Mens Rea - General Flashcards

1
Q

Explain the significance of R v Majewski.

A

Simon LJ - Mens rea = “The state of mind stigmatised as wrongful by the criminal law where + Prohibited conduct = Particular offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain the significance of R v Moloney.

A

Mens rea often has to be inferred from the surrounding circumstances - Look at accused’s actions and surrounding circumstances of the case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain the significance of Clifford v DPP (HC).

A

Charleton J:
- “Intention has nothing to do with motive”; Blowing up the luggage in a plane analogy
- Motive = Evidential matter; support guilt or RD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 4 types of mens rea/states of fault?

A
  1. Intention
  2. Recklessness
  3. Negligence
  4. Strict liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Give 4 reasons for having a mens rea requirement.

A
  1. Blameworthiness (moral fault)
  2. Distinguishing civil from criminal matters
  3. Determining the extent of fault e.g. murder v manslaughter
  4. Acknowledging a deterrence role in the criminal law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain the concept of the presumption of mens rea.

A

Principle of statutory interpretation – Arises where an SP is silent as to the mens rea of an offence - Presume that mens rea is required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain the significance of Sherras v de Rutzen.

A
  • Presumption of mens rea requirement
    Wright J - “Presumption that mens rea, an evil intention, or a knowledge of the wrongfulness of the act is an essential ingredient in every offence; but that presumption is liable to be displaced either by the words of the statute creating the offence or by the subject-matter with which it deals, and both must be considered…”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain the significance of Sweet v Parsley.

A

Application of principle
Lord Reid - Parliament = Not blameworthy people - not criminals; Require mens rea where statute silent
Lord Morris - Require knowledge in case as no express wording or subject matter criteria to suggest parliament did not intend mens rea.
Lord Pearce - “Persons “cannot reasonably be branded with guilt whenever there happens to be on their premises someone who without their knowledge or assent smokes cannabis.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the steps for mens rea?

A
  1. Apply presumption
  2. Read it in
  3. Can the presumption be rebutted? – Express wording or subject matter
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the significance of Re Employment Equality Bill.

A
  • Section 15(1) - Employer vicariously liable for employees’ actions without employer’s “knowledge or approval”
  • Hamilton CJ - No mens rea requirement; Fine or imprisonment - Stigma - “Unjust, irrational and inappropriate” - Violates Articles 38.1/40.1
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly