rendered.
(iv) The promisor must have intended to compensate the promisee.
CAPACITY TO CONTRACT
Every person who (a) has attained the age of majority, (b) is of
sound mind and (c) is not otherwise disqualified from contracting, is competent to contract.
(Section 11)
(a) Age of majority
In India, the age of majority is regulated by the Indian Majority Act (Act
IX of 1875). Every person domiciled in India attains majority on the completion of 18
years of age.
(b) Sound mind
A person is said to be of sound mind for the purposes of making a contract
if, at the time when he makes it, he is capable of understanding it and of forming a rational
judgement as to its effect upon his interests.
Sound mind
A person who is usually of unsound mind, but occasionally of sound mind, may make a contract
when he is of sound mind.
A person who is usually of sound mind, but occasionally of unsound mind, may not make a
contract when he is of unsound mind.
Position of Minor’s agreement
- An agreement entered into by a minor is altogether void
- Minor can be a beneficiary
- Minor can always plead minority
- Ratification on attaining majority is not allowed
- Contract by guardian - how far enforceable
- Liability for necessaries
FREE CONSENT
According to Section 13, “two or more persons are said to have consented when they agree upon the
same thing in the same sense(Consensus-ad-idem).
ELEMENTS VITIATING FREE CONSENT
(a) Coercion : Section (15)
(b) Undue influence (Section 16)
(c) Fraud (Section 17)
(d) Misrepresentation (Section 18)
(e) Mistake as per Section 20
Coercion
“Coercion” is the committing, or threatening to commit, any act
forbidden by the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), or the unlawful detaining, or threatening to
detain any property, to the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any
person to enter into an agreement.
Undue influence
A contract is said to be induced by “undue influence” where
the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage of the other. A
person is deemed to be in a position to dominate the will of the other, when he holds authority real
or apparent over the other, or when he stands in a fiduciary relation to the other.
Fraud
As per the Act “Fraud” means and includes any of the following acts
committed by a party to a contract, or with his connivance or by his agent with intent to deceive
another party thereto or his agent, or to induce him to enter into the contract
Mere silence amounting to fraud?
Mere silence as to facts likely to affect the willingness of a
person to enter into a contract is no fraud; but where it is the duty of a person to speak, or
his silence is equivalent to speech, silence amounts to fraud.
Misrepresentation
Where a person asserts something which is not true,
though he believes it to be true, his assertion amounts to misrepresentation. Misrepresentation may be either innocent or without reasonable ground. Misrepresentation is misstatement of facts by one, which misleads the other who, consequently, can avoid the
contract.
Misrepresentation as to law
Misrepresentation as to fact renders a contract, voidable
misrepresentation as to law does not, ordinary, make the contract voidable. But a deliberate
misrepresentation in matter of law is certainly a cause for avoiding a contract.
Mistake
When both the parties to an agreement are under a mistake to
a matter of act essential to the agreement the agreement is altogether void. The Court will enforce a voidable contract if not avoided, but will not recognise an agreement that is
void.
UNLAWFUL OBJECT
The limits to contractual freedom are set out in Section 23 of the Act. An agreement, the
object or consideration of which is unlawful is void. “Consideration or object is unlawful if it is
forbidden by law; or it would; if permitted defeat the provisions of any or law or is fraudulent;
or involves injury to the person or property of another, or is immoral; or opposed to public
policy.”
The seven circumstances which would make consideration as well as an object unlawful are
discussed below
(i) Forbidden by law
(ii) Defeat of the provision of law
(iii) Defeat of any rule for the time being in force in India
(iv) Fraudulent
(v) Injury to the person or property of another
(vi) Immoral
(vii) Agreement opposed to public policy
Agreement opposed to public policy
(a) Trading with enemy
(b) Stifling prosecution
(c) Champerty and maintenance
(d) Interference with the course of justice
(e) Marriage brokerage contracts
(f) Interest against obligation
(g) Sale of public offices
(h) Agreement for the creation of monopolies
(i) Agreement in restraint of marriage (Section 26)
(j) Agreement in restraint of trade (Section 27)
(k) Agreement in restraint of legal proceedings (Section 28)
AGREEMENTS EXPRESSLY DECLARED VOID
(a) Consideration Unlawful in Part
(b) Agreement - the meaning of which is uncertain (Section 29)
(c) Wagering agreement
gambling
gambling is prohibited by law, whereas speculation is generally not. Under Section 30 of
the Act, a wagering contract is void, the reason being that such a contract is opposed to public
policy.
BY WHOM CONTRACT MAY BE PERFORMED ?
- Promisor himself
- Agent
- Representatives
- Third persons
- Joint promisors
PERFORMANCE OF RECIPROCAL PROMISES
(i) General observations
(ii) Simultaneous performance of reciprocal promises
(iii) Performance of reciprocal promises where the order of performance is expressly fixed
(iv) Performance of reciprocal promises when the order of performance is fixed by implication
(v) Effect of one party preventing another from performing promise
IMPOSSIBILITY OF PERFORMANCE
(1) Impossibility existing at the time of contract
(2) Supervening impossibility:
(1) Impossibility existing at the time of contract
(i) If known to the parties
(ii) If unknown to the parties
(iii) If known to the promisor only
APPROPRIATION OF PAYMENTS
(i) Application of Payment where debt to be discharged is indicated
(ii) Application of payment where neither party appropriates
CONTRACTS WHICH NEED NOT BE PERFORMED
(a) Effect of novation
(b) Effect of rescission
(c) Effect of alteration of contract
(d) Promisee may waive or remit performance of promise
DISCHARGE OF A CONTRACT
(i) Discharge by performance
(ii) Discharge by mutual agreement
(iii) Discharge by impossibility of performance
(iv) Discharge by lapse of time
(v) Discharge by operation of law
(vi) Discharge by breach of contract
LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES
(a) Liability for special damages
(b) Liability to pay vindictive or exemplary damages
(c) Liability to pay nominal damages
(d) Damages for deterioration caused by delay
Besides claiming damages as a remedy for the breach of contract, the following remedies are
also available
(i) Rescission of contract
(ii) Suit upon Quantum Meruit
(iii) Suit for specific performance
(iv) Suit for injunction
WHAT IS A CONTINGENT CONTRACT ?
According to Section 31 of the Act, contingent contract is a contract to do or not to do something,
if some event collateral to such contract, does or does not happen.
RULES RELATING TO ENFORCEMENT
1.Enforcement of contracts contingent on an event ‘happening
2.Enforcement of contracts contingent on an event ‘not-happening’
3.When shall an event on which contract is contingent be deemed impossible, if it is the
future conduct of a living person
4.Agreement contingent on impossible event (Section 36)
TYPES OF QUASI-CONTRACTS
(a) Claim for necessaries supplied to persons incapable of contracting (Section 68)
(b) Right to recover money paid for another person
(c) Obligation of a person enjoying benefits of non-gratuitous act (Section 70)
(d) Responsibility of a finder of goods
(e) Liability for money paid or thing delivered by mistake or under coercion
The law of contract in India is contained in
Indian Contract Act, 1872
An agreement enforceable by law is a
Contract.
A void agreement is one which is
Not enforceable in a court of law.
An agreement which is enforceable by law at the option of one or more of the parties
thereon but not at the option of the other or others is a
Voidable Contract
Which of the following is false? An offer to be valid must
Contain a term the non-compliance of which would amount to acceptance
When the consent of a party is not free, the contract is
Voidable.
Which of the following is false? An acceptance:
May be presumed from silence of offeree.
In case of illegal agreements, the collateral agreements are
Void.
An offer may lapse by:
(a) Revocation. (b) Counter Offer. (c) Rejection of Offer by Offeree.
A proposal when accepted becomes a
Promise.
Which of the following statement is true?
Consideration must be something, which a promisor is not already bound to do.
Which of the following statement is false? Consideration:
Must be illusory.
Which of the following statement is false?
A verbal promise to pay a time barred debt is valid
Consideration must move at the desire of
Promisor
Which of the following statement is true
There can be a stranger to a consideration
Consideration may be
Past (b) Present (c)Future
Consideration in simple term means:
Something in return.
Which of the following is not an exception to the rule – No consideration, No contract
Compensation for involuntary services.
Ordinarily, a minor’s agreement is
Void ab initio
A minor’s liability for ‘necessaries’ supplied to him
Is against only minor’s property.
Which of the following statements is not true about minor’s position in a firm?
He can become a partner in an existing firm
Which of the following statement is true?
A person who is usually of a sound mind cannot enter into contract when he is of
unsound mind.
