Men and Masculinity Flashcards

1
Q

What are three approaches manhood has been looked at?

A
  • Focuses on cultural codes that informed how men should be men as they lived their lives in different periods
  • Looking at masculinity as detached from male bodies
  • Raising questions about the emotional lives of make historical actors and how cultural constructs of masculinity have been lived
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does Rose see the study of men and masculinity as significant in the contribution of gender history?

A
  • It brought about the study of history writing that didn’t just focus on men within political, economic and social activities. Instead focused on them as gendered beings.
  • Only women were understood to be embodied
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Michael Kimmel say about people in power?

A
  • He emphasised those in power or elevated in social positions are invisible to themselves as specifically constituted groups.
  • They see themselves as normal and unmarked universal though they are relative to social standing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why does Rose say historians look at maleness and norms of masculinity?

A
  • To understand how it influences both men and women’s lives
  • They aim to expose activities of men as men to analyse whether how the diverse meanings of masculinity etc have been implicated in a variety of kinds of regimes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How was the term masculinity used differently in the 19th century to the 20th century?

A
  • 19th century American English the term masculine was used to differentiate between things pertaining to men verses women e.g. masculine clothing vs feminine
  • 20th century, masculinity came into use and would later have specific different meaning to how manhood had been understood earlier
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How have scholars looked at social construction in terms of masculinity?

A
  • They look at how social construction and experience of being a male have influenced men’s identities and their activities and hoe it has differed across cultured, groups and time
  • They insist there is never one way to be a man so say masculinities rather than masculinity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does Rose think suggests that masculinity is an unstable formation?

A
  • The changing is the meaning of manliness
  • The traits that men are supposed to exhibit at a single point
  • The fact that there may be alternative versions of ideal manhood that coexist
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does John Tosh argue about Manliness?

A
  • That manliness in the 19th century was only secondarily about relations with women
  • Instead manliness was about the inner character of a man and the kind of behaviour which displayed this character in the world at large
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Tosh say about the Victorian Male?

A
  • Looks at 1830-next century
  • His central theme is that domesticity became crucial to the middle class male life.
  • That males became engages in the tending of home and engage with rearing children, representing a shift from patriarchal homestead of 16/17th century England
  • Home became idealised
  • He argues that the Victorian men split between home and work, there was a shift not abandoning work but including domesticity too
  • Domesticity and traditional notion of masculinity didn’t always fit together. Marriage involved companionship on shared value, interests and love.
  • 1860-70s saw debates on the appropriateness of men’s domesticity, especially with the rise of feminism threatening men’s power
  • End of 19th century was a growth in all-male associations and domesticated masculinity came under attack
  • He had the idea of Flight from Domesticity - both the family histories and public discourses about marriage he examined showed that showed that ‘the contradictions which had always been inherent in masculine domesticity had by the end of the century come into the open’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Mark Francis say about Tosh’s work on masculinity?

A
  • Male response to domesticity was always complex through 19th and 20th century
  • Men had constantly been travelling back and forward across domesticity, even if only in their imagination. They’d been attracted by marriage and father hood but also homosocial camaraderie
  • He also says that people being appalled at loss of life which had cause re-domestication of masculinity was wrong. Men continued to travel back and forward
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Mark Francis use RAF pilot and members of the bomb crew letters to show?

A
  • He used these first person accounts during ww2 to show that domestic worlds for men were of significance, especially with their families living close to airbases
  • Also shows the significance of love and anticipated marriage for men as looked forward to a post-war future
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is lots of work on masculine gender focused on and how is it changing?

A
  • Lots focuses on the codes or ideals of masculinity, political discourses and cultural prescriptions
  • Recently this has been challenged by historians concerned with men’s subjectivities e.g. Michael Roper
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does Michael Roper do with letters in WW1?

A
  • He analysis letter by regimental officers to their mothers and focuses on the psychological states as they veered between the mother centred existence of their early years and precepts of manliness associated with school and the military
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does Michael Roper argue letters written to and from mothers during ww1 shows?

A
  • They provide evidence of the emotional consequences of trench warfare and the significance of family relationships to men on the battlefield
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How did Sociologist Connell influence historians?

A
  • Influenced them to use the term ‘hegemonic’ to refer to dominant cultural constructions - the normative dominant code of masculine attributes
  • Also got them to question how men were viewed: hegemonic as natural and permanent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Ruth Karras’ study on late medieval European men?

A
  • she focussed on 3 groups: knights, uni students and urban craftsmen 1300-1500
  • Although Knights claim to be jousting for love, their fighting prowess was meant to impress other men too. As others would evaluate a young knight through it and confirm his aristocratic manhood. The main measure of manhood was successful violence in the battlefield
  • Uni students also got manhood through competition, but a different sort. It was more intellectual battles. Masculinity was confirmed through initiation rituals, through which men bonded. In uni masculinity was associated with moderation, rationality.
  • Craft-shop workmen had to prove they were not boys any ore. Learning a skill and independence showed they were capable of being substantial citizens
17
Q

What does Ruth Karras’ study on late medieval European men show?

A
  • Shows that while definitions of manhood may be presumed that manhood was opposite to womanliness. Manliness was mostly about boys becoming men by dominating/successfully competing against other men
  • She suggests medieval men took women’s subordination for granted. The subjection of women was always part of masculinity but not always it’s purpose or central feature
18
Q

How does M. Sinha show race and gender can be linked in masculinity?

A
  • She analysis the practices of ruling in British India andhow the stereotype of a manly Englishman and an effeminate Bengali were constituted and became the rhetorical grounds upon which colonial rulers and native elites engaged in the late 19th century
  • Ideology of colonial masculinity developed within the an ‘imperial social formation’ that included both Britain and India
  • Manly Englishman arose in late 19th century from anxieties about manhood within the British Metropole, given the perceived threat of feminism and economic and political unease.
  • 1883-1884 a bill was proposed to allow Indian men to try British men in colonial courts
  • Anglo-Indian press portrayed the effeminate Babu to presume Indian men were to feminine and unfit for such manly duties
  • Gender differences were substituted for racial differences so Anglo-Indians could attempt to reassert power
19
Q

What does Alexandra Shepard analyse to look at manhood?

A
  • In early modern England mid 16-17th century
  • Analysing how normative patriarchal manhood was defined in literature and medical texts and the ways men engaged in the social practices of manhood
21
Q

What does Shepard find in her results?
What are the routes of patriarchal manhood?
How did young and poor men show manhood?

A
  • Manhood referred to as an estate = status is a privilege
  • Manhood is based on gender differences but estate also linked to being an adult male - the head of the household, married
  • Age, Marital and Social status = routes of patriarchal manhood
  • Also includes honesty, strength and authority
  • Young & poor men found other ways to assert authority - through their peers and opposition to elders e.g. acts of vandal
22
Q

What does Shepard argue from her results?

A
  • Patriarchal manhood may have been defined in relation to women, not all men could achieve it
  • Manhood was mostly worked out between men
23
Q

What does Shepards work show?

A
  • Shows that manhood was often defined relative to and constructed by other men
  • But also provides an example of how alternative forms of manliness challenged hegemonic masculinity making it an unstable formation
24
Q

What are two criticisms for masculine history in gender?

A

1) See the history of masculinity as a not-so-subtle attempt to infiltrate women’s history
2) It’s an ideological misleading area which will add nothing to what we already know about identity, social consciousness and agency and obscure what we do know

25
Q

What does Natalie Davis argue to support masculinity in history of gender?

A
  • 1975
  • She argues historians should be interested in both males and females to understand the significance of the sexes
  • To understand the system of social relations as a whole - class first then gender
  • She argues unless the field of power in which women lived in is studies the historical situation they’re in will be obscured.
26
Q

What does Tosh argue adding masculinity can do for the study of gender?

A
  • Historians of masculinity are in a strong position the demonstrate that gender is inherent in all aspects of social life, whether women are present of not
27
Q

What mistake does Tosh say historians make about Victorian masculinity?

A
  • A mistake to suppose that the cultural representation of Victorian masculinity was an entirely elite affair
  • He says the mistake is made by scholars because scholarly work has been tilted in this direction
28
Q

Why was men’s social power a problem in Tosh’s eyes when studying men’s history?
What’s an example of mens power e.g. in reforms and why Tosh still sees social power as important to look at?

A
  • Explanations are simple
  • Those aspects of masculinity that seem most directly upholding men’s social power are least likely to be looked at in depth
  • Men’s opposition to measures of reforms against equality of women are not spoken about but this does not stop the importance
    E.g. John Stuart Mill was not liked in conservative circles as he wrote about how males cannot yet tolerate the idea of equality
  • Tosh argues the rage men felt towards law on custody of children reforms comes from men feeling their identity to be vested in the exercise of domesticity authority.
29
Q

What does Tosh say can be a problem with pursuing the cultural turn?

A
  • Historians have become used to finding plurality of meanings in texts and images of the past
  • Which has the effect of dissolving any sense of trajectory or process
30
Q

What does Tosh study about masculinity that has previously not been looked into?

A
  • He said most historical work on masculinity had been focused on family, work or public sphere
  • He wants to look at how masculinity in 19th century holds weight in economic development, imperial expansion and the culture of gender
31
Q

What did Harvey and Shepard find when asking what ways has masculinity been defined as a concept and deployed as an analytical category by historians?

A
  • It is evident that both the concepts of masculinity deployed by historians and the approach to change taken in their work are closely connected to the methodologies they employ
32
Q

What are four methods historians have taken with gender that Harvey and Shepard found?

A
  • a gender analysis of patriarchal relations between men and women
  • Social historical analysis of the ways in which concepts of masculinity interacted with social status and class
  • a psychological look, emphasising selfhood and the subjective experience of being male
  • A cultural historical approach, focusing on representations of manliness and masculinities
33
Q

What problems did Harvey and Shephard say they were from having four different methods for masculine history?

A
  • The approaches pose different questions
  • The differences between social, psychological and cultural approaches also produce areas of enquiry that are sometimes incommensurable, meaning they can’t be compared or questioned in the same ways
34
Q

Why does Shepard and Harvey think there needs to be a more comprehensive methodology when studying history of men?

A
  • It would allow historians of 1500-1659 and 1650-1809 to compare their findings more easily
  • As currently the earlier period is mostly social historians and the later is mostly cultural history
  • While cultural codes related to refined masculinity in the 18th century have been analysed, their social remit remains unclear. So difficult to estimate the change in dominant codes.
35
Q

What is an example of a historian being dissatisfied with an exclusively cultural approach viewed at the moment?

A
  • Michael Roper says cultural approach can lead to an exclusion of the psychological experience of masculinity. He calls for both cultural and social relations of gender
36
Q

What would including other determinants of status along with masculinity do?

A
  • Including particularly class into it would aid comparisons between periods by demanding greater specificity about the social position of the subjects of analysis
37
Q

What does Shepard and Harvey argue the long-term picture of masculinity shows?

A
  • There are period of change and continuity

- Long-term there’s a tidal of change and deep continuity rather than linear transformation