Memory - Evaluations Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into capacity, coding and duration into STM and LTM:

ONE STRENGTH INTO THIS RESEARCH IS THAT IS HAD A HIGH CONTROL OVER VARIABLES.

A

+ research is conducted in controlled setting of a laboratory

+ allowed EV to be controlled

+eg noise temp lighting and time of day = all be standardised

Positive = gives research high internal validity

means IV did impact DV and we can be more sure of our cause relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into capacity, coding and duration into STM and LTM:

FURTHERMORE, THIS RESEARCH INTO MEMORY IS EASY TO REPLICATE

A

+ research conditions for one study can be easily repeated for further replications

+eg same lighting, noise levels, materials

POSITIVE: means findings about memory can be easily tested for reliability (consistency)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into capacity, coding and duration into STM and LTM:

HOWEVER, A PROBLEM WITH RESEARCH INTO THE FEATURES OF STM AND LTM IS THAT THE MATRRIALS USED A MEANINGLESS

A

+ lacking in mundane realism

+ does not reflect much of the info we use in LTM and STM for remembering in real world

+ eg remembering lists of letters, numbers or similar sounding words doesn’t reflect real life memory activity

+ what we remember more meaningful

+eg shopping lists , names, phone numbers

PROBLEM: findings may not be representative of real life STM and LTM use.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into the Multi-Store Model (MSM):

ONE STRENGTH OF THE MSM IS THAT EVIDENCE SUPPORTS THE VIEW THAT MEMORY IS AMDE UP OF DIFFERENT STORES

A

+ case studies have shown there are separate stores for STM and LTM

+ evidence comes from KF

+ stm damaged for verbal stm ( he had a digit span of 2 digits)

+but visual remained mainly unaffected + LTM remained completely in tact

+ shows us clearly that there are separate stores for LTM and STM- if there wasn’t he would have lost LTM as well.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into the Multi-Store Model (MSM):

HOWEVER A WEAKNESS IS THAT THIS EVIDENCE ALSO SUGGESTS THE STM STORE IS NOT UNITARY

A

+ msm argues there is only 1 type of stm

+ research shows this might be false

+ evidence comes from KF ( stm damaged for verbal but unaffected visual)

+ PROBLEM: goes against the view of stm being unitary otherwise damage to KFs STM would have affected all of his stm equally. Therefore the MSM is insufficient to fully explain STM on its own.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into the Multi-Store Model (MSM):

FURTHER SUPPORT FOR THE IDEA OF SEPARATE STM AND LTM STORES COMES FROM MURDOCK (1962)

A

+murdocks serial position research

+ found no matter how many words a person is shown and asked to recall,

+ items at start of list have greater recall than those in middle ( primacy affect)

+ items at end of list have greater recall than those in middle ( recency effect)

+ end + start words have had more time for rehearsal

+ middle words have had no time for rehearsal and have been displaced by later words in list

Therefore this supports many of the ideas proposed in the MSM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into the Multi-Store Model (MSM):

ANOTHER WEAKNESS OF THE MSM IS THAT EVIDENCE SUGGESTS LTM IS NOT UNITARY

A

+ msm argues that there is only 1 type of LTM but research shows this might be false

+ evidence = Clive wearing

+ viral infection cause him to lose his episodic memory but still has use of procedural

+ PROBLEM= goes against view that LTM is one unitary store otherwise damaged to Clive wearing ltm would have affect all of his long term memory equally

Therefore the msm is insufficient to fully explain ltm on its own

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into the Multi-Store Model (MSM):

EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE FEATURES OF THE SENSORY RESISTER COMES FROM SPERLING (1960)

A

+ when participants were shown a letter chart for 50 milliseconds and asked to recall as many letters as possible = only remember 3 letter on average

+ when a high, medium, low tone was played immediately after chart to indicate top middle or bottom row of letters, participants could report 3 letters from any row.

POSITIVE= supports the idea that sensory register has a large capacity and short duration as participants clearly had no problem holding a memory of the entire image which fades in the time it takes to report back the items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into the Working Memory Model (WMM):

A STRENGTH OF THE WMM IS THAT EVIDENCE SUPPORTS THE VIEW THAT STM IS NOT UNITARY:

A

+ research has shown there are separate stores within short term memory

+evidence= KF

+POSITIVE= supports view that stm does have separate verbal and visual stores otherwise damage to KFs memory would have been equal

Therefore, the WMM may be viewed as an improvement on the msm which suggested stm was unitary and as a result could not explain the case of KF and the functions of stm as effectively as the WMM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into the Working Memory Model (WMM)

FUTHER SUPPORT FOR A NON-UNITARY STM COMES FROM DUALT TASK RESEARCH

A

+WMM , unlike msm, can explain why participants struggle to process two similar tasks at once but can process two different ones

+ this is because different tasks use different slave systems.