Consent is not said to be free when it is caused by
Coercion. (b) Undue Influence. (c)Fraud.
When the consent of a party is obtained by fraud, the contract is;
Voidable.
The threat to commit suicide amounts to
Coercion
Moral pressure is involved in the case of
Undue Influence
A wrong representation when made without any intention to deceive the other party
amounts to
Misrepresentation
Which of the following statement is true?
Ignorance of law is no excuse.
In case of illegal agreements, the collateral agreements are:
Void
An agreement the object or consideration of which is unlawful, is
Void.
An agreement is void if it is opposed to public policy. Which of the following is not
covered by heads of public policy?
Contracts to do impossible acts.
On the valid performance of the contractual obligations by the parties, the contract
is discharged
Which of the following persons can perform the contract?
Promisor alone. (b) Legal representatives of promisor.
(c) Agent of the promisor.
A, B and C jointly promised to pay Rs. 60,000 to D. Before performance of the contract,
C dies. Here, the contract
should be performed by A and B along with C’s legal representatives.
A contract is discharged by novation which means the
substitution of existing contract for a new one
A contract is discharged by rescisson which means the
cancellation of the existing contract.
When prior to the due date of performance, the promisor absolutely refuses to perform
the contract, it is known as
anticipatory breach of contract.
In case of anticipatory breach, the aggrieved party may treat the contract
as discharged and bring an immediate action for damages.
(b) as operative and wait till the time for performance arrives.
In case of breach of contract, which of the following remedy is available to the aggrieved
party?
Suit for rescission. (b) Suit for damages.
(c) Suit for specific performance.
Sometimes, a party is entitled to claim compensation in proportion to the work done by
him. It is possible by a suit for
quantum meruit
Generally, the following damages are not recoverable?
Remote damages.
A contract dependent on the happening or non-happening of future uncertain event, is
a
Contingent contract
A contingent contract is
Valid
A contingent contract dependent on the happening of future uncertain event can be
enforced when the event
happens
A agrees to pay Rs. One lakh to B if he brings on earth a star from sky. This is a contingent
contract and
Void.
Which of the following statements is true
an agreement enforceable by law is a contract
(b) an agreement is an accepted proposal
A voidable contract is one which
can be enforced at the option of aggrieved party
A voidable contract is one which
Both the acceptor and offeree becomes bound by the contract.
As a general rule, an agreement made without consideration is
void
A agrees to sell his car worth Rs. 100,000 to B for Rs. 20,000 only, and A’s consent was
obtained by coercion. Here, the agreement is
voidable
An agreement made with free consent to which the consideration is lawful but
inadequate, is
valid
Which of the following persons are not competent to contract
minors (b) persons of unsound mind
(c) persons disqualified by law
For the purposes of entering into a contract, a minor is a person who has not completed
the age of
18 years
A contract with the minor, which is beneficial for him, is
valid
Which of the following persons do not fall under the category of persons of unsound
mind?
alien.
Which of the following elements does not affect the free consent of the parties
incompetency
When the consent of a party is obtained by coercion undue influence, fraud or
misrepresentation, the contract is
voidable
A threatens to kill B if he does not agree to sell his scooter to him for Rs. 1000 only. Here
B’s consent is obtained by
coercion
When the consent to an agreement is obtained by coercion, the agreement is voidable at
the option of
a party whose consent was so obtained
Where one party is in a position to dominate the will of another and uses his superior
position to obtain the consent of a weaker party, the consent is said to be obtained by
undue influence
Which of the following acts does not fall under the categories of fraud?
Innocent false statement
Where the consent of a party is obtained by misrepresentation, the contract is
voidable
Which of the following statements is false?
A party who affirms the contract, can also change his option afterwards if he so
decides.
Where the consent of both the parties is given by mistake, the contract is
void
As per section 20, the contract is void on account of bilateral mistake of fact. But as per
Section 22, if there is mistake of only one party, then the contract is
valid
A contract made by mistake about the India Law, is
valid
A contract made by mistake about some foreign law, is
void
A mistake as to a law not in force in India has the same effect as
mistake of fact
The consideration or object of an agreement is considered unlawful, if it is
forbidden by law (b) fraudulent
(c) immoral
A agrees to pay Rs. 5 lakhs to B if he (B) procures an employment for A in Income Tax
Department. This agreement is
void
A agrees to pay Rs. 50,000 to B if he kills C. The agreement is
void