Mens Rea Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Two Ways to Prove Intent

A

Direct Evidence (oral or written confession)
Indirect/Circumstantial Evidence (DNA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Three points where we inquire about def’s mental functioning
(mens rea)

A

Time of the Crime
Time of the Trial
Time of Sentencing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Two Doctrines used to Infer Intent

A

Inferring intent from conduct
inferring purpose from knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

List

List all six Mens Rea form most culpability to least

CLAW

A

Maliciously, Willful, Intentional, Extreme Recklessness (homicide), Recklessness, Negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define

Willful

Mens Rea

A

Intent [knowingly or purposely]
PLUS:

Bad faith OR
Wrongful Motive OR
Violation of a Known Duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define

Intentional

Mens Rea

A

Purposely
(wants, desires, aware/hopes/believes)

OR

Knowingly
(Virtually/practically certain, aware)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define

Knowingly

Mens Rea

A

Virtually or Practically Certain (Result Crimes)
Awareness (Conduct)
Awareness (Att Cir)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define

Purposely

Mens Rea

A

Wants/Desires (Result)
Wants/Desires (Conduct)
Aware/Hopes/Believes (Att Cir)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define

Inferring Intent from Conduct

A

Juries may infer intended natural and probable consequences

Juries may not presume (mandatory inferences) because changes the burden of proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define

Inferring Purpose from Knowledge

A

If def knew something was going to happen (knowingly), jury can infer
def wanted it to happen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define

Purpose v. Motive

A

Purpose = whether one wants to act (result or conduct crime) or whether one is aware/believes/hopes (att cir)
Motive = why someone wants to act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define

Reckless

Mens Rea

A

Knowingly taking a
Substantial and Unjustified Risk
Gross Deviation from Reasonable Person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define

If the harm caused was high, what is needed to constitute a substantial risk?

A

A small chance of a low harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define

Negligence

Mens Rea

A

Should have been aware of
the Substantial and Unjustified risk
Gross Deviation from a Reasonable Person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define

Maliciously

Mens Rea

A

Either intentionally [purposeful or knowingly] or recklessly
Homicide: intentionally [puposeful or knowingly] or extreme recklessness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Fill in the Blank

Alpha did not file his income tax returns for the past three years. Alpha has been charged with violating a federal statute that criminalized the willful failure to file a tax return. In order to find Alpha liable, the prosecutor must establish that Alpha not only intentionally (knowingly or purposely) failed to pay taxes, but also: ___________________

Mens Rea

A

Mens Rea = Willful
Intent PLUS:

Bad Faith OR
Wrongful Motive OR
Violation of a Known Duty

17
Q

Async T/F

  1. If Alpha is charged with purposefully killing Beta, the prosecutor must show that Alpha knew that Beta would die.

Mens Rea

A

False: Purposely as to a result crime = wanted
Here, Prosecutor does not need to show knowledge

18
Q

Async T/F

If Alpha is charged with purposefully driving drunk, the prosecutor must show that Alpha wanted to drive drunk.

Mens Rea

A

True: Purposely as to a conduct crime = wanted

19
Q

Async T/F

  1. If Alpha is charged with purposefully committing burglary, in addition to the other elements, the prosecutor must show that Alpha was aware that it was nighttime or that Alpha hoped it was nighttime or that Alpha believed it was nighttime.

Mens Rea

A

True: Purposely as to an attendant circumstance = wants or hopes or believes

20
Q

Async T/F

If Alpha is charged with knowingly killing Beta, the prosecutor must show that Alpha was aware that it was practically certain that Beta would die.

Mens Rea

A

True: Knowingly as to a result crime = virtually or practically certain

21
Q

Async T/F

If Alpha is charged with knowingly driving drunk, the prosecutor must show that Alpha was practically certain that he was driving drunk.

A

True: Knowingly as to a conduct crime = awareness
Wanting demonstrates awareness

22
Q

Async T/F

If Alpha is charged with knowingly committing burglary, in addition to the other elements, the prosecutor must show that Alpha was aware that it was nighttime or that Alpha hoped it was nighttime or that Alpha believed it was nighttime.

A

False: Knowingly as to an attendant circumstance = awareness ONLY

NOT hoping or believing

23
Q

Async T/F

Indirect evidence (i.e. circumstantial evidence) of mens rea can be obtained by considering the facts and circumstances surrounding the crime, including the defendant’s conduct before, during, or after the time of the crime.

A

True

24
Q

Async T/F

A jury may infer that the defendant intended the natural and probable consequences of the conduct the defendant engaged in.

A

True
Inferring Intent from Conduct

25
Q

Async T/F

If the jury finds that the defendant acted knowingly, then the jury must presume that it was the defendant’s purpose to do so.

A

True
Inferring Purpose from Knowledge
Jury does not have to make this presumption, but it may

26
Q

Which Mens Rea?

The risk must be of such a nature and degree that, considering the nature and purpose of the actor’s conduct and the circumstances known to the actor, its disregard involves a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a law-abiding person would observe in the actor’s situation.

A

Recklessness
Circumstances were known to the actor

27
Q

Which Mens Rea?

The risk must be of such a nature and degree that the actor’s failure to perceive it, considering the nature and purpose of his conduct and the circumstances known to him, involves a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would observe in the actor’s situation.

A

Negligence
Failure of actor to perceive the risk

28
Q

Which Mens Rea?

With respect to a material element of an offense, the defendant should be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the material element exists or will result from the conduct.

A

Negligence
Should be aware

29
Q

Which Mens Rea?

With respect to a material element of an offense, the defendant consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the material element exists or will result from the conduct.

A

Recklessness
Conscious disregard

30
Q

Async T/F

Transferred intent cannot be used if a higher harm results than what was intended.

A

True
Transferred intent cannot be used to elevate someone’s criminality

31
Q

Async T/F

Jurisdictions applying the Common Law often provide that knowledge of an attendant circumstance can be found if the actor: (1) believes that there is a high probability that the attendant circumstance exists; and (2) purposely avoids confirming the existence of the attendant circumstance.

Mens Rea

A

True
Willful Blindness
Culpability is elevated past recklessness and negligence

32
Q

Define

Willful Blindness

Mens Rea

A

Def subjectively believes there is a high probability the attendant circumstance exists
AND
takes deliberate actions to avoid learning that fact
Culpability is elevated past recklessness and negligence

33
Q

T/F

Mens Rea and Actus Reus can occur separately

A

FALSE! They must occur together (Concurrence of the Elements)