+ evidence= baddeley et al (1975)

+ found participants had more difficulty doing two visual tasks (tracking a light and describing the letter f) than doing one visual and one verbal task at the same time .

This matters because it suggests stm is not unitary and provides imperial evidence that supports the major features of the model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into the Working Memory Model (WMM):

BRAIN SCAN EVIDENCE FUTHER SUPPORTS THE SLAVE SYSTEMS OF THE WMM

A

+pet scans have show pneumonia different areas of the brain are used whilst undertaking visual and verbal tasks

This matters because it supports that visual and verbal material is dealt with by separate structures that may even be physically separate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into the Working Memory Model (WMM):

ANOTHER STRENGTH OF THE RESEARCH INTO WMM IS THAT IT HAS REAL LIFE APPLICATIONS

A

+ being able to identify different aspects of stm allows psychologists to target certain kinds of memory

+eg educational psychologists have developed memory training to specifically improve verbal memory to help improve learning for students who experience difficulties

+ POSITIVE= shows how a better understanding of types of stm can improve people’s lives by allowing strategies to be developed that work in the real world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into the Working Memory Model (WMM):

HOWEVER A MAJOR CRITICISM IS THAT VERY LITTLE IS KNOWN ABOUT THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CENTRAL EXECUTIVE

A

+ despite great deal of evidence to support the existence of separate visual and verbal stm stores- there’s very little evidence to understand the main WMM component

+ baddeley himself said= the ce is the most important yet least understood component of WMM.

+ eg we are unsure of its capacity

+ some argue that it is oftentimes used to explain the functions of memory that haven’t yet been addressed by the WMM

Matters because it shows that the WMM is an incomplete model of memory as it doesn’t fully explain all functions of working memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into Types of Long term memory:

ONE STRENGTH OF TULVINGS TYPES OF LTM IS EVIDENCE SUPPORTS THIS VIEW

A

+clinical evidence from case studies of brain damaged patients suggests ltm is indeed made up of separate types of ltm

+ evidence = clive wearing

+supports different types of ltm because if it was all in one place, all of his brain should be equally damaged however it wasn’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into Types of Long term memory:

HOWEVER THERE ARE PROBLEMS WITH EVIDENCE FROM BRAIN DAMAGED PATIENTS

A

+because cases of brain damaged patients= rare

They might not represent the way memory functions for everyone

+ eg Clive wearings ltm may function slightly differently to most other people’s ltm

PROBLEM: suggests evidence from case studies such as this may not generalise to everyone reducing the population validity of the research and limiting the extent to which we can draw conclusions about the types of ltm from this kind of research alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into Types of Long term memory:

FURTHERMORE, PHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FROM BRAIN SCANS ALSO SUPPORTS THE IDEA OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF LTM

A

+ pet scans= been able to show different areas of the brain were active when participants were required to use different types of memory

+ eg Tulving et al (1994) found episodic memory and semantic memories were recalled from different sides of the prefrontal cortex whilst procedural memories is associated with the cerebellum.

POSITIVE= supports the view that there are different types of LTM that may even be physically separate

17
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into Types of Long term memory:

HOWEVER FOCUSING ON THREE TYPES OF LTM MAY IGNORE A FOURTH TYPE

A

+ research has identified another type of ltm called priming

+ this is where implicit memories influence the responses a person makes to a stimulus

Eg if a person is given a list of words including the word yellow and is later asked to name a fruit- probability that they answer lemon is greater than if not primed

PROBLEM= suggests LTM is more complex that tulvings theory

18
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into Types of Long term memory:

NONETHELESS, A BIG STRENGTH OF ALL RESEARCH INTO TYPES OF LTM IS THAT IS HAS REAL LIFE APPLICATIONS

A

+being able to identify different aspects of ltm allowed psychologists to target certain kinds of memory

+ Belleville (2006) was able to develop memory training to specifically improve episodic memory as it’s the most often effected ltm affected by mild cognitive impairment

+ he found this was highly effective in improving the memory of older people

POSITIVE= gives us real life strategies to improve the quality of life of those affected

19
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research inti interference explanations of forgetting:

EVIDENCE TI SUPPORT THE RI EXPLANATION COMES FROM MCGEOGH AND MCDONALD (1931)

A

+found = when participants had learned a word list with 100% accuracy and were then given one of a range of new lists to memorise

The more similar the new list was, the poorer their recall was of the og list.

Concluded that even very strong memories can be disrupted by new learning if that new learning is very similar.

This matters because it shows us the strong impact of retro interference and it highlights the more similar information to the list, the more disruptions occurs

20
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research inti interference explanations of forgetting:

EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE PI EXPLANATION COMES FROM UNDERWOOD (1957)

A

+found= after analysing the results of a number of studies (meta analysis) , that when participants have to learn a series of word lists they do not learn the lists given later in the series as well as the lists given earlier on in the series.

Conclusion= earlier word lists were disrupting the learning of the new material in the later word lists.

POSITIVE= supports the idea of proactive interference in the learning of words

21
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research inti interference explanations of forgetting:

HOWEVER A PROBLEM WITH RI AND PI IS THAT THE RESEARCH SUPPORT FOR THESE EXPLANATIONS USES MATERIALS WHICH ARE MEANINGLESS

A

+ although there is large number of highly controlled lab studies showing clear evidence of RI and PI occurring, the materials they use don’t reflect the kind of info we use memory for in the real world

+ eg remembering lists of words and nonsense syllables doesn’t reflect real life memory activities

+ we remember things that are more meaningful and varied such as passwords etc

PROBLEM= findings may not be representative of real life forgetting

22
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into retrieval failure explanations of forgetting:

EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT CONTEXT-DEPENDENT FORGETTING COMES FROM DIFFERENT STUDIES

A

+abernethy (1940)

Participants learned info from an instructor in one room and were tested, they forgot far more when they were tested in different room, different instructor.

+ godden and baddeley (1975)

Scuba divers who learned a word list either underwater or on land forgot most when the learning context did not match the retrieval context

POSITIVE= research supports the view that retrieval failure occurs in a range of contexts

23
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into retrieval failure explanation for forgetting:

A FURTHER STRENGTH INTO FORGETTING IS THAT IS HAS REAL WORLD APPLICATIONS

A

+ retrieval failure explanation can be used to reduce forgetting in the real world

+ evidence comes from smith ( 1979)

Showed that just thinking of the room where you did the og learning was just as effective as being in the room at time of retrieval

This matters because it can help students who struggle with remembering exam material. Can also help in a medical episode
.

24
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into retrieval failure explanation for forgetting:

EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT STATE- DEPENDENT FORGETTING COMES FROM GOODWIN ET AL (1969)

A

+ found male volunteers who learnt a list of words drunk or sober forget most when their learning state didn’t match their state on retrieval.

Concluded that state- dependent forgetting applies to degrees of intoxication as well as emotion.

POSITIVE= there is evidence from a variety of different states for this explanation of forgetting too.

25
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into leading questions :

HIGH DEGREE OF CONTROL OVER VARIABLES

A

+ study was conducted in a controlled environment of a lab

+ all potential extraneous variables could be easily controlled

Eg lighting, temperature, noise, positioning in the room

Strength= gives the research high internal validity meaning the experiment has measured what it intended to measure

26
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into leading questions:

FURTHERMORE, LOFTUS AND PALMERS FINDINGS HAVE PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

A

+ the findings can be used to warn the criminal justice system about potential problems with eyewitness evidence

+ eg juries can be warned about fully trusting the evidence given by an eyewitness and they can take in account a wider range of evidence alongside the witness when making decisions

+ POSITIVE= may have helped avoid inaccurate judgments being made in court, saving people from being wrongfully convicted due to memory contamination

27
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into leading questions:

HOWEVER USING STUDENTS AS A SAMPLE IS UNREPRESENTATIVE

A

+ all participants in the study were one type of person (uni students) who are not generally representative of the population

+ eg students may be above average intelligence

PROBLEMATIC: results lack external validity

As the Findings cannot be generalised to everyone In society

Therefore can’t explain how all people would react when recalling

28
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into leading questions:

FURTHERMORE, THE RESEARCH LACKED ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY

A

+ study conducted in artificial setting of a lab = doesn’t reflect EWT in everyday life

+ eg studies don’t represent the experience of witnessing a real life car accident in the street and may also lack the fear or emotion present in eye witness events of this kind

PROBLEM= findings cannot be generalised to real life settings, meaning the research is lacking in mundane realism

29
Q

Summarise this evaluation from research into leading questions:

EVIDENCE AGAINST LOFTUS AND PALMERS FINDINGS COME FROM YUVILLE AND CUTSHALL (2009)

A

+ found that 4 months after a real life robbery In Canada, the 13 eyewitnesses were not affected by two leading questions and gave the same responses they had given in their initial reports straight after the robbery

+ concluded that misleading questions does not affect real life EWT, this is possibly due to the level of anxiety and emotion experienced in real life.

PROBLEM= adds further weight to the view that Loftus and palmers findings do not generalise to real life EWT because laboratory conditions lack the emotion of real life EWT