mens rea Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

direct intent - dolus directus

A
  • focuses on the will or desire of the actor to bring about a certain result
  • highest degree of intent
  • goals that are not primarily desired but are understood as necessary means to the end goal count as direct intent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

indirect intent - dolus indirectus

A
  • actor knows their conduct will almost certainly bring about consequences that they do not desire or primarily aim at
  • deals with he side- effects that the actor knows are almost certain to occur

test of failure= if the result does not happen does the actor consider their plans to have failed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

conditional intent - dolus eventualis

A
  • actor was aware of the possible side effects and decided to act nonetheless
  1. awareness risk
  2. acceptance of risk
    • actor must endorse or come to terms with the result
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

conditional intent- risk awareness

A
  • cognitive = awareness of risk
  • volitional = taking the risk for granted

DE= defendant only needs to be aware of possible chance that the risk may materialise
- GSC 1988

NL= the degree of this risk must be considerable
- Dutch Supreme Court 2007- HIV case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

conditional intent- acceptance

A

DE = leather belt case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

recklessness

A
  • conscious taking of an unreasonable risk
    • does not require that the person takes the risk for granted
  • person needs to be aware of the risk
  • risk is assessed normatively

R v Konzani

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

caldwell recklessness test

A
  • ## definition was extended to the failure to foresee an obvious risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Negligence or culpa

A

conscious
- the actor could have foreseen a possibility of a consequence resulting from their conduct but relied on the idea that the result would not occur

unconscious
- actor does not consider consequence of action

was there a duty of care

negligence in England is always unconscious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

subjective test for recklessness

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Murder in England

A

Causing death of a human being with malice aforethought (motive and premeditation are not relevant)
S.1 (1) murder act 1965: life imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Voluntary manslaughter

A

Mens rea for murder but mitigating circumstances allowing partial defence –Coroners and justice act 2009
- Loss of self-control (due to fear of serious violence)
- Diminished responsibility (abnormal mental functioning)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

involuntary manslaughter

A
  • Mens rea for murder is lacking

Constructive manslaughter = unlawful act resulting in unintended death / mens rea of core offence

Gross negligence manslaughter = violation of specific duty of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Gross negligent manslaughter

A

R v Adomako
- During operation an oxygen pipe was disconnected and the patient died
- Aneasthetist failed to notice the obvious signs

Honey v Rose
- Optometrist performs sigh test on 8 year old boy
- Fails to notice abnormalities in retinal images
- Boy dies 5 months later due to built up fluid in the brain
- There was a breach of duty but no GNM
- She was not actually aware of the problem but she was aware that there was a possibility something could be wrong if she didn’t perform the test

R v Rudling
- Duty of care which is reasonably foreseeable gives rise to a serious and obvious risk of death
- Foreseeability
- Reasonable person would have foreseen a serious and obvious risk
- Grossness
- Decided by the jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Background of German murder offence

A
  • Motives, means and aims are morally loaded
  • Article was created during the nazi regime
  • Before murder was defined as killing with consideration
  • The distinction between manslaughter and murder stemmed from roman law which was too foreign for the nazis

Roland Freisler
- Criminal law should not be based on the wrongfulness of the act but rather perpetrator typologies
- Some people are innately evil
- Criminal law should embody what the people what/ popular sentiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

criticism of 211 GCC

A
  • Definition born from nazi ideology which is in conflict with modern criminal law
  • Application of qualifying circumstances is often arbitrary, problematic, vague and uncertain
  • Insidiously = if you kill without stealth you are a coward
    • Problemes illustrated by Marianne Bachmeier case
    • Mother killed the person who murdered her daughter inside a courtroom by shooting him in the back- showing cowardice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Recklessness

A
  • Taking an unjustified risk
  • Subjective form of mens rea
    • R v G
      • Subjective test for all types of crime
      • Abolished objective recklessness test
17
Q

R v Cunningham

A

The accused has foreseen that the particular harm might be done and yet has gone to take the risk of it

18
Q

Caldwell recklessness test

A

Prosecuting for arson creating damage
1. Act creates an obvious risk
2. When one does the act they have not given any thought to the possibility of there being a risk or have recognized the risk and have gone on to do